| Literature DB >> 34250160 |
Yong Hu1, Cheng Yue2, Xiucun Li1, ZhengXun Li1, Dongsheng Zhou3, Hailin Xu4, Ning Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current techniques for medial malleolar osteotomy may lead to posterior tibial tendon injury and have a high rate of malunion.Entities:
Keywords: displacement; mechanical stability; osteochondral lesions; talar fracture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34250160 PMCID: PMC8237210 DOI: 10.1177/2325967121989988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Diagram of the partial step-cut osteotomy technique. (A) The first cut was made approximately 1.5 to 2.0 cm above the anterior margin of the distal tibia at the ankle joint in the transverse plane, and the second cut was made approximately 1.5 to 2.0 cm lateral to the axilla on the medial tibial plafond in the sagittal plane. (B) The depth of these 2 cuts involved the anterior one-third to two-thirds of the medial malleolus in the sagittal plane. The third cut was made in the coronal plane to join the above 2 cuts. (C) The osteotomized medial malleolus was then reflected plantarward on the deltoid ligament to expose the medial part of the talar dome.
Figure 2.Exposure of the talus. (A) The anterior and medial sides of the medial malleolus were exposed through an incision slightly anterior to the midline and curved at the malleolus. (B) A total of 3 cuts were performed. (C) The medial malleolus was then reflected plantarward on the deltoid ligament to expose the medial osteotomized part of the talar dome. (D) The necrotic sequestrum was removed and curetted until bleeding was observed from the surrounding bone. (E) Autologous osteoperiosteal cylinder grafting of the iliac crest. (F) The harvested block was inserted into the defect with the periosteum layer parallel to the cartilage level.
Figure 3.Immediate fixation after osteotomy with 2 cancellous lag screws or 1 lag screw plus a buttress plate.
Characteristics of Study Patients
| Patient | Age, y | Sex | Side Affected | Lesion Size, cm2 | Containment Type | Zone | Previous Intervention | Associated Procedure | Type of Fixation | Osteotomy Time, min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | M | R | 2.8 | Uncontained | 1 | — | — | 2 lag screws | 12 |
| 2 | 35 | M | R | 2.5 | Uncontained | 4 | — | ATFL reconstruction | Plate + 1 lag screw | 13 |
| 3 | 25 | M | R | 2.2 | Contained | 4 | Debridement | — | 2 lag screws | 16 |
| 4 | 43 | M | L | 2.1 | Contained | 4 | — | — | 2 lag screws | 11 |
| 5 | 19 | M | R | 2.4 | Uncontained | 4 | — | ATFL reconstruction | 2 lag screws | 15 |
| 6 | 38 | F | R | 2.5 | Uncontained | 4 | Debridement | — | 2 lag screws | 14 |
| 7 | 40 | F | R | 2 | Contained | 4 | — | — | Plate + 1 lag screw | 15 |
| 8 | 48 | M | R | 1.8 | Contained | 4 | — | — | Plate + 1 lag screw | 11 |
| 9 | 52 | M | R | 1.2 | Contained | 4 | Microfracture | — | Plate + 1 lag screw | 14 |
| 10 | 43 | M | L | 1.5 | Contained | 4 | — | — | Plate + 1 lag screw | 12 |
| 11 | 36 | F | R | 2.2 | Contained | 4 | — | — | Plate + 1 lag screw | 12 |
| 12 | 42 | M | Bilateral | 1.6 (L); 2 (R) | Contained (both sides) | 4 (both sides) | — | — | 2 lag screws (both sides) | 10 (L); 11 (R) |
| 13 | 26 | M | R | 1.8 | Contained | 7 | — | — | 2 lag screws | 13 |
| 14 | 38 | M | L | 1.9 | Contained | 4 | Synovectomy | — | 2 lag screws | 12 |
| 15 | 42 | M | R | 2.2 | Contained | 1 | Microfracture | — | 2 lag screws | 15 |
| 16 | 28 | F | L | 1.6 | Uncontained | 4 | — | ATFL reconstruction | 2 lag screws | 10 |
| 17 | 38 | M | R | 1.8 | Contained | 4 | Debridement | — | 2 lag screws | 10 |
| 18 | 50 | M | L | 2.4 | Contained | 7 | — | — | 2 lag screws | 14 |
Dashes indicate that the category is not applicable. ATFL, anterior talofibular ligament; F, female; L, left; M, male; R, right.
According to the 9-zone grid scheme of Elias et al.
Figure 4.The 9-zone anatomic grid scheme of the talar dome used to indicate the location of the osteochondral lesion of the talus. Zones 1, 4, and 7 are positioned on the medial talus, and zones 1, 2, and 3 are positioned anteriorly.
Figure 5.Follow-up radiographs demonstrating union after osteotomy.
Radiographic and Functional Results
| Patient | Medial Displacement, mm | Proximal Displacement, mm | AOFAS Score | VAS Score | Time to Heal, wk | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | Postoperative | Preoperative | Postoperative | ||||
| 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 65 | 78 | 7.5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2 | 0.3 | 1 | 50 | 81 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 8 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 92 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 90 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 87 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 | 0.5 | 1 | 58 | 70 | 6.5 | 0 | 6 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 82 | 5 | 2.5 | 6 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 80 | 6.5 | 3 | 6 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 91 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 88 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 87 | 5 | 0.5 | 6 |
| 12 (L) | 0 | 0 | 58 | 79 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 12 (R) | 0 | 0 | 69 | 98 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 13 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 64 | 82 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 6 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 87 | 6 | 2 | 12 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 88 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 8 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 77 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 80 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 90 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society; L, left; R, right; VAS, visual analog scale.