Literature DB >> 34256246

False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions.

Philip M Fernbach1, Leaf Van Boven2.   

Abstract

Although political polarization in the United States is real, intense, and increasing, partisans consistently overestimate its magnitude. This 'false polarization' is insidious because it reinforces actual polarization and inhibits compromise. We review empirical research on false polarization and the related phenomenon of negative meta-perceptions, and we propose three cognitive and affective processes that likely contribute to these phenomena: categorical thinking, oversimplification, and emotional amplification. Finally, we review several interventions that have shown promise in mitigating these biases.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biases; Cognition; False Polarization; Meta-Perceptions; Political Psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34256246     DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol        ISSN: 2352-250X


  2 in total

1.  Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Most users do not follow political elites on Twitter; those who do show overwhelming preferences for ideological congruity.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojcieszak; Andreu Casas; Xudong Yu; Jonathan Nagler; Joshua A Tucker
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 14.957

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.