| Literature DB >> 34257879 |
Xin-Ping Duan1,2, Tianyi Chen1, Tianxiang Chen3, Lele Huang2, Li Ye1,4, Benedict T W Lo3, Youzhu Yuan2, Shik Chi Edman Tsang1.
Abstract
CoinageEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34257879 PMCID: PMC8246077 DOI: 10.1039/d1sc01700d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Chemical composition and textural structure properties of 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–M0.05/SBA-15 catalysts
| Catalyst | Metal loading | Alkali/Ag ratio |
|
| Pore size (±0.2)/nm | Particle size | Ag dis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | Alkali | |||||||
| SBA-15 | — | — | — | 804 | 1.05 | 5.5 | — | — |
| 5Ag/SBA-15 | 4.92 | 0 | 0 | 462 | 0.78 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 23.1 |
| 5Ag1–Li0.05/SBA-15 | 4.96 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 471 | 0.79 | 5.6 | 4.6 | 25.6 |
| 5Ag1–Na0.05/SBA-15 | 4.89 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 484 | 0.77 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 24.5 |
| 5Ag1–K0.05/SBA-15 | 4.90 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 475 | 0.81 | 5.7 | 4.4 | 26.8 |
| 5Ag1–Rb0.05/SBA-15 | 4.88 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 468 | 0.74 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 25.1 |
Calculated with data determined by ICP-AES.
Obtained from P/P0 = 0.99.
Determined using the Scherrer equation.
Metal dispersion was estimated using the metal size according to D = 1.178 nm/dAg.
Fig. 1XRD patterns of the as-reduced 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–M0.05/SBA-15 catalysts.
Fig. 2TEM images and HRTEM images of typical regions determined from 5Ag1–Li0.05/SBA-15 catalysts (a–c) compared to 5Ag/SBA (d–f), accompanied by the corresponding average particle size (inset image) and lattice fringes of Li-free and -doped silver nanoparticles.
Catalytic performance of 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–M0.05/SBA-15 catalysts for DMO hydrogenationa at WLHSVDMO = 0.6 h−1
| Catalyst | Conversion/% | Selectivity/% | MG yield/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG | EG | CH4 | Others | |||
| 5Ag/SBA-15 | 42.29 | 97.49 | 2.02 | 0.48 | 0 | 41.23 |
| 5Ag1–Li0.05/SBA-15 | 99.45 | 82.20 | 17.71 | 0.09 | 0 | 81.75 |
| 5Ag1–Na0.05/SBA-15 | 56.56 | 94.62 | 4.85 | 0.36 | 0 | 53.52 |
| 5Ag1–K0.05/SBA-15 | 49.81 | 96.16 | 2.05 | 2.62 | 0.22 | 47.90 |
| 5Ag1–Rb0.05/SBA-15 | 7.63 | 97.53 | 0 | 4.12 | 0 | 7.44 |
Reaction conditions: T = 473 K, P(H2) = 3.0 MPa, H2/DMO molar ratio = 80.
Others include ethanol, 1,2-propanediol and 1,2-butanediol.
Fig. 3(a) Arrhenius plots of the reaction rate (ln(r)) versus 1/T for the DMO hydrogenation over 5Ag1–Li0.05/SBA-15 versus 5Ag/SBA-15 (DMO conversion was set below 25%). (b) Durability test for 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–Li0.05/SBA-15 catalysts under conditions of T = 473 K, P(H2) = 3.0 MPa, H2/DMO = 80, WLHSVDMO = 0.6 h−1.
Catalytic performance of 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–M0.10/SBA-15 catalysts for DMO hydrogenationa at WLHSVDMO = 0.6 h−1
| Catalyst | Conversion/% | Selectivity/% | MG yield/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG | EG | CH4 | Others | |||
| 5Ag/SBA-15 | 42.29 | 97.49 | 2.02 | 0.48 | 0 | 41.23 |
| 5Ag1–Li0.10/SBA-15 | 14.12 | 99.10 | 0 | 0.90 | 0 | 13.99 |
| 5Ag1–Na0.10/SBA-15 | 8.64 | 98.36 | 0 | 1.64 | 0 | 8.50 |
| 5Ag1–K0.10/SBA-15 | 5.73 | 94.47 | 0 | 4.22 | 0 | 5.41 |
| 5Ag1–Rb0.10/SBA-15 | 1.55 | 97.63 | 0 | 3.96 | 0 | 1.51 |
Reaction conditions: T = 473 K, P(H2) = 3.0 MPa, H2/DMO molar ratio = 80.
Others include ethanol, 1,2-propanediol and 1,2-butanediol.
Catalytic performance of 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–M0.05/SBA-15 catalysts for DMO hydrogenationa at WLHSVDMO = 1.0 h−1
| Catalyst | Conversion/% | Selectivity/% | MG yield/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG | EG | CH4 | Others | |||
| 5Ag/SBA-15 | 27.23 | 99.59 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 27.12 |
| 5Ag1–Li0.05/SBA-15 | 85.51 | 93.14 | 6.72 | 0.15 | 0 | 79.64 |
| 5Ag1–Na0.05/SBA-15 | 37.28 | 91.80 | 5.47 | 0.43 | 0 | 34.22 |
| 5Ag1–K0.05/SBA-15 | 28.15 | 95.57 | 1.48 | 2.95 | 0 | 25.84 |
| 5Ag1–Rb0.05/SBA-15 | 4.21 | 95.10 | 0 | 4.90 | 0 | 4.00 |
Reaction conditions: T = 473 K, P(H2) = 3.0 MPa, H2/DMO molar ratio = 80.
Others include ethanol, 1,2-propanediol and 1,2-butanediol.
Fig. 4(a) Ag 3d XPS spectra of as-reduced 5Ag/SBA-15 and 5Ag1–M0.05/SBA-15 catalysts. (b) FTIR spectra of CO adsorption on reduced 5Ag1–Li/SBA-15 catalysts.
Fig. 5(a) PDF patterns of %Ag/C (black) and Ag-intLi0.10/C (red). (b) Data fitting of experimental Ag/C (blue) to the theoretical value (red) with an Rwp of 20.968%. (c) Data fitting of experimental Ag-intLi0.14 (blue) to the theoretical value (red) with an Rwp of 19.614%. (d) A simple crystal model based on Li+ placed in the octahedral sites of the Ag FCC lattice. The data were collected over the range of 0.2 < Q < 17 Å−1. This was corrected for background, Compton and multiple scattering, and beam attenuation by the sample holder interference using the Rigaku-XPDF package, which outputted the PDF as a g(r) function.
Fig. 6Simultaneously acquired Z-contrast STEM-ADF and ptychographic phase images of a Ag-intLi/C NP oriented in the [110] zone axis. (a) Z-contrast STEM-ADF image of a Ag-intLi/C NP. (b) Enlarged image of the area of the NP marked in (a); Li position is hardly visualized. (c) Ptychographic phase image reconstructed using a Wigner Distribution Deconvolution (WDD) method after aberration correction – see the ESI.† (d) Enlarged image of the area of the NP marked in (c). The enlarged image shows contrast visible in octahedral positions (blue) between the Ag columns (white), which can be superimposed to the model predicted by XPDF within the degree of distortion.