Literature DB >> 34259547

Self-Collected Gargle Lavage Allows Reliable Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an Outpatient Setting.

Johannes Zander1,2, Stephan Scholtes3, Maximilian Ottinger4, Marcel Kremer1, Azadeh Kharazi1, Vanessa Stadler1, Julia Bickmann1, Christian Zeleny3, Johannes W P Kuiper5, Christof R Hauck5,6.   

Abstract

Current procurement of specimens for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection requires trained personnel and dedicated equipment. We compared standard nasopharyngeal swabs with self-collected gargle lavage fluid obtained from 80 mostly symptomatic outpatients. After RNA extraction, RT-PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 was performed. Qualitative results obtained with the paired samples from individual outpatients were 100% congruent. Therefore, self-collected gargle lavage fluid can serve as a suitable specimen for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing in outpatients. IMPORTANCE The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still strains health care systems worldwide. While COVID-19 testing is considered an essential pillar in combating this infectious disease, shortages in supplies and trained health care personnel often limit the procurement of patient samples, in particular in outpatient settings. Here, we compared the simple self-collection of gargle lavage fluid with the gold standard nasopharyngeal swab as a specimen for COVID-19 testing. By finding complete congruence of results obtained with paired samples of a sizeable patient cohort, our results strongly support the idea that the painless self-collection of gargle lavage fluid provides a suitable and uncomplicated sample for reliable SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; gargle lavage; outpatients

Year:  2021        PMID: 34259547     DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.00361-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Spectr        ISSN: 2165-0497


  4 in total

1.  User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers and household contacts.

Authors:  Kirsty McLennan; Ellen Barton; Christie Lang; Ian R Adams; Gina McAllister; Martin A M Reijns; Kate Templeton; Ingólfur Johannessen; Alastair Leckie; Nick Gilbert
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Natural spring water gargle samples as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a laboratory-developed test.

Authors:  Sarah Gobeille Paré; Julie Bestman-Smith; Judith Fafard; Florence Doualla-Bell; Mariève Jacob-Wagner; Christian Lavallée; Hugues Charest; Stéphanie Beauchemin; François Coutlée; Jeannot Dumaresq; Lambert Busque; Manon St-Hilaire; Guylaine Lépine; Valérie Boucher; Marc Desforges; Isabelle Goupil-Sormany; Annie-Claude Labbé
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 20.693

3.  The impact of offering multiple cervical screening options to women whose screening was overdue in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland.

Authors:  L Wedisinghe; P Sasieni; H Currie; G Baxter
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-08-11

4.  Self-Collected Samples to Detect SARS-CoV-2: Direct Comparison of Saliva, Tongue Swab, Nasal Swab, Chewed Cotton Pads and Gargle Lavage.

Authors:  Niko Kohmer; Lisa Eckermann; Boris Böddinghaus; Udo Götsch; Annemarie Berger; Eva Herrmann; Marhild Kortenbusch; Peter Tinnemann; Rene Gottschalk; Sebastian Hoehl; Sandra Ciesek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.