Literature DB >> 34250384

Prevalence and Characterization of Biallelic and Monoallelic NTHL1 and MSH3 Variant Carriers From a Pan-Cancer Patient Population.

Erin E Salo-Mullen1, Anna Maio1, Semanti Mukherjee1, Chaitanya Bandlamudi2, Jinru Shia3, Yelena Kemel1, Karen A Cadoo1, Ying Liu1, Maria Carlo1, Megha Ranganathan1, Sarah Kane1, Preethi Srinivasan3, Shweta S Chavan2, Mark T A Donoghue2, Caitlin Bourque2, Margaret Sheehan1, Prince Rainier Tejada1, Zalak Patel1, Angela G Arnold1, Jennifer A Kennedy1, Kimberly Amoroso1, Kelsey Breen1, Amanda Catchings1, Rosalba Sacca1, Vanessa Marcell1, Arnold J Markowitz1, Alicia Latham1, Michael Walsh1, Maksym Misyura3, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy3, David B Solit1,2, Michael F Berger2,3, Mark E Robson1, Barry S Taylor2,4,5, Kenneth Offit1, Diana Mandelker3, Zsofia K Stadler1.   

Abstract

NTHL1 and MSH3 have been implicated as autosomal recessive cancer predisposition genes. Although individuals with biallelic NTHL1 and MSH3 pathogenic variants (PVs) have increased cancer and polyposis risk, risks for monoallelic carriers are uncertain. We sought to assess the prevalence and characterize NTHL1 and MSH3 from a large pan-cancer patient population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with pan-cancer (n = 11,081) underwent matched tumor-normal sequencing with consent for germline analysis. Medical records and tumors were reviewed and analyzed. Prevalence of PVs was compared with reference controls (Genome Aggregation Database).
RESULTS: NTHL1-PVs were identified in 40 patients including 39 monoallelic carriers (39/11,081 = 0.35%) and one with biallelic variants (1/11,081 = 0.009%) and a diagnosis of isolated early-onset breast cancer. NTHL1-associated mutational signature 30 was identified in the tumors of the biallelic patient and two carriers. Colonic polyposis was not identified in any NTHL1 patient. MSH3-PVs were identified in 13 patients, including 12 monoallelic carriers (12/11,081 = 0.11%) and one with biallelic MSH3 variants (1/11,081 = 0.009%) and diagnoses of later-onset cancers, attenuated polyposis, and abnormal MSH3-protein expression. Of the 12 MSH3 carriers, two had early-onset cancer diagnoses with tumor loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type MSH3 allele. Ancestry-specific burden tests demonstrated that NTHL1 and MSH3 prevalence was not significantly different in this pan-cancer population versus controls.
CONCLUSION: NTHL1 and MSH3 germline alterations were not enriched in this pan-cancer patient population. However, tumor-specific findings, such as mutational signature 30 and loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele, suggest the potential contribution of monoallelic variants to tumorigenesis in a subset of patients.
© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34250384      PMCID: PMC8232072          DOI: 10.1200/PO.20.00443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2473-4284


  33 in total

1.  FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Venkatraman E Seshan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Extending the clinical phenotype associated with biallelic NTHL1 germline mutations.

Authors:  Florentia Fostira; Emmanouil Kontopodis; Paraskevi Apostolou; Maria Fragkaki; Nikolaos Androulakis; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Irene Konstantopoulou; Emmanouil Saloustros
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.

Authors:  Diana Mandelker; Liying Zhang; Yelena Kemel; Zsofia K Stadler; Vijai Joseph; Ahmet Zehir; Nisha Pradhan; Angela Arnold; Michael F Walsh; Yirong Li; Anoop R Balakrishnan; Aijazuddin Syed; Meera Prasad; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria I Carlo; Karen A Cadoo; Meg Sheehan; Megan H Fleischut; Erin Salo-Mullen; Magan Trottier; Steven M Lipkin; Anne Lincoln; Semanti Mukherjee; Vignesh Ravichandran; Roy Cambria; Jesse Galle; Wassim Abida; Marcia E Arcila; Ryma Benayed; Ronak Shah; Kenneth Yu; Dean F Bajorin; Jonathan A Coleman; Steven D Leach; Maeve A Lowery; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Philip W Kantoff; Charles L Sawyers; Maura N Dickler; Leonard Saltz; Robert J Motzer; Eileen M O'Reilly; Howard I Scher; Jose Baselga; David S Klimstra; David B Solit; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; Marc Ladanyi; Mark E Robson; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH.

Authors:  Oliver M Sieber; Lara Lipton; Michael Crabtree; Karl Heinimann; Paulo Fidalgo; Robin K S Phillips; Marie-Luise Bisgaard; Torben F Orntoft; Lauri A Aaltonen; Shirley V Hodgson; Huw J W Thomas; Ian P M Tomlinson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Isolation of MutSbeta from human cells and comparison of the mismatch repair specificities of MutSbeta and MutSalpha.

Authors:  J Genschel; S J Littman; J T Drummond; P Modrich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-07-31       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  EMAST is associated with a poor prognosis in microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Venderbosch; Shannon van Lent-van Vliet; Anton F J de Haan; Marjolijn J Ligtenberg; Monique Goossens; Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation of the MethylationEPIC BeadChip for fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours.

Authors:  Teresia Kling; Anna Wenger; Stephan Beck; Helena Carén
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.551

8.  Genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Xiangyu Ma; Ben Zhang; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Monoallelic NTHL1 Loss-of-Function Variants and Risk of Polyposis and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Fadwa A Elsayed; Judith E Grolleman; Abiramy Ragunathan; Daniel D Buchanan; Tom van Wezel; Richarda M de Voer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans.

Authors:  Konrad J Karczewski; Laurent C Francioli; Grace Tiao; Beryl B Cummings; Jessica Alföldi; Qingbo Wang; Ryan L Collins; Kristen M Laricchia; Andrea Ganna; Daniel P Birnbaum; Laura D Gauthier; Harrison Brand; Matthew Solomonson; Nicholas A Watts; Daniel Rhodes; Moriel Singer-Berk; Eleina M England; Eleanor G Seaby; Jack A Kosmicki; Raymond K Walters; Katherine Tashman; Yossi Farjoun; Eric Banks; Timothy Poterba; Arcturus Wang; Cotton Seed; Nicola Whiffin; Jessica X Chong; Kaitlin E Samocha; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Zachary Zappala; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; Eric Vallabh Minikel; Ben Weisburd; Monkol Lek; James S Ware; Christopher Vittal; Irina M Armean; Louis Bergelson; Kristian Cibulskis; Kristen M Connolly; Miguel Covarrubias; Stacey Donnelly; Steven Ferriera; Stacey Gabriel; Jeff Gentry; Namrata Gupta; Thibault Jeandet; Diane Kaplan; Christopher Llanwarne; Ruchi Munshi; Sam Novod; Nikelle Petrillo; David Roazen; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Andrea Saltzman; Molly Schleicher; Jose Soto; Kathleen Tibbetts; Charlotte Tolonen; Gordon Wade; Michael E Talkowski; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next.

Authors:  Nina Gupta; Christine Drogan; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.287

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.