Jun Lu1, Xin Ma2,3, Wen-Cong Gao2,3, Xin Zhang2, Yuanling Fu2, Qian Liu2,3, Lixiang Tian2, Xiao-Dan Qin1, Weimin Yang2, Hong-Yi Zheng3, Chang-Bo Zheng2. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541199, China. 2. School of Pharmaceutical Science and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Diseases Mechanisms of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China.
Abstract
Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is commonly associated with an upregulation of fetal genes, fibrosis, cardiac dysfunction, and heart failure. Previous studies have demonstrated that gastrodin (GAS) exerts cardioprotective action in the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy. However, the mechanism by which GAS protects against cardiac hypertrophy is yet to be elucidated. A mouse model of myocardial hypertrophy was established using an angiotensin II (Ang II) induction. GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) was orally administered every day starting 7 days prior to the Ang II infusion combined with sham-operated controls. Heart samples from each group were collected for RNA sequencing. Using bioinformatics analysis, the key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that are involved in reversing cardiac function were identified. Through bioinformatics analysis, the key DEGs that are involved in GAS's inhibition of Ang II-induced abnormal gene expression within the heart were identified. This was further validated using quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs). Oral administration of GAS significantly suppressed the Ang II-induced increase in heart size and heart weight to body weight. Furthermore, pretreatment of the NRCMs with GAS led to a dose-dependent inhibition of Ang II-induced increases in Nppb mRNA expression. We identified 620 upregulated and 87 downregulated Ang II-induced DEGs II, among which the expression patterns of 58 and 146 genes were inverted by low-dose and high-dose GAS, respectively. These inverted DEGs were found to be mainly enriched in the biological processes of regulation of Ras protein signal transduction, heart contraction, covalent chromatin modification, glucose metabolism, and positive regulation of cell cycle. Among them, the insulin-like growth factor type 2 (Igf2) gene, which was found to be highly reversed and downregulated by GAS, served as a core gene linking energy metabolism, immune regulation, and systemic development. Subsequent functional verification demonstrated that IGF2, and its receptor IGF2R, is one of the targets of GAS that helps protect against cardiac hypertrophy. Taken together, we have identified, for the first time, IGF2/IGF2R as a potential target influenced by GAS in the prevention of cardiac hypertrophy.
Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is commonly associated with an upregulation of fetal genes, fibrosis, cardiac dysfunction, and heart failure. Previous studies have demonstrated that gastrodin (GAS) exerts cardioprotective action in the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy. However, the mechanism by which GAS protects against cardiac hypertrophy is yet to be elucidated. A mouse model of myocardial hypertrophy was established using an angiotensin II (Ang II) induction. GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) was orally administered every day starting 7 days prior to the Ang II infusion combined with sham-operated controls. Heart samples from each group were collected for RNA sequencing. Using bioinformatics analysis, the key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that are involved in reversing cardiac function were identified. Through bioinformatics analysis, the key DEGs that are involved in GAS's inhibition of Ang II-induced abnormal gene expression within the heart were identified. This was further validated using quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs). Oral administration of GAS significantly suppressed the Ang II-induced increase in heart size and heart weight to body weight. Furthermore, pretreatment of the NRCMs with GAS led to a dose-dependent inhibition of Ang II-induced increases in Nppb mRNA expression. We identified 620 upregulated and 87 downregulated Ang II-induced DEGs II, among which the expression patterns of 58 and 146 genes were inverted by low-dose and high-dose GAS, respectively. These inverted DEGs were found to be mainly enriched in the biological processes of regulation of Ras protein signal transduction, heart contraction, covalent chromatin modification, glucose metabolism, and positive regulation of cell cycle. Among them, the insulin-like growth factor type 2 (Igf2) gene, which was found to be highly reversed and downregulated by GAS, served as a core gene linking energy metabolism, immune regulation, and systemic development. Subsequent functional verification demonstrated that IGF2, and its receptor IGF2R, is one of the targets of GAS that helps protect against cardiac hypertrophy. Taken together, we have identified, for the first time, IGF2/IGF2R as a potential target influenced by GAS in the prevention of cardiac hypertrophy.
Cardiac hypertrophy
initially develops as an adaptive response
of the heart to various physiologic and pathologic stimuli, which
leads to increased workload of the heart. Unfortunately, pathological
hypertrophy has been shown to be associated with cardiac dysfunction
and congestive heart failure, which are some of the major causes of
morbidity and mortality worldwide.[1] Because
of lack of effective drugs, the current clinical treatment of hypertrophy
is challenging.In recent years, many natural compounds extracted
from herbs have
been utilized as a treatment of hypertrophy.[2][3][4] Gastrodin
(GAS), an active component of Gastrodia elata Bl.,
has been widely used in the treatment of neurological diseases, including
dizziness, paralysis, epilepsy, and migraine. GAS has also been proven
to exert cardioprotective pharmacological effects. Combined with antihypertensive
drugs, GAS has been shown to be efficacious at lowering blood pressure
among older patients with refractory hypertension.[5] Despite the fact that several studies have investigated
the effect of GAS on the expression of individual genes in relation
to hypertrophy,[6][7][8] little has been done to prove the effect
of GAS on global gene expression changes in hypertrophy. Therefore,
additional studies are needed to determine the unknown targets of
GAS.Gene expression profiling has been introduced as a method
of identifying
differentially expressed genes (DEGs) during disease progression.
Herein, we used RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) techniques to identify DEGs
in sham operation and angiotensin II (Ang II) treatment group with
or without GAS pretreatment. Enrichment analysis was conducted to
reveal the potential functions and pathways of these DEGs. A protein–protein
interaction (PPI) network demonstrated that the insulin-like growth
factor type 2 (Igf2) as a core gene is likely to
play a central role in Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy with or
without GAS pretreatment. IGF2 is a member of the IGF family of peptide
growth factors. IGF2 is able to bind and activate insulin-like growth
factor type 2 receptor (IGF2R), which leads to the development of
pathologic cardiac hypertrophy.[9] To date,
several studies highlight the importance of IGF2R in the regulation
of cardiac development, growth, and survival.[10,11] IGF2R has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of cardiac
hypertrophy.[12][13][14][15] In addition
to its cardiovascular roles, IGF2R also plays a role as a tumor suppressor
gene that is involved in apoptosis and tumorigenesis.[16] In our studies, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results
have demonstrated that Igf2 was upregulated in Ang
II-induced hypertrophic neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs) and was
downregulated via GAS treatment, which is consistent with the results
from the bioinformatics analysis. Meanwhile IGF2R was also found to
be significantly increased, and this increase was substantially inhibited
by GAS treatment via the analysis of gene and protein expression.
We postulate that GAS exerts a cardioprotective action by inhibiting
IGF2/IGF2R expression in cardiac hypertrophy, and it may be useful
in designing novel therapeutic strategies.
Results
GAS Protected
Against Ang II-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy In
Vivo
In order to investigate the effect of GAS on Ang II-induced
cardiac hypertrophy, we assessed the effects of oral gavage of GAS
on cardiac hypertrophy induced by Ang II infusion in mice. Interestingly,
subcutaneous Ang II infusion could increase heart size and ratio of
heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) compared with the sham group (Figure A,B). However, oral
gavage of GAS (5 and 50 mg/kg/d) significantly attenuates Ang II-induced
increases in heart size and HW/BW (Figure A,B). Additionally, GAS markedly reduces
the mRNA expression of the hypertrophic marker Nppa and Nppb induced by Ang II (Figure D). The heart rate recorded in the mice is
presented in Figure C. Neither Ang II subcutaneous infusion nor GAS administration altered
heart rate compared to the sham group (Figure C).
Figure 1
GAS inhibited Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy
in vivo. The mice
were infused with Ang II at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d for 2 weeks. The
GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) oral gavage was initiated 7 days before surgery.
Hypertrophy was assessed by measuring heart size (A) representative
from six pairs of mice. (B) Ratio of HW/total BW (n = 5–6). (C) Data summary of heart rate recorded in the mice
(n = 5). (D) Data summary of relative mRNA expression
of Nppa and Nppb, normalized to Gapdh (n = 5). The data are expressed as
mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the Ang II Veh group and #p < 0.05and ##p < 0.01
compared with Sham_Veh group.
GAS inhibited Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy
in vivo. The mice
were infused with Ang II at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d for 2 weeks. The
GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) oral gavage was initiated 7 days before surgery.
Hypertrophy was assessed by measuring heart size (A) representative
from six pairs of mice. (B) Ratio of HW/total BW (n = 5–6). (C) Data summary of heart rate recorded in the mice
(n = 5). (D) Data summary of relative mRNA expression
of Nppa and Nppb, normalized to Gapdh (n = 5). The data are expressed as
mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the Ang II Veh group and #p < 0.05and ##p < 0.01
compared with Sham_Veh group.
Ang II-Induced DEGs Are Involved in the Formation of Cardiac
Hypertrophy
In order to validate the mechanism of GAS against
myocardial hypertrophy, we initially analyzed how changes in cardiac
gene expression caused by Ang II participate in the development of
cardiac hypertrophy. By comparing RNA-seq data from the Ang II treatment
and sham group, we identified 707 DEGs (absolute log 2 fold change
(FC) > 1 and FDR corrected p value < 0.05)
induced
by Ang II, which includes 620 upregulated and 87 downregulated genes
(Figure A). Interestingly,
there were far more upregulated DEGs compared to downregulated DEGs,
which indicates that Ang II has a transcriptional activation effect.
Among the most upregulated genes, some were found to be involved in
actin assembly and movement, such as Apoa1, Apoa2, Notch2, and Syne2. However, some play roles in muscle development and differentiation,
including Igf2, Scgb3a1, and Luc7l. According to the information of the Gene Ontology
(GO) database, all of these genes play a direct role in functional
changes of the cardiac muscle. Additional genes, such as Igf2 and Unc13, are known to be involved in glucose
metabolism and homeostasis. Next, Ahsg, F2, and Dlx1 are involved in regulating
the cell cycle and growth and have regulatory roles in the process
of energy metabolism and cell renewal of the heart muscle. Among the
most downregulated genes, Fstl4 and Baiap2l1 regulate cell size; Tlr4 and Dusp26 regulate the MAPK cascade; Pik3ca, Ankrd, and Rad1 regulate DNA damage and metabolism; and Myot and Pcdhgc3 play a role in cell adhesion
(Figure C,D). This
result indicates that Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy is a coordinated
process that encompasses multiple genes through multiple signaling
pathways.
Figure 2
Identification of Ang II-induced DEGs and GAS inverted DEGs. The
mice were treated with vehicle solution, Ang II, GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg).
(A) Volcano plots demonstrate the identification process of Ang II-induced
DEGs, GAS-induced DEGs, and GAS-inverted DEGs. For Ang II-induced
DEGs, among all genes that are expressed in the Ang II treatment group,
genes with FDR < 0.05 and the absolute value of log 2 FC greater
than 1 relative to the sham operation group were chosen. For GAS-induced
DEGs, among all genes that are expressed in the GAS-treated sham-operated
group, genes with FDR < 0.05 and the absolute value of log 2 FC
greater than 1 relative to the sham operation group were chosen. For
GAS-inverted DEGs, Ang II-induced DEGs were identified as those whose
differential expression patterns were significantly inverted (interaction
FDR < 0.05 and the absolute value of inverted log 2 FC > 1)
by
different doses (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) of GAS. The cyan dots indicate that
the identified DEGs, as well as gray dots, indicate other genes that
are not significantly affected by Ang II or GAS. The red dots indicate
15 key GAS-inverted DEGs with high connectivity identified in the
functional analysis. (B) Venn diagram demonstrates the relationships
among Ang II-induced DEG (blue circle, n = 707),
inverted DEGs by low-dose (5 mg/kg/d) of GAS (red circle, n = 58), and inverted DEGs by high-dose (50 mg/kg/d) of
GAS (green circle, n = 146). Heat maps display the
gene expression profiles of noninverted DEGs by GAS (C) and inverted
DEGs by GAS (D) among all samples. The samples are divided into Ang
II modeling and sham operation groups, which were arranged in each
group according to their drug concentrations. The red and blue gradient
squares map the normalized gene expression values. The brown bars
in the D plot indicate whether genes are inverted by low-dose or high-dose
GAS. The genes with the top significant differential expression are
marked on the right side of C and D plots.
Identification of Ang II-induced DEGs and GAS inverted DEGs. The
mice were treated with vehicle solution, Ang II, GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg).
(A) Volcano plots demonstrate the identification process of Ang II-induced
DEGs, GAS-induced DEGs, and GAS-inverted DEGs. For Ang II-induced
DEGs, among all genes that are expressed in the Ang II treatment group,
genes with FDR < 0.05 and the absolute value of log 2 FC greater
than 1 relative to the sham operation group were chosen. For GAS-induced
DEGs, among all genes that are expressed in the GAS-treated sham-operated
group, genes with FDR < 0.05 and the absolute value of log 2 FC
greater than 1 relative to the sham operation group were chosen. For
GAS-inverted DEGs, Ang II-induced DEGs were identified as those whose
differential expression patterns were significantly inverted (interaction
FDR < 0.05 and the absolute value of inverted log 2 FC > 1)
by
different doses (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) of GAS. The cyan dots indicate that
the identified DEGs, as well as gray dots, indicate other genes that
are not significantly affected by Ang II or GAS. The red dots indicate
15 key GAS-inverted DEGs with high connectivity identified in the
functional analysis. (B) Venn diagram demonstrates the relationships
among Ang II-induced DEG (blue circle, n = 707),
inverted DEGs by low-dose (5 mg/kg/d) of GAS (red circle, n = 58), and inverted DEGs by high-dose (50 mg/kg/d) of
GAS (green circle, n = 146). Heat maps display the
gene expression profiles of noninverted DEGs by GAS (C) and inverted
DEGs by GAS (D) among all samples. The samples are divided into Ang
II modeling and sham operation groups, which were arranged in each
group according to their drug concentrations. The red and blue gradient
squares map the normalized gene expression values. The brown bars
in the D plot indicate whether genes are inverted by low-dose or high-dose
GAS. The genes with the top significant differential expression are
marked on the right side of C and D plots.
GAS-Inverted DEGs Play an Anticardiac Hypertrophic Effect
Subsequently, we compared the effect of different doses (low, 5
mg/kg/d; high, 50 mg/kg/d) of GAS on the expression of DEGs induced
by Ang II. After screening by the interaction FDR < 0.05 and the
absolute value of inverted log 2 FC > 1, we determined that the
expressions
of 58 and 146 DEGs were inverted by low-dose and high-dose GAS, respectively
(Figure A,B). Most
DEGs that are highly inverted by low-dose GAS have immunoregulatory
functions, such as Serpinblc, Igf2, Ltf, Notch2, Bpifb1, and Cdo1, which negatively regulate interleukin-1
production or participate in the toll-like receptor signaling pathway.
Among the DEGs that are highly inverted by high-dose GAS, Apoa1, Apoa2, Igf2, Unc13b, Ahsg, Noch2, Pcdhgc3, and Gpr27 are known to be involved
in the metabolism of glucose, lipids, and steroids and are more closely
related to the metabolic regulation of cardiomyocytes (Figure A). It is worth noting that Apoa1, Apoa2, Igf2, and Noch2 were inverted via both low-dose and high-dose GAS.
These are widely involved in immunity, metabolism, and additional
cellular activities and may be important therapeutic targets (Figure D). Furthermore,
we determined that the low-dose and high-dose GAS groups only had
11 and 14 DEGs compared to the sham operation group, which was less
than 0.1% of the total expressed genes (Figure A). Among these, Fen1, Creb1, and Igf2 genes are involved in memory,
while Epn2 and Aak1 genes are involved
in the notch signaling pathway. The correlation between these DEGs
is very weak, indicating that GAS does not affect normal heart tissue.
GAS-Improved Cardiac Hypertrophy by Regulating Ras Protein Signal
Transduction
Next, we carried out GO enrichment analysis
on both Ang II-induced DEGs and GAS-inverted DEGs, which includes
biological process (BP), cell component (CC), and molecular function
(MF), to explore how GAS affects Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy
at the gene function level. The enrichment results of BP identified
inverted DEGs in cell-substrate adhesion, positive regulation of steroid
metabolic process, exocrine system development, glucose homeostasis,
response to insulin, negative regulation of immune response, and notch
signaling pathway, indicating that GAS exerts an effect at the metabolic
level, immunity, and development (Figure A). For CC enrichment, inverted DEGs exhibit
characteristics that are mainly distributed in the fibrillar collagen
trimer, receptor complex, chylomicron, protein–lipid complex,
actomyosin, and cell–cell contact zone, which reflects that
GAS has an effect on signal transduction, cell movement, and visceral
fat metabolism (Figure B). Results from MF enrichment were consistent with those from BP
and CC; that is, GAS exerts therapeutic effects by affecting cardiac
functions, including extracellular matrix structural constituent,
actinin binding, cell adhesion molecule binding, chemorepellent activity,
high-density lipoprotein particle binding, and integrin binding (Figure C).
Figure 3
Gene function analysis
for Ang II-induced DEGs inverted by GAS.
Bubble plots show the enrichment results of GO, including BPs (A),
cellular component (B), and MF (C) of Ang II-induced DEG and inverted
DEG by low dose (5 mg/kg/d) or high dose (50 mg/kg/d) of GAS. The Y axis shows the key GO terms of enrichment, while the X axis shows the number of enriched DEGs within each group.
The size of the bubble maps, the gene ratio of the GO item, and color
maps enrich the p value. A p value
≤ 0.05 is considered to be significantly enriched. The treemaps
show the clustering results of all enriched BP (D) and MF (E) terms
after summarization by REVIGO. Each square represents a GO term. The
GO terms framed by thick black lines indicate that they belong to
a higher level root term, which is shown in bold font with a white
background. Different colors indicate whether the GO item is enriched
with inverted DEGs by 5, 50, or 5 and 50 mg GAS, or other Ang II-induced
DEGs.
Gene function analysis
for Ang II-induced DEGs inverted by GAS.
Bubble plots show the enrichment results of GO, including BPs (A),
cellular component (B), and MF (C) of Ang II-induced DEG and inverted
DEG by low dose (5 mg/kg/d) or high dose (50 mg/kg/d) of GAS. The Y axis shows the key GO terms of enrichment, while the X axis shows the number of enriched DEGs within each group.
The size of the bubble maps, the gene ratio of the GO item, and color
maps enrich the p value. A p value
≤ 0.05 is considered to be significantly enriched. The treemaps
show the clustering results of all enriched BP (D) and MF (E) terms
after summarization by REVIGO. Each square represents a GO term. The
GO terms framed by thick black lines indicate that they belong to
a higher level root term, which is shown in bold font with a white
background. Different colors indicate whether the GO item is enriched
with inverted DEGs by 5, 50, or 5 and 50 mg GAS, or other Ang II-induced
DEGs.After summarizing the enriched
GO terms, we determined that the
regulation of Ras protein signal transduction is key to GAS’s
anticardiac hypertrophic effect. In inverted DEG-enriched BP terms,
this signaling pathway largely includes the negative regulation of
immune response, response to insulin, notch signaling pathway, and
glucose homeostasis. It also involves regulating immunity, energy
metabolism, and cell growth and development, including Apoa1, Apoa2, Igf2, Igf1r, Ahsg, Baiap2l1, Notch2, Hp, Unc13b, and other important
regulatory genes (Figure D). In addition, protein serine/threonine kinase activity
is a key gene function that was found to be enriched in inverted DEGs,
involving ATPase, UDP-galactosyltransferase, phosphorus-oxygen lyase,
and deoxyribonuclease. This indicates that GAS uses a variety of enzyme-linked
reactions to exert its effect (Figure E).
Igf2 Is the Key Target Gene
for GAS to Regulate
Cardiac Hypertrophy
Functional analysis demonstrates that
most Ang II-mediated signaling pathways are inverted through the use
of high-dose instead of low-dose GAS (Figure D,E). The functional enrichment of DEGs inverted
by low-dose GAS is largely related to immune regulation, including
negative regulation of interleukin-1β production, regulation
of toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathway, and innate immune response
in mucosa. In addition to the negative regulation of the immune response,
DEGs that were inverted by high-dose GAS are enriched in lipid metabolism,
carbohydrate metabolism, growth, and peptide hormone response (Figure S1). High-dose GAS had an improved effect
at protecting cardiac hypertrophy at the level of gene regulation.
Thus, we used DEGs inverted by high-dose GAS to construct functional
networks. The core functional network of BP enrichment displayed that
the central genes, including Igf2, Igf2r, Apoa1, Apoa2, and Muc4, are involved in regulating Ras protein signal transduction and
play a central role in insulin response, cell adhesion, immune regulation,
and systemic development (Figure A). The core functional network is constructed on the
results of MF enrichment and demonstrate the core functions of Vwf, Col6a1, Jam3, Igf2, Ptprb, and Pik3ca genes as phosphatase, insulin binding, integrin binding, and cell
adhesion molecule binding molecules (Figure B). By constructing a PPI network using the
STRING database and filtering gene nodes with low connectivity, we
extracted the core PPI network that contains 23 genes, including key
genes such as Ahsg, Vwf, Igf2, and Igf1r (Figure C). According to these gene function networks,
we discovered that 15 key genes of Ahsg, Apoa1, Vwf, Apoa2, Hp, Itga1, Csrp3, Igf1r, Igf2, Notch2, Col16a1, Egr2, Jag1, Unc13b, and Muc4 are involved in suppressing
Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by GAS. The expression patterns
of these genes show that Igf2 has a very strong Ang
II induction effect and GAS reversal effect and is a potential therapeutic
target (Figure D).
Interestingly, Igf2 was found to be upregulated by
GAS in the sham operation group but to be downregulated by GAS in
the Ang-II group. However, according to the results of functional
analysis, the upregulation of the Igf2 gene in heart
tissue induced by GAS is involved in learning and memory.
Figure 4
Gene function
networks reveal key genes of GAS against cardiac
hypertrophy. The network graphs demonstrate the relationships among
GAS-inverted DEGs and their enriched key GO terms of BP (A) and MF
(B). The gray circles represent enriched GO terms and are labeled
with brown text nearby. The size maps represent the number of enriched
genes. The triangle and square represent inverted DEGs and are labeled
with black gene names. (C) PPI network displays the core interactions
among GAS-inverted DEGs. The genes displayed were chosen from the
top hub genes with the most significant inverted log 2 FC and the
highest functional network connectivity. (D) Line graphs demonstrate
the expression patterns of the average expression values of 15 key
GAS-inverted DEGs in the Ang II modeling group (vermillion) and the
sham operation group (cyan) at different doses of GAS (5 and 50 mg/kg/d).
Gene function
networks reveal key genes of GAS against cardiac
hypertrophy. The network graphs demonstrate the relationships among
GAS-inverted DEGs and their enriched key GO terms of BP (A) and MF
(B). The gray circles represent enriched GO terms and are labeled
with brown text nearby. The size maps represent the number of enriched
genes. The triangle and square represent inverted DEGs and are labeled
with black gene names. (C) PPI network displays the core interactions
among GAS-inverted DEGs. The genes displayed were chosen from the
top hub genes with the most significant inverted log 2 FC and the
highest functional network connectivity. (D) Line graphs demonstrate
the expression patterns of the average expression values of 15 key
GAS-inverted DEGs in the Ang II modeling group (vermillion) and the
sham operation group (cyan) at different doses of GAS (5 and 50 mg/kg/d).
Detection of Gene Expression by qRT-PCR and
Western Blotting
In order to verify the sequencing results,
seven genes (Apoa1, Apoa2, Notch2, Syne2, Igf2, Scgb3a1,
and Luc7l) were chosen for qPCR analysis (Figure S3). Only Igf2 mRNA expression
was found to be significantly upregulated in Ang II-induced hypertrophic
NRCMs and downregulated by GAS treatment, which is consistent with
the results from the bioinformatics analysis (Figure B). Therefore, we examined the effect of
GAS on recombinant IGF2-induced cardiac hypertrophy. NRCMs were pretreated
with GAS for 12 h prior to stimulation with recombinant IGF2 (100
ng/mL). The hypertrophic response was determined after 48 h. Interestingly,
recombinant IGF2 induced a marked increase in Nppb mRNA and ANP expression, which was partially inhibited by GAS (Figure S4). As IGF2 induces hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes
through an IGF2R-dependent pathway,[17] we
further determined the Igf2r mRNA expression and
IGF2R expression and found that they were significantly increased
(Figure C,D). However,
these increases were substantially inhibited via GAS treatment (Figure C,D). Intriguingly,
Ang II-induced IGF2R increase was abolished in the IGF2R-deficient
NRCMs using siRNA-mediated knockdown (Figure F). The results indicate that GAS may exert
a cardioprotective action by inhibiting IGF2/IGF2R expression in the
treatment of cardiac hypertrophy.
Figure 5
Validation of gene expression via qRT-PCR
and Western blotting.
(A–D) NRCMs were treated with 100 nM Ang II for 48 h to induce
hypertrophy. GAS (100 μM) was applied 12 h prior to Ang II.
(A–C) Summary data of mRNA expression of Nppb, Igf2, and Igf2r. (D) Representative
immunoblots of IGF2R protein levels together with quantification.
(E) NRCMs were transfected with scrambled-siRNA, Igf2r-siRNA1, or Igf2r-siRNA2 for 48 h. The representative
images demonstrate immunoblots of IGF2R protein together with quantification.
(F) NRCMs were transfected with scrambled-siRNA or Igf2r-siRNA1 for 48 h. The representative images demonstrate immunoblots
of IGF2R protein levels with or without Ang II treatment together
with quantification. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 compared to AngII_Veh group or Scrambled siRNA group
or AngII_Scrambled siRNA group; #p <
0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 compared to the Control_Veh group.
Validation of gene expression via qRT-PCR
and Western blotting.
(A–D) NRCMs were treated with 100 nM Ang II for 48 h to induce
hypertrophy. GAS (100 μM) was applied 12 h prior to Ang II.
(A–C) Summary data of mRNA expression of Nppb, Igf2, and Igf2r. (D) Representative
immunoblots of IGF2R protein levels together with quantification.
(E) NRCMs were transfected with scrambled-siRNA, Igf2r-siRNA1, or Igf2r-siRNA2 for 48 h. The representative
images demonstrate immunoblots of IGF2R protein together with quantification.
(F) NRCMs were transfected with scrambled-siRNA or Igf2r-siRNA1 for 48 h. The representative images demonstrate immunoblots
of IGF2R protein levels with or without Ang II treatment together
with quantification. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 compared to AngII_Veh group or Scrambled siRNA group
or AngII_Scrambled siRNA group; #p <
0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 compared to the Control_Veh group.
Discussion
Pathological cardiac
hypertrophy is a complex remodeling process
that involves multiple signaling pathways and targets.[18] Cardiac hypertrophy is associated with an increase
in heart mass as well as an increase in the rate of protein synthesis
that involve several signaling pathways, including phosphoinositide
3-kinase (PI3K) and Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk pathways.[19] Some studies have identified that the transfection or microinjection
of cardiomyocytes with activated Ras mutants (V12Ras) can induce the
activation of MAP kinase (MAPK) and increase the expression of genes
that are related to cardiac hypertrophy, including c-Fos and atrial
natriuretic factor.[20] In recent years,
many natural compounds, such as GAS, have been utilized for the treatment
of hypertrophy because of their antihypertrophic effects and low toxicities.[21][22][23][24][25] GAS, the major bioactive component extracted from the Chinese herb Gastrodia elata Bl., has been widely used in the treatment
of neurological diseases. Furthermore, it has been suggested that
GAS possesses comprehensive pharmacological functions, including anticonvulsant,
analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and hypoxia tolerance.[22][23][24] The pharmacological effects of GAS have also been reflected in many
other aspects, particularly in cardiovascular disease. Consistent
with our previous study, GAS pretreatment can attenuate Ang II-induced
cardiac hypertrophy in a dose-dependent manner.[6] Additionally, GAS can lower blood pressure in patients
with hypertension.[5] Other studies show
that GAS can significantly inhibit the expression of notch signaling
pathway members, including Notch-1, NICD, RBP-JK, and Hes-1.[26] GAS can also regulate glucose and lipid metabolism,
as it activates AMP-activated protein kinase, inhibits liver steatosis,
and reduces serum triglycerides (TG)/glucose.[27] GAS treatment can strongly inhibit the activation of nuclear factor-κB
(NF-κB) and MAPK family as well as induce the upregulation of
nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2, thereby inhibiting an
inflammatory response in septic cardiac dysfunction.[19] Moreover, some studies have demonstrated that GAS protects
against cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by abrogating the ERK1/2
signaling pathway and activation of GATA-4.[7] Our previous study suggests that GAS attenuates cardiac hypertrophy
through the Stim1–Orai1 pathway of store-operated Ca2+ entry.[6] However, GAS may be an effective
intervention in preventing hypertrophy when focusing directly on a
single gene, such as Orai1. However, it is also important
to consider that GAS treatment can simultaneously affect other genes
and may have both counterproductive and/or synergistic effects. Since
targets by which GAS regulates in preventing cardiac hypertrophy are
a relatively new field of study, understanding the DEGs that are regulated
by GAS during progression of cardiac hypertrophy, as offered by this
study, provides clues for the mechanism of GAS action.As high-throughput
RNA-seq technology has been rapidly developed,
it has been increasingly used to study genetic and molecular mechanisms
that underlie complex diseases, such as cardiac hypertrophy.[28] Lee et al. analyzed mouse cardiac transcriptome
complexity during heart failure using the RNA-seq technique.[29] By identifying unique transcriptomic signatures
of physiological hypertrophy and pathological hypertrophy of the heart,
Song et al. employed RNA-seq and found not only DEGs but also different
alternative splicing patterns during the progression of hypertrophy.[30] In addition, Hu et al. studied mRNA and microRNA
transcriptome changes that occur during pressure overloading hypertrophy
in mice hearts.[31] In order to identify
GAS therapeutic targets, we conducted RNA-seq experiments to categorize
the genes that are differentially expressed in Ang II-induced cardiac
hypertrophy in the mouse animal model in response to GAS treatment.
Herein, a total of 707 DEGs (620 upregulated and 87 downregulated)
were obtained, among which 58 and 146 Ang II-mediated DEGs were reversed
by different doses of GAS (5 or 50 mg/kg) and identified in the first
step (Figure A,B).Next, we noticed that low-dose GAS mainly exerts anti-inflammatory
effects by inhibiting IL-1 and TLR4 signaling pathways to inhibit
Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. However, high-dose GAS exerts
an inhibitory effect through the dual regulation of immunity and metabolism.
Studies have demonstrated that cardiac hypertrophy is related to the
activation of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway. That is, increased
systemic inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-1β)
and TLR4 activity can trigger cardiac hypertrophy, while the inhibition
of this pathway is beneficial for alleviating cardiac dysfunction.[32,33] The most significant change in metabolism of the hypertrophic heart
is an increased dependence on glucose, a reduction in oxidative metabolism,
and an improvement in oxidative efficiency, which are all important
goals for the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy.[34] Additionally, excessive accumulation of lipids in cardiomyocytes
and reduced lipid oxidation can also cause reduced heart function
and cardiomyopathy.[35] These results suggest
that we should choose different doses of GAS for treatment, according
to the pathological and metabolic characteristics of a hypertrophic
heart. Subsequently, these Ang II-mediated DEGs reversed by GAS were
separated by GO terms into three different groups, including BP, CC,
and MF (Figure A–C).
Gene function analysis demonstrated that GAS has an anti-Ang II-induced
cardiac hypertrophic effect by influencing a variety of signaling
pathways, such as glucose homeostasis, response to insulin, negative
regulation of immune response, notch signaling pathway, and regulation
of lipase activity (Figure D), which is consistent with prior evidence. This indicates
that GAS resists Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy through the Ras
protein signaling pathway and that the key target is in DEGs related
to this pathway. In addition, we noticed that Ang II induces a large
number of upregulated genes, which were enriched in multiple pathways,
including the regulation of Ras protein signal transduction, heart
contraction and glucose metabolism, cell growth, apoptosis, cell cycle,
metabolism, and cell movement (Figure A–C). The two main cellular pathways in which
Ras proteins act include the MAPK and PI3K pathways. In normal cells,
these control multiple functions, such as cell growth and survival.[36] These results indicate that cardiac hypertrophy
is accompanied by the activation of the Ras protein signaling pathway.
The treatment of cardiomyocytes with a variety of hypertrophic agents
can lead to an increased ratio of Ras in the form of active GTP ligands,
such as endothelin-1, phenylephrine, and phorbol ester.[37] Ang II has a similar effect, as it mainly activates
the Ras/MAPK pathway by activating the cytochrome P450 metabolites,
which leads to hypertension, vascular damage, and cardiac hypertrophy.[38] Our transcriptomic analysis results are consistent
with these studies, in which Ang II plays a role in promoting cardiac
hypertrophy by affecting the Ras signaling pathway. In the third step,
a DEG PPI network complex was developed, in which a total of 15 DEGs
of the 23 commonly altered DEGs were filtered into this DEG complex
(Figure A). We discovered
that Igf2 exhibited significant alteration and high
connectivity in Ang II-induced hypertrophy prior to and after GAS
treatment.In order to verify the expression of Igf2, an
Ang II-induced hypertrophic model in NRCMs was successfully established
(Figure A). Consistent
with results from the bioinformatics analysis, the mRNA expression
of Igf2 was significantly upregulated in Ang II-induced
hypertrophic NRCMs and downregulated by GAS treatment, which suggests
that Igf2 likely plays a central role in Ang II-induced
cardiac hypertrophy before and after GAS treatment (Figure B). It has also been reported
that IGF2 has a hypertrophic effect and activates a hypertrophic pathway
in the neonatal ventricular myocytes.[17] Previous studies have determined that after binding with IGF2, IGF2R
triggers an intracellular signaling cascade that contributes to the
progression of pathologic cardiac hypertrophy.[12] Therefore, we further examined the expression of IGF2R
and determined that Ang II-induced IGF2R increase was inhibited by
GAS treatment (Figure D). IGF2R was originally discovered as a significantly upregulated
protein in pathological hypertrophic cardiomyocytes[39] as well as in the myocardial infarction scars that had
undergone myocardial remodeling fibrosis.[11] The overexpression and activation of IGF2R resulted in cardiac hypertrophy
and apoptosis in H9C2 and NRCMs.[12,40,41] The findings from our present study indicate that
the expression of IGF2/IGF2R was altered during cardiac hypertrophy
with or without GAS pretreatment but does not elucidate the underlying
mechanism. Further studies are required to explore the underlying
mechanism of GAS treatment in cardiac hypertrophy.
Conclusions
In summary, we utilized the next-generation sequencing technology
to examine the effect of GAS on transcripts in an Ang II-induced hypertrophic
model. Our bioinformatics analysis reveals that Ang II-mediated DEGs
reversed by GAS were associated with regulating Ras protein signal
transduction, covalent chromatin modification, heart contraction,
glucose metabolism, and quaternary ammonium group transport. Among
these DEGs, Igf2 expression was dramatically reduced
by post-GAS treatment in the prevention of cardiac hypertrophy, which
emphasizes its clinical relevance. Furthermore, IGF2R was further
upregulated by Ang II, and this increase was substantially inhibited
by GAS treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
report to demonstrate that GAS attenuates cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting
IGF2/IGF2R expression to protect against cardiac hypertrophy.
Methods
Animal
Experiments
Sprague-Dawley (S/D) rats (1–2
days) and male C57BL/6 mice (8 weeks) were provided by the Laboratory
Animal Center of Kunming Medical University. The animals were fed
ad libitum with free access to water and were housed in a stable environment
with 12/12 h light/dark cycle, 23–25 °C room temperature,
and 50–60% humidity. The mice were divided into six experimental
groups: first group which received sham surgery and the same volume
of vehicle solution, a second group with GAS (oral gavage, 5 mg/kg/d,
7 days before surgery), a third group with GAS (oral gavage, 50 mg/kg/d,
7 days before surgery), a fourth group with Ang II infusion, a fifth
group with Ang II and GAS (oral gavage, 5 mg/kg/d, 7 days before surgery),
and a sixth group with Ang II and GAS (oral gavage, 50 mg/kg/d, 7
days before surgery). For Ang II infusion, osmotic minipumps (Alza
Corp., Alzet model 1002, Cupertino, CA) were implanted subcutaneously
into mice. Ang II was delivered using pumps at a rate of 1.5 mg/kg/d
for 14 days. GAS was dissolved in 0.9% saline solution for animal
experiments. The heart rate was measured using tail-cuff plethysmography
every other day during the treatment. At the end of the experiment,
the mice were euthanized, and the hearts were removed and weighed
to determine the HW/BW. All experiments were granted approval by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kunming Medical
University.
Hypertrophic Model of Cultured Cardiomyocytes
The isolation
and culture of NRCMs were previously described.[42] Briefly, ventricles from 1- to 2-day-old neonatal S/D rats
were sliced into 1 mm3 pieces and digested in a series
of 4–5 steps using collagenase II (Worthington, LS004176) and
trypsin (Gibco, 15400-054) at 37 °C. The dissociated cardiomyocytes
were then suspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
[Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12)] with GlutaMAX (GIBCO, 10565-018)
with 10% horse serum (GIBCO, 16050-122), 5% FBS (Hyclone, SH30406.05),
and 50 μg/mL gentamicin (Biological Industries, 03-035-1B).
The cardiomyocytes were then separated from fibroblasts using a matrigel
(Corning, 354234) gradient centrifugation step to allow the selective
adhesion of cardiac fibroblasts to the cell culture dishes. Nonadhesive
cardiomyocytes in the suspension were transferred to another dish,
cultured for 24 h in DMEM, and then cultured with NRCMs in Opti-MEM-reduced
serum medium (Thermo, 51985034) for 24 h. The NRCMs were treated with
GAS (100 μmol/L) for 12 h and then exposed to Ang II (100 nmol/L)
for 48 h to induce hypertrophy.
RNA Extraction and Library
Preparation
Total RNA of
the heart samples was isolated using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen,
Germany). The purity, concentration, and integrity of the total RNA
were determined utilizing a NanoDrop2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), an agarose gel electrophoresis (1.0%),
and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa
Clara, CA). Satisfactory RNA with an RNA integrity number greater
than 7.0 was utilized for library construction and sequencing. The
RNA samples were pooled and used to generate sequencing libraries
through the use of Illumina TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina,
San Diego, CA). All libraries were constructed and sequenced using
PE 250 through the Illumina Novaseq6000 platform, according to standard
procedures. All data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus
database under the accession number GSE164187.
Mapping and Assembly of
RNA-Seq Data
Clean data were
acquired from the raw data by removing adapter sequences and trimming
reads using poly-N and low quality reads, which is when the percentage
of low-quality bases is over 50% in a read. The subsequent workflows
of alignment, assembly, and mapping for these RNA-seq data were all
completed in https://usegalaxy.org.[43] In brief, clean reads from all libraries
were aligned according to the Mus musculus reference
genome (Mus_musculus. GRCm38.p6) from Ensembl database using HISAT2
v 2.2.1.[44] The mapped reads of each library
were assembled through the use of StringTie v2.1.3.[45] Gtf files were generated by Stringtie and converted to
gene count matrix using Ballgown v2.22.[46]
DEG Identification
DESeq2 v1.30[47] helped identify DEGs between the Ang II modeling group
and the sham operation group using the Benjamini–Hochberg method
adjusted p value (FDR) ≤ 0.05 as well as the
absolute value of log 2 FC > 1. Then, we compared gene expression
changes of Ang II modeling and sham operation groups using different
doses (5 or 50 mg/kg/d) of GAS treatment and calculated the interaction
effect between GAS and Ang II using ImpulseDE v1.16.[48] We defined GAS-inverted DEGs as the genes of interaction
with FDR ≤ 0.05 and the absolute value of inverted log 2 FC
> 1 in Ang II-induced DEGs.
Functional Analysis for
DEGs
All DEGs were examined
using clusterProfiler v3.18 for GO enrichment.[49] A p value < 0.05 and q value < 0.2 were considered to be significantly enriched GO terminology.
Next, the enriched GO terms were analyzed by REVIGO for semantic similarity,[50] with dispersion <0.4 being considered as
a key term. The summarized GO terms were used by the treemap package
in R to demonstrate the relationship between GO terms. Furthermore,
the enrichplot package in R helped construct the gene function networks.
All GAS-inverted DEGs were constructed to a PPI network using STRING
V11.9.[51] According to the network analysis,
we selected 23 highly inverted genes with top connectivity to reconstruct
a core PPI network.
Analysis of mRNA Expression by qRT-PCR
In order to
determine the mRNA expressions of Nppa, Nppb, Igf2, and Igf2r, we performed
qRT-PCR analyses. We isolated total RNA using the TRIZOL reagent from
the myocardium tissues. The cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of
total RNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara,
RR047A). Gapdh was utilized as a housekeeping control.
The primer sequences were as follows: Gapdh forward
CCATCAACGACCCCTTCATT, reverse CACGACATACTCAGCACCAGC; Nppa forward ACCTGCTAGACCACCTGGAGGAG, reverse CCTTGGCTGTTATCT TCGGTACCG; Nppb forward GCTGCTTTGGGCACAAGATAG, reverse GGTCTTCCTACAACAACTTCA; Igf2r forward AACTGCCAGGTGAAAGACCC, reverse TCTGATTAAGGAGCCCTGCC. Igf2 forward CTAGAGCATCCCGAGAATCCAG, reverse CCAACATCGACTTCCCCACTG; Apoa1 forward TCTTCCTGACAGGTTGCCAAG, reverse TGGCGAAATCCTTCACCCTG; Apoa2 forward CCATCTGTAGCCTAGAAGGAGC, reverse GCTGGGCCTTCTCCATCAAA; Notch2 forward ATGTGTCAACGGCTGGAGTG, reverse GCAAGAGAAGGAGGCCACAC; Syne2 forward ATCGAGGCAGTGAGGCGAG, reverse GGGGCTATCGGCCATTCTTC; Scgb3a1 forward CATTCCACCATGAAGCTCACC, reverse CGAAGAAAGCAACGCCAGAGT; Luc7l forward TCCTAAATCCATGCGCGTCC, reverse CCTGCATTGACACCTGTGAA.
The qRT-PCR was conducted using Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time
PCR system (Applied Biosystems, NY) and TB Green Premix Ex Taq II
(Takara, RR820B). Relative quantification was calculated according
to the ΔΔCT method.
Western Blotting
Myocardium tissues or cell lysates
were prepared in the RIPA (Beyotime, P0013B) lysis buffer and resolved
on a SDS/PAGE gel. Next, they were blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF) membrane. Then, the PVDF membrane was blocked using 2% BSA
in TBST for 1 h at room temperature, which was followed by incubation
with primary antibodies, including anti-IGF2R (Cell Signaling Technology,
14364S), anti-α-Tubulin (Cell Signaling Technology, 2144S),
and anti-ANP (proteintech, 27426-1-AP) at 4 °C overnight. After
incubating with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibodies, we visualized the protein bands using enhanced
chemiluminescence detection system. The intensity of immunoblot bands
was quantified using the ImageJ software.
siRNA Transfection
NRCMs were seeded at a density of
1.2 × 106/well in a 6-well dish and were cultured
in a humidified incubator (95% air with 5% CO2) for 24
h. The Igf2r-siRNA and INVI DNA–RNA Transfection
Reagent (Invigentech, IV1216150) were suspended in Opti-MEM medium
(GIBCO, 31985062), which was followed by adding cultured cells to
a final concentration of 120 nM. After culturing for 6 h, the medium
was replaced with normal medium, which was followed by a 24 h incubation
period. The small interfering RNAs (Igf2r-siRNA and
scrambled-siRNA) were purchased from Gene Pharma.
Drugs
GAS (Aladdin, S31318) (100 μmol/L, dissolved
in PBS) was added 12 h prior to treating NRCMs with Ang II (Aladdin,
A107852) (100 nmol/L, dissolved in sterilized water) or recombinant
IGF2 (Cloud-Clone Corp, RRA051Ra01) (100 ng/mL, dissolved in 20 mM
Tris, and 150 mM NaCl) for 48 h. Next, the culture media containing
the different drugs were renewed every 24 h.
Statistical Analysis
All values were expressed as mean
± SEM (n), where n corresponds
to the number of independent experiments. The significant differences
were evaluated using paired or unpaired Student’s t-test to compare two groups using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad
Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). The differences were considered to
be statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Authors: M M Muthalif; N A Karzoun; L Gaber; Z Khandekar; I F Benter; A E Saeed; J H Parmentier; A Estes; K U Malik Journal: Hypertension Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Ping Yang; Yi Han; Li Gui; Jun Sun; Yuan-li Chen; Rui Song; Jia-zhi Guo; Ya-nan Xie; Di Lu; Lin Sun Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Damian Szklarczyk; Annika L Gable; David Lyon; Alexander Junge; Stefan Wyder; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Milan Simonovic; Nadezhda T Doncheva; John H Morris; Peer Bork; Lars J Jensen; Christian von Mering Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 16.971