| Literature DB >> 34248961 |
Yan-Mei Qiu1, Chun-Lin Zhang1, An-Qi Chen1, Hai-Ling Wang1, Yi-Fan Zhou1, Ya-Nan Li1, Bo Hu1.
Abstract
Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) disruption is an important pathophysiological process of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), resulting in devastating malignant brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation. The rapid activation of immune cells plays a critical role in BBB disruption after ischemic stroke. Infiltrating blood-borne immune cells (neutrophils, monocytes, and T lymphocytes) increase BBB permeability, as they cause microvascular disorder and secrete inflammation-associated molecules. In contrast, they promote BBB repair and angiogenesis in the latter phase of ischemic stroke. The profound immunological effects of cerebral immune cells (microglia, astrocytes, and pericytes) on BBB disruption have been underestimated in ischemic stroke. Post-stroke microglia and astrocytes can adopt both an M1/A1 or M2/A2 phenotype, which influence BBB integrity differently. However, whether pericytes acquire microglia phenotype and exert immunological effects on the BBB remains controversial. Thus, better understanding the inflammatory mechanism underlying BBB disruption can lead to the identification of more promising biological targets to develop treatments that minimize the onset of life-threatening complications and to improve existing treatments in patients. However, early attempts to inhibit the infiltration of circulating immune cells into the brain by blocking adhesion molecules, that were successful in experimental stroke failed in clinical trials. Therefore, new immunoregulatory therapeutic strategies for acute ischemic stroke are desperately warranted. Herein, we highlight the role of circulating and cerebral immune cells in BBB disruption and the crosstalk between them following acute ischemic stroke. Using a robust theoretical background, we discuss potential and effective immunotherapeutic targets to regulate BBB permeability after acute ischemic stroke.Entities:
Keywords: blood-brain barrier; immune cells; immune therapy; inflammation; ischemic stroke
Year: 2021 PMID: 34248961 PMCID: PMC8260997 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Temporal profile of peripheral immune cells accumulation after stroke onset based on experimental data. Neutrophil accumulation in the ischemic hemisphere increased significantly after 3 hours, reaching maximum accumulation after 24 hours, followed by a steady dissipation over 7 days. Monocyte counts in the ipsilateral hemisphere robustly increased after 1 day, peaked after 3 - 7 days, and then returned to baseline levels after 14 days. Lymphocytes extravasate into the injured hemisphere in smaller counts and longer persistence compared to the former two immune cells. The accumulation of T cells in the ischemic hemisphere significantly increased as early as 24 hours after AIS, peaked at 3 days, and persisted for 1 month.
Figure 2Schematic representation of cerebral and peripheral immune cells regulating BBB integrity during early and later phases of ischemic stroke. Infiltrated neutrophils produce proteases (MMPs, proteinase 3, and elastase), lipocalin-2, NET, microvesicles, cytokines, and chemokines to destroy the BBB structure. M1-type monocytes secret cytokines and chemokines to degrade TJs. Perivascular microglia phagocyte ECs, which directly lead to endothelial dysfunction and BBB disintegration. In addition, M1 microglia disrupt BBB integrity through the production and secretion of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and CCL2), MMP9, and VEGF. A1 astrocytes directly exert deleterious effects on BBB through increasing VEGF, cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), chemokines (CCL2 and CCL5), MMP, and LCN-2. However, in the recovery phase of AIS, these immune cells contribute to inflammation resolution and BBB re-establishment. N2 neutrophils promote engulfment of neutrophils by macrophages and inflammation resolution. Monocyte-derived M2 macrophages facilitate the expression of collagen IV and efferocytosis. Microglia directly protect BBB integrity through the secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β. A2 astrocytes are capable of secreting IL-2, IL-10, and TGF-β to accelerate inflammation resolution.
Figure 3Schematic representation of T lymphocytes homeostasis disorder regulating BBB integrity in ischemic stroke. DAMP and chemokines are released from the ischemic brain via impaired BBB. Acute infarction in the brain can induce microbiota dysbiosis in the gut. Microbiota dysbiosis abolishes the ability of Dendritic cells (DC) to drive the Treg differentiation and promotes the power of DC to induce γδT cell differentiation. The disturbed balance between pro-inflammatory subsets and anti-inflammatory subsets contributes to BBB disruption during ischemic stroke. Th1 and Th17 may degrade TJs and destroy BBB integrity through secreting IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-21 in the acute phase. CD8+T cells potentiate the ischemic stroke progression by two main methods: one is granzyme-b and FasL induced cytotoxicity through FasL-PDPK1 pathway and the other is TNF-α and IFN-γ. Treg suppresses the overactivation of resident microglia, infiltrated T cells, and neutrophils, and decrease pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β) levels mainly through the action of IL-10 and TGF-β.
Preclinical attempts to target neutrophils for treating AIS.
| Mechanism | Drug | Molecular targets | Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infiltration inhibition | reparixin | CXCR1 CXCR2 | Reduced infarct volume; improved functional outcome | ( |
| evasin-3 | CXCL1 CXCL2 | No improvement in BBB leakage, infarct volume, or functional outcome | ( | |
| Anti-CKLF1 antibody | CKLF1 | Decreased BBB permeability | ( | |
| Adhesion interferes | Anti-ICAM-1 antibody/antisense oligonucleotides | ICAM-1 | Decreased infarct volume and neurological deficit | ( |
| Anti-MAC-1 antibody (Hu23F2G) | Mac-1 | Reduced ischemic injury | ( | |
| Anti-E-selectin antibody | E-selectin | Decreased infarct volume and neurological deficit | ( | |
| Anti-P-selectin antibody | P-selectin | Decreased BBB leakage, infarct volume, and neurological deficit | ( | |
| anfibatide | GPIbα | ( | ||
| JAM-Ap | JAM-A | ( | ||
| Deleterious factor neutralization | KYC | MPO | ( | |
| Anti-lipocalin-2 antibody | lipocalin-2 | ( | ||
| melatonin | MMP9 | ( | ||
| S-oxiracetam | ( | |||
| alpha-1 antitrypsin | elastase | Decreased infarct volume and neurological deficit | ( | |
| Polarization regulation | All trans-retinoic acid | STAT1 | ( | |
| bexarotene | RXR/PPARγ | Decreased BBB leakage and infarct volume, improved neurological outcome | ( | |
| rosiglitazone | PPARγ | ( |
CXCR1, C-X-C chemokine receptor 1; CXCR2, C-X-C chemokine receptor 2; CXCL1 CXC chemokines ligand 1; CXCL2, CXC chemokines ligand 1; BBB, blood-brain barrier; CKLF1, chemokine-like factor 1; G31P, ELR-CXC, CXC chemokines bearing the glutamic acid-leucine-arginine; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; MAC-1, macrophage-1 antigen; GPIbα, glycoprotein Ib alpha; JAM-Ap, JAM-A antagonist peptide; JAM-A, Junctional adhesion molecule-A; KYC, N-acetyllysyltyrosylcysteine amide; MPO, myeloperoxidase; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription; RXR/PPARγ, retinoid X receptors/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.
Randomized controlled trials targeting immune cells in human ischemic stroke.
| Treatment | Mechanism | Author | Year | Study place | Sample Size | Intervention | Outcome | Reference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time window, duration | Drug dose | Administration route | mRS/ΔSSS/mBI at day 90 | Mortality rate | Infarct volume at day 5/NIHSS score at 1 week | Adverse event | |||||||
| Anti-ICAM-1 (Enlimomab) | Inhibiting leukocytes infiltration | Enlimomab Acute Stroke Trial Investigators | 2001 | USA Europe | Enlimomab (n=317) placebo (n=308) | Within 6 hours after onset; 5 days | LB: 160mg; MB: 40mg | Intravenously | worse | Higher | -* | More infections and fever | ( |
| Anti-Mac-1(UK-279,276) | Inhibiting leukocytes infiltration | Krams | 2003 | UK | 966 patients randomly treated | Once within 6 hours after onset | 1 of 15 doses (dose range, 10 to 120 mg) | Intravenously | Not significant | Similar | – | More headache | ( |
| Anti-α4 integrin (natalizumab) | Inhibiting lymphocyte infiltration | Elkins | 2017 | USA Europe | Natalizumab (n=79) Placebo (n=82) | Once up to 9 h after onset | 300 mg | Intravenously | More good outcome | – | Similar | Similar | ( |
| Anti-α4 integrin (natalizumab) | Inhibiting lymphocyte infiltration | Elkind | 2020 | USA Europe | 300mg Natalizumab (n=91) 600mg Natalizumab (n=92) Placebo(n=94) | ≤9 or >9 to ≤24 hours | 300 or 600 mg | Intravenously | Similar | Similar | – | Similar | ( |
| S1PR agonist (fingolimod) | Inhibiting lymphocyte infiltration | Fu | 2014 | China | Fingolimod (n=11) Control (n=11) | Within 72 hours after onset; 3 days | 0.5mg | Orally | More good outcome | No | Less | No serious event | ( |
| S1PR agonist (fingolimod) | Inhibiting lymphocyte infiltration | Zhu | 2015 | China | Fingolimod (n=25) Control (n=22) | Within 4.5 hours after onset; 3 days | 0.5mg | Orally | More good outcome | – | Less | No serious event | ( |
| S1PR agonist (fingolimod) | Inhibiting lymphocyte infiltration | Tian | 2018 | China | Fingolimod (n=23) Control (n=23) | 4.5-6 hours after onset; 3 days | 0.5mg | Orally | More good outcome | No death | Less | No serious event | ( |
| Resveratrol | Regulating lymphocyte subsets | Chen | 2016 | China | Resveratrol (n=154) Placebo (n=158) | Within 4 hours after onset | 2.5 mg/kg | Intravenously | Only 24 hours NIHSS score is evaluated, Resveratrol reduce NIHSS score at 24 hours | ( | |||
| Atorvastatin | Regulating lymphocyte subsets | Muscari | 2011 | Italy | Atorvastatin (n=31) Placebo (n=31) | Within 24 hours after onset; 7 days | 80mg | Orally | More good outcome | Similar | Similar | Similar | ( |
| Rosuvastatin | Inhibiting microglia activation | Heo | 2016 | Korea | Rosuvastatin (n=155) Placebo (n=159) | Within 66 hours after onset; 14 days | 20 mg | Orally | – | Similar | Similar | Similar | ( |
| Minocycline | Inhibiting immune cells activation | Westphal | 2007 | Israel | Minocycline (n=74) Placebo (n=77) | 6-24 hours after stroke onset; 5 days | 200 mg | Orally | More good outcome | Similar | – | Similar | ( |
| IL-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) | Inhibiting IL-1 | Emsley | 2005 | UK | rhIL-1ra (n=17) Placebo (n=17) | Within 6 hours after onset; 3 days | LB: 100mg; MB: 2mg/kg/h | Intravenously | More good outcome in cortical infarcts patients | Similar | Less in cortical infarcts patients | Similar | ( |
| IL-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1Ra) | Inhibiting IL-1 | Smith | 2018 | UK | IL-1Ra (n=39) Placebo (n=41) | Within 5 hours after onset; 3 days | 100 mg twice daily | subcutaneously | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar | ( |
*not mentioned in the study.
AIS, acute ischemic stroke; mRS, modified ed Rankin Scale; ΔSSS, the Scandinavian Stroke Scale; mBI, modified Barthel Index; NIHSS, the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; USA, The United States of America; LB, loading bonus; MB: maintenance bolus; RCT, Randomized Controlled Trial; MAC-1, macrophage-1 antigen; UK, The United Kingdom; S1PR, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor; rhIL-1ra, recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist.
Preclinical attempts to target monocyte and microglia for treating AIS.
| Target cell | Mechanism | Drug | Molecular targets | Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| monocytes | Polarization regulation | 5-BDBD | P2X4R | Reduced BBB leakage, infarct size neurological deficit | ( |
| N15 | PPARα/γ | ( | |||
| 1, 25-D 3 | PPARγ | ( | |||
| rosiglitazone | Reduced BBB leakage and hemorrhagic transformation | ( | |||
| rhFGF21 | Reduced infarct size and neurological deficit | ( | |||
| pamoic acid | GPR35 | ( | |||
| DHA | ? | ( | |||
| AUDA | sEH | ( | |||
| miR-669c | MyD88 | ( | |||
| Microglia | Regulation of Activation and Polarization | ligustilide | TLR4 | ( | |
| miR-1906 | ( | ||||
| TAK-242 | ( | ||||
| eritoran | Reduced BBB disruption and infarct volume; improve functional outcome | ( | |||
| MTS510 | ( | ||||
| Ticagrelor | P2Y12R | ( | |||
| adjudin | NF-kB | ( | |||
| Statin | HMG-CoA reductase | ( | |||
| Minocycline | NLRP3 | ( | |||
| Metformin | AMPK | ( | |||
| Cytokine inhibition | IL-1Ra | IL-1 | ( | ||
| Canakinumab | IL-1β | ( | |||
| Infliximab | TNF-α | ( |
P2X4R, purinergic P2Y4 receptor; BBB, blood brain barrier; N15, Propane-2-sulfonic acid octadec-9-enyl-amide; PPARα/γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/gamma; 1, 25-D 3, 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3; rhFGF21, recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 21; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; GPR35, G protein Coupled Receptor 35; Akt/p38 protein kinase B/p38 MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; AUDA, 12-(3-adamantan-1-yl-ureido)-dodecanoic acid; sEH, soluble epoxide hydrolase; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88; TLR4, Toll-like Receptor 4; P2Y12R, purinergic P2Y12 receptor;NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; IL-1Ra, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist; IL-1, interleukin-1; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
Preclinical attempts to target T lymphocytes for treating AIS.
| Mechanism | Drug | Molecular targets | Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infiltration inhibition | Anti-VLA-4 antibody | CD49d | Reduced infarct size and neurological deficit | ( |
| FTY720/Fingolimod | S1P R | Reduced hemorrhagic transformation | ( | |
| Immune homeostasis regulation | JPI-289 | PARP-1 | Reduced BBB leakage, infarct size, and neurological deficit | ( |
| PJ34 | ( | |||
| FR247304 | Reduced infarct size, neurological deficit | ( | ||
| MP-124 | ( | |||
| IL-33 | ST2R | ( | ||
| vitamin D 3 | vitamin D receptor | ( | ||
| atorvastatin | HMG-CoA reductase | ( | ||
| resveratrol | PPARγ | ( | ||
| Gut microbiota modulation | resveratrol | Microbiota formation | Reduced BBB leakage, infarct size, neurological deficit | ( |
| fecal microbiota transplantation | ( | |||
| NaB | HDAC | ( | ||
| VPA | ( | |||
VLA-4, very late antigen-4; CD49d, cluster of differentiation 49d; S1P R, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor; BBB, blood brain barrier; PARP-1, Poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymerase-1; IL-33, interleukin-33; ST2R, simultaneous translation on 2 rods; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; NaB, Sodium butyrate; HDAC, histone deacetylase; VPA, valproic acid.
Preclinical attempts to target astrocytes for treating AIS.
| Mechanism | Drug | Molecular targets | Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibiting Activation | Cottonseed oil | TLR | Decreased BBB disruption, infarction size, and alleviated functional disorder | ( |
| Ginkgoaceae | ( | |||
| Metformin | Reduced infarct volume and neurological deficit | ( | ||
| Ligustilide | ( | |||
| Z-Guggulsterone | ( | |||
| MicroRNA-1906 | ( | |||
| Kaempferol glycosides | ( | |||
| Honokiol | Reduced BBB permeability | ( | ||
| IL-32a | Improved functional outcome | ( | ||
| Telmisartan | NLRP3 | Reduced GFAP positive astrocytes | ( | |
| Sinomenine | Alleviated cerebral infarction, BBB disruption and neurological deficit | ( | ||
| Adiponectin | ( | |||
| Afobazole | Sigma receptor | Reduced astrocytes activation | ( | |
| PRE-084 | Decreased infarct volume and neurological deficiency | ( | ||
| AS605240 | PI3Kγ | Improved neurological function and reduced infarct size | ( | |
| Oleoylethanolamide | PPARα | Improved motor function | ( | |
| Diminishing Detrimental factors | Memantine | MMP2/9 | Reduced BBB leakage, infarct size and neurological defecit | ( |
| Exendin-4 | GLP-1R | ( | ||
| IGF-1 supplement | IGF-1 | Improved BBB integrity and sensory-motor performance | ( |
TLR, Toll like receptor; BBB, blood brain barrier; IL-32a, interleukin-32a; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; PI3Kγ, phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; GLP-1R, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1.