Literature DB >> 34249472

Political Party Identification and Romantic Relationship Quality.

Troy L Fangmeier1, Scott M Stanley1, Kayla Knopp2, Galena K Rhoades1.   

Abstract

Although there are studies on voting similarity in mate selection, very little research has examined party identification and relationship quality. We assessed associations between reports of personal and partner voting behavior (Democrat, Republican, or Independent) and both relationship adjustment and commitment to one's partner. We used a national (U.S.) sample of individuals (N = 510) in their 20s and 30s who were mostly in different-sex, serious relationships (Mdn duration = 5.25 years; 50% married). Controlling for age, college graduation, income, religiosity, minority status, and duration of relationship, voting Republican was associated with higher levels of commitment compared to voting Democrat. Similarly, being partnered with someone voting Republican was associated with higher relationship adjustment and commitment compared to being partnered with someone voting Democrat. Notably, differences in commitment were found only among those who were not already married or engaged. Findings were largely consistent with numerous online reports of survey data that have shown modestly greater relationship quality among those who report being politically conservative. While research has shown that people are less attracted to those who vote differently and that voting differently can be associated with lower relationship quality, we did not generally find perceived voting similarity to be associated with relationship adjustment or commitment. There was one exception: In exploratory analyses, Republicans paired with Democrats tended to report substantially lower relationship adjustment than if paired with Republicans. Implications for political differences among intimate partners and clinical work around these themes are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Relationship quality; marriage; politics

Year:  2020        PMID: 34249472      PMCID: PMC8266382          DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Couple Family Psychol        ISSN: 2160-4096


  6 in total

1.  Communication, conflict, and commitment: insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey.

Authors:  Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman; Sarah W Whitton
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2002

2.  Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.

Authors:  Stéphane Sabourin; Pierre Valois; Yvan Lussier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-03

3.  Religion in families 1999 to 2009: A relational spirituality framework.

Authors:  Annette Mahoney
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2010-08

4.  The role of leaders' working alliance in premarital education.

Authors:  Jesse J Owen; Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-02

5.  Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2010-10

6.  Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew D Bramlett; William D Mosher
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2002-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.