| Literature DB >> 34257895 |
Gudeta Ararsa1, Eyob Hirpa1, Morka Amante1.
Abstract
Brucellosis is one of the major zoonotic diseases yet prevalent in Ethiopia. It is contagious and has harmful effects on free animal movement and export. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2016 to April 2017 in the Loko and Uke peasant association of Guto Gida District. The goal of this study is to determine the seroprevalence and associated risk factors of bovine brucellosis. The questionnaire survey was conducted on 200 respondents to collect the livestock owner's perception of this disease. Eighty (80) blood samples were collected from grazing cattle above six months of age. Serum was tested by complement fixation test (CFT) for Brucella antibody detection. Pearson chi-square is used to assess the relation of independent variables such as sex, site, and age with seroprevalence in a 95% confidence interval if P value is less than 0.05, recoded as significant. Seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in the present study is 22.5%. Bovine brucellosis prevalence recorded in Uke (28.6%) was higher than that in Loko (21.2%). Again bovine brucellosis is higher in males (30.4%) than females (19.2%). There is prevalence variation among site, sex, and age which is statistically insignificant (P value>0.05). Survey findings revealed that 52% (104/200) of respondents did not know the causes of abortion, while 48% (96/200) of them confirmed abortion in their herd and 64% (124/200) of respondents removed retained fetal membrane by themselves. Brucellosis is a contagious reproductive disease of cattle with zoonotic implications and needs to design and implement control measures aiming at preventing further spread of the disease.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34257895 PMCID: PMC8245253 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6668167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in two peasant association.
| Variables | Category | Tested animals | Positive animals | Prevalence (%) | Chi-square |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peasant association | Uke | 14 | 4 | 28.6 | 0.035 | 0.00 |
| Loko | 66 | 14 | 21.2 | |||
| Total | 80 | 18 | 22.5 |
Seroprevalence of brucellosis analyzed against age and sex.
| Variables | Category | Tested animals | Positive animals | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 23 | 7 | 30.4 |
| Female | 57 | 11 | 19.3 | |
|
| ||||
| Age | Young | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Adult | 74 | 18 | 24.3 | |
Demography of respondent involved in questionnaire survey.
| Variable | Category | Respondent | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education level of owner | Illiterate | 39 | 19.5 |
| Primary | 91 | 45.5 | |
| Secondary | 69 | 34.5 | |
| above | 1 | 0.5 | |
|
| |||
| Owner sex | Male | 147 | 73.5 |
| Female | 53 | 26.5 | |
|
| |||
|
| <30>15 | 38 | 19 |
| <45>31 | 64 | 32 | |
| <60>46 | 76 | 38 | |
| >60 | 22 | 11 | |
|
| |||
| Type of breed they own | Cross breed | 22 | 11 |
| Local breed | 176 | 88 | |
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | |
Distribution of selected risk factors on health care.
| Factors affecting health care | Categories | Respondents | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management system | Extensive | 119 | 59.5 |
| Intensive | 17 | 8.5 | |
| Semi-intensive | 64 | 32 | |
|
| |||
| Breeding technique | Artificial insemination | 55 | 27.5 |
| Natural | 112 | 56 | |
| Both | 33 | 16.5 | |
|
| |||
| Vaccination against | No | 186 | 93 |
| Yes | 14 | 7 | |
|
| |||
| Way of eradication of | Culling of aborted animals | ||
| Yes | 136 | 68 | |
| No | 64 | 32 | |
| Control | |||
| Yes | 134 | 67 | |
| No | 66 | 33 | |
|
| |||
| Where brucellosis highly found | Rural | 16 9 | 84.5 |
| Urban | 13 | 6.5 | |
| Per urban | 17 | 8.5 | |
| None | 1 | ½ | |
Distribution of selected risk factors on economic importance.
| Economic important factors | Categories | Respondents | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Term of abortion (Gatachiisa) | No | 140 | 70 |
| Yes | 60 | 30 | |
|
| |||
| Rate of abortion | 1–5 | 124 | 62 |
| 5–10 | 26 | 13 | |
| >10 | 1 | ½ | |
| None | 49 | 24.5 | |
|
| |||
| Cause of abortion | Yes | 96 | 48 |
| No | 104 | 52 | |
|
| |||
| Loses of economy of country | Yes | 197 | 98.5 |
| No | 3 | 1.5 | |
|
| |||
| Period at animals aborted | First trimmers | 37 | 18.5 |
| Second trimmers | 7 | 3.5 | |
| Third trimmers | 115 | 57.5 | |
| Unknown | 41 | 20.5 | |
Distribution of selected risk factors on public health importance.
| Factors | Categories | Respondents | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission | Consumption | 19 | 9.5 |
| Contact | 37 | 18.5 | |
| Through inhalation | 2 | 1 | |
| Both contact and consumption | 142 | 71 | |
|
| |||
| Host affected by | Human being | 92 | 31.5 |
| Large animals | 103 | 35 | |
| Small animals | 6 | 2 | |
| Avian | 0 | 0 | |
| All species' except avian | 91 | 31 | |
|
| |||
| Whose acquired | Veterinarian | 179 | 89.5 |
| Teachers | 5 | 2.5 | |
| Unknown | 15 | 7.5 | |
| None | 1 | ½ | |