Literature DB >> 34260010

The hidden interplay between sex and COVID-19 mortality: the role of cardiovascular calcification.

Alberto Cereda1,2, Marco Toselli3, Anna Palmisano4,5, Davide Vignale4,5, Riccardo Leone4,5, Valeria Nicoletti4,5, Chiara Gnasso4,5, Antonio Mangieri3, Arif Khokhar3, Gianluca Campo6, Alessandra Scoccia6, Matteo Bertini6, Marco Loffi7, Pietro Sergio7, Daniele Andreini8, Gianluca Pontone8, Gianmarco Iannopollo9, Tommaso Nannini9, Davide Ippolito10, Giacomo Bellani10, Gianluigi Patelli11, Francesca Besana11, Luigi Vignali12, Nicola Sverzellati12, Mario Iannaccone13, Paolo Giacomo Vaudano13, Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi14, Piergiorgio Turchio15, Alberto Monello15, Gabriele Tumminello5, Aldo Pietro Maggioni3, Claudio Rapezzi3,6, Antonio Colombo3, Francesco Giannini3, Antonio Esposito4,5.   

Abstract

Recent clinical and demographical studies on COVID-19 patients have demonstrated that men experience worse outcomes than women. However, in most cases, the data were not stratified according to gender, limiting the understanding of the real impact of gender on outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the disaggregated in-hospital outcomes and explore the possible interactions between gender and cardiovascular calcifications. Data was derived from the sCORE-COVID-19 registry, an Italian multicentre registry that enrolled COVID-19 patients who had undergone a chest computer tomography scan on admission. A total of 1683 hospitalized patients (mean age 67±14 years) were included. Men had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, a higher pneumonia extension, more coronary calcifications (63% vs.50.9%, p<0.001), and a higher coronary calcium score (391±847 vs. 171±479 mm3, p<0.001). Men experienced a significantly higher mortality rate (24.4% vs. 17%, p=0.001), but the death event tended to occur earlier in women (15±7 vs. 8±7 days, p= 0.07). Non-survivors had a higher coronary, thoracic aorta, and aortic valve calcium score. Female sex, a known independent predictor of a favorable outcome in SARS-CoV2 infection, was not protective in women with a coronary calcification volume greater than 100 mm3. There were significant differences in cardiovascular comorbidities and vascular calcifications between men and women with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. The differences in outcomes can be at least partially explained by the different cardiovascular profiles. However, women with poor outcomes had the same coronary calcific burden as men. The presumed favorable female sex bias in COVID-19 must therefore be reviewed in the context of comorbidities, especially cardiovascular ones.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Lung CT; Cardiovascular calcifications; Sars-CoV2; Sex bias

Year:  2021        PMID: 34260010     DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00409-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geroscience        ISSN: 2509-2723            Impact factor:   7.713


  1 in total

1.  Coronavirus COV-19/SARS-CoV-2 affects women less than men: clinical response to viral infection.

Authors:  P Conti; A Younes
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2020 March-April,       Impact factor: 1.711

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  COVID-19 mortality in Italy varies by patient age, sex and pandemic wave.

Authors:  Francesca Minnai; Gianluca De Bellis; Tommaso A Dragani; Francesca Colombo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on coronary calcifications in COVID-19.

Authors:  A Cereda; L Allievi; A Palmisano; G Tumminello; L Barbieri; A Mangieri; A Laricchia; A Khokhar; F Giannini; M Toselli; G M Sangiorgi; A Esposito; P Aseni; S Lucreziotti; A Mafrici; S Carugo
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-04-30

Review 3.  Advanced cardiac imaging in the spectrum of COVID-19 related cardiovascular involvement.

Authors:  Anna Palmisano; Michele Gambardella; Tommaso D'Angelo; Davide Vignale; Raffaele Ascione; Marco Gatti; Giovanni Peretto; Francesco Federico; Amar Shah; Antonio Esposito
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 4.  Coronary artery calcium score as a prognostic factor of adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Fateme Yousefimoghaddam; Ehsan Goudarzi; Alireza Ramandi; Isa Khaheshi
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 16.464

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.