Literature DB >> 34259655

Prone-Positioning for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Matthieu Petit1, Catalin Fetita2, Augustin Gaudemer3, Ludovic Treluyer4, Guillaume Lebreton5,6, Guillaume Franchineau1,2,3,4,5,6, Guillaume Hekimian1,2,3,4,5,6, Juliette Chommeloux1,2,3,4,5,6, Marc Pineton de Chambrun1,2,3,4,5,6, Nicolas Brechot1,2,3,4,5,6, Charles-Edouard Luyt1,2,3,4,5,6, Alain Combes1,2,3,4,5,6, Matthieu Schmidt1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients prone-positioned during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung CT pattern associated with improved respiratory system static compliance after that intervention.
DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center study over 8 years. SETTINGS: Twenty-six bed ICU in a tertiary center.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A propensity score-matched analysis compared patients with prone-positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those without. An increase of the static compliance greater than or equal to 3 mL/cm H2O after 16 hours of prone-positioning defined prone-positioning responders. The primary outcome was the time to successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning within 90 days of postextracorporeal membrane oxygenation start, with death as a competing risk. Among 298 venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-treated adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, 64 were prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Although both propensity score-matched groups had similar extracorporeal membrane oxygenation durations, prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients' 90-day probability of being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and alive was higher (0.75 vs 0.54, p = 0.03; subdistribution hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.54 [1.05-2.58]) and 90-day mortality was lower (20% vs 42%, p < 0.01) than that for no prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related complications were comparable for the two groups. Patients without improved static compliance had higher percentages of nonaerated or poorly aerated ventral and medial-ventral lung regions (p = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: Prone-positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was safe and effective and was associated with a higher probability of surviving and being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 90 days. Patients with greater normally aerated lung tissue in the ventral and medial-ventral regions on quantitative lung CT-scan performed before prone-positioning are more likely to improve their static compliance after that procedure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34259655     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   9.296


  6 in total

1.  Effect of prone position in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ziying Chen; Min Li; Sichao Gu; Xu Huang; Jingen Xia; Qinghua Ye; Jiangnan Zheng; Qingyuan Zhan; Chen Wang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  Prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled individual patient data analysis.

Authors:  Marco Giani; Emanuele Rezoagli; Christophe Guervilly; Jonathan Rilinger; Thibault Duburcq; Matthieu Petit; Laura Textoris; Bruno Garcia; Tobias Wengenmayer; Giacomo Grasselli; Antonio Pesenti; Alain Combes; Giuseppe Foti; Matthieu Schmidt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Effect of prone positioning on survival in adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laurent Papazian; Matthieu Schmidt; David Hajage; Alain Combes; Matthieu Petit; Guillaume Lebreton; Jonathan Rilinger; Marco Giani; Camille Le Breton; Thibault Duburcq; Mathieu Jozwiak; Tobias Wengenmayer; Damien Roux; Rachael Parke; Anderson Loundou; Christophe Guervilly; Laurent Boyer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Prone positioning in ARDS patients supported with VV ECMO, what we should explore?

Authors:  Hongling Zhang; Zhengdong Liu; Huaqing Shu; Yuan Yu; Xiaobo Yang; Ruiting Li; Jiqian Xu; Xiaojing Zou; You Shang
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-10-04

5.  Effects of Prone Positioning on Respiratory Mechanics and Oxygenation in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Driss Laghlam; Julien Charpentier; Zakaria Ait Hamou; Lee S Nguyen; Frédéric Pene; Alain Cariou; Jean-Paul Mira; Mathieu Jozwiak
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Bedside Selection of Positive End Expiratory Pressure by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients Undergoing Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Comparison between COVID-19 ARDS and ARDS from Other Etiologies.

Authors:  Michela Di Pierro; Marco Giani; Alfio Bronco; Francesca Maria Lembo; Roberto Rona; Giacomo Bellani; Giuseppe Foti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.