| Literature DB >> 34258065 |
Joseph Kojo Oduro1, Kwaku Kissah-Korsah1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study sought to examine the nutritional wellness among aged persons living with HIV in Somkhele, South Africa.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34258065 PMCID: PMC8249153 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6635814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Aging Res ISSN: 2090-2204
Figure 1Model of HIV infection and nutritional wellness of the aged.
Figure 2Factor loadings of nutritional wellness.
Regression analysis on high nutritional wellness among the aged.
| Covariates | Model I | Model II |
|---|---|---|
| OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | |
| HIV status | ||
| Not infected | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Infected | 0.74 [0.96, 2.26] | 0.71 [0.80, 2.48] |
|
| ||
| Confounding factors | ||
| Individual level factors | ||
| Age | ||
| 50–64 | — | 1.00 |
| 65–74 | — | 1.22 [0.66, 2.27] |
| 75–84 | — | 0.81 [0.31, 2.07] |
| 85+ | — | 0.09 [0.01, 0.73] |
|
| ||
| Level of education attained | ||
| No formal education | — | 1.00 |
| Primary | — | 0.53 [0.28, 0.99] |
| Secondary | — | 0.71 [0.37, 1.37] |
| Tertiary | — | 0.62 [0.10, 3.75] |
|
| ||
| Household source of income | ||
| No source of income | — | 1.00 |
| Self-generated income | — | 0.08 [0.01, 0.73] |
| Wages/salaries | — | 0.09 [0.01, 0.73] |
| Govt grants | — | 0.19 [0.03, 1.45] |
| From rental property/retirement fund | — | 0.08 [0.00, 1.37] |
|
| ||
| Financial situation | ||
| Much worse | — | 1.00 |
| About the same | — | 1.6 [0.45, 2.35] |
| Better | — | 6.15 [2.23, 16.93] |
|
| ||
| Variance of the random effects (SE) | ||
| Individual level | 1.69 | 0.1937 [2.10 |
| %∆ in random effect | −3 | −1 |
|
| ||
| Individual level | ||
| Deviance | 503.4 | 415.8 |
| %∆ in deviance | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| AIC | 510.5 | 446.4 |
p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05; SE, standard error; 95% CI, 95 percent confidence interval; AIC, akaike information criterion.
Background characteristics of sampled aged (n = 440).
| Background characteristics | Sample size | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 89 | 20.2 |
| Female | 351 | 79.8 |
|
| ||
| Age | ||
| 50–64 years | 289 | 65.7 |
| 65–74 years | 107 | 24.3 |
| 75–84 years | 37 | 8.4 |
| 85+ | 7 | 1.6 |
|
| ||
| Marital status | ||
| Not married | 116 | 26.4 |
| Married | 118 | 26.8 |
| Separated/divorce | 32 | 7.3 |
| Widowed | 174 | 39.5 |
|
| ||
| Level of education | ||
| No formal education | 203 | 46.1 |
| Primary | 129 | 29.3 |
| Secondary | 98 | 22.3 |
| Tertiary | 10 | 2.3 |
|
| ||
| Source of drinking water | ||
| Other | 2 | 0.5 |
| Treated tap water | 275 | 62.5 |
| Rainwater | 10 | 2.3 |
| Flowing river/stream | 27 | 6.1 |
| Dam/stagnant water | 126 | 28.6 |
|
| ||
| Household source of income | ||
| No source of income | 43 | 9.8 |
| Self-generated income | 24 | 5.5 |
| Wages/salaries | 61 | 13.9 |
| Govt grants | 307 | 69.8 |
| From rental property/retirement fund | 5 | 1.1 |
|
| ||
| Financial situation of household compared to 3 years ago | ||
| Better | 36 | 8.2 |
| About the same | 188 | 42.7 |
| Much worse | 216 | 49.1 |
|
| ||
| Servings of fruits | ||
| No servings of fruits | 1 | 0.2 |
| One | 127 | 28.9 |
| Two | 171 | 38.9 |
| Three | 122 | 27.7 |
| Four | 15 | 3.4 |
| 5/8 | 4 | 0.9 |
|
| ||
| Servings of vegetables | ||
| No servings of vegetables | 5 | 1.1 |
| One | 260 | 59.1 |
| Two | 135 | 30.7 |
| Three | 35 | 8.0 |
| Four | 5 | 1.1 |
|
| ||
| HIV status | ||
| Infected | 262 | 59.5 |
| Not infected | 178 | 40.5 |
Distribution of the sampled aged by background characteristics (n = 440).
| Background characteristics | High nutritional wellness | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI |
| |
| Overall | 73.6 | — | — |
| HIV status | — | — | 0.007 |
| Infected | 76.7 | [0.71, 0.83] | — |
| Not infected | 69.1 | [0.61, 0.77] | — |
|
| |||
| Sex | — | — | 0.023 |
| Male | 78.7 | [0.70, 0.87] | — |
| Female | 72.4 | [0.68, 0.77] | — |
|
| |||
| Age | — | — | 0.003 |
| 50–64 years | 75.4 | [0.70, 0.80] | — |
| 65–74 years | 74.8 | [0.67, 0.83] | — |
| 75–84 years | 64.9 | [0.50, 0.80] | — |
| 85+ | 28.6 | [−0.05, 0.62] | — |
|
| |||
| Marital status | — | — | 0.074 |
| Not married | 77.6 | [0.70, 0.85] | — |
| Married | 72.0 | [0.64, 0.80] | — |
| Separated/divorce | 71.9 | [0.56, 0.87] | — |
| Widowed | 72.4 | [0.66, 0.79] | — |
|
| |||
| Level of education | — | — | 0.027 |
| No formal education | 77.8 | [0.72, 0.84] | — |
| Primary | 68.2 | [0.60, 0.76] | — |
| Secondary | 72.4 | [0.64, 0.81] | — |
| Tertiary | 70.0 | [0.42, 0.98] | — |
|
| |||
| Source of drinking water | — | — | 0.000 |
| Other | 50.0 | [-0.19, 1.19] | — |
| Treated tap water | 74.2 | [0.69, 0.79] | — |
| Rainwater | 50.0 | [0.19, 0.81] | — |
| Flowing river/stream | 44.4 | [0.26, 0.63] | — |
| Dam/stagnant water | 81.0 | [0.74, 0.88] | — |
|
| |||
| Household source of income | — | — | 0.000 |
| No source of income | 97.7 | [0.93, 1.02] | — |
| Self-generated income | 66.7 | [0.48, 0.86] | — |
| Wages/salaries | 49.2 | [0.37, 0.62] | — |
| Govt grants | 76.2 | [0.62, 0.72] | — |
| From rental property/retirement fund | 40.0 | [−0.03, 0.83] | — |
|
| |||
| Financial situation of household compared to 3 years ago | — | — | 0.000 |
| Better | 50.0 | [0.34, 0.66] | — |
| About the same | 59.6 | [0.53, 0.67] | — |
| Much worse | 89.8 | [0.86, 0.94] | — |