| Literature DB >> 34256639 |
Yanmei Xu1, Xuehua Ma2, Yong Ma3, Juan Li4, Renya Zhang5, Xiaomei Li6.
Abstract
Much attention has been paid to renal hemangioblastoma, but there are still challenges in its differential diagnosis. Three cases (2 men, 1 woman; age: 40-56 years) presented with renal tumors. The tumors were surrounded by a thick fibrous capsule, well-demarcated from the surrounding renal parenchyma, and composed of sheets or nests of polygonal to short spindle-shaped tumor cells with a rich capillary network. In cases 1 and 3, the large polygonal tumor cells contained abundant pale or eosinophilic cytoplasm, and some possessed intracytoplasmic lipid vacuoles. In case 2, tumor cells were characterized by a uniform size, mild, clear, or lightly stained cytoplasm, and typical "clear cell" appearance. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the polygonal stromal cells were strongly and diffusely positive for α-inhibin, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100 protein, and vimentin. Cluster of differentiation (CD)10 and paired box gene (PAX)8 were positive, while epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and cytokeratin (CK) were focally positive in case 3. CD34 and CD31 outlined the contours and distribution of the vascular networks. Renal hemangioblastoma is rare and prone to misdiagnosis; more attention should be paid to the morphological features and reasonable application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of hemangioblastoma.Entities:
Keywords: Hemangioblastoma; histology; immunohistochemistry; kidney; tumor; von Hippel–Lindau disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34256639 PMCID: PMC8283055 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211027774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Antibody information in our and case of renal hemangioblastoma.
| Antibody | Clone | Source | Dilution |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | AE1/AE3 | Dako | 1:100 |
| EMA | E29 | Dako | 1:500 |
| CK8/18 | Cam5.2 | Dako | 1:200 |
| Vimentin | V9 | Dako | 1:200 |
| CD10 | 56C6 | Novocastra Laboratories | prediluted |
| Syn | polyclone | Dako | 1:200 |
| CgA | polyclone | Dako | 1:100 |
| NSE | polyclone | Dako | 1:100 |
| CD56 | 123C3 | Dako | 1:500 |
| CD34 | QBEnd/10 | Dako | 1:50 |
| CD31 | JC/70A | Dako | 1:50 |
| PAX8 | polyclone | Proteintech Group | 1:800 |
| α-inhibin | R1 | Dako | 1:50 |
| HMB45 | polyclone | Dako | 1:50 |
| MelanA | A103 | Novocastra Laboratories | 1:100 |
| S100 | polyclone | Dako | 1:2000 |
| Desmin | D33 | Dako | 1:50 |
| SMA | 1A4 | Dako | 1:200 |
| Ki67 | MIB-1 | Dako | 1:50 |
CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; CD10, cluster of differentiation 10; CgA, human chromogranin A; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; PAX8, paired box gene 8; SMA, smooth muscle actin; Dako, DAKO Diagnostics, Mississauga, Canada; Novocastra Laboratories, Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Proteintech Group, Proteintech Group Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
Figure 1.Computed tomography (CT) and macroscopic findings. (a) CT image showing a heterogeneous soft tissue mass at the mid-lateral pole of the right kidney in case 1. (b) The cut surface of the tumor was a grayish-red to grayish-brown color. The tumor was solid and tough, with no necrosis or cystic degeneration. (c) A round mass was seen at the middle pole of the right kidney in case 2, with a clear boundary and significant enhancement. (d) The tumor was solid and tough, and the cut surface was a grayish-red and grayish-brown color with a small grayish-white area in the center. No necrosis or cystic changes were observed. (e) CT image in case 3 showing a rounded mass in the dorsal right kidney. The lesion had a clear boundary, protruded extrarenally and pelvically, and had low-density necrosis. (f) A well-circumscribed, soft grayish-brown tumor is visible in the middle of the kidney.
Figure 2.Histological features. (a) Case 2. The tumor is surrounded by a thick fibrous capsule and is well-demarcated from the surrounding renal parenchyma under low magnification (×5). (b) The large polygonal tumor cells contain abundant pale or eosinophilic cytoplasm. Some of the cells contain intracytoplasmic lipid vacuoles (case 3) under high magnification. (c) Cell morphology, nuclear size, and atypical features of some cells in case 1 under high magnification. (d) Tumor cells are characterized by uniform size with mild, clear, or lightly stained cytoplasm and typical "clear cell" appearance (case 2) under high magnification. (e) Significant stromal cell hyaline degeneration in case 3 under high magnification. (f) Psammoma-like calcification in case 3 under high magnification.
The magnification in panels b–f was ×40.
Figure 3.Immunohistochemical findings. (a) Tumor cells demonstrating diffuse and strong reactivity for α-inhibin in case 1 under high magnification. (b) Diffusely and strongly positive reaction against neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in case 1 under high magnification. (c) S100 positive expression in case 2 under high magnification. (d) Diffusely positive reaction against cluster of differentiation (CD)10 in case 3 under high magnification. (e) Tumor cells positive for PAX8 in case 3 under high magnification. (f) CD34 highlighted in the endothelial cells lining the rich vascular network in case 2 under high magnification.
The magnification in all panels was ×20.
Summary of the results for each antibody for all three cases.
| Antibody | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | − | − | Focal + |
| EMA | − | − | Focal + |
| CK8/18 | − | − | − |
| Vimentin | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ |
| CD10 | − | − | 1+ |
| Syn | − | − | − |
| CgA | − | − | − |
| NSE | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ |
| CD56 | − | − | − |
| CD34 | vascular networks+ | vascular networks+ | vascular networks+ |
| CD31 | vascular networks+ | vascular networks+ | vascular networks+ |
| PAX8 | − | − | 1+ |
| α-inhibin | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ |
| HMB45 | − | − | − |
| MelanA | − | − | − |
| S100 | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ |
| Desmin | − | − | − |
| SMA | − | − | − |
| Ki67 | 2% | 3% | 2% |
CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; CD10, cluster of differentiation 10; CgA, human chromogranin A; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; PAX8, paired box gene 8; SMA, smooth muscle actin.
Clinical characteristics of the 27 reported cases of renal hemangioblastoma.
| Year | Reference | Site/size (cm) | Age (years) | Sex | Clinical features of VHL | VHL gene testing | Follow-up findings/ duration (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Nonaka et al.
| R/6.8 | 71 | M | None | No | NED/108 |
| 2010 | Ip et al.
| R/5 | 58 | M | None | Yes | NED/24 |
| 2010 | Ip et al.
| R/3.5 | 55 | F | None | No | NED/5 |
| 2011 | Verine et al.
| L/3.2 | 64 | M | None | No | NED/12 |
| 2012 | Wang et al.
| R/2.7 | 29 | M | None | Yes | NED/20 |
| 2012 | Liu et al.
| L/1.2 | 16 | F | None | No | NED/6 |
| 2012 | Yin et al.
| R/5.3 | 61 | M | None | No | NED/12 |
| 2013 | Wang et al.
| R/6.5 | 61 | M | None | No | NED/12 |
| 2013 | Jiang et al.
| R/3 | 51 | M | None | Yes | NED/6 |
| 2013 | Zhao et al.
| R/6 | 51 | F | None | No | NED/12 |
| 2014 | Doyle and Fletcher
| R/4.5 | 58 | M | None | No | NED/19 |
| 2014 | Doyle and Fletcher
| L/2–15 (three tumors) | 42 | F | None | No | NED/5 |
| 2014 | Doyle and Fletcher
| R/2.7 | 29 | M | None | No | NED/32 |
| 2015 | Kuroda et al.
| L/3.6 | 37 | M | None | No | NED/Not stated |
| 2015 | Wu et al.
| R/3.2 | 30 | M | None | No | Died |
| 2015 | Wu et al.
| R/unknown | 57 | F | None | No | NED/Not stated |
| 2015 | Wu et al.
| R/2.3 | 48 | M | None | No | NED/42 |
| 2015 | Wu et al.
| L/4.1 | 25 | M | None | No | NED/27 |
| 2015 | Wu et al.
| L/unknown | 36 | F | None | No | NED/3 |
| 2017 | Xu et al.
| L/2.2 | 61 | M | None | Yes | NED/72 |
| 2018 | Muscarella et al.
| L/3.5 | 19 | F | None | Yes | NED/96 |
| 2018 | Muscarella et al.
| R/3 | 28 | F | None | Yes | NED/108 |
| 2018 | Muscarella et al.
| R/3.1 | 47 | M | None | Yes | NED/84 |
| 2018 | Muscarella et al.
| R/unknown | Unknown | Unknown | None | Yes | Not available |
| Current case | R/3 | 40 | M | None | No | NED/108 | |
| Current case | R/2 | 45 | F | None | No | NED/72 | |
| Current case | R/8 | 56 | M | None | No | NED/60 |
R, right; L, left; M, male; F, female; NED, no evidence of disease; VHL, von Hippel–Lindau disease.