Literature DB >> 34249636

Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking technology for differentiating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction.

Huaibi Huo1, Xu Dai1, Simiao Li1, Yue Zheng1, Jie Zhou1, Yao Song1, Shuang Liu2, Yang Hou3, Ting Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking (CMR-TT) technology in the quantitative evaluation of left myocardial infarction for differentiating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction.
METHODS: A total of 104 human subjects were enrolled in this prospective study. Among them, 64 healthy subjects and 40 patients with left ventricular myocardial infarction and 7 days and 6 months' follow-up CMR studies, including steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence and late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging, were enrolled. The strain parameters of the infarcted myocardium, its corresponding remote segments, and global right ventricular strain were analyzed using tissue tracking technology, and CMR-TT 3D strain parameters in radial, circumferential, and longitudinal directions were obtained. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CMR-TT strain parameters for discriminating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Peak radial strain (RS) of infarcted myocardium increased from 12.99±7.28 to 18.57±6.66 at 6 months (P<0.001), whereas peak circumferential strain (CS) increased from -8.82±4.71 to -12.78±3.55 (P<0.001). CS yielded the best areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.751 in showing differentiation between acute and chronic myocardial infarction of all the strain parameters obtained. The highest significant differences between acute myocardial infarction and normal myocardium, both in the left and right ventricles, were also found in the RS (P<0.001) and CS (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RS and CS obtained by CMR-TT have high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of acute versus chronic myocardial infarction, and their use is thus worth popularizing in clinical application. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); acute myocardial infarction (AMI); chronic myocardial infarction (CMI); myocardial strain; tissue tracking

Year:  2021        PMID: 34249636      PMCID: PMC8250004          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-1109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  28 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard R Chaitman; Jeroen J Bax; David A Morrow; Harvey D White
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2018-08-25

3.  Cardiac strain as a universal biomarker: interpreting the sounds of uneasy heart muscle cells.

Authors:  Partho P Sengupta; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05

4.  Recovery of myocardial mechanics in Kawasaki disease demonstrated by speckle tracking and tissue Doppler methods.

Authors:  Emine Azak; Ibrahim Ilker Cetin; Hazım A Gursu; Ayse Esin Kibar; Murat Surucu; Ali Orgun; Utku Pamuk
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential gold standard for infarct quantification.

Authors:  Marcus Carlsson; Hakan Arheden; Charles B Higgins; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Strain-encoded MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function and transmurality in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mirja Neizel; Dirk Lossnitzer; Grigorios Korosoglou; Tim Schäufele; Hooman Peykarjou; Henning Steen; Christina Ocklenburg; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Nael F Osman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Characterisation of Myocardial Injury via T1 Mapping in Early Reperfused Myocardial Infarction and its Relationship with Global and Regional Diastolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Shah M Azarisman; Angelo Carbone; Mitra Shirazi; Julie Bradley; Karen S Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.975

8.  Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and tagging for the assessment of left ventricular systolic strain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jamal N Khan; Anvesha Singh; Sheraz A Nazir; Prathap Kanagala; Anthony H Gershlick; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Clinical experience of strain imaging using DENSE for detecting infarcted cardiac segments.

Authors:  Johan Kihlberg; Henrik Haraldsson; Andreas Sigfridsson; Tino Ebbers; Jan E Engvall
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Feature tracking CMR reveals abnormal strain in preclinical arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/ cardiomyopathy: a multisoftware feasibility and clinical implementation study.

Authors:  Mimount Bourfiss; Davis M Vigneault; Mounes Aliyari Ghasebeh; Brittney Murray; Cynthia A James; Crystal Tichnell; Firdaus A Mohamed Hoesein; Stefan L Zimmerman; Ihab R Kamel; Hugh Calkins; Harikrishna Tandri; Birgitta K Velthuis; David A Bluemke; Anneline S J M Te Riele
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of right ventricular function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Yongning Shang; Yulin Zhang; Weiling Leng; Xiaotian Lei; Liu Chen; Xiaoyue Zhou; Ziwen Liang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.