| Literature DB >> 34248656 |
C H B van Niftrik1,2, M Sebök1,2, G Muscas1,2,3, S Wegener2,4, A R Luft2,4, C Stippich2,5, L Regli1,2, J Fierstra1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Wallerian degeneration and diaschisis are considered separate remote entities following ischemic stroke. They may, however, share common neurophysiological denominators, since they are both related to disruption of fiber tracts and brain atrophy over time. Therefore, with advanced multimodal neuroimaging, we investigate Wallerian degeneration and its association with diaschisis.Entities:
Keywords: H2O–PET; Wallerian degeneration; blood oxygenation-level dependent; cerebrovascular reactivity; diaschisis; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34248656 PMCID: PMC8264262 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.645157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Examplary image of manual masking of a right cerebellar peduncle following Mark et al. (2008).
Characteristics of healthy cohort.
| Total cohort ( | |
| Age | 59.4 ± 11.1 |
| Sex, | 12 (66.6) |
| Smoking | 1 (6) |
| Hypertension | 3 (18) |
| Mean CVR whole brain | 0.19 ± 0.04 |
| Mean CVR left cerebral peduncle | 0.20 ± 0.08 |
| Mean CVR right cerebral peduncle | 0.19 ± 0.08 |
| Volume left cerebral peduncle (cm3) | 2.20 ± 0.27 |
| Volume right cerebral peduncle (cm3) | 2.16 ± 0.24 |
| Cerebral peduncle volume AI (%) | 1.5 ± 4.5% |
| CVR Thalamic AI (%) | 4.1 ± 8.0% |
| Volume thalamus left (cm3) | 0.74 ± 0.09 |
| Volume thalamus right (cm3) | 0.67 ± 0.06 |
| CVR Cerebellar AI (%) | 1.0 ± 5.5% |
Relevant clinical and baseline characteristics of patients.
| Total cohort* ( | Wallerian degeneration positive group ( | Wallerian degeneration negative group ( | ||
| Age (mean ± SD) | 58.3 ± 12.9 | 58.1 ± 13.5 | 58.5 ± 13.2 | 0.95 |
| Sex, | 13 (76) | 5 (63) | 8 (89) | 0.37 |
| Smoking | 12 (71) | 4 (50) | 8 (89) | 0.09 |
| Hypertension | 12 (71) | 4 (50) | 8 (89) | 0.09 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 5 (29) | 5 (29) | 12 (71) | 0.50 |
| Obesity | 2 (12%) | 3 (38) | 2 (22) | 0.93 |
| Diabetes | 1 (6%) | 1 (13%) | 1 (11) | 0.34 |
| Mean CO2 baseline (mmHg) | 37.8 ± 2.67 | 37.4 ± 2.5 | 38.2 ± 2.9 | 0.56 |
| Mean CO2 hypercapnia (mmHg) | 47.2 ± 2.2 | 46.8 ± 2.5 | 47.6 ± 2.0 | 0.48 |
| Mean CO2 stepchange (mmHg) | 9.4 ± 1.3 | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 0.98 |
| Mean time after stroke (weeks) | 41.6 ± 59 | 32.3 ± 28.8 | 50.0 ± 78.5 | 0.56 |
| Stroke volume | 7.86 ± 12.07 | 10.29 ± 17.4 | 3.19 ± 4.20 | 0.25 |
FIGURE 2Illustrative image of a 39-year old female patient with Wallerian degeneration (91 weeks post-stroke). Panel (A) shows the T1 image of the post-stroke defect (orange arrow), thalamus, left and right cerebral peduncle masks and cerebellum. Note the large difference between the ipsilateral (top: 1.21 cm3) and contralateral cerebral peduncle (bottom: 1.65 cm3) with a cerebral peduncle asymmetry index of −37%. Panel (B) shows the equivalent BOLD-CVR images. Ipsilateral thalamic diaschisis can be seen (white arrow vs black arrow) as a asymmetry in BOLD-CVR (i.e. ipsilateral decrease). No clear BOLD-CVR asymmetry was seen in the cerebral peduncle or cerebellum. Panel (C) shows the equivalent 15O-H2O-PET cerebral blood flow images. Here also, thalamic asymmetry can be appreciated without blood flow differences in the cerebral peduncles or cerebellum. Abbreviations: BOLD: blood oxygenation-level dependent, cm: cubic centimeter, min: minute, ml: milliliter, mmHg: millimeter mercury, PET- Positron Emission Tomography, rCBF: relative cerebral blood flow.
Structural and hemodynamic findings.
| Functional measurement (mean ± standard deviation) | Total cohort ( | Wallerian degeneration positive group ( | Wallerian degeneration negative group ( | |
| Volume ipsilateral cerebral peduncle (cm3) | 1.75 ± 0.32 | 1.51 ± 0.27 | 1.96 ± 0.21 | |
| Volume contralateral cerebral peduncle (cm3) | 1.92 ± 0.32 | 1.82 ± 0.32 | 2.01 ± 0.21 | 0.17 |
| Cerebral peduncle volume AI | −11.0 ± 10.7 | −20.33 ± 7.71 | −2.71 ± 3.95 | |
| Mean BOLD-CVR ipsilateral cerebral peduncle | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.14 ± 0.12 | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.50 |
| Mean BOLD-CVR contralateral cerebral peduncle | 0.17 ± 0.10 | 0.15 ± 0.12 | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.41 |
| Cerebral peduncular BOLD-CVR AI (%) | 1.09 ± 23.09 | −4.53 ± 27.01 | 7.52 ± 17.45 | 0.33 |
| Cerebral peduncular PET Baseline AI (%) | 6.76 ± 5.49 | 6.19 ± 4.08 | 7.4 ± 7.07 | 0.68 |
| Cerebral peduncular PET Diamox AI (%) | 5.32 ± 7.31 | 6.44 ± 4.76 | 4.06 ± 9.74 | 0.55 |
| Ipsilateral thalamic diaschisis*** (%) | 9 (47%) | 7 (88) | 2 (22) | |
| Volume thalamus ipsilateral (cm3) | 0.57 ± 0.95 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | |
| Volume thalamus contralateral (cm3) | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.10 | 0.32 |
| Thalamic volume AI (%) | −19.2 ± 16.6 | −34.5 ± 24.1 | −9.7 ± 12.5 | |
| BOLD-CVR ipsilateral thalamus | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.12 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.05 | |
| BOLD-CVR contralateral thalamus | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 0.62 |
| Thalamic BOLD-CVR AI (%) | 20.15 ± 22.98 | 32.97 ± 29.26 | 9.36 ± 17.66 | 0.07 |
| Thalamic H2O PET baseline AI (%) | 10.65 ± 9.65 | 14.58 ± 7.82 | 5.69 ± 10.54 | 0.10 |
| Thalamic H2O PET Diamox AI (%) | 10.78 ± 9.35 | 15.38 ± 8.79 | 5.08 ± 8.09 | 0.05 |
| Crossed cerebellar diaschisis*** (%) | 7 (36) | 4 (50) | 3 (33) | 0.61 |
| Volume cerebellum ipsilateral (cm3) | 5.58 ± 0.80 | 6.06 ± 0.62 | 5.7 ± 0.92 | 0.44 |
| Volume cerebellum contralateral (cm3) | 5.79 ± 0.82 | 5.88 ± 0.43 | 5.72 ± 0.10 | 0.74 |
| Cerebellar volume AI (%) | −1.47 ± 6.80 | −2.88 ± 5.19 | −0.41 ± 7.99 | 0.52 |
| Cerebellar BOLD-CVR AI (%) | 3.78 ± 18.01 | 1.82 ± 6.8 | −1.90 ± 26.08 | 0.87 |
| Cerebellar H2O PET baseline AI (%) | 4.42 ± 5.07 | 6.11 ± 5.01 | 2.50 ± 5.62 | 0.18 |
| Cerebellar H2O PET Diamox AI (%) | 4.42 ± 3.84 | 5.45 ± 4.03 | 2.48 ± 3.44 | 0.15 |
| Stroke volume (cm3) | 6.53 ± 12.46 | 10.29 ± 17.4 | 3.19 ± 4.20 | 0.25 |
| Corticospinal tract involvement (%) | 7 (36) | 7 (88) | 0 (0) |
FIGURE 3Correlation between cerebral peduncular volume asymmetry index and thalamic volume asymmetry index. Values around zero represent no ipsilateral-contralateral difference. Negative values represent a smaller ipsilateral volume. Note the strong positive relationship between both variables.