Literature DB >> 34259857

Time outweighs the effect of host developmental stage on microbial community composition.

Reilly R Dibner1, A Monique Weaver2, Marcus T Brock3, Gordon F Custer4, Hilary G Morrison5, Lois Maignien6, Cynthia Weinig7.   

Abstract

Thousands of microbial taxa in the soil form symbioses with host plants, and due to their contribution to plant performance, these microbes are often considered an extension of the host genome. Given microbial effects on host performance, it is important to understand factors that govern microbial community assembly. Host developmental stage could affect rhizosphere microbial diversity while, alternatively, microbial assemblages could change simply as a consequence of time and the opportunity for microbial succession. Previous studies suggest that rhizosphere microbial assemblages shift across plant developmental stages, but time since germination is confounded with developmental stage. We asked how elapsed time and potential microbial succession relative to host development affected microbial diversity in the rhizosphere using monogenic flowering-time mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Under our experimental design, different developmental stages were present among host genotypes after the same amount of time following germination, e.g. at 76 days following germination some host genotypes were flowering while others were fruiting or senescing. We found that elapsed time was a strong predictor of microbial diversity whereas there were few differences among developmental stages. Our results support the idea that time and, likely, microbial succession more strongly affect microbial community assembly than host developmental stage.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; developmental stage; microbes; rhizosphere; succession

Year:  2021        PMID: 34259857     DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiab102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  6 in total

1.  Effects on community composition and function Pinus massoniana infected by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

Authors:  Xin Hao; Xuefeng Liu; Jie Chen; Bowen Wang; Yang Li; Yi Ye; Wei Ma; Ling Ma
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.465

2.  Microbial Turnover and Dispersal Events Occur in Synchrony with Plant Phenology in the Perennial Evergreen Tree Crop Citrus sinensis.

Authors:  Nichole A Ginnan; N Itzel De Anda; Flavia Campos Freitas Vieira; Philippe E Rolshausen; M Caroline Roper
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 7.786

3.  Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Intragenus Variability in Rhizobacterial Associations with Brassica rapa Growth.

Authors:  Scott A Klasek; Marcus T Brock; W John Calder; Hilary G Morrison; Cynthia Weinig; Lois Maïgnien
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  The core bacterial microbiome of banana (Musa spp.).

Authors:  Henry W G Birt; Anthony B Pattison; Adam Skarshewski; Jeff Daniells; Anil Raghavendra; Paul G Dennis
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  The niche-specialist and age-related oral microbial ecosystem: crosstalk with host immune cells in homeostasis.

Authors:  Dongjia Lin; Qiannan Hu; Lisa Yang; Xian Zeng; Yiwei Xiao; Dikan Wang; Wenxiao Dai; Huanzi Lu; Juan Fang; Zhonghui Tang; Zhi Wang
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2022-06

Review 6.  Root phenotypes as modulators of microbial microhabitats.

Authors:  Henry W G Birt; Courtney L Tharp; Gordon F Custer; Francisco Dini-Andreote
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.