Janet H Pollard1,2, Yusuf Menda1, K D Zamba3, Mark Madsen1, M Sue O'Dorisio4, Thomas O'Dorisio5, David Bushnell1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 2. Iowa City Veterans Administration Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, and University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Abstract
Background: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been shown in preclinical studies to upregulate norepinephrine transporters in neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma, and somatostatin receptors in pulmonary carcinoid, small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic neuroendocrine malignancies. This pilot imaging study in humans focuses on midgut neuroendocrine carcinoma metastatic to the liver, evaluating the effect of pretreatment with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat on uptake of 123I-MIBG and 68Ga-DOTATOC. Materials and Methods: Multiple midgut neuroendocrine liver metastases in clinically stable subjects were imaged with 123I-MIBG and 68Ga-DOTATOC before and after a 4-d course of vorinostat. Scans were performed with strict attention to detail and timed about 1 month apart occurring just before monthly long-acting octreotide administrations. Uptake changes in tumor and normal liver parenchyma were assessed on positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with standardized uptake values and on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with qualitative ratio images. Results: The experimental units were metastatic liver lesions within patients (n = 50). There was no significant difference in administered activity or uptake time between pairs of scans for either radiotracer. Statistically significant increase in maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) averaged over all lesions was noted on the 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans (+11%, p < 0.01). SUVmax in normal liver showed no significant change (p = 0.12). There was no qualitative change in uptake of 123I-MIBG after vorinostat. Conclusions: In this pilot imaging study in patients with midgut neuroendocrine liver metastases, a short course of the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat induced a statistically significant increase in SUVmax on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging in some hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases. There was no significant effect of vorinostat on tumor uptake of 123I-MIBG on SPECT/CT imaging. Given the pilot nature of this trial, the findings merit further investigation with a more rigorous protocol evaluating longer pretreatment and different dosages of vorinostat or other HDAC inhibitors, as well as effects on the therapeutic capability of 177Lu- or 90Y-somatostatin analogs.
Background: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been shown in preclinical studies to upregulate norepinephrine transporters in neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma, and somatostatin receptors in pulmonary carcinoid, small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic neuroendocrine malignancies. This pilot imaging study in humans focuses on midgut neuroendocrine carcinoma metastatic to the liver, evaluating the effect of pretreatment with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat on uptake of 123I-MIBG and 68Ga-DOTATOC. Materials and Methods: Multiple midgut neuroendocrine liver metastases in clinically stable subjects were imaged with 123I-MIBG and 68Ga-DOTATOC before and after a 4-d course of vorinostat. Scans were performed with strict attention to detail and timed about 1 month apart occurring just before monthly long-acting octreotide administrations. Uptake changes in tumor and normal liver parenchyma were assessed on positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with standardized uptake values and on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with qualitative ratio images. Results: The experimental units were metastatic liver lesions within patients (n = 50). There was no significant difference in administered activity or uptake time between pairs of scans for either radiotracer. Statistically significant increase in maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) averaged over all lesions was noted on the 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans (+11%, p < 0.01). SUVmax in normal liver showed no significant change (p = 0.12). There was no qualitative change in uptake of 123I-MIBG after vorinostat. Conclusions: In this pilot imaging study in patients with midgut neuroendocrine liver metastases, a short course of the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat induced a statistically significant increase in SUVmax on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging in some hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases. There was no significant effect of vorinostat on tumor uptake of 123I-MIBG on SPECT/CT imaging. Given the pilot nature of this trial, the findings merit further investigation with a more rigorous protocol evaluating longer pretreatment and different dosages of vorinostat or other HDAC inhibitors, as well as effects on the therapeutic capability of 177Lu- or 90Y-somatostatin analogs.
Authors: Yusuf Menda; M Sue O'Dorisio; Simon Kao; Geetika Khanna; Stacy Michael; Mary Connolly; John Babich; Thomas O'Dorisio; David Bushnell; Mark Madsen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yusuf Menda; Laura L Boles Ponto; Michael K Schultz; Gideon K D Zamba; G Leonard Watkins; David L Bushnell; Mark T Madsen; John J Sunderland; Michael M Graham; Thomas M O'Dorisio; M Sue O'Dorisio Journal: Pancreas Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Marije J Veenstra; Peter M van Koetsveld; Fadime Dogan; William E Farrell; Richard A Feelders; Steven W J Lamberts; Wouter W de Herder; Giovanni Vitale; Leo J Hofland Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-05-19
Authors: Tibor Vag; Katja Steiger; Andreas Rossmann; Ulrich Keller; Aurelia Noske; Peter Herhaus; Johannes Ettl; Markus Niemeyer; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Markus Schwaiger Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Rachael E Guenter; Tolulope Aweda; Danilea M Carmona Matos; Jason Whitt; Alexander W Chang; Eric Y Cheng; X Margaret Liu; Herbert Chen; Suzanne E Lapi; Renata Jaskula-Sztul Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Constantin Lapa; Katharina Lückerath; Martina Rudelius; Jan-Stefan Schmid; Alexander Schoene; Andreas Schirbel; Samuel Samnick; Theo Pelzer; Andreas K Buck; Saskia Kropf; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Ken Herrmann Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-02-23
Authors: Julie Refardt; Maria J Klomp; Peter M van Koetsveld; Fadime Dogan; Mark Konijnenberg; Tessa Brabander; Richard A Feelders; Wouter W de Herder; Leo J Hofland; Johannes Hofland Journal: Clin Transl Med Date: 2022-07