Literature DB >> 34253196

Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing.

Yeshwant Reddy Chillakuru1,2, Shourya Munjal1,3, Benjamin Laguna1, Timothy L Chen1, Gunvant R Chaudhari1, Thienkhai Vu1, Youngho Seo1, Jared Narvid1, Jae Ho Sohn4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to MRI protocol assignment is essential for the efficient delivery of safe patient care. Advances in natural language processing (NLP) allow for the development of accurate automated protocol assignment. We aim to develop, evaluate, and deploy an NLP model that automates protocol assignment, given the clinician indication text.
METHODS: We collected 7139 spine MRI protocols (routine or contrast) and 990 head MRI protocols (routine brain, contrast brain, or other) from a single institution. Protocols were split into training (n = 4997 for spine MRI; n = 839 for head MRI), validation (n = 1071 for spine MRI, fivefold cross-validation used for head MRI), and test (n = 1071 for spine MRI; n = 151 for head MRI) sets. fastText and XGBoost were used to develop 2 NLP models to classify spine and head MRI protocols, respectively. A Flask-based web app was developed to be deployed via Heroku.
RESULTS: The spine MRI model had an accuracy of 83.38% and a receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.8873. The head MRI model had an accuracy of 85.43% with a routine brain protocol ROC-AUC of 0.9463 and contrast brain protocol ROC-AUC of 0.9284. Cancer, infectious, and inflammatory related keywords were associated with contrast administration. Structural anatomic abnormalities and stroke/altered mental status were indicative of routine spine and brain MRI, respectively. Error analysis revealed increasing the sample size may improve performance for head MRI protocols. A web version of the model is provided for demonstration and deployment.
CONCLUSION: We developed and web-deployed two NLP models that accurately predict spine and head MRI protocol assignment, which could improve radiology workflow efficiency.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automation; Natural language processing; Neuroimaging; Protocol

Year:  2021        PMID: 34253196     DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01574-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  1 in total

1.  Intelligent Word Embeddings of Free-Text Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Sriraman Madhavan; Roger Eric Goldman; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16
  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Automated Protocoling for MRI Exams-Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Jonas Denck; Oliver Haas; Jens Guehring; Andreas Maier; Eva Rothgang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.