| Literature DB >> 34252009 |
Ines Marongiu1, Elena Spinelli2, Eleonora Scotti2, Alessandra Mazzucco3, Yu-Mei Wang2,4, Leonardo Manesso1, Giulia Colussi2, Osvaldo Biancolilli2, Michele Battistin2, Thomas Langer5, Francesca Roma2, Gianluca Lopez6,7, Caterina Lonati8, Valentina Vaira1,7, Lorenzo Rosso3, Stefano Ferrero6,7, Stefano Gatti8, Alberto Zanella1,2, Antonio Pesenti1,2, Tommaso Mauri1,2.
Abstract
Rationale: Unilateral ligation of the pulmonary artery may induce lung injury through multiple mechanisms, which might be dampened by inhaled CO2.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 inhalation; VILI; pulmonary perfusion; therapeutic hypercapnia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34252009 PMCID: PMC8534619 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202101-0122OC
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med ISSN: 1073-449X Impact factor: 21.405
Figure 1.Severity of histological, computed tomographic scan, and physiological alterations at the end of the experiment. (A) The histological score of lungs from each study group. The score had 10 components that were ranked between 0 and 3 and summed within apical, medial, and basal samples from each lung. Then, scores from the six samples were averaged to obtain the total lung histological score for each animal (range 0–30). (B) Quantitative computed tomographic scan analysis showing change in lung weights from the baseline (after instrumentation and before surgical ligation of the left pulmonary artery) to the end of the experiment (48 hours or at development of severe lung injury) (Δlung weight) in each study group. (C) Proportion of nonaerated lung tissue in each study group. (D and E) Compliance of the respiratory system (rs) (D) and PaO/FiO (E) at the end of the experiment in each study group. Data are expressed as scatter dot plot with mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Holm-Sidak test (A, C, D, and E) or Kruskal-Wallis test (B). P values in the graph refer to ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis P value. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001, ligation + FiCO 5% versus ligation group. ^P < 0.05, ^^P < 0.01, and ^^^P < 0.01, no-ligation versus ligation group.
Figure 2.Microscopic appearance of the lungs at the end of the experiment. (A–D) Representative microphotographs of the left ligated and right nonligated lungs from the ligation + FiCO 5% group (A and B) and ligation group (C and D). (C) The left lung of the ligation group shows a marked inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of lymphocytes and macrophages, with vascular congestion and hemorrhage. (D) The right lung of the ligation group shows a patchy acute inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of neutrophils (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]). Notably, the lungs of the ligation + FiCO 5% group (A and B) showed no inflammatory changes (H&E). (E and F) In the lower panels, representative microphotographs of the lungs from the no ligation group with no significant histological alterations (H&E). Scale bars: main panels, 500 μm; insets, 100 μm.
Physiological Characteristics of the Study Groups at the End of the Experiment
| Ligation + F | Ligation ( | No Ligation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory mechanics | ||||
| Peak pressure, cm H2O | 20 ± 3 | 33 ± 12 | 19 ± 2 | |
| Plateau pressure, cm H2O | 14 ± 1.5 | 23 ± 8.2 | 14 ± 0.8 | |
| Mean airway pressure, cm H2O | 9 ± 0.9 | 12 ± 2.8 | 9 ± 0.8 | |
| Driving pressure, cm H2O | 9 ± 1.2 | 18 ± 8.2 | 9 ± 0.8 | |
| Respiratory system compliance, ml/cm H2O | 38 ± 6 | 23 ± 10 | 39 ± 4 | |
| Lung compliance, ml/cm H2O | 83 (50–102) | 32 (17–50) | 70 (54–88) | |
| Chest wall compliance, ml/cm H2O | 80 ± 14 | 82 ± 20 | 102 ± 31 | 0.154 |
| Arterial blood gas analyses data | ||||
| PaO2/F | 478 ± 96 | 320 ± 137 | 471 ± 95 | |
| PaCO2, mm Hg | 63 (57–66) | 33 (31–40) | 32 (30–36) | |
| pH | 7.42 (7.40–7.45) | 7.49 (7.45–7.51) | 7.53 (7.51–7.55) | |
| HCO3−, mmol/L | 37.8 ± 2.4 | 27.3 ± 3.0 | 28.4 ± 2.2 | |
| Capnography | ||||
| P | 67 (63–71) | 30 (26–34) | 29 (27–35) | |
| Hemodynamics | ||||
| Systolic arterial pressure, mm Hg | 107 ± 10 | 119 ± 12 | 122 ± 18 | 0.103 |
| Diastolic arterial pressure, mm Hg | 63 ± 13 | 84 ± 17 | 88 ± 26 | |
| Mean arterial pressure, mm Hg | 86 ± 13 | 101 ± 13 | 100 ± 16 | |
| Systolic pulmonary artery pressure, mm Hg | 31 ± 4 | 35 ± 9 | 25 ± 3 | |
| Diastolic pulmonary artery pressure, mm Hg | 15 ± 4 | 19 ± 8 | 15 ± 2 | 0.222 |
| Mean pulmonary artery pressure, mm Hg | 20 ± 2 | 27 ± 7 | 23 ± 3 | |
| Pulmonary vascular resistance, dyn ⋅ s ⋅ cm−5 | 255 (230–291) | 307 (226–398) | 280 (237–331) | 0.389 |
| Wedge pressure, mm Hg | 8 ± 1 | 10 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 | 0.434 |
| Cardiac output, L/min | 5.1 ± 1.1 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 0.082 |
| Heart rate, beats/min | 97 (80–103) | 96 (78–107) | 80 (72–85) | 0.169 |
| Fluid balance, ml | 67 ± 458 | 57 ± 474 | −71 ± 1,622 | 0.946 |
Definition of abbreviation: PEtCO = end-tidal CO2 pressure.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (normally distributed values) or median (quartiles) (nonnormally distributed values). Significant P values are shown in bold.
Comparisons are obtained with one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for normally and nonnormally distributed values, respectively, followed by Holm-Sidak or Dunn multiple comparison tests as appropriate.
P < 0.05 versus no-ligation group.
P < 0.05 versus ligation + FiCO 5% group.
P < 0.01 versus no-ligation group.
P < 0.01 versus ligation + FiCO 5% group.
P < 0.001 versus no-ligation group.
P < 0.001 versus ligation + FiCO 5% group.
Figure 3.Ventilation distribution and regional respiratory system compliance along the experiments. (A) The ratio between Vt distending the right and the left lung along the study time points shows significant imbalance in the ligation group, which was prevented by inhalation of CO2. (B and C) Respiratory system compliance for left (B) and right (C) respiratory hemisystem. In the ligation group, left compliance was lower than the ligation + FiCO group and remained stable over time, whereas in the right side of the ligation group, it declined along the study; FiCO maintained both compliances stable. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized estimating equation models to account for repeated measures in time (longitudinal data); the model included group and time as main independent factors and group-by-time interaction. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01, ligation + FiCO 5% versus ligation group. Compliance rsL = respiratory system compliance for left respiratory hemisystem; Compliance rsR = respiratory system compliance for right respiratory hemisystem; VtRL/VtLL = the ratio between Vt distending the right and the left lung.
Figure 4.Characterization of the lung immune cell infiltrates in the different groups by immunohistochemistry. (A and C) Representative image of the MPO (myeloperoxidase)-positive (A) or IBA-1 (ionized calcium-binding adaptor 1)–positive (C) infiltrates in the lungs of pigs from the three different groups of treatment with the corresponding digital quantification (mask). Images show representative samples from the most affected side. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B and D) Quantification of the MPO-positive (B) or IBA-1–positive (D) cells in the different groups. Each circle is a sample (n = 8 per group); bars, mean ± SEM. (B) *q = 0.010, no ligation versus ligation; **q = 0.008, ligation versus ligation + FiCO 5%. (D) ^^q = 0.001, no ligation versus ligation + FiCO 5%; *q = 0.014, no ligation versus ligation + FiCO 5%. P values from Kruskal-Wallis tests are reported in the graphs; q values are false discovery rate–adjusted P values from Dunn’s post hoc test according to the Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli method.
Figure 5.Differences between left ligated and right nonligated lung in the ligation group. (A) Histological score of each lung in the ligation group at the end of the experiment. (B) Quantitative computed tomographic scan analysis showing change in lung weight of each lung in the ligation group from the baseline (after instrumentation and before surgical ligation of the left pulmonary artery) to the end of the experiment (48 h or at development of severe lung injury) (Δlung weight). (C) Proportion of nonaerated lung tissue of each lung in the ligation group at the end of the experiment. Data are expressed as scatter dot plot with mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by a paired t test, and P values are reported in the graph.
Figure 6.Pathophysiological mechanisms inducing bilateral lung injury and protective effects of inhaled CO2. Left pulmonary artery ligation induces bilateral lung injury through multiple processes (black pathway). The addition of 5% CO2 to inspiratory gases guarantees alveolar normocapnia and exerts antiinflammatory properties, blocking critical processes and ultimately preventing injury (green pathways).