Literature DB >> 34256110

Risk and influencing factors for subsequent primary lung cancer after treatment of breast cancer: a systematic review and two meta-analyses based on four million cases.

Yan Wang1, Jialong Li1, Shuai Chang1, Yingxian Dong1, Guowei Che2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the risk of developing lung cancer between breast cancer patients and the general population and explore the risk factors for the development of primary lung cancer after treatment for breast cancer.
METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched from the establishment date to October 11, 2020. Two separate meta-analyses were performed: one focused on studies reporting the risk of subsequent lung cancer after breast cancer and one focused on studies exploring the risk factors for subsequent lung cancer in breast cancer patients. The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to compare the risk of developing lung cancer between breast cancer patients and the general population. The relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were combined to assess the association of clinicopathological parameters with the risk of developing lung cancer after breast cancer. All statistical analyses were conducted by STATA 12.0.
RESULTS: A total of 15 studies involving 1,161,979 patients were eventually included in the first meta-analysis, and the pooled results indicated that female patients with breast cancer showed a significantly higher risk of developing subsequent lung cancer (SIR=1.25, P<0.001). In addition, a total of 22 articles involving 3,090,620 patients were included in the second meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that smoking (OR=9.73, P<0.001) and radiotherapy (RR=1.40, P<0.001) were risk factors for developing subsequent lung cancer in breast cancer patients, and chemotherapy (RR=0.69, P=0.002), positive estrogen receptor (ER) status (RR=0.93, P=0.014) and positive progesterone receptor (PR) status (RR=0.86, P<0.001) were protective factors. Meanwhile, subgroup analysis based on the relative position of the breast and lung cancers (ipsilateral vs contralateral) was conducted, which indicated that radiotherapy only increased the risk of ipsilateral lung cancer in breast cancer patients (RR=1.27, P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients are more likely to develop lung cancer than the general population, and the risk of developing primary lung cancer after breast cancer is affected by smoking, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, ER status and PR status.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; influencing factors; risk; subsequent primary lung cancer; systematic review and meta-analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34256110     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  7 in total

1.  X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1): a potential role in chemotherapy response, clinical pathologic features, non-inflamed tumour microenvironment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhipeng Zhu; Hongliang Zhan; Anran Sun; Heqing Huang; Baisheng Chen; Fuxing Zhang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.976

2.  The genomic and transcriptome characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma patients with previous breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Wenpeng Song; Sicheng Zhou; Shuai Chang; Junke Chang; Jie Tian; Liming Zhang; Jue Li; Guowei Che
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Prognostic value of computed tomography derived skeletal muscle mass index in lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue-Lin Pan; Hong-Jun Li; Zhen Li; Zhen-Lin Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Risk Factors for Brain Metastases in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haiyan Zeng; Danyang Zheng; Willem J A Witlox; Antonin Levy; Alberto Traverso; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Ruud Houben; Dirk K M De Ruysscher; Lizza E L Hendriks
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Comparison of Long-Term Survival Between cT1N0 Stage Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Endoscopic Dissection and Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Peng Li; Wu Wen; Yi Jian
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Prognostic value of neutrophil/lymphocyte, platelet/lymphocyte, lymphocyte/monocyte ratios and Glasgow prognostic score in osteosarcoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Peng Peng; Jie Li; Xian-Feng Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Prognostic value of YKL-40 in colorectal carcinoma patients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Shi Qi; Yu-Bing Zhu; Lei Ding
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.