Caitlin Lythgoe1, Kirsty Lowe1, Mary McCauley1,2, Hannah McCauley3. 1. Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. 2. Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK. 3. Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. Hannah.McCauley@lstmed.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is a global health concern with the highest burden documented after childbirth in women and babies living in sub-Saharan Africa. To date, there is limited information on the quality of postnatal care and/or whether evidence-based interventions to improve postnatal care in a way that meets the specific health needs of each mother and her baby have been lacking. There is also limited data related to how quality of care (respectful or disrespectful) influences women's decision to access postnatal care. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review available qualitative evidence for how quality of care (respectful or disrespectful) influences perceptions and experiences of, and decisions to, access postnatal care for women living in sub-Saharan Africa. SEARCH STRATEGY: CINAHL plus, Cochrane library, Global Health, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science were searched from 2009-2019. Grey literature was searched on Google Scholar. SELECTION CRITERIA: Qualitative literature in English describing women's perceptions and experiences of the quality of care they received after childbirth and how this influenced their perceptions of and decisions to access postnatal care. DATA ANALYSIS: Thematic analysis was performed to extract subthemes and themes. Outcomes were themes from the qualitative data used to form a thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included with data from 985 women interviewed face-to-face across eight countries. Descriptions of respectful care included healthcare providers being kind, supportive and attentive to women's needs. Women described preferring healthcare services where the healthcare providers communicated in a respectful and caring manner. Descriptions of disrespectful care included verbal and/or physical abuse and power imbalances between women and healthcare providers. Some women were denied postnatal care when attending a healthcare facility after giving birth at home. There is evidence to suggest that vulnerable women (adolescents; women with poor socioeconomic status; women who are HIV positive) are more likely to receive disrespectful care. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review describes how aspects of respectful and disrespectful maternity care influence women's perceptions and experiences of, and decisions to access postnatal care services. There is a need for a renewed focus to prioritise respectful maternity care and to sustainably provide good quality postnatal care to all women and their babies in a way that meets their expectations and health needs.
BACKGROUND: The burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is a global health concern with the highest burden documented after childbirth in women and babies living in sub-Saharan Africa. To date, there is limited information on the quality of postnatal care and/or whether evidence-based interventions to improve postnatal care in a way that meets the specific health needs of each mother and her baby have been lacking. There is also limited data related to how quality of care (respectful or disrespectful) influences women's decision to access postnatal care. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review available qualitative evidence for how quality of care (respectful or disrespectful) influences perceptions and experiences of, and decisions to, access postnatal care for women living in sub-Saharan Africa. SEARCH STRATEGY: CINAHL plus, Cochrane library, Global Health, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science were searched from 2009-2019. Grey literature was searched on Google Scholar. SELECTION CRITERIA: Qualitative literature in English describing women's perceptions and experiences of the quality of care they received after childbirth and how this influenced their perceptions of and decisions to access postnatal care. DATA ANALYSIS: Thematic analysis was performed to extract subthemes and themes. Outcomes were themes from the qualitative data used to form a thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included with data from 985 women interviewed face-to-face across eight countries. Descriptions of respectful care included healthcare providers being kind, supportive and attentive to women's needs. Women described preferring healthcare services where the healthcare providers communicated in a respectful and caring manner. Descriptions of disrespectful care included verbal and/or physical abuse and power imbalances between women and healthcare providers. Some women were denied postnatal care when attending a healthcare facility after giving birth at home. There is evidence to suggest that vulnerable women (adolescents; women with poor socioeconomic status; women who are HIV positive) are more likely to receive disrespectful care. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review describes how aspects of respectful and disrespectful maternity care influence women's perceptions and experiences of, and decisions to access postnatal care services. There is a need for a renewed focus to prioritise respectful maternity care and to sustainably provide good quality postnatal care to all women and their babies in a way that meets their expectations and health needs.
Authors: Tabassum Firoz; Doris Chou; Peter von Dadelszen; Priya Agrawal; Rachel Vanderkruik; Ozge Tunçalp; Laura A Magee; Nynke van Den Broek; Lale Say Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: M L Abel Ntambue; K Françoise Malonga; Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet; Philippe Donnen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Timothy Abuya; Charlotte E Warren; Nora Miller; Rebecca Njuki; Charity Ndwiga; Alice Maranga; Faith Mbehero; Anne Njeru; Ben Bellows Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 3.240