| Literature DB >> 34248891 |
Junhyeong Kim1, Allen H Goldstein2, Romy Chakraborty1, Kolby Jardine1, Robert Weber2, Patrick O Sorensen1, Shi Wang1, Boris Faybishenko1, Pawel K Misztal2, Eoin L Brodie1,2.
Abstract
Snowmelt dynamics are a significant determinant of microbial metabolism in soil and regulate global biogeochemical cycles of carbon and nutrients by creating seasonal variations in soil redox and nutrient pools. With an increasing concern that climate change accelerates both snowmelt timing and rate, obtaining an accurate characterization of microbial response to snowmelt is important for understanding biogeochemical cycles intertwined with soil. However, observing microbial metabolism and its dynamics non-destructively remains a major challenge for systems such as soil. Microbial volatile compounds (mVCs) emitted from soil represent information-dense signatures and when assayed non-destructively using state-of-the-art instrumentation such as Proton Transfer Reaction-Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) provide time resolved insights into the metabolism of active microbiomes. In this study, we used PTR-TOF-MS to investigate the metabolic trajectory of microbiomes from a subalpine forest soil, and their response to a simulated wet-up event akin to snowmelt. Using an information theory approach based on the partitioning of mutual information, we identified mVC metabolite pairs with robust interactions, including those that were non-linear and with time lags. The biological context for these mVC interactions was evaluated by projecting the connections onto the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) network of known metabolic pathways. Simulated snowmelt resulted in a rapid increase in the production of trimethylamine (TMA) suggesting that anaerobic degradation of quaternary amine osmo/cryoprotectants, such as glycine betaine, may be important contributors to this resource pulse. Unique and synergistic connections between intermediates of methylotrophic pathways such as dimethylamine, formaldehyde and methanol were observed upon wet-up and indicate that the initial pulse of TMA was likely transformed into these intermediates by methylotrophs. Increases in ammonia oxidation signatures (transformation of hydroxylamine to nitrite) were observed in parallel, and while the relative role of nitrifiers or methylotrophs cannot be confirmed, the inferred connection to TMA oxidation suggests either a direct or indirect coupling between these processes. Overall, it appears that such mVC time-series from PTR-TOF-MS combined with causal inference represents an attractive approach to non-destructively observe soil microbial metabolism and its response to environmental perturbation.Entities:
Keywords: global change biology; microbial volatile compounds; non-destructive sampling; soil biogeochemistry; soil metabolomics; soil microbiome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34248891 PMCID: PMC8261151 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.679671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1A schematic image of the dynamic flow-through system used for soil VC measurement. Soils were incubated without water for 6 days and were subsequently saturated with water. This set-up provides clean and humidified air to the soils and also prevents artificial accumulation of trace gases with constant outflow matching the inflow air.
FIGURE 2A conceptual model for using VC time-series data to infer causality. Dependencies across different timelags in (Δτ) are used to calculate lagged mutual information (LMI). LMI is further partitioned into unique (U), synergistic (S), and redundant (R) contributions between VCs.
FIGURE 3PCA (Principal Component Analysis) plot for VC time-series data shows the effect of wet-up treatment on soil VC dynamics. Each point is VC emission profile across 5-min time window and green arrows show specific VCs with corresponding m/z’s contributing to the shifts in VC profile with time and wetness. VC profile experienced the largest change during early wet-up as the time points show rapid migration toward bottom right quadrant. Subsequently, VC profile gradually stabilizes over time and returns closer to the beginning of dry measurement. Large colored circles mark the start and end of the incubation or start of the wet-up treatment. Pre-treatment time points are labeled in a gradient of red and post-treatment time points are labeled in a gradient of blue. Red and blue ellipses mark 95% confidence intervals of dry and wet VC profiles, respectively.
FIGURE 4KEGG reaction network projected with metabolic connections that were tentatively detected by VC measurement. For a given pairwise connection observed, a corresponding shortest path was mapped onto the reaction network. Each edge is a metabolite-to-gene or a gene-to-metabolite connection. Dark red and blue nodes are metabolites detected as VCs and light red and blue nodes are metabolites or genes that the projected shortest paths go through. The projected portion of KEGG reaction network was further divided into six sub-networks shown as circles.
FIGURE 5Reaction pathways that constitute methane and nitrogen metabolism sub-networks from Figure 4. Unique connections are shown in straight yellow edges and synergistic connections are shown in forked blue arrows. Each detected compound is labeled in orange and juxtaposed with respective time-series following wet-up. Genes responsible for each reaction are labeled in blue diamonds with respective KEGG reaction IDs. Gray edges represent KEGG pathways.
FIGURE 6Reaction pathways that constitute sulfur metabolism sub-network from Figure 4. Unique connections are shown in straight yellow edges and synergistic connections are shown in forked blue arrows. Each detected compound is labeled in orange and juxtaposed with respective time-series following wet-up. Genes responsible for each reaction are labeled in blue diamonds with respective KEGG reaction IDs. Gray edges represent KEGG pathways.
FIGURE 7Reaction pathways that constitute central metabolism and isoprene sub-network from Figure 4. Unique connections are shown in straight yellow edges and synergistic connections are shown in forked blue arrows. Each detected compound is labeled in orange and juxtaposed with respective time-series following wet-up. Genes responsible for each reaction are labeled in blue diamonds with respective KEGG reaction IDs. Gray edges represent KEGG pathways.