Literature DB >> 3425786

A comparative electromyographic analysis of the shoulder during pitching. Professional versus amateur pitchers.

I D Gowan1, F W Jobe, J E Tibone, J Perry, D R Moynes.   

Abstract

Dynamic, fine-wire, intramuscular electromyography (EMG) was performed on 12 different shoulder muscles in 13 normal male subjects as they pitched a baseball. Seven were major league baseball pitchers and six were amateur pitchers. The act of pitching a fast ball was filmed at 450 frames per second with the EMG signals recorded synchronously. The subscapularis, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles were tested in 13 subjects, the biceps brachii muscle was tested in 12, and other shoulder muscles were tested variously among the subjects. Two groups of muscles were identified. Group I muscles, the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, deltoid, trapezius, and biceps brachii, served primarily to position the shoulder and elbow for the delivery of the pitch. These muscles were found to have greater activity during the early and late cooking stages, with less activity during acceleration. Group II muscles accelerated the arm and baseball forward in space. These muscles, the pectoralis major, serratus anterior, subscapularis, and latissimus dorsi, had stronger activity during the propulsive phase of the pitch. The professional pitchers were able to use the muscles about the shoulder in an efficient manner to achieve greater pitching velocities. The subscapularis and latissimus dorsi muscles of Group II had stronger activity among the professionals, whereas the supraspinatus, teres minor, and biceps brachii muscles of Group I had only minimal activity. The amateurs, on the other hand, continued to use all of the rotator cuff muscles and the biceps brachii muscle of Group I through the acceleration stage of the pitch.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3425786     DOI: 10.1177/036354658701500611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  42 in total

1.  A novel technique to measure active tendon forces: application to the subscapularis tendon.

Authors:  Anthony M J Bull; Peter Reilly; Andrew L Wallace; Andrew A Amis; Roger J H Emery
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Braking of elbow extension in fast overarm throws made by skilled and unskilled subjects.

Authors:  J Hore; D B Debicki; S Watts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Electromyographic analysis in patients with multidirectional shoulder instability during pull, forward punch, elevation and overhead throw.

Authors:  Arpád Illyés; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patterns of shoulder flexibility among college baseball players.

Authors:  L Johnson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The role of the scapula in the rehabilitation of shoulder injuries.

Authors:  M L Voight; B C Thomson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Management of rotator cuff and impingement injuries in the athlete.

Authors:  G R Williams; M Kelley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Posterior rotator cuff strengthening using theraband(r) in a functional diagonal pattern in collegiate baseball pitchers.

Authors:  P A Page; J Lamberth; B Abadie; R Boling; R Collins; R Linton
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Functional plyometric exercises for the throwing athlete.

Authors:  D J Pezzullo; S Karas; J J Irrgang
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Pitching mechanics, revisited.

Authors:  Gary J Calabrese
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

10.  Case reports: unusual cause of shoulder pain in a collegiate baseball player.

Authors:  Cassandra A Ligh; Brian L Schulman; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.