Literature DB >> 34257323

The foggy effect of egocentric distance in a nonverbal paradigm.

Bo Dong1, Airui Chen1, Yuting Zhang1, Yangyang Zhang2, Ming Zhang3,4, Tianyang Zhang5.   

Abstract

Inaccurate egocentric distance and speed perception are two main explanations for the high accident rate associated with driving in foggy weather. The effect of foggy weather on speed has been well studied. However, its effect on egocentric distance perception is poorly understood. The paradigm for measuring perceived egocentric distance in previous studies was verbal estimation instead of a nonverbal paradigm. In the current research, a nonverbal paradigm, the visual matching task, was used. Our results from the nonverbal task revealed a robust foggy effect on egocentric distance. Observers overestimated the egocentric distance in foggy weather compared to in clear weather. The higher the concentration of fog, the more serious the overestimation. This effect of fog on egocentric distance was not limited to a certain distance range but was maintained in action space and vista space. Our findings confirm the foggy effect with a nonverbal paradigm and reveal that people may perceive egocentric distance more "accurately" in foggy weather than when it is measured with a verbal estimation task.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34257323     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93380-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  30 in total

1.  Distance perception of vehicle rear lights in fog.

Authors:  V Cavallo; M Colomb; J Doré
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Effects of reduced contrast on the perception and control of speed when driving.

Authors:  D Alfred Owens; Joanne Wood; Trent Carberry
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Simulation of Driving in Low-Visibility Conditions: Does Stereopsis Improve Speed Perception?

Authors:  Kevin R Brooks; Mohammed E Rafat
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Reducing contrast makes speeds in a video-based driving simulator harder to discriminate as well as making them appear slower.

Authors:  Mark S Horswill; Annaliese M Plooy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops.

Authors:  R J Snowden; N Stimpson; R A Ruddle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Motion prediction at low contrast.

Authors:  Claudio de'Sperati; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.

Authors:  Johnell O Brooks; Matthew C Crisler; Nathan Klein; Richard Goodenough; Rebekkah W Beeco; Chris Guirl; Peg J Tyler; Anna Hilpert; Yarbough Miller; Jason Grygier; Brooke Burroughs; Ashley Martin; Rob Ray; Cody Palmer; Christine Beck
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2010-12-15

9.  Can headway reduction in fog be explained by impaired perception of relative motion?

Authors:  Stéphane Caro; Viola Cavallo; Christian Marendaz; Erwin R Boer; Fabrice Vienne
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Foggy perception slows us down.

Authors:  Paolo Pretto; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Gregor Rainer; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.