| Literature DB >> 34257851 |
Benzhen Guo1, Yanli Ma1, Jingjing Yang1, Zhihui Wang1.
Abstract
Introduction: Health monitoring and remote diagnosis can be realized through Smart Healthcare. In view of the existing problems such as simple measurement parameters of wearable devices, huge computing pressure of cloud servers, and lack of individualization of diagnosis, a novel Cloud-Internet of Things (C-IOT) framework for medical monitoring is put forward.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34257851 PMCID: PMC8260290 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4109102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1System architecture.
Figure 2Blood pressure measurement method.
Data standardization.
| Index | Range of measurement value | Range of standard value |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 0–150 kg | 0–255 |
| Fat | 0%–50% | 0–255 |
| SP | 0–250 mmHg | 0–255 |
| DP | 0–250 mmHg | 0–255 |
| HR | 0–200 bpm | 0–255 |
| APP | 0–200 mmHg | 0–255 |
| MAP | 0–300 mmHg | 0–255 |
| ARPP | 0–50000 | 0–255 |
| Step num | 0–30000 | 0–255 |
| Distance | 0–20 km | 0–255 |
| Fast motion time | 0–24 h | 0–255 |
| Fast motion distance | 0–20 km | 0–255 |
| Length of sleeping | 0–24 h | 0–255 |
| Length of awakening | 0–24 h | 0–255 |
| Body temperature | 30–45°C | 0–255 |
Human health map.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|
| ||||||
| 1 | SP1 | DP1 | HR1 | APP1 | MAP1 | ARPP1 |
| 2 | SP2 | DP2 | HR2 | APP2 | MAP2 | ARPP2 |
| 3 | Weight | Fat | ||||
| 4 | Step num | Distance | Fast motion time | Fast motion distance | Length of sleeping | Length of awakening |
| 5 | Body temperature1 | |||||
| 6 | Body temperature2 | |||||
Figure 32D images of human health.
Figure 4CNN model architecture.
Blood pressure measurement verification results.
| SP (mmHg) (PM-900S) | SP (mmHg) (test node) | Error (%) | DP (mmHg) (PM-900S) | DP (mmHg) (test node) | Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120 | 123 | 2.5 | 83 | 86 | 3.6 |
| 2 | 107 | 112 | 4.7 | 78 | 82 | 5.1 |
| 3 | 124 | 130 | 4.8 | 89 | 86 | 3.4 |
| 4 | 109 | 105 | 3.7 | 78 | 81 | 3.8 |
| 5 | 140 | 145 | 3.6 | 95 | 99 | 4.2 |
Figure 5(a) Blood pressure measurement node device. (b) Step monitoring node device.
Step monitoring node verification results.
| Step num (honor3) | Step num (test node) | Error (%) | Amount of sleep (h) (honor3) | Amount of sleep (h) (test node) | Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5600 | 5743 | 2.6 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 3.1 |
| 2 | 8212 | 7920 | 3.6 | 7.4 | 7.0 | 5.4 |
| 3 | 15401 | 16280 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 7.7 | 6.1 |
| 4 | 7231 | 7102 | 1.8 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 11005 | 10098 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 4.3 |
Figure 6Classification accuracy of each subject. Each bar and the corresponding error bar show the average classification accuracy with standard deviation of three health patterns.
Figure 7Confusion matrices acquired by the CNN model. (a–f) The confusion matrix of S1–S6.
Figure 8Precision, recall, and F1-score obtained by the CNN model. (a–f) The result curves of S1–S6.