Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer have no approved targeted therapies after disease progression on first-line osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Preclinical studies suggest that tumors with both EGFR-sensitizing alteration and acquired second-site EGFR resistance alterations after treatment with osimertinib retain sensitivity to second-generation EGFR TKIs. We hypothesized that dacomitinib, a pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, may be effective in this setting. METHODS: In this phase II study, patients who had progressed on first-line osimertinib were treated with dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily until disease progression or intolerability. The primary end point was objective response rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 12 patients. Two partial responses were documented (17% objective response rate; 95% CI, 5 to 45). The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to not reached). One patient with an original sensitizing EGFR G719A mutation and one patient without molecular testing available had partial responses, whereas 0 of the 3 patients with second-site acquired EGFR resistance mutations (two C797S and one G724S) met the response criteria. The patient with EGFR G719A has an ongoing response at 17 months, which exceeds prior time on osimertinib (11 months). CONCLUSION: In the first trial evaluating a second-generation EGFR TKI after first-line third-generation osimertinib, we found that dacomitinib after disease progression on osimertinib has limited benefit.
Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer have no approved targeted therapies after disease progression on first-line osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Preclinical studies suggest that tumors with both EGFR-sensitizing alteration and acquired second-site EGFR resistance alterations after treatment with osimertinib retain sensitivity to second-generation EGFR TKIs. We hypothesized that dacomitinib, a pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, may be effective in this setting. METHODS: In this phase II study, patients who had progressed on first-line osimertinib were treated with dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily until disease progression or intolerability. The primary end point was objective response rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 12 patients. Two partial responses were documented (17% objective response rate; 95% CI, 5 to 45). The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to not reached). One patient with an original sensitizing EGFR G719A mutation and one patient without molecular testing available had partial responses, whereas 0 of the 3 patients with second-site acquired EGFR resistance mutations (two C797S and one G724S) met the response criteria. The patient with EGFR G719A has an ongoing response at 17 months, which exceeds prior time on osimertinib (11 months). CONCLUSION: In the first trial evaluating a second-generation EGFR TKI after first-line third-generation osimertinib, we found that dacomitinib after disease progression on osimertinib has limited benefit.
Authors: Zofia Piotrowska; Matthew J Niederst; Chris A Karlovich; Heather A Wakelee; Joel W Neal; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Linnea Fulton; Aaron N Hata; Elizabeth L Lockerman; Anuj Kalsy; Subba Digumarthy; Alona Muzikansky; Mitch Raponi; Angel R Garcia; Hillary E Mulvey; Melissa K Parks; Richard H DiCecca; Dora Dias-Santagata; A John Iafrate; Alice T Shaw; Andrew R Allen; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Dalia Ercan; Hwan Geun Choi; Cai-Hong Yun; Marzia Capelletti; Ting Xie; Michael J Eck; Nathanael S Gray; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Helena A Yu; Shaozhou K Tian; Alexander E Drilon; Laetitia Borsu; Gregory J Riely; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Donavan T Cheng; Talia N Mitchell; Ahmet Zehir; Ronak H Shah; Ryma Benayed; Aijazuddin Syed; Raghu Chandramohan; Zhen Yu Liu; Helen H Won; Sasinya N Scott; A Rose Brannon; Catherine O'Reilly; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Angela Yannes; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Jinjuan Yao; Wei Song; Dara S Ross; Alifya Oultache; Snjezana Dogan; Laetitia Borsu; Meera Hameed; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: James C-H Yang; Lecia V Sequist; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Chun-Ming Tsai; Tony Shu Kam Mok; Martin Schuler; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Chong-Jen Yu; Sai-Hong I Ou; Caicun Zhou; Daniel Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Yi-Long Wu Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Karen L Reckamp; Giuseppe Giaccone; D Ross Camidge; Shirish M Gadgeel; Fadlo R Khuri; Jeff A Engelman; Marianna Koczywas; Arun Rajan; Alicyn K Campbell; Diana Gernhardt; Ana Ruiz-Garcia; Stephen Letrent; Jane Liang; Ian Taylor; Joseph P O'Connell; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kenneth S Thress; Cloud P Paweletz; Enriqueta Felip; Byoung Chul Cho; Daniel Stetson; Brian Dougherty; Zhongwu Lai; Aleksandra Markovets; Ana Vivancos; Yanan Kuang; Dalia Ercan; Sarah E Matthews; Mireille Cantarini; J Carl Barrett; Pasi A Jänne; Geoffrey R Oxnard Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jacob J Chabon; Andrew D Simmons; Alexander F Lovejoy; Mohammad S Esfahani; Aaron M Newman; Henry J Haringsma; David M Kurtz; Henning Stehr; Florian Scherer; Chris A Karlovich; Thomas C Harding; Kathleen A Durkin; Gregory A Otterson; W Thomas Purcell; D Ross Camidge; Jonathan W Goldman; Lecia V Sequist; Zofia Piotrowska; Heather A Wakelee; Joel W Neal; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 14.919