OBJECTIVE: Whether periodontitis increases the risk of diabetic microangiopathy remains controversial. The present meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between periodontitis and diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang data were searched without language restrictions. The methodological quality of the studies included was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale method, and meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the risk of periodontitis for diabetic microangiopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Thirteen cross-sectional studies, covering 10 570 participants, were included in the present meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that periodontitis was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetic microangiopathy (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.65-3.56), diabetic retinopathy (OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 2.19-8.55), and diabetic nephropathy (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.85), while periodontitis was not associated with diabetic neuropathy (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.19-5.12). Subgroup analysis among the studies in Asian (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.94-4.84) and North American (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86) populations confirmed the existed association between periodontitis and type 2 diabetic microangiopathy. The relationship still existed in groups with sample size larger than 500 (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.34-2.34) and smaller than 500 (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.38-8.03). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results by excluding moderate quality studies or removing articles one after the other. CONCLUSION: Current evidences have proved that periodontitis is associated with increased risk of diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This conclusion may provide useful evidence for correlated clinical researches. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021247773.
OBJECTIVE: Whether periodontitis increases the risk of diabetic microangiopathy remains controversial. The present meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between periodontitis and diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang data were searched without language restrictions. The methodological quality of the studies included was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale method, and meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the risk of periodontitis for diabetic microangiopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Thirteen cross-sectional studies, covering 10 570 participants, were included in the present meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that periodontitis was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetic microangiopathy (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.65-3.56), diabetic retinopathy (OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 2.19-8.55), and diabetic nephropathy (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.85), while periodontitis was not associated with diabetic neuropathy (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.19-5.12). Subgroup analysis among the studies in Asian (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.94-4.84) and North American (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86) populations confirmed the existed association between periodontitis and type 2 diabetic microangiopathy. The relationship still existed in groups with sample size larger than 500 (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.34-2.34) and smaller than 500 (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.38-8.03). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results by excluding moderate quality studies or removing articles one after the other. CONCLUSION: Current evidences have proved that periodontitis is associated with increased risk of diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This conclusion may provide useful evidence for correlated clinical researches. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021247773.
Authors: Nanae Dewake; Yukiko Iwasaki; Akira Taguchi; Nobuyuki Udagawa; Nobuo Yoshinari Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 4.614