| Literature DB >> 34249855 |
Benxin Jing1,2, Xiaofeng Wang3, Yi Shi3, Yingxi Zhu1,2, Haifeng Gao3, Susan K Fullerton-Shirey4,5.
Abstract
Polyethylene oxide (PEO)-based polymers are commonly studied for use as a solid polymer electrolyte for rechargeable Li-ion batteries; however, simultaneously achieving sufficient mechanical integrity and ionic conductivity has been a challenge. To address this problem, a customized polymer architecture is demonstrated wherein PEO bottle-brush arms are hyperbranched into a star architecture and then functionalized with end-grafted, linear PEO chains. The hierarchical architecture is designed to minimize crystallinity and therefore enhance ion transport via hyperbranching, while simultaneously addressing the need for mechanical integrity via the grafting of long, PEO chains (M n = 10,000). The polymers are doped with lithium bis(trifluoromethane) sulfonimide (LiTFSI), creating hierarchically hyperbranched (HB) solid polymer electrolytes. Compared to electrolytes prepared with linear PEO of equivalent molecular weight, the HB PEO electrolytes increase the room temperature ionic conductivity from ∼2.5 × 10-6 to 2.5 × 10-5 S/cm. The conductivity increases by an additional 50% by increasing the block length of the linear PEO in the bottle brush arms from M n = 1,000 to 2,000. The mechanical properties are improved by end-grafting linear PEO (M n = 10,000) onto the terminal groups of the HB PEO bottle-brush. Specifically, the Young's modulus increases by two orders of magnitude to a level comparable to commercial PEO films, while only reducing the conductivity by 50% below the HB electrolyte without grafted PEO. This study addresses the trade-off between ion conductivity and mechanical properties, and shows that while significant improvements can be made to the mechanical properties with hierarchical grafting of long, linear chains, only modest gains are made in the room temperature conductivity.Entities:
Keywords: hierarchically hyperbranched polymers; lithium ion battery; low crystallinity; polyethylene oxide; solid polymer electrolyte
Year: 2021 PMID: 34249855 PMCID: PMC8268023 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.563864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
SCHEME 1Schematic of the synthesis routes of HB PEO (HB-1k; HB-2k) and end-capped HB PEO (HB-1k-10k).
FIGURE 1(A) Volume fraction distribution of the measured hydrodynamic diameter, D h, of HB MI and HB PEO in DCM by DLS. (B) SEC trace profiles of HB MI and HB PEO in DMF based on linear PMMA standards for HB MI and linear PEO standards for HB PEO samples.
Structural information for the HB MI and HB PEO synthesized in this work.
| Polymer |
| CV |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HB MI (core) | 13 | 0.25 | 132 × 103 | 1.3 |
| HB-65nm-2k | 65 | 0.23 | 452 × 103 | 1.2 |
| HB-68nm-1k | 68 | 0.21 | 478 × 103 | 1.29 |
| HB-80nm-1k | 80 | 0.19 | 621 × 103 | 1.29 |
| HB-106nm-1k-10k | 106 | 0.17 | 913 × 103 | 1.30 |
Hydrodynamic diameter (D h) and coefficient of variation (CV) in DCM measured by DLS.
Apparent number-average molecular weight, M n,RI and polydispersity M w/M n measured by DMF SEC, calibrated with linear PMMA standards.
FIGURE 2AFM micrographs showing the topology of (A) HB-68nm-1k and (B) HB-106nm-1k-10k, both of which were deposited from their corresponding dilute (0.01 g/L) HB PEO solution in acetonitrile. The scale bar for both panels is 200 nm.
FIGURE 3(A) Distribution of Young’s modulus measurements by nano-indentation with AFM for i) HB-68nm-1k and ii) HB-106nm-1k-10k. (B) AFM topology scans of the HB-106nm-1k-10k film deposited from concentrated (10 g/L) HB PEO solution in acetonitrile. The scale bar is 200 nm. (C) Measured Young’s modulus (E) of HB-68nm-1k and HB-106nm-1k-10k films by nano-indentation with AFM, which was averaged over 100 force curve measurements shown in (B). The error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
FIGURE 4Temperature-dependent ionic conductivity showing the effect of HB PEO molecular architecture and thermal history. Measured conductivity (σ) vs. 1,000/T (K−1) of (A) HB and linear PEO electrolytes and (B) HB-80nm-1k (circles) and HB-106nm-1k-10k (squares) upon heating (filled symbols) and cooling (open symbols). The solid lines in (A) and (B) are fits using the Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher Eq. 2. Samples are equilibrated at each temperature for 10 min before data collection.
FIGURE 5DSC measurements of heat flow for different HB and linear PEO/LiTFSI electrolytes upon (A) cooling from 80 to −90°C and (B) heating from −90 to −20°C. Tc is capture in panel (A) and Tg is capture in panel (B) and tabulated in Table 2.
Thermal properties of the electrolytes: glass transition (Tg), melting (Tm), crystallization temperatures (Tc), and crystal fraction (Xcrystal) of the HB and linear PEO/LiTFSI electrolytes.
| PEO electrolyte | Tg ( | Tm ( | Tc ( | Xcrystal (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1k | −53.9 | 27.5 | −23.5 | 26.6 |
| L2k | −37.9 | 45.6 | 4.7 | 44.8 |
| L10k | −34.6 | 55.0 | 30.4 | 49.4 |
| L1.5M | −35.2 | 55.4 | 37.5 | 53.5 |
| HB-80nm-1k | −51.2 | 28.4 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| HB-65nm-2k | −38.2 | 43.4 | 2.4 | 35.5 |
| HB-106nm-1k-10k | −47.4 | 42.0 | − | 0.1 |
Measured during heating sweep after equilibrating at −90.
C for 10 min (Supplementary Figure S5), indicating sluggish recrystallization kinetics.