Literature DB >> 34248840

Type 2 Diabetes Coagulopathy Proteins May Conflict With Biomarkers Reflective of COVID-19 Severity.

Abu Saleh Md Moin1, Ahmed Al-Qaissi2,3, Thozhukat Sathyapalan2, Stephen L Atkin4, Alexandra E Butler1.   

Abstract

Objective: Detailed proteomic analysis in a cohort of patients with differing severity of COVID-19 disease identified biomarkers within the complement and coagulation cascades as biomarkers for disease severity has been reported; however, it is unclear if these proteins differ sufficiently from other conditions to be considered as biomarkers.
Methods: A prospective, parallel study in T2D (n = 23) and controls (n = 23). A hyperinsulinemic clamp was performed and normoglycemia induced in T2D [4.5 ± 0.07 mmol/L (81 ± 1.2 mg/dl)] for 1-h, following which blood glucose was decreased to ≤2.0 mmol/L (36 mg/dl). Proteomic analysis for the complement and coagulation cascades were measured using Slow Off-rate Modified Aptamer (SOMA)-scan.
Results: Thirty-four proteins were measured. At baseline, 4 of 18 were found to differ in T2D versus controls for platelet degranulation [Neutrophil-activating peptide-2 (p = 0.014), Thrombospondin-1 (p = 0.012), Platelet factor-4 (p = 0.007), and Kininogen-1 (p = 0.05)], whilst 3 of 16 proteins differed for complement and coagulation cascades [Coagulation factor IX (p < 0.05), Kininogen-1 (p = 0.05), and Heparin cofactor-2 (p = 0.007)]; STRING analysis demonstrated the close relationship of these proteins to one another. Induced euglycemia in T2D showed no protein changes versus baseline. At hypoglycemia, however, four proteins changed in controls from baseline [Thrombospondin-1 (p < 0.014), platelet factor-4 (p < 0.01), Platelet basic protein (p < 0.008), and Vitamin K-dependent protein-C (p < 0.00003)], and one protein changed in T2D [Vitamin K-dependent protein-C, (p < 0.0002)].
Conclusion: Seven of 34 proteins suggested to be biomarkers of COVID-19 severity within the platelet degranulation and complement and coagulation cascades differed in T2D versus controls, with further changes occurring at hypoglycemia, suggesting that validation of these biomarkers is critical. It is unclear if these protein changes in T2D may predict worse COVID-19 disease for these patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03102801.
Copyright © 2021 Moin, Al-Qaissi, Sathyapalan, Atkin and Butler.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; biomarkers; hypoglycemia; proteomics; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2021        PMID: 34248840      PMCID: PMC8267927          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.658304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


Introduction

Proteomic pathways of platelet degranulation and the complement and coagulation cascades have recently been suggested as biomarkers of disease severity, being derived from a cohort of patients with differing severity of COVID-19 disease, including non-survivors (1). These data were in accord with another recently reported plasma proteomic analysis that also identified biological pathways involved in platelet degranulation and the coagulation cascade (2) in COVID-19 disease. Biomarkers to predict COVID-19 disease progression and outcome that allow a measured and appropriate proactive intervention may be key in improving patient treatment (3); however, they do need to be distinct from levels found in an uninfected population. In this regard, protein expression showing altered platelet function resulting in a prothrombotic potential together with changed markers of coagulation (4) has been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (5). With the increasing prevalence of diabetes, particularly with those patients having a worse COVID-19 outcome, this is of particular relevance (6). Therefore, we undertook platelet degranulation and complement and coagulation cascade proteomic analysis in subjects with and without T2D to compare with these coagulopathy pathways described recently using proteomics in COVID-19 disease (1).

Methods

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) (n = 23) and control subjects (n = 23) were enrolled in a case-controlled study, approved by Yorkshire and Humber Research Ethics Committee. A hyperinsulinemic clamp was performed as reported (7); all subjects were Caucasian and underwent a 10-h fast prior to the clamp. T2D: T2D baseline glucose 7.6 ± 0.4 mmol/L (136.8 ± 7.2 mg/dl), reduced to 4.5 ± 0.07 mmol/L (81 ± 1.2 mg/dl) for 1-h, following which the blood glucose was decreased to ≤2.0 mmol/L (36 mg/dl). Controls: baseline 4.9 ± 0.1 mmol/L (88.2 ± 1.8 mg/dl) ( ). The duration of diabetes was <10 years and all T2D subjects were on a stable dose of medication (metformin, statin, and/or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker) over the prior 3 months. For those with T2D, no medications for glycemic control except metformin was allowed. All had normal renal and hepatic biochemical indices and no prior history of cancer nor any contraindication to insulin infusion to achieve hypoglycemia (ischemic heart disease, epilepsy, seizure history, drop attacks, history of adrenal insufficiency, and treated hypothyroidism). Proteins that were described for platelet degranulation (18 of 27 proteins) and the complement and coagulation cascades (16 of 19 proteins) (1) were measured using the Slow Off-rate Modified Aptamer (SOMA)-scan plasma protein measurement (7), shown in .
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.

BaselineType 2 Diabetes (n = 23)Controls (n = 23)p-value
Age (years)64 ± 860 ± 10<0.0001
Sex (M/F)12/1111/120.77
Weight (kg)90.9 ± 11.179.5 ± 8.8<0.0001
Height (cm)167 ± 14169 ± 50.64
BMI (kg/m2)32 ± 428 ± 3<0.0001
Systolic BP (mmHg)132 ± 8122 ± 80.001
Diastolic BP (mmHg)81 ± 775 ± 60.003
Duration of diabetes (years)4.5 ± 2.2N/A
HbA1c (mmol/mol)51.2 ± 11.437.2 ± 2.2<0.0001
HbA1c (%)6.8 ± 1.05.6 ± 0.2<0.0001

BMI, Body mass index; BP, Blood pressure; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; N/A, not applicable.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants. BMI, Body mass index; BP, Blood pressure; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; N/A, not applicable.

Statistical Analysis

There are no studies detailing the changes in platelet degranulation or complement and coagulation proteins in response to hypoglycemia on which to base a power calculation. Sample size for pilot studies has been reviewed by Birkett and Day (8). They concluded that a minimum of 20 degrees-of-freedom was required to estimate effect size and variability. Hence, we needed to analyze the samples from a minimum of 20 patients per group. Data trends were visually evaluated for each parameter and non-parametric tests were applied on data that violated the assumptions of normality when tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. Comparison between groups was performed at each timepoint using Student’s t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Within-group comparisons are as follows: changes from baseline, and from hypoglycemia, to each subsequent timepoint were compared using Student’s t-test. The sample size was too small to adjust for baseline covariates. Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism (San Diego, CA, USA). For the proteomic analysis we fitted an intercept-free general linear model as a function of a subgroup (i.e. condition:timepoint), while taking the patient ID as a random effect using the R package limma. Subsequently, we computed the p value for two contrasts: baseline to hypoglycemia for both T2D and controls, and false discovery rate (FDR) corrected at a value of <0.05 as the cutoff for significance.

Results

As reported previously (5), T2D subjects had higher BMI (p = 0.001) and higher blood pressure (p < 0.003) with a duration of diabetes 4.5 ± 2.2 years ( ). For the 46 protein biomarkers described by Shu et al. (1), 34 were available for measurement in the Somalogic platform: 4 of 18 were found to differ at baseline in T2D for platelet degranulation [Neutrophil-activating peptide 2 (NAP-2) (p = 0.014), Thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) (p = 0.012), Platelet factor 4 (PF4) (p = 0.007), and Kininogen-1 (KNG1) (p = 0.05)], whilst 3 of 16 proteins differed for the complement and coagulation cascades [Coagulation factor IX (F9) (p < 0.05), Kininogen-1 (KNG1) (p = 0.05), and Heparin cofactor 2 (SERPIND1) (p = 0.007)] ( ). All proteins that differed between T2D and controls were higher at baseline in T2D, apart from Kininogen-1 that was lower at baseline in T2D.
Table 2

Proteins identified as being altered in COVID-19 disease categorized according to (A) platelet degranulation; (B) complement and coagulation cascades in non-COVID infected type 2 diabetes and control subjects at baseline.

A. PLATELET DEGRANULATION
Target Full NameTargetUniProtEntrez Gene Symbol T-test Baseline Control vs T2D
Transgelin-2Transgelin-2P37802TAGLN20.608
Neutrophil-activating peptide 2NAP-2P02775PPBP0.014
Fibrinogen gamma chainFibrinogen g-chain dimerP02679FGG0.364
FibrinogenFibrinogenP02671, P02675 P02679FGA0.333
Thrombospondin-1Thrombospondin-1P07996THBS10.012
Platelet factor 4PF-4P02776PF40.007
von Willebrand factorvWFP04275VWF0.986
Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 3alpha-1-antichymotrypsin complexP01011SERPINA30.892
Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase Aaldolase AP04075ALDOA0.377
Metalloproteinase inhibitor 1TIMP-1P01033TIMP10.079
PlasminogenPlasminogenP00747PLG0.398
Kininogen-1“Kininogen, HMW”P01042KNG10.05
Alpha-2-antiplasmina2-AntiplasminP08697SERPINF20.277
FibronectinFibronectinP02751FN10.995
CD109 antigenCD109Q6YHK3CD1090.074
Alpha-2-macroglobulina2-MacroglobulinP01023A2M0.924
KallistatinKallistatinP29622SERPINA40.079
Apolipoprotein A-IApo A-IP02647APOA10.466
B. COMPLEMENT AND COAGULATION CASCADES
Target Full NameTargetUniProtEntrez Gene Symbol T-test Baseline Control vs T2D
Fibrinogen gamma chainFibrinogen g-chain dimerP02679FGG0.364
FibrinogenFibrinogenP02671, P02675 P02679FGA0.333
Complement factor IFactor IP05156CFI0.132
von Willebrand factorvWFP04275VWF0.986
Coagulation factor IXCoagulation Factor IXP00740F90.049
Complement factor HFactor HP08603CFH0.675
Complement component C9C9P02748C90.993
VitronectinVitronectinP04004VTN0.294
PlasminogenPlasminogenP00747PLG0.398
Kininogen-1“Kininogen, HMW”P01042KNG10.05
Alpha-2-antiplasmina2-AntiplasminP08697SERPINF20.277
Complement component C4B P0C0L4 P0C0L5C4B0.337
Plasma serine protease inhibitorPCIP05154SERPINA50.608
Heparin cofactor 2Heparin cofactor IIP05546SERPIND10.007
Vitamin K-dependent protein CProtein CP04070PROC0.50
Alpha-2-macroglobulina2-MacroglobulinP01023A2M0.924

All proteins that differed between T2D and controls were higher at baseline in T2D apart from Kininogen-1 that was lower in T2D.

Students’ t-test was used to determine differences between protein levels. Proteins that differed significantly (p < 0.05) are shown in red font. Proteins that are common to both the platelet degranulation and the complement/coagulation cascades are shaded in orange.

Proteins identified as being altered in COVID-19 disease categorized according to (A) platelet degranulation; (B) complement and coagulation cascades in non-COVID infected type 2 diabetes and control subjects at baseline. All proteins that differed between T2D and controls were higher at baseline in T2D apart from Kininogen-1 that was lower in T2D. Students’ t-test was used to determine differences between protein levels. Proteins that differed significantly (p < 0.05) are shown in red font. Proteins that are common to both the platelet degranulation and the complement/coagulation cascades are shaded in orange. Those proteins that significantly differed between T2D and controls share a close relationship to one another, as shown by the protein-protein interaction tool STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) pathways ( ).
Figure 1

The protein-protein interaction tool STRING 11.0 (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) was used to visualize the significantly different proteins in type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to controls, and for all of the proteomic proteins in COVID-19 disease severity described by others (1) (https://string-db.org/). Interactions between proteins are evidence-based and collated from databases, experiments, neighborhood, gene fusion, co-occurrence, text mining, co-expression, and homology. Here, we determined the relationships between the platelet degranulation (A) and complement and coagulation cascade proteins (B) presented in the study by Shu et al. (1) that were significantly different between non-COVID infected T2D and control subjects. (A) Platelet degranulation proteins that differed significantly between T2D and control subjects, indicating their relationship to one another. (B) Complement and coagulation cascade proteins that differed significantly between T2D and control subjects, indicating their relationship to one another. (C) Combined platelet degranulation and complement and coagulation cascade proteins that differed significantly in T2D, indicating their relationships to one another.

The protein-protein interaction tool STRING 11.0 (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) was used to visualize the significantly different proteins in type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to controls, and for all of the proteomic proteins in COVID-19 disease severity described by others (1) (https://string-db.org/). Interactions between proteins are evidence-based and collated from databases, experiments, neighborhood, gene fusion, co-occurrence, text mining, co-expression, and homology. Here, we determined the relationships between the platelet degranulation (A) and complement and coagulation cascade proteins (B) presented in the study by Shu et al. (1) that were significantly different between non-COVID infected T2D and control subjects. (A) Platelet degranulation proteins that differed significantly between T2D and control subjects, indicating their relationship to one another. (B) Complement and coagulation cascade proteins that differed significantly between T2D and control subjects, indicating their relationship to one another. (C) Combined platelet degranulation and complement and coagulation cascade proteins that differed significantly in T2D, indicating their relationships to one another. Following the hyperinsulinemic clamp inducing euglycemia in T2D, no difference from baseline to euglycemia was seen for any of the proteins (data not shown). However, when the clamp was continued to hypoglycemia, four proteins changed in controls from baseline [Thrombospondin-1 (p < 0.014), platelet factor 4 (p < 0.01), Platelet basic protein (p < 0.008), and Vitamin K-dependent protein C (p < 0.00003)], but only one in T2D [Vitamin K-dependent protein C (p < 0.0002)]. In view of the discrepancy in BMI between T2D and control subjects, correlations with the individual proteins versus BMI were undertaken. Only Coagulation factor IX was positively correlated with BMI, in T2D subjects only (p = 0.04, r = 0.43) ( ).

Discussion

From the potential biomarkers identified by Shu for platelet degranulation and the complement and coagulation cascades that were purported to be predictors of severity in COVID-19 disease (1), 7 of the 34 proteins that were available in the SOMA-scan proteomic platform differed at baseline in patients with T2D compared to controls. This would potentially suggest that T2D patients with COVID-19 disease would be classed as having more severe disease, as some of their protein biomarker levels would be already altered, potentially leading to the introduction of early intensive therapy that may not be warranted or appropriate. Therefore, the significant difference seen in T2D compared to controls indicates the need for validation of such markers in the non-COVID-19 infected T2D population before they can be considered as biomarkers for COVID-19 and its severity. Conversely, that these biomarkers already differ in T2D may predict that more severe COVID-19 disease will result and be an indicator that more proactive intervention is required, as patients with T2D have a known propensity for increased COVID-19 disease severity (5). In a wider context, exclusive of COVID-19, the results of this study also show that the complement and coagulation proteins investigated were not affected by glycemic changes until frank hypoglycemia was induced, showing that glycemic variability that is known to affect proteins through oxidative stress was not an issue here (9). Neutrophil-activating peptide 2 is a heparin sulfate degrading enzyme (10) basally increased in T2D and its elevation is seen in acute coronary syndrome and it is thought to have a role in platelet-mediated vascular inflammation (11). Thrombospondin-1 is a component of extracellular matrix that acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis and is associated with cardiovascular disease where its elevation is seen in cardiac insults such as myocardial infarction (12). Here, it was basally increased in T2D versus controls that is in accord with its elevation and association with induced delay in re-endothelialization following arterial injury in diabetes (13), likely through increased inflammation (14) that is seen in T2D. Platelet factor 4 was increased basally in T2D, as has been reported previously, and has been shown to be discriminatory for diabetes nephropathy and neuropathy (15). Kininogen-1 plays a role in the kallikrein-kinin system (cooperating with the renin-angiotensin system); it has been suggested as a possible urinary biomarker for diabetic nephropathy (16) and may effect renal protection (17). Here, basal Kininogen-1 was higher in controls than T2D and this has been reported by others where it was suggested that its reduction may reflect bradykinin formation that has potent inflammatory effects (18). Taken together, this data suggests that basal elevation in T2D for Neutrophil-activating peptide 2, Thrombospondin-1, and Platelet factor 4 and a reduction in Kininogen-1 may contribute towards the vascular pathology of T2D. Coagulation factor IX is a result of activation of the intrinsic coagulation pathway leading to fibrin formation and is not reported to be different in T2D versus controls, the converse to what was observed here (19); however, its elevation in T2D may potentially increase the risk of a vascular event. Notably, this was the only factor that correlated positively with BMI, indicating that obesity may be a factor in its expression. Heparin cofactor 2 is a vascular protective factor that primarily acts as an anticoagulant (20) and, in this context, its elevation would be protective. Hypoglycemia resulted in alteration of the complement and coagulation cascades with an increase in thrombospondin, platelet factor 4, platelet basic protein (NAP-2 or PPBP), and vitamin K-dependent protein C. Vitamin K-dependent protein C functions as a natural anticoagulant to downregulate thrombin generation in the clotting cascade with cardioprotective properties (21), and therefore its elevation shown here may be seen to be protective. These data show that protein changes in response to glucose variability above and below the physiological range and back to normoglycemia do occur but, to date, have scarcely been investigated despite their potential importance. It is unclear from the Shu report what differing therapeutic agents were used for each of the COVID-19 severity categories (1), and therefore whether these treatment regimes may affect protein expression. This may be particularly relevant for hydroxychloroquine therapy, that has been associated with hypoglycemia in both diabetes and non-diabetes patients (22), and here we show that proteomic biomarker changes may result from hypoglycemia particularly in those without diabetes where four proteins changed in controls whilst only one protein differed from baseline in T2D. Limitations of the study include that the SOMAlogic panel only included 34 of the 46 proteins in the platelet degranulation and complement and coagulation cascades that were reported by Shu et al. (1), and that the proteomic analysis used in each study differed so direct comparison to the Shu study (1) or others (2) was not possible. Of note, however, most proteins were common to the differing proteomic platforms used. In addition, as all study subjects were Caucasian, the results presented here may not be generalizable to other ethnic groups. In conclusion, 8 of 34 protein biomarkers contained within the platelet degranulation and complement and coagulation cascades differed in T2D, with further changes at hypoglycemia that may be modified by COVID-19 therapy, suggesting that validation of these biomarkers is critical. It is unclear if these protein changes in T2D may be predictors of more severe COVID-19 disease in these patients.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Newcastle & North Tyneside Ethics committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AM and AB analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. AA-Q contributed to study design, performed experiments, collected, analyzed, and interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. TS supervised clinical studies and edited the manuscript. SA contributed to study design, data interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. AB is the guarantor of this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  20 in total

1.  Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size.

Authors:  M A Birkett; S J Day
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Dec 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Platelet function following induced hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  H Kahal; A Aburima; B Spurgeon; K S Wraith; A S Rigby; T Sathyapalan; E S Kilpatrick; K M Naseem; S L Atkin
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.041

3.  Kallikrein protects against microalbuminuria in experimental type I diabetes.

Authors:  Sophie Bodin; Catherine Chollet; Nicolas Goncalves-Mendes; Joelle Gardes; Franck Pean; Didier Heudes; Patrick Bruneval; Michel Marre; François Alhenc-Gelas; Nadine Bouby
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  CXC chemokines connective tissue activating peptide-III and neutrophil activating peptide-2 are heparin/heparan sulfate-degrading enzymes.

Authors:  A J Hoogewerf; J W Leone; I M Reardon; W J Howe; D Asa; R L Heinrikson; S R Ledbetter
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-02-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Platelet aggregation, beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4 in diabetes mellitus and in patients with vasculopathy.

Authors:  J Fritschi; M Christe; B Lämmle; G A Marbet; W Berger; F Duckert
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1984-12-29       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Coagulation and oxidative stress plasmatic levels in a type 2 diabetes population.

Authors:  Giovanni Barillari; Elisabetta Fabbro; Samantha Pasca; Enrico Bigotto
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.276

7.  Role of thrombospondin‑1 and thrombospondin‑2 in cardiovascular diseases (Review).

Authors:  Kaijie Zhang; Miaomiao Li; Li Yin; Guosheng Fu; Zhenjie Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 8.  Coagulatory Defects in Type-1 and Type-2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Amélie I S Sobczak; Alan J Stewart
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Plasma Proteomics Identify Biomarkers and Pathogenesis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ting Shu; Wanshan Ning; Di Wu; Jiqian Xu; Qiangqiang Han; Muhan Huang; Xiaojing Zou; Qingyu Yang; Yang Yuan; Yuanyuan Bie; Shangwen Pan; Jingfang Mu; Yang Han; Xiaobo Yang; Hong Zhou; Ruiting Li; Yujie Ren; Xi Chen; Shanglong Yao; Yang Qiu; Ding-Yu Zhang; Yu Xue; You Shang; Xi Zhou
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 31.745

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Protein Biomarkers of β-Cell Function in Type 2 Diabetes and Their Modulation with Glucose Normalization.

Authors:  Abu Saleh Md Moin; Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Stephen L Atkin; Alexandra E Butler
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-02-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.