| Literature DB >> 34249402 |
Chi-Ting Yang1, Paul Siu Fai Yip2,3.
Abstract
The suicide rate in Hong Kong has increased significantly over the past four decades. Population subgroups such as the elderly or economically-distressed are reported to be more vulnerable than others to suicidal behaviors, while changing suicide methods (such as charcoal burning which emerged in 1998), has also contributed significantly to increasing suicide rates. However, the extent of the contribution of different factors to changes in suicide rate remains unclear. This paper reported on a decomposition analysis of the epidemiological profile of suicide in Hong Kong between 1976 and 2015, specifically considering factors underlying the increasing suicide rate over this period. Completed death registry information was available from the Census and Statistics Department of the Hong Kong SAR for this investigation. We compared absolute and relative contributions of gender, age and suicide method to rate changes over time. Changes in suicide rate were generally underpinned by more than one factor. Population aging in a rapidly-aging city contributed significantly to suicide rate increases, whilst jumping from a height had the greatest influence on rate changes throughout the study period. Suicides by male aged 25-34 years and 45-54 years were more likely to be triggered by economic factors, compared with the other gender-age subgroups. The decomposition approach provided a comprehensive understanding about how socioeconomic factors and suicide methods interacted to influence over-time suicide patterns. This research supports development of more focused suicide prevention measures to reduce suicide rate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42379-021-00087-5. © China Population and Development Research 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Decomposition analysis; Epidemiological trend; Hong Kong; Suicide
Year: 2021 PMID: 34249402 PMCID: PMC8259555 DOI: 10.1007/s42379-021-00087-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: China Popul Dev Stud ISSN: 2523-8965
Fig. 1Trends of suicide rates during the period of 1976–2015 in Hong Kong (aged 15 or over) where five significant turning points were identified by Joinpoint regression analysis at the 1% level of significance
Fig. 2The trend of suicide rate during the period of 1976–2015 in Hong Kong by gender (aged 15 or over)
Fig. 3The trend of suicide rate during the period of 1976–2015 in Hong Kong by age group (aged 15 or over)
Fig. 4The trend of suicide rate during the period of 1976–2015 in Hong Kong by method use (aged 15 or over)
Decomposing the proportion contributed by gender, age group and method use to the increase of the overall suicide rate during the period of 1976–2015 in Hong Kong
| Age Group | Male | Female | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Percent %) | Aging | Suicide Rate | Total | Aging | Suicide Rate | Total | ||||||||
| CO | Hanging | Jumping | Poisoning | Other | CO | Hanging | Jumping | Poisoning | Other | |||||
| Period: 1976–1982 | Rate Change: − 8.8 | |||||||||||||
| 15–24 | − 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | − 0.8 | − 2.1 | 0.2 | − 2.5 | − 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.7 | − 1.9 | − 2.9 | − 0.4 | − 4.5 |
| 25–34 | 4.9 | 0.0 | − 4.6 | − 4.7 | − 2.2 | − 0.5 | − 7.1 | 3.8 | 0.0 | − 0.8 | − 5.1 | − 2.3 | − 2.5 | − 6.9 |
| 35–44 | − 1.9 | 0.0 | − 3.3 | − 1.9 | 0.4 | − 1.8 | − 8.4 | − 1.4 | 0.0 | − 0.5 | − 2.4 | − 1.7 | 0.3 | − 5.6 |
| 45–54 | − 1.8 | 0.0 | 1.1 | − 5.0 | − 4.8 | − 0.5 | − 11.0 | − 2.0 | 0.0 | − 1.2 | − 4.7 | − 3.7 | − 1.3 | − 12.9 |
| 55–64 | − 0.3 | 0.0 | − 2.0 | − 6.9 | − 1.6 | − 1.6 | − 12.4 | − 0.4 | 0.0 | − 2.4 | − 0.1 | − 0.8 | − 0.8 | − 4.6 |
| 65 + | 5.0 | 0.0 | − 8.0 | − 7.8 | − 3.1 | − 2.4 | − 16.3 | 1.6 | 0.0 | − 3.2 | − 5.9 | 0.7 | − 1.0 | − 7.8 |
| Total | 5.3 | 0.0 | − 15.9 | − 27.1 | − 13.4 | − 6.6 | − 57.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | − 6.5 | − 20.1 | − 10.7 | − 5.8 | − 42.3 |
| Period: 1982–1985 | Rate Change: 6.2 | |||||||||||||
| 15–24 | − 2.2 | 0.0 | − 0.9 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 6.4 | − 1.6 | 0.0 | − 2.6 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 3.4 |
| 25–34 | 1.0 | 0.0 | − 1.0 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 9.3 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 8.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 14.8 |
| 35–44 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.2 | − 0.8 | 1.7 | 11.2 | 1.4 | 0.0 | − 2.5 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 3.9 |
| 45–54 | − 0.9 | 0.4 | − 3.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.4 | − 0.6 | 0.0 | − 0.7 | 6.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 5.8 |
| 55–64 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 10.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 7.7 | − 0.1 | 0.3 | 11.6 |
| 65 + | 2.0 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 16.4 | 1.7 | 0.0 | − 4.1 | 7.2 | − 1.6 | 2.5 | 5.7 |
| Total | 2.9 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 33.0 | 5.8 | 11.1 | 54.8 | 3.0 | 0.0 | − 4.5 | 37.3 | 2.0 | 7.4 | 45.2 |
| Period: 1985–1999 | Rate Change: − 0.7 | |||||||||||||
| 15–24 | − 49.5 | 13.4 | 2.4 | − 9.7 | − 8.6 | − 22.5 | − 74.6 | − 32.7 | 6.4 | 0.5 | − 0.8 | − 11.3 | − 20.7 | − 58.5 |
| 25–34 | − 106.5 | 107.2 | 2.3 | 13.3 | − 0.5 | − 22.0 | − 6.2 | − 22.7 | 39.4 | − 23.6 | − 16.9 | − 24.0 | − 16.9 | − 64.8 |
| 35–44 | 97.5 | 78.9 | − 58.5 | − 54.0 | − 11.9 | − 13.9 | 38.2 | 63.9 | 20.7 | − 0.9 | − 35.8 | − 29.9 | − 3.5 | 14.5 |
| 45–54 | 38.4 | 55.5 | 28.6 | 12.6 | 5.9 | 8.3 | 149.3 | 34.6 | 23.6 | − 15.4 | − 10.1 | 2.2 | − 4.8 | 30.1 |
| 55–64 | − 25.0 | 28.4 | − 31.6 | − 34.8 | − 14.8 | 5.9 | − 71.9 | − 28.8 | 3.0 | − 10.5 | − 50.9 | 2.8 | − 3.3 | − 87.6 |
| 65 + | 109.8 | 8.9 | − 40.4 | 9.9 | − 12.5 | − 18.8 | 57.0 | 62.2 | 2.4 | − 59.5 | − 4.6 | − 13.5 | − 12.6 | − 25.6 |
| Total | 64.7 | 292.4 | − 97.2 | − 62.8 | − 42.3 | − 63.0 | 91.8 | 76.5 | 95.5 | − 109.2 | − 119.1 | − 73.7 | − 61.9 | − 191.8 |
| Period: 1999–2003 | Rate Change: 5.5 | |||||||||||||
| 15–24 | − 1.4 | 4.4 | − 0.3 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 7.2 | − 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 4.1 | − 0.6 | 0.0 | 3.5 |
| 25–34 | − 4.7 | 8.7 | − 3.3 | 6.6 | − 2.2 | − 0.6 | 4.6 | − 1.9 | 3.8 | 0.1 | − 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 4.2 |
| 35–44 | − 4.3 | 15.0 | 3.7 | 8.7 | − 0.9 | − 1.6 | 20.6 | 0.3 | 5.2 | − 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 8.4 |
| 45–54 | 6.7 | 6.6 | − 3.5 | 5.6 | − 2.7 | − 2.7 | 10.1 | 4.1 | 1.8 | − 2.2 | − 0.4 | − 1.7 | − 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 55–64 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 0.2 | − 0.8 | 12.9 | 0.8 | 2.1 | − 2.0 | 1.7 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | 2.4 |
| 65 + | 3.6 | 2.9 | − 0.3 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 19.4 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.6 | − 0.4 | 6.0 |
| Total | 0.6 | 39.9 | 0.1 | 38.8 | − 3.6 | − 1.1 | 74.8 | 4.6 | 14.3 | − 5.6 | 10.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 25.2 |
| Period: 2003–2006 | Rate Change: − 5.7 | |||||||||||||
| 15–24 | − 0.4 | − 3.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | − 1.8 | 0.1 | − 1.0 | − 0.3 | − 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | − 4.6 |
| 25–34 | − 2.0 | − 9.7 | − 1.2 | − 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | − 15.7 | − 0.9 | − 1.8 | − 0.3 | − 2.1 | − 1.2 | − 0.6 | − 6.9 |
| 35–44 | − 6.2 | − 9.9 | − 3.8 | − 5.0 | 0.1 | 1.7 | − 23.1 | − 1.5 | − 2.2 | 1.3 | 6.1 | − 0.6 | − 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 45–54 | 2.2 | − 6.9 | − 5.1 | − 4.5 | − 0.1 | − 0.2 | − 14.6 | 1.4 | − 3.2 | 0.3 | − 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | − 3.1 |
| 55–64 | 3.5 | − 3.4 | − 4.5 | − 6.7 | − 1.4 | − 1.5 | − 14.0 | 2.3 | − 1.9 | − 0.8 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | − 0.4 | − 0.8 |
| 65 + | 1.6 | − 3.2 | 4.7 | − 6.8 | − 2.9 | − 2.4 | − 9.0 | 1.0 | − 0.6 | − 5.0 | − 0.8 | − 1.7 | − 1.1 | − 8.3 |
| Total | − 1.3 | − 36.8 | − 9.6 | − 24.6 | − 3.9 | − 2.2 | − 78.2 | 2.4 | − 10.8 | − 4.8 | − 2.3 | − 3.2 | − 3.0 | − 21.8 |
| Period: 2006–2015 | Rate Change: − 1.6 | |||||||||||||
| 15–24 | − 9.2 | − 0.6 | − 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.3 | − 5.6 | − 4.4 | − 0.8 | 2.3 | − 8.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | − 8.7 |
| 25–34 | − 6.7 | − 10.9 | 9.1 | − 8.8 | 1.0 | − 3.0 | − 19.3 | − 0.8 | − 7.2 | 1.4 | − 15.9 | − 2.1 | − 0.1 | − 24.8 |
| 35–44 | − 26.0 | − 10.8 | 5.0 | 13.6 | − 2.8 | 0.1 | − 20.8 | − 8.6 | − 0.4 | 1.3 | − 16.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | − 24.3 |
| 45–54 | − 16.7 | − 4.1 | − 5.6 | − 3.9 | 3.3 | − 3.6 | − 30.6 | 1.3 | − 4.9 | 2.7 | − 0.3 | − 2.3 | 1.7 | − 1.9 |
| 55–64 | 30.2 | − 0.9 | 0.0 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 40.4 | 21.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 | − 14.2 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 13.8 |
| 65 + | 31.6 | 0.6 | − 43.9 | 6.2 | 4.7 | − 8.6 | − 9.5 | 17.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | − 19.9 | − 3.6 | − 3.9 | − 8.9 |
| Total | 3.3 | − 26.7 | − 36.0 | 13.3 | 11.0 | − 10.1 | − 45.3 | 25.8 | − 10.9 | 10.2 | − 75.2 | − 6.1 | 1.4 | − 54.7 |
Fig. 5The absolute contribution by gender, age group and method use to the increase of the overall suicide rate during the period of 1976–1982, 1982–1985 and 1985–1999 in Hong Kong
Fig. 6The absolute contribution by gender, age group and method use to the increase of the overall suicide rate during the period of 1999–2003, 2003–2006 and 2006–2015 in Hong Kong
Kendall rank correlation coefficient by gender and age group between the changing suicide rate and the changing unemployment rate during the period of 1976–2015 in Hong Kong at 5% level of significance
| Age group | 15–24 | 25–34 | 35–44 | 45–54 | 55–64 | 65 + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | ||||||
| Tau | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.45 | |||
| Female | ||||||
| Tau | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.05 |
| 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
Key suicide prevention programme and project during the period of 2001–2018 in Hong Kong
| Year | Key Suicide Prevention Programme and Project in Hong Kong |
|---|---|
| 2001 | Live Life! Joint Project on Prevention of Elderly Suicide |
| Suicide Prevention Service for Elderly Hotline (2382-0881) | |
| 2002 | The establishment of HKJC Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention |
| The establishment of Suicide Crisis Intervention Centre (24-h Hotline) | |
| The establishment of Central Suicide Information System | |
| The establishment of Life Education Centre | |
| Suicide Prevention Service for Youths—SHKP Operation Sunshine Programme | |
| Elderly Suicide Prevention Programme—Support elderly people with suicidal tendency at psychogeriatric fast track clinics | |
| 2004 | Little Prince is Depressed—School-based mental health enhancement programme |
| Live the Rainbow Programme—One stop services including counselling, small groups and continuous support service in which the survivors will be accompanied in their difficult moments | |
| 2006 | Barbecue charcoal packs removal project in Tuen Mun |
| Outreach Befriending Service for the Suicidal Elderly | |
| 2007 | "Don't Qua" Elderly Visit Programme—The first large-scale seasonal volunteer service programme |
| 2008 | Suicide Prevention on neT and Web Engagement Project—Suicide prevention services on internet |
| BLESS Programme—Services for survivors of suicide loss | |
| 2010 | Revitalizing the Elders Project—Promote positive life attitudes in the community |
| 2011 | Filling Lives with Joy for Teenage Life Education Programme |
| Problem-solving Skills Training and Mentorship Programme for Adolescents | |
| 2012 | Action for Happiness—Individual Activity Plan for Depressive Elderly—Promote positive life attitudes in the depressed elderly through tailoring activity plans |
| Gatekeeper Training Project for Youth Suicide Prevention Project | |
| Professor Gooley & the Flame of Mind Programme—A web-based mental health programme for adolescents with parental involvement | |
| 2013 | KidMatters Programme—A Web and School-based approach to mental health promotion among children in primary schools |
| 2015 | Quality Education Fund Thematic Network on Developing Students’ Positive Attitudes and Values |
| Recommendations on Suicide Reporting & Online Information Dissemination for Media Professionals | |
| 2016 | WeCare Fund for Student-Initiated Youth Suicide Prevention Projects |
| Family Support for Elderly Mental Health | |
| Youth Link Hotline (2382 0777)—Support youth aged below 24 | |
| 2018 | Chat Point in 2018—A cross-platform suicide prevention and emotional support service |