| Literature DB >> 34249369 |
Carmen H Logie1,2,3, Candice L Lys4, Nina Sokolovic5, Kayley Inuksuk Mackay4, Holly Donkers1, Amanda Kanbari4, Sherri Pooyak6, Charlotte Loppie7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persons in Arctic regions disproportionately experience depression. Knowledge gaps remain regarding factors associated with depression among adolescents in the Northwest Territories (NWT), Canada, where child and adolescent mental health hospitalizations are nearly 2.5 times the national rate. This study assesses correlates of depression among adolescents in the NWT.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic; Canada; Depression; adolescents; dating violence; food insecurity; gender; sexual orientation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34249369 PMCID: PMC8246646 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2021.21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) ISSN: 2054-4251
Participant social and demographic characteristics
| Missing | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age | 14.3 (1.3) | 0 |
| Gender | ||
| Cisgender women | 198 (50%) | 0 |
| Cisgender men | 191 (48%) | |
| Transgender or other gender category | 8 (2%) | |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Indigenous | 312 (79%) | 1 |
| Non-Indigenous | 84 (21%) | |
| Urbanicity | ||
| Urban (Yellowknife) | 66 (17%) | 4 |
| Rural (Other place in NWT) | 327 (83%) | |
| Sexuality | ||
| Sexually diverse (LGBQ2S) | 58 (15%) | 1 |
| Heterosexual | 338 (85%) | |
| Food security | ||
| Food insecure | 179 (45%) | 3 |
| Food secure | 215 (55%) | |
| Dating violence | ||
| Experienced violence | 125 (51%) | 154 |
| No violence | 118 (49%) | |
| Resilience score | 39.6 (9.5) | 6 |
Analysis of social and demographic factors across participant depression score categories
| Depression category | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal/none | Mild | Moderate/severe | χ2/ | ||
| Distribution of social and demographic indicators by depression category | |||||
| Binary variables | |||||
| Cisgender women ( | 67 (36%) | 52 (52%) | 79 (71%) | 34.60 | <0.0001 |
| Indigenous ( | 135 (73%) | 77 (77%) | 100 (90%) | 12.42 | 0.002 |
| Urban ( | 35 (19%) | 19 (19%) | 12 (11%) | 3.79 | 0.15 |
| LGBQ2S ( | 21 (11%) | 10 (10%) | 27 (24%) | 11.63 | 0.003 |
| Food insecure ( | 56 (31%) | 54 (54%) | 69 (62%) | 31.73 | <0.0001 |
| Dating violence ( | 47 (41%) | 30 (52%) | 48 (69%) | 13.37 | 0.001 |
| Continuous variables | |||||
| Age | 14.24 (1.23) | 13.99 (1.07) | 14.62 (1.40) | 7.00 | 0.001 |
| Resilience | 39.12 (10.97) | 41.41 (7.59) | 38.65 (8.14) | 2.60 | 0.08 |
| Marginal probabilities and 95% confidence interval by depression category | |||||
| Gender | |||||
| Women (cisgender) | 0.45 (0.35–0.54) | 0.29 (0.24–0.34) | 0.27 (0.19–0.34) | ||
| Men/transgender/other gender | 0.65 (0.57–0.73) | 0.21 (0.16–0.26) | 0.14 (0.09–0.18) | ||
| Age | |||||
| 13-year old | 0.46 (0.35–0.57) | 0.28 (0.23–0.34) | 0.25 (0.17–0.34) | ||
| 16-year old | 0.41 (0.30–0.52) | 0.29 (0.24–0.34) | 0.29 (0.20–0.39) | ||
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Indigenous | 0.45 (0.35–0.54) | 0.29 (0.24–0.34) | 0.27 (0.19–0.34) | ||
| Non-Indigenous | 0.57 (0.43–0.70) | 0.25 (0.18–0.32) | 0.18 (0.10–0.27) | ||
| Sexuality | |||||
| LGBQ2S | 0.27 (0.15–0.40) | 0.29 (0.23–0.35) | 0.44 (0.28–0.59) | ||
| Heterosexual | 0.45 (0.35–0.54) | 0.29 (0.24–0.34) | 0.27 (0.19–0.34) | ||
| Food Security | |||||
| Insecure | 0.27 (0.20–0.34) | 0.29 (0.24–0.34) | 0.44 (0.36–0.53) | ||
| Secure | 0.45 (0.35–0.54) | 0.29 (0.24–0.34) | 0.27 (0.19–0.34) | ||
| Dating Violence | |||||
| Yes | 0.32 (0.19–0.45) | 0.30 (0.23–0.37) | 0.38 (0.24–0.52) | ||
| No | 0.50 (0.36–0.63) | 0.28 (0.21–0.35) | 0.23 (0.13–0.33) | ||
Results in these columns are reported as N (%) for the number of individuals in that depression category who identify as women, Indigenous, etc. for binary variables or the mean (s.d.) of the outcome in each category for continuous variables.
Ordered and binary logistic regression models assessing depression categories
| Entire sample | Dating sub-sample | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% CI | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% CI | |
| Ordered logistic regression model assessing depression categories (none/minimal, mild, moderate/severe) | ||||||
| Age | 1.16* | 1.00–1.35 | 1.07 | 0.91–1.25 | 1.11 | 0.91–1.35 |
| Gender (woman) | 3.09** | 2.11–4.53 | 2.31** | 1.55–3.45 | 2.86** | 1.69–4.86 |
| Indigenous | 2.16** | 1.35–3.45 | 1.62 | 0.98–2.68 | 1.96 | 0.94–4.08 |
| LGBQ2S | 2.13** | 1.25–3.64 | 2.14** | 1.21–3.78 | 3.25** | 1.45–7.27 |
| Food insecure | 2.92** | 2.00–4.28 | 2.19** | 1.47–3.26 | 1.65 | 0.98–2.76 |
| Dating violence | 2.41** | 1.49–3.91 | NA | NA | 2.11* | 1.25–3.54 |
| Binary logistic models assessing mild depression outcomes | ||||||
| Age | 0.83 | 0.67–1.03 | 0.80 | 0.63–1.01 | 0.83 | 0.63–1.10 |
| Gender (woman) | 1.92* | 1.17–3.15 | 1.71* | 1.01–2.88 | 2.56** | 1.29–5.08 |
| Indigenous | 1.24 | 0.70–2.19 | 1.07 | 0.58–1.97 | 1.25 | 0.53–2.97 |
| LGBQ2S | 0.88 | 0.40–1.96 | 0.76 | 0.33–1.79 | 0.71 | 0.20–2.51 |
| Food insecure | 2.66** | 1.61–4.40 | 2.44** | 1.45–4.12 | 1.58 | 0.81–3.10 |
| Dating violence | 1.55 | 0.82–2.93 | NA | NA | 1.71 | 0.87–3.36 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01