Literature DB >> 34258554

Internal microbial zonation during the massive growth of marimo, a lake ball of Aegagropila linnaei in Lake Akan.

Ryosuke Nakai1, Isamu Wakana2, Hironori Niki1,3.   

Abstract

Marimo (lake ball) is an uncommon ball-like aggregation of the green alga, Aegagropila linnaei. Although A. linnaei is distributed in fresh and brackish waters in the northern hemisphere, marimo colonies are found only in particular habitats. Here, we report the bacterial communities inside various sizes and aggregating structures of natural marimo collected from Lake Akan, Japan. We observed multi-layers composed of sediment particles only in the sizable radial-type marimo with >20 cm diameter and not in the tangled-type marimo. The deeper layers were enriched by Nitrospira, potential sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and sulfate-reducing bacteria. Microorganisms of the multi-layers would form biofilms incorporating nearby sediment, which would function as microbial "seals" within large radial-type marimo. These findings provide clues to deciphering the growth of endangered marimo.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algology; Ecology; Microbiome; Omics

Year:  2021        PMID: 34258554      PMCID: PMC8253969          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

Aegagropila linnaei, a filamentous green alga, widely inhabits ponds, lakes, and brackish waters at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere (Boedeker et al., 2010b). Morphologically, individuals of this species are filaments of 1–4 cm that are generally found attached to rocky substrates with rhizoids. This alga is known for an intriguing phenomenon in some lakes, including Lake Akan in Japan: it aggregates in spherical formations known as “lake balls” or “marimo” (Japanese for algal ball) (Soejima et al., 2009; Umekawa et al., 2021). There are two structurally different types of marimo: the “tangled type” is an aggregate of disorderly entangled filaments, and the “radial type” is an aggregate of filaments radially arranged from the center to the surface (Horiguchi et al., 1998; Einarsson, 2014) (Figure 1). The size of the tangled type is usually several cm in diameter and not over 15 cm. On the other hand, the radial type develops into a sizable ball that occasionally reaches about 30 cm in diameter through the tip growth of the filaments (Horiguchi et al., 1998). Undoubtedly, the environmental conditions in habitats are significant determinants for the formation of the tangled- and radial-type marimo. Indeed, each type inhabits different areas of Lake Akan with different environmental conditions (Figure S1).
Figure 1

Two structurally different types of marimo from Lake Akan

Images of the radial-type marimo: (A) outward appearance, (B) a cross section showing the radial arrangement of filaments, (C) an enlarged cross section (×1.7). Images of the tangled-type marimo: (D) outward appearance, (E) a cross section showing the entanglement of pine leaves and an alder cone in the tangled filaments, (F) an enlarged cross section (×1.7). Scale bars, 5 cm.

Two structurally different types of marimo from Lake Akan Images of the radial-type marimo: (A) outward appearance, (B) a cross section showing the radial arrangement of filaments, (C) an enlarged cross section (×1.7). Images of the tangled-type marimo: (D) outward appearance, (E) a cross section showing the entanglement of pine leaves and an alder cone in the tangled filaments, (F) an enlarged cross section (×1.7). Scale bars, 5 cm. Recently, dense colonies of the radial-type marimo that grow over 10 cm in diameter have been found in two lakes, Lake Mývatn, Iceland, and Lake Akan (Einarsson et al., 2004), although this species inhabits many lakes. Regrettably, the marimo in Lake Mývatn has almost disappeared due to a deterioration of the environmental conditions (Einarsson, 2014). In Lake Akan, the dense colonies of the radial-type marimo are maintained within a restricted area at Churui Bay and Kinetanpe Bay. It is known that external factors such as light, water quality, and water motion are involved in giving the marimo its spherical shape (Boedeker et al., 2010a; Sano et al., 2016). In addition to environmental conditions, we considered that various internal factors might be crucial for the more massive growth of the radial-type marimo. When the radial-type marimo inhabiting Lake Akan grows to about 10 cm in diameter, the filaments near its center begin to die, and a hollow is formed inside (Horiguchi et al., 1998). As a result, the densely packed filaments remain as an outer mass. These hollow structures are specific to the large aggregations of the radial-type marimo and are not formed in the smaller marimo of several cm in diameter. In a similar phenomenon, large aggregates of aquatic mosses are known to form “Koke-Bouzu” or large pillar-like structures with an internal hollow at the bottom of ultraoligotrophic Antarctic lakes (Imura et al., 1999, 2000). The formation of the hollow structure in Koke-Bouzu is positively related to the internal microbiomes (Nakai et al., 2012). The interior of Koke-Bouzu is decomposed and rotten; redox potential gradients between this rotten interior and the exterior lead to a high diversity of microorganisms that are involved in material cycling in the in situ environment (Nakai et al., 2019). In addition to such moss-microbe associations, some bacteria co-existing with algae are known to exert beneficial effects on host growth through various symbiotic factors (e.g., nitrogen fixation and hormone production; Ramanan et al., 2016; Cirri and Pohnert, 2019). In some cases, the morphology and reproduction of a certain algal species are strongly dependent on the presence of bacteria (Tapia et al., 2016). Therefore, we presumed that the hollow structure and its associated microbiomes are related to the large size of the radial-type marimo.

Results and discussion

Dissection of natural marimo in Lake Akan

We dissected three differently sized natural samples of the radial-type marimo, each having a different internal structure and different redox conditions. Then, we examined the microbial communities in the outer and inner sections of these fresh marimo samples. We collected the radial-type marimo at Churui Bay in Lake Akan and categorized them into three sizes: small (about 4 cm in diameter, n = 3), medium (11–12 cm in diameter, n = 3), and large (21 and 22 cm in diameter, n = 2). Each of the samples was cut to separate the outer and inner sections of the algal outer mass on a board immediately after the collection (Figure 2A). Using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene-based sequencing of DNA samples extracted and pooled from each size fraction, we constructed bacterial catalogs for the sections of the marimo of different sizes, as well as for other samples, including a tangled-type marimo, a filament form, and the surrounding lake water and sediments, for comparison (Figure 2B and Tables S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S9). We excluded archaeal taxa from further analyses because they were poorly represented in our metabarcoding data. We found no apparent differences in the non-parametric Shannon diversity index (α-diversity) among the marimo microbiomes (Table S2). This result indicates that the species diversity of microbiomes is similar in the outer and inner sections. However, the β-diversity calculated by a generalized UniFrac dendrogram indicated apparent similarities and differences among bacterial communities of the marimo microbiomes (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

An integrated view of the phylogenetic diversity of the internal microbiomes of natural marimo

(A) Image of the interior structure of the radial-type marimo with a major axis of about 12 cm. The algal outer mass is indicated by an orange arrow, and the hollow structure is indicated by a blue arrow.

(B) Taxonomic composition of 13 bacterial phyla and 5 candidate phylum-level lineages (TM7, WS3, GN04, OP8, and AY491574_p) with >1% sequence abundance in at least one sample in DNA-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon data from radial-type marimo, floating filaments, tangled-type marimo, and other environmental samples, and RNA-based 16S rRNA transcript amplicon data from the multi-layers that developed only in the large radial-type marimo samples (see the layer structure presented in Figure 3). The outer sections of small-, medium-, and large-sized radial-type marimo are labeled Radi-SO, Radi-MO, and Radi-LO, respectively, and the inner sections are labeled Radi-SI, Radi-MI, and Radi-LI, respectively. Floating A. linnaei filaments and the outer and inner sections of the tangled-type marimo were labeled Fil, Tang-O, and Tang-I, respectively. Surface lake water and sediments surrounding the studied marimo colony were labeled LW, Sed-1, Sed-2, and Sed-3. The multi-layers (three layers), which were composed of sediment particles, were labeled Radi-L1, Radi-L2, and Radi-L3. Details for each sample are given in Table S1.

(C) A generalized UniFrac dendrogram showing similarities among the bacterial fractions of the microbiomes.

An integrated view of the phylogenetic diversity of the internal microbiomes of natural marimo (A) Image of the interior structure of the radial-type marimo with a major axis of about 12 cm. The algal outer mass is indicated by an orange arrow, and the hollow structure is indicated by a blue arrow. (B) Taxonomic composition of 13 bacterial phyla and 5 candidate phylum-level lineages (TM7, WS3, GN04, OP8, and AY491574_p) with >1% sequence abundance in at least one sample in DNA-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon data from radial-type marimo, floating filaments, tangled-type marimo, and other environmental samples, and RNA-based 16S rRNA transcript amplicon data from the multi-layers that developed only in the large radial-type marimo samples (see the layer structure presented in Figure 3). The outer sections of small-, medium-, and large-sized radial-type marimo are labeled Radi-SO, Radi-MO, and Radi-LO, respectively, and the inner sections are labeled Radi-SI, Radi-MI, and Radi-LI, respectively. Floating A. linnaei filaments and the outer and inner sections of the tangled-type marimo were labeled Fil, Tang-O, and Tang-I, respectively. Surface lake water and sediments surrounding the studied marimo colony were labeled LW, Sed-1, Sed-2, and Sed-3. The multi-layers (three layers), which were composed of sediment particles, were labeled Radi-L1, Radi-L2, and Radi-L3. Details for each sample are given in Table S1.
Figure 3

Multi-layers, internal microbial zonation, and proposed development process of the sizable radial-type marimo

(A) Image of three brown-colored layers inside the algal outer mass and the internal hollow of the large-sized, radial-type marimo with a diameter of >20 cm. The three layers were labeled Radi-L1 (0.3–0.4 cm deep from the surface), Radi-L2 (1 cm deep), and Radi-L3 (2 cm deep). Scale bar, 1 cm.

(B) Heatmap showing 6 genera (Limisphaera, Hyphomicrobium, Gemmata, Nitrospira, Solibacter, and Thiohalocapsa) and 23 other unclassified or candidate genus-level lineages with >1% sequence abundance in at least one sample in RNA-based 16S rRNA transcript amplicon data from the multi-layers. The frequency of occurrence of each lineage in other samples obtained from DNA-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon data is also shown. Sample name codes are presented in Figure 2 and Table S1. EzTaxon category names and taxonomic affiliations at the phylum or class level (for Proteobacteria) are shown on the left and the right side, respectively. Note that reclassification of the δ-proteobacterial members has recently been proposed (Waite et al., 2020). Following the EzBioCloud database, the uncultured phylotype is tentatively given the hierarchical name assigned to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank accession number with the following suffixes: “_s” (for species), “_g” (genus), “_f” (family), “_o” (order), “_c” (class), and “_p” (phylum). The unclassified sequences below the cut-off values are labeled “_uc” (for unclassified).

(C) Models of development and regeneration of the tangled-type and radial-type marimo. For the tangled-type marimo, A. linnaei filaments cycle between a free-floating state and an entangled state (left). The radial-type marimo is regenerated from a fragment derived from a broken larger radial-type individual so that the radial arrangements of filaments and the inside microbiomes are inherited (right).

(C) A generalized UniFrac dendrogram showing similarities among the bacterial fractions of the microbiomes.

The phylogenetic diversity of the internal microbiomes of natural marimo

Microbiomes in the outer and inner sections of the small-sized marimo were similar. On the other hand, the microbiomes in the outer and inner sections of the medium- and large-sized marimo separated into respective clusters. We carried out a permutational multivariate analysis of variance analysis to assess statistical differences among the clusters in the UniFrac dendrogram (Figure 2C). The outer cluster of the radial and tangled types trended toward a difference from the inner cluster of radial types (p = 0.051). The outer cluster was significantly different from the sediment cluster (p < 0.01). Nitrospira was frequently detected in the inner sections, while cyanobacteria were mainly found in the outer sections in the larger radial-type marimo (Figures 2B and Table S8). In particular, filamentous cyanobacterial members of Nostocales and Oscillatoriales were dominant (Table S6). Filamentous cyanobacteria are generally known to form benthic mats in aquatic environments, and their nitrogen-fixing capabilities are nutritionally significant in the biotic community (Paerl et al., 2000). In addition, we found bacteria related to the Richelia genus of the Nostocales, albeit at a low ratio (∼0.1%) (Table S8). The bacteria of Richelia are known to promote host microalgal growth through symbiotic nitrogen fixation (Foster et al., 2011; Yao et al., 2019). Although Lake Akan is considered mesotrophic, it becomes nitrogen deficient in summer when aquatic plants and phytoplankton proliferate. Our measurements in Churui Bay, where we collected the marimo, showed that the concentrations of PO43−, NH4+, NO2–, and NO3– in the surface water were below the detection limits (Table S3). Therefore, cyanobacterial N2 fixation might help the marimo to grow under otherwise nitrogen-deficient conditions. Meanwhile, nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira members also can convert urea to NH4+ and CO2 and are considered to contribute to nitrogen (N) cycling processes beyond nitrite oxidation (Koch et al., 2015). Thus, taxonomically different but functionally relevant (i.e., N cycle related) bacteria were consistently recovered from the outer and inner sections of the larger marimo. In contrast, such a distribution was not found in the smaller marimo. The UniFrac dendrogram also indicates that the microbiomes of the radial-type marimo were separately clustered with the other samples, including the surrounding lake water and sediments (Figure 2C). These results suggest that the radial-type marimo harbors unique and specific bacterial communities that assist in massive growth regardless of poor nutrient conditions.

Internal microbial zonation of the sizable radial-type marimo

We analyzed the interior structure of the radial-type marimo with a diameter of >20 cm. A cross section of the marimo showed that the algal outer mass developed to a thickness of about 2.5 cm, and the core part had a hollow. Additionally, we found multi-layers composed of accumulated brown-colored sediment particles inside the outer mass. Note that the sizable marimo populations distributed in shallow areas tend to be covered by lake sediments (Figure S2), while the attached sediments appear to be removed by the marimo's rotation. However, the sediment particles themselves are often sandwiched in layers within the algal outer mass. The large marimo we collected had a three-layered structure, and we named the layers Radi-L1 (0.3–0.4 cm deep from the surface), Radi-L2 (1 cm deep), and Radi-L3 (2 cm deep) (Figures 3A and S3). We then determined the composition of viable and active microbiomes in these multi-layers by means of RNA-based metabarcoding of the 16S rRNA transcripts. While DNA-based analysis cannot differentiate live and dead bacterial cells, RNA-based analysis can identify live bacteria because RNA is degraded after cell death (Bleve et al., 2003; Li et al., 2017). The results of the RNA-based metabarcoding analysis showed that (1) Proteobacteria was dominant in Radi-L1, Radi-L2, and Radi-L3, as shown in the results of the DNA-based analysis, (2) Chloroflexi and Planctomycetes were subdominant in all layers, and (3) Cyanobacteria was prominent only in Radi-L1 (Figure 2B). Multi-layers, internal microbial zonation, and proposed development process of the sizable radial-type marimo (A) Image of three brown-colored layers inside the algal outer mass and the internal hollow of the large-sized, radial-type marimo with a diameter of >20 cm. The three layers were labeled Radi-L1 (0.3–0.4 cm deep from the surface), Radi-L2 (1 cm deep), and Radi-L3 (2 cm deep). Scale bar, 1 cm. (B) Heatmap showing 6 genera (Limisphaera, Hyphomicrobium, Gemmata, Nitrospira, Solibacter, and Thiohalocapsa) and 23 other unclassified or candidate genus-level lineages with >1% sequence abundance in at least one sample in RNA-based 16S rRNA transcript amplicon data from the multi-layers. The frequency of occurrence of each lineage in other samples obtained from DNA-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon data is also shown. Sample name codes are presented in Figure 2 and Table S1. EzTaxon category names and taxonomic affiliations at the phylum or class level (for Proteobacteria) are shown on the left and the right side, respectively. Note that reclassification of the δ-proteobacterial members has recently been proposed (Waite et al., 2020). Following the EzBioCloud database, the uncultured phylotype is tentatively given the hierarchical name assigned to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank accession number with the following suffixes: “_s” (for species), “_g” (genus), “_f” (family), “_o” (order), “_c” (class), and “_p” (phylum). The unclassified sequences below the cut-off values are labeled “_uc” (for unclassified). (C) Models of development and regeneration of the tangled-type and radial-type marimo. For the tangled-type marimo, A. linnaei filaments cycle between a free-floating state and an entangled state (left). The radial-type marimo is regenerated from a fragment derived from a broken larger radial-type individual so that the radial arrangements of filaments and the inside microbiomes are inherited (right). Moreover, distinctive distributions of certain taxa were found in each layer. Some of the dominant bacterial genera and genus-level lineages differed between the surface layer, Radi-L1, and the deeper layers, Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 (Figure 3B). In Radi-L1, a novel cyanobacterial lineage within the Symploca-related family was frequently detected. The novel δ-proteobacterial lineage AJ617907_g of Polyangiaceae and α-proteobacterial Hyphomicrobium were also detected. In contrast, these members were minor components (<0.2%) in the Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 layers. Symploca spp. are aerobic, filamentous N2-fixing cyanobacteria that occur in microbial mats (Stal, 2012). The δ-proteobacterial AJ617907 sequence was initially discovered from the oxic-anoxic interphase of soil (DDBJ/ENA/GenBank: AJ617907). Members of Hyphomicrobium are considered to be significant players in denitrification (Martineau et al., 2015), which is a microbial process of converting NO2– and NO3– to N2 under oxygen-limiting conditions. The detection of these viable and active members suggests that an O2 concentration gradient might be formed in the surface layer Radi-L1.

Unique microbiome in the deeper layers of the sizable radial-type marimo

On the other hand, a novel γ-proteobacterial group within the Sedimenticola-related family, the δ-proteobacterial AXXL_g of Desulfobacteraceae, Nitrospira, and other multiple uncultured lineages dominated in both Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 (Figure 3B). The novel γ-proteobacterial group and Nitrospira were highly enriched in Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 (6.1–7.1% and 3.9–4.0%, respectively) and were minor in Radi-L1 (0.03% and 0.8%, respectively). Known Sedimenticola strains are chemoautotrophic bacteria and can utilize sulfur compounds (e.g., elemental sulfur and hydrogen sulfide) (Flood et al., 2015). They fall within the unclassified γ-Proteobacteria monophyletic clade with multiple microaerobic sulfur-oxidizing endosymbionts of marine invertebrates (e.g., bivalve molluscs) endemic to sulfidic environments (Dubilier et al., 2008). The majority of the sequences of the novel γ-proteobacterial group had 93–94% similarity with the marine sediment sequence (DDBJ/ENA/GenBank: JF344428). Their closest type strain was Sulfurivermis fontis JG42T, which is a sulfur-oxidizing autotroph that was isolated from a hot spring microbial mat (Kojima et al., 2017). The novel member inhabiting the marimo deeper layers might have a sulfur-related chemoautotrophic metabolism. Filaments in the inner sections maintain their green color, indicating that chloroplasts remain despite the darkness within the marimo (Figure 3A). When the inner filaments are isolated and irradiated with light, the photosynthesis activity recovers within a few days (Yokohama et al., 1994; Horiguchi et al., 1998). Thus, the photosynthetic activity of the radial-type marimo decreases from the surface to the interior, but the inner filaments are somehow viable. In this context, potential chemoautotrophic bacteria identified in the inner sections may carry out chemosynthetic CO2 fixation. Then, the primary production by the CO2 fixation may contribute to the survival of inner filaments in the marimo interior. Remarkably, Lake Akan is rich in sulfur and hydrogen sulfide, which sulfur-oxidizing bacteria can use, due to the inflow of water from a river associated with a nearby volcano, Mt. Me-Akan (Suzuki et al., 1957; Japan Wildlife Research Center, 2015). Moreover, an uncultured lineage AXXL_g dominantly detected in the deeper layers of Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 belongs to Desulfobacteraceae within δ-Proteobacteria. Most of the Desulfobacteraceae species are sulfate-reducing anaerobes (Kuever, 2014). The AXXL_g-related sequences were found in the sediments surrounding the marimo colonies (Figure 3B). Other lineages, such as GQ396871_g of Chloroflexi in Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 were also enriched in the nearby sediments. The spatial distributions suggested that the two deeper layers possess anaerobic microenvironments which sediment bacteria can inhabit.

The microbial zonation as a mechanical structure

It is worth noting that the filamentous cyanobacteria on the marimo surface might be involved in not only CO2 and N2 fixation but also the incorporation of minerals and organic matter. Furthermore, the filamentous microorganisms produce extracellular polymeric substances and release them into their surroundings (Stal, 2012). The surfaces of A. linnaei filaments isolated from the radial-type marimo are known to be highly sticky. Cyanobacteria-mediated formation of microbial granules and biofilms is often observed in nutrient-limited glaciers and polar freshwater lakes (Uetake et al., 2016; Jungblut and Vincent, 2017). In addition, many of the Acidobacteria that were frequently detected in both Radi-L2 and Radi-L3 (Figure 3B) have the potential to form biofilms and facilitate particle aggregates (Kielak et al., 2016). Thus, it is possible that “microbial sealing” by bacterial aggregates/biofilms enhances the beneficial effects on the strength of the multi-layers inside marimo. In fact, sizable radial-type marimo are airtight and rigid structures (Figure S4 and Video S1). It is difficult for water to enter the internal cavity. Once the inside water is removed, the marimo floats on water for days (Figure S4C).

The development process and the life cycles of the radial-type marimo

Physical factors in the growing environment are involved in the developmental mechanism of the ball-like marimo. Wind waves are a driving force which rotates marimo and maintains their rounded spherical form (Sano et al., 2016). The rotation of marimo enables photosynthesis over the entire marimo surface and removes sediment from the surface. However, the tangled-type marimo cannot grow into a larger aggregate of over 20 cm in diameter like the radial-type marimo. Only the actively growing marimo over 20 cm in diameter develops the internal multi-layers. The layers are available for habitats of distinctive bacteria. As a result, the bacterial zonation would supply carbon sources and nutrients to the host A. linnaei and promote the massive growth of the radial-type marimo. In addition, the microbial sealing of the layer structure could confer mechanical strength to the radial-type marimo. A possible scenario of the regeneration of a radial-type marimo is as follows (Figure 3C). First, an extremely large marimo is broken down and fragmented by external forces such as turbulent water movements (Figure S2A). Fragments of the large aggregate then reform as a small marimo which inherits the radial arrangements of filaments and the interior microbiomes. Environmental eutrophication affects not only the algal growth but also the microbial community inside the marimo. Understanding both the external factors and the functioning of the internal microbiomes will aid in the management of these globally endangered organisms.

Limitations of the study

Due to the challenge created by the limited number of marimo samples available for analysis, inter-individual differences and seasonal variations in the marimo microbiomes were not elucidated. Species diversity and host associations of eukaryotic microorganisms, which were not targeted in this study, also merit investigation in order to clarify the contribution of the microbiome to algal growth.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for reagents and resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Hironori Niki (hniki@nig.ac.jp).

Materials availability

This study did not generate unique reagents.

Data and code availability

The sequence datasets (n = 16) generated during this study are available at the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA) under accession number DRA010176. The associated BioProject and BioSample numbers are PRJDB8727 and SAMD00224685 to SAMD00224700, respectively.

Experimental model and subject details

Sample collection

Radial-type marimo samples of Aegagropila linnaei were collected on 5 August 2014 at Churui Bay in Lake Akan (43° 27’ N 144° 06’ E), Hokkaido, Japan. Small (about 4 cm in diameter, n = 3), medium (11 to 12 cm, n = 3), and large (21 and 22 cm, n = 2) samples were collected by scuba divers. Each sample was immediately transferred to a researcher in a boat. The samples were dissected on the boat; the outer surface and inner sections (∼1.5 cm × ∼1.5 cm × ∼0.5 cm portions) used for DNA extraction were picked apart using sterilized tweezers and were separately placed in sterilized tubes; the samples for RNA extraction were also picked apart and immersed in RNAlater® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The outer sections of the small, medium, and large samples were labeled Radi-SO, Radi-MO, and Radi-LO, respectively; the inner sections were labeled Radi-SI, Radi-MI, and Radi-LI. All samples were transported to the lakeside laboratory and stored at –80°C until analysis. The samples in RNAlater® were kept at 4°C overnight and then deep-frozen. To characterize microorganisms associated with radial-type marimo, floating A. linnaei filaments (labeled Fil) and tangled-type marimo of about 5 cm in diameter (n = 3) were collected for comparative analysis at Takiguchi Bay in Lake Akan. The tangled-type samples were dissected into the outer surface and inner sections in a similar manner as for the radial-type marimo, and were then labeled Tang-O and Tang-I, respectively. Additionally, surface lake water (labeled LW) and three samples of sediment (labeled Sed-1, Sed-2, and Sed-3) surrounding marimo colonies were collected. These samples were stored as described above. Further details of the sample codes are presented in Table S1.

Method details

Evaluation of lake water quality

The pH and electrical conductivity of the lake surface water were measured using a pH meter (D-71; Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) and a conductivity meter (ES-51; Horiba), respectively. The additional analyses described below were performed at Chikyu Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. (Geo-Science Laboratory, Nagoya, Japan) following the Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) methods (see Key Resources Table). The concentrations of Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ were determined using an atomic absorption spectrometer (SOLAAR S Series; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The concentration of NH4+ was measured by indophenol blue absorptiometry (UV–160; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The concentrations of Cl–, NO2–, NO3–, SO42–, and PO43– were determined by ion chromatography (761 Compact IC; Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). To determine the total nitrogen concentration, the water sample was digested with potassium persulfate and was analyzed by UV-spectrophotometry (UV–160; Shimadzu). Total phosphorus was determined by standard molybdenum-blue colorimetry following persulfate digestion. Total organic carbon was measured using a TOC Analyzer (TOC-VCPH; Shimadzu).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and high-throughput sequencing

DNA was extracted from natural marimo samples using a modified version of the bead-beating method described previously (Nakai et al., 2012). A 0.5-g sub-sample was placed in a Lysing Matrix E Tube (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA), and then lysis solutions of an ISOIL for Beads Beating Kit (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) were pre-warmed at 65°C and added to the tube according to the manufacturer’s manual. After shaking in a Beads Crusher μT-12 (Taitec, Saitama, Japan) at 3200 rpm for 45 s, the tube was incubated at 65°C for 1 h, followed by centrifugal separation. DNA was purified from the aqueous supernatant using a MagExtractorTM Genome Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The above procedure was conducted three times for each sample of each size, and the extracted DNAs were pooled by each size group (that is, small, medium, or large) to create a representative DNA sample. PCR amplicons were generated using the universal primer set 342F-806R (Mori et al., 2014), covering both archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes. The PCR mixture containing KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA), reaction conditions, and sequencing library generation followed the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation protocol provided by Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA). Pair-end 300-bp MiSeq (Illumina) sequencing was performed using a Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina). DNA from comparative samples was extracted as outlined above. For the lake water, a 2000-ml sample was filtered onto a Sterivex Filter Unit with 0.22 μm pore size (Millipore, Billerica, MA) by using a Quantitative Liquid Feed Pump (RP-1000; EYELA, Tokyo) and a sterilized silicone tube (Yamato Scientific, Tokyo) with Luer-Lock fittings (Millipore). DNA extraction from the Sterivex unit was performed using a PowerWater Sterivex DNA Isolation Kit (MP Biomedicals). Each DNA sample was then PCR-amplified and sequenced as described above.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

The internal multi-layers composed of sediment particles were observed only in the two large-sized, radial-type marimo samples. The three layers, the surface, intermediate and innermost layer, were used in order from the surface to the innermost layer for RNA extraction. The parts of each layer submersed in RNAlater® were picked apart and labeled Radi-L1 (about 0.3 to 0.4 cm deep from the surface), Radi-L2 (1 cm deep), and Radi-L3 (2 cm deep), respectively. Total RNA was extracted from 0.5 g of each layer using a FastRNA® Pro Soil-Direct Kit (MP Biomedicals), as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Residual DNA was digested using a TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The absence of DNA contamination was confirmed as the absence of PCR amplification of the digested template using the universal primer set 342F-806R as indicated above. The RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a SuperScript® VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit and Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), including random primers. The above procedure was performed three times for each sample, and the cDNAs from each layer group were pooled. Each cDNA was PCR-amplified and sequenced as described in the “DNA extraction” section.

Data analysis

The adapter sequences as well as ambiguous sequences that had a low average quality score (<25) were removed using cutadapt v. 1.1 (Martin, 2011) and Trimmomatic v. 0.32 (Bolger et al., 2014). The trimmed pair-end reads were assembled using fastq-join v. 1.1.2–537 (Aronesty, 2013). Taxonomic assignment of the quality-filtered sequences was processed with the default settings in the Microbiome Taxonomic Profiling (MTP) pipeline of the EzBioCloud (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/contents/16smtp; ChunLab Inc., Seoul, Korea) (Yoon et al., 2017). The quality-filtered sequences were compared to the EzBioCloud 16S rRNA gene sequence database v. PKSSU4.0 constructed from the curated 16S rRNA gene sequences using the USEARCH program v.8.1.1861_i86linux32 (Edgar, 2010). It is noted that, in this database, the yet-uncultured phylotype is tentatively given the hierarchical name assigned to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank accession number with the following suffixes: “_s” (for species), “_g” (genus), “_f” (family), “_o” (order), “_c” (class) and “_p” (phylum) (Kim et al., 2012). The taxonomic category was assigned based on the following cut-off values of sequence similarity: species (≥97%), genus (>97% > x ≥94.5%), family (>94.5% > x ≥86.5%), order (>86.5% > x ≥82%), class (>82% > x ≥78.5%), and phylum (>78.5% > x ≥75%), where x corresponds to the sequence identity with sequences in the database. These cut-off values were taken from previous studies (Yarza et al., 2014; Yoon et al., 2017). The sequences below the cut-off value at the species or a higher level were assigned in the unclassified group labeled as “_uc” (for unclassified). Chimeras of the sequences that did not match at the species level (≥97%) were identified using the UCHIME program within USEARCH (Edgar et al., 2011) and the EzBioCloud chimera-free reference database (https://help.ezbiocloud.net/mtp-pipeline/), and chimeric sequences were omitted. Unmatched and eukaryotic plastid sequences were also excluded. The filtered valid sequences were used as the final dataset. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% identity threshold were picked up by the open-reference method (https://help.ezbiocloud.net/mtp-pipeline/) using the EzBioCloud MTP pipeline. Singleton sequences were removed in the OTU picking process, according to Unno (2015). Chao1 and non-parametric Shannon’s indices and Good’s coverage were used to estimate α-diversity indices (note that the chao1 index takes singleton reads into account), whereas β-diversity was expressed as generalized UniFrac distance (Chen et al., 2012). The α- and β-diversity indices were computed in the MTP pipeline.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed in the EzBioCloud MTP pipeline as mentioned above. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) was used to compare the microbiome groups obtained from the generalized UniFrac dendrogram. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Biological samples

Marimo samples, see Table S1Lake Akan, Japan43° 27’ N 144° 06’ E
Sediment samples, see Table S1Lake Akan, Japan43° 27’ N 144° 06’ E
Lake water sample, see Table S1Lake Akan, Japan43° 27’ N 144° 06’ E

Critical commercial assays

RNAlaterThermo Fisher ScientificCat# AM7020
Lysing Matrix E TubeMP BiomedicalsCat# 116914050
ISOIL for Beads Beating KitNippon GeneCat# 319-06201
MagExtractor Genome KitToyoboCat# NPK-101
KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (2X)Kapa BiosystemsCat# KK2601
Nextera XT Index KitilluminaCat# FC-131-1002
16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparationilluminahttps://jp.support.illumina.com/downloads/16s_metagenomic_sequencing_library_preparation.html
PowerWater Sterivex DNA Isolation KitMP BiomedicalsCat# 14600-50-NF
FastRNA Pro Soil-Direct KitMP BiomedicalsCat# 6070-050
TURBO DNA-free KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat# AM1907
SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit and Master MixThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 11752050

Deposited data

Raw sequence dataThis studyDDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA): DRA010176
Project dataThis studyBioProject: PRJDB8727
Sample data, see Table S1This studyBioSample: SAMD00224685 to SAMD00224700

Oligonucleotides

Primer forward 342F: 5’-CTACGGGGGGCAGCAG-3’Mori et al., 2014https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst052
Primer reverse 806R: 5’-GGACTACCGGGGTATCT-3’Mori et al., 2014https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst052

Software and algorithms

fastq-join v. 1.1.2–537Aronesty, 2013https://doi.org/10.2174/1875036201307010001
cutadapt v. 1.1Martin, 2011https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Trimmomatic v. 0.32Bolger et al., 2014https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
EzBioCloud Microbiome Taxonomic Profiling pipelineChunLab;Kim et al., 2012;Yoon et al., 2017https://www.ezbiocloud.net/contents/16smtp;https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
EzBioCloud 16S rRNA gene sequence database v. PKSSU4.0ChunLab;Kim et al., 2012;Yoon et al., 2017https://help.ezbiocloud.net/mtp-pipeline/;https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
EzBioCloud curated chimera-free reference databaseChunLabhttps://help.ezbiocloud.net/mtp-pipeline/
USEARCH v.8.1.1861_i86linux32Edgar, 2010https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
UCHIME in the USEARCH package as mentioned aboveEdgar et al., 2011https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381
Chao1Chao, 1984https://www.jstor.org/stable/4615964
Non-parametric Shannon’s indexChao and Shen, 2003https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026096204727
Good's coverage of libraryGood, 1953https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237
generalized UniFrac distanceChen et al., 2012https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts342
Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA)Anderson, 2017https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841

Other

pH meter D-71HORIBACat# D-71S
Conductivity meter ES-51HORIBACat# ES-51
SOLAAR S Series AA spectrometerThermo Fisher Scientifichttps://www.thermofisher.com/jp/en/home/industrial/spectroscopy-elemental-isotope-analysis.html
UV–160Shimadzuhttps://www.shimadzu.com/an/products/molecular-spectroscopy/index.html
761 Compact ICMetrohmhttps://www.metrohm.com/ja-jp/products-overview/17610010
TOC Analyzer TOC-VCPHShimadzuhttps://www.shimadzu.eu/total-organic-carbon-analysis
Determination of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, NH4+, Cl, NO2, NO3, SO42–, and PO43– concentrationsJapanese Industrial Standard (JIS) methods:JIS K 0102 48.2;JIS K 0102 49.2;JIS K 0102 50.2;JIS K 0102 51.2;JIS K 0102 42.2;JIS K 0102 35.3;JIS K 0102 43.1.2;JIS K 0102 43.2.5;JIS K 0102 41.3;JIS K 0102 46.1.3https://webdesk.jsa.or.jp/books/W11M0090/index/?bunsyo_id=JIS+K+0102%3A2016
Determination of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total organic carbonJapanese Industrial Standard (JIS) methods:JIS K 0102 45.2;JIS K 0102 46.3.1;JIS K 0102 22.1https://webdesk.jsa.or.jp/books/W11M0090/index/?bunsyo_id=JIS+K+0102%3A2016
Beads Crusher μT-12TAITECCat# 0068700-000
Sterivex-GV 0.22 μm PVDFMilliporeCat# SVGV010RS
Luer lockMilliporeCat# XX3002564
Silicone pump tubeYamamoto ScientificCat# 96400-25
Quantitative liquid feed pumpEYELA TOKYO RIKAKIKAICat# RP-1000
  25 in total

1.  Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species.

Authors:  Ok-Sun Kim; Yong-Joon Cho; Kihyun Lee; Seok-Hwan Yoon; Mincheol Kim; Hyunsoo Na; Sang-Cheol Park; Yoon Seong Jeon; Jae-Hak Lee; Hana Yi; Sungho Won; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Algae-bacteria interactions: Evolution, ecology and emerging applications.

Authors:  Rishiram Ramanan; Byung-Hyuk Kim; Dae-Hyun Cho; Hee-Mock Oh; Hee-Sik Kim
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 4.  Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis.

Authors:  Nicole Dubilier; Claudia Bergin; Christian Lott
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Microbial community variation in cryoconite granules on Qaanaaq Glacier, NW Greenland.

Authors:  Jun Uetake; Sota Tanaka; Takahiro Segawa; Nozomu Takeuchi; Naoko Nagatsuka; Hideaki Motoyama; Teruo Aoki
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 6.  Microalgae-bacteria symbiosis in microalgal growth and biofuel production: a review.

Authors:  S Yao; S Lyu; Y An; J Lu; C Gjermansen; A Schramm
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar; Brian J Haas; Jose C Clemente; Christopher Quince; Rob Knight
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies.

Authors:  Seok-Hwan Yoon; Sung-Min Ha; Soonjae Kwon; Jeongmin Lim; Yeseul Kim; Hyungseok Seo; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Microbiota Influences Morphology and Reproduction of the Brown Alga Ectocarpus sp.

Authors:  Javier E Tapia; Bernardo González; Sophie Goulitquer; Philippe Potin; Juan A Correa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Comparison of DNA-, PMA-, and RNA-based 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing for detection of live bacteria in water.

Authors:  Ru Li; Hein Min Tun; Musarrat Jahan; Zhengxiao Zhang; Ayush Kumar; W G Dilantha Fernando; Annemieke Farenhorst; Ehsan Khafipour
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.