Literature DB >> 34249640

Change in left ventricular velocity time integral during Trendelenburg maneuver predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients in the operating room.

Guo-Guang Ma1,2, Li-Ying Xu3, Jing-Chao Luo1, Jun-Yi Hou1, Guang-Wei Hao1, Ying Su1, Kai Liu1, Shen-Ji Yu1, Guo-Wei Tu1, Zhe Luo1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluid responsiveness is an important topic for clinicians. We investigated whether changes in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) during a Trendelenburg position (TP) maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness as a non-invasive marker in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients in the operating room.
METHODS: This prospective, single-center observational study, performed in the operating room, enrolled 65 elective CABG patients. Hemodynamic data coupled with transesophageal echocardiography monitoring of the LVOT VTI and the peak velocity were collected at each step [baseline 1, TP, baseline 2 and fluid challenge (FC)]. Patients whose VTI increased ≥15% after FC (500 mL of Gelofusine infusion within 30 min) were considered responders.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight (43.1%) patients were responders to fluid administration. VTI changes during the TP maneuver predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), with a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 70% at a threshold of 10% (gray zone, 8-15%). The increase in VTI during the TP was correlated with the VTI changes induced by FC (r=0.61, P<0.0001). Changes in peak velocity and pulse pressure during the TP were poorly predictive of fluid responsiveness, with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60-0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.77), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: An increase in VTI induced by the TP could predict fluid responsiveness in CABG patients in the operating room. However, changes in peak velocity and pulse pressure stimulated by the TP could not reliably predict fluid responsiveness. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid responsiveness; Trendelenburg position (TP); cardiac surgery; hemodynamic monitoring; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); velocity time integral (VTI)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34249640      PMCID: PMC8250022          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  35 in total

1.  Trendelenburg positioning after cardiac surgery: effects on intrathoracic blood volume index and cardiac performance.

Authors:  D A Reuter; T W Felbinger; C Schmidt; K Moerstedt; E Kilger; P Lamm; A E Goetz
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Postoperative Critical Care of the Adult Cardiac Surgical Patient. Part I: Routine Postoperative Care.

Authors:  R Scott Stephens; Glenn J R Whitman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (RUSH) Velocity-Time Integral: A Proposal to Expand the RUSH Protocol.

Authors:  Pablo Blanco; Francisco Miralles Aguiar; Michael Blaivas
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients by Using Combined End-Expiratory and End-Inspiratory Occlusions With Echocardiography.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; François Depret; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Emmanuel Alphonsine; Christopher Lai; Christian Richard; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Predicting Fluid Responsiveness by Passive Leg Raising: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Thomas G V Cherpanath; Alexander Hirsch; Bart F Geerts; Wim K Lagrand; Mariska M Leeflang; Marcus J Schultz; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for predicting fluid challenge in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Hui-Bin Huang; Biao Xu; Guang-Yun Liu; Bin Du
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-06

9.  End-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Li-Ying Xu; Guo-Wei Tu; Jing Cang; Jun-Yi Hou; Ying Yu; Zhe Luo; Ke-Fang Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

10.  Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.

Authors:  Hodane Yonis; Laurent Bitker; Mylène Aublanc; Sophie Perinel Ragey; Zakaria Riad; Floriane Lissonde; Aurore Louf-Durier; Sophie Debord; Florent Gobert; Romain Tapponnier; Claude Guérin; Jean-Christophe Richard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Rui Shi; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 10.318

2.  A Wireless Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Detects Changing Stroke Volume: Proof-of-Principle Comparison with Trans-Esophageal Echocardiography during Coronary Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Jon-Émile Stuart Kenny; Geoffrey Clarke; Matt Myers; Mai Elfarnawany; Andrew M Eibl; Joseph K Eibl; Bhanu Nalla; Rony Atoui
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.