Shunyao Zhang1, Atsushi Tamura1, Nobuhiko Yui1. 1. Department of Organic Biomaterials, Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
To improve the therapeutic potential of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD)-threaded acid-degradable polyrotaxanes (β-CD PRXs) in cholesterol-related metabolic disorders, we investigated the effect of carboxylation of β-CD PRXs on intracellular uptake. In this study, we established a synthetic method for the modification of carboxylalkyl carbamates on β-CD PRXs without degradation and synthesized three series of carboxyalkyl carbamate group-modified β-CD PRXs with different alkyl spacer lengths. The modification of carboxymethyl carbamate (CMC), carboxyethyl carbamate (CEC), and carboxypropyl carbamate (CPC) on the β-CD PRXs slightly reduced the interaction of the PRXs with the lipid layer model compared with the modification of 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl carbamate (HEE-PRX), which was used in our previous studies. However, all the carboxylated β-CD PRXs showed a significantly stronger interaction with a protein model compared with HEE-PRX. The carboxylated β-CD PRXs showed significantly high intracellular uptake, through macrophage scavenger receptor A (MSR-A)-mediated endocytosis, in MSR-A-positive RAW 264.7 cells compared with HEE-PRX. Interestingly, the carboxylated β-CD PRXs also showed significantly higher intracellular uptake even in MSR-A-negative cells compared with HEE-PRX. Carboxylated β-CD PRXs are considered to strongly interact with other membrane proteins, resulting in high intracellular uptake. The length of the alkyl spacer affected the intracellular uptake levels of carboxylated PRXs, however, this relationship was varied for different cell types. Furthermore, none of the carboxylated β-CD PRXs exhibited cytotoxicity in the RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells. Altogether, carboxylation of β-CD PRXs is a promising chemical modification approach for their therapeutic application because carboxylated β-CD PRXs exhibit high cellular internalization efficiency in MSR-A-negative cells and negligible toxicity.
To improve the therapeutic potential of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD)-threaded acid-degradable polyrotaxanes (β-CDPRXs) in cholesterol-related metabolic disorders, we investigated the effect of carboxylation of β-CDPRXs on intracellular uptake. In this study, we established a synthetic method for the modification of carboxylalkyl carbamates on β-CDPRXs without degradation and synthesized three series of carboxyalkyl carbamate group-modified β-CDPRXs with different alkyl spacer lengths. The modification of carboxymethyl carbamate (CMC), carboxyethyl carbamate (CEC), and carboxypropyl carbamate (CPC) on the β-CDPRXs slightly reduced the interaction of the PRXs with the lipid layer model compared with the modification of 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl carbamate (HEE-PRX), which was used in our previous studies. However, all the carboxylated β-CDPRXs showed a significantly stronger interaction with a protein model compared with HEE-PRX. The carboxylated β-CDPRXs showed significantly high intracellular uptake, through macrophage scavenger receptor A (MSR-A)-mediated endocytosis, in MSR-A-positive RAW 264.7 cells compared with HEE-PRX. Interestingly, the carboxylated β-CDPRXs also showed significantly higher intracellular uptake even in MSR-A-negative cells compared with HEE-PRX. Carboxylated β-CDPRXs are considered to strongly interact with other membrane proteins, resulting in high intracellular uptake. The length of the alkyl spacer affected the intracellular uptake levels of carboxylatedPRXs, however, this relationship was varied for different cell types. Furthermore, none of the carboxylated β-CDPRXs exhibited cytotoxicity in the RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells. Altogether, carboxylation of β-CDPRXs is a promising chemical modification approach for their therapeutic application because carboxylated β-CDPRXs exhibit high cellular internalization efficiency in MSR-A-negative cells and negligible toxicity.
Cyclodextrin (CD)-threaded polyrotaxane (PRX) is a representative supramolecular polymer, in which several CDs are threaded along a linear polymer chain and interlocked onto the polymer axis through capping with bulky stopper molecules [1-3]. PRXs have recently received considerable attention as a new class of polymeric materials because the molecular mobility of threaded cyclic molecules imparts new material functions [4]. Another advantage of PRXs for material applications is their stimuli-responsive dissociative character [5,6]. When stimuli-cleavable chemical bonds are introduced in the axle polymer, the resulting PRXs readily dissociate into their constituent molecules in response to various chemical and physical stimuli, such as pH, light, reductive molecules, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [7-10]. These stimuli-degradable PRXs have been applied as delivery carriers of drugs, therapeutic genes, and proteins for achieving immediate release of therapeutic payloads through the stimuli-induced degradation of the PRXs in intracellular environments (e.g. acidic pH and reductive glutathione) [9-15].Taking advantage of the stimuli-degradable character of PRXs, our research groups have proposed the therapeutic application of PRXs without conjugation and complexation of therapeutic drugs [7,16-18]. Recently, β-CD derivatives have demonstrated therapeutic effects in several intractable diseases such as Niemann-Pick type C (NPC) disease, atherosclerosis, diabetic kidney diseases, and Alport syndrome [19-23], most likely through the encapsulation of cellular cholesterol in its hydrophobic cavity. In particular, clinical trials are currently ongoing for 2-hydroxypropyl β-CD (HP-β-CD) in NPC disease, which is an autosomal recessive lysosomal trafficking disorder that exhibits abnormal cholesterol accumulation in lysosomes [24]. However, phase I/IIa clinical trials revealed that intrathecal administration of HP-β-CD induced audiotoxicity [24], and the safety of β-CD derivatives is controversial. The toxic effects of β-CD derivatives arise from the extraction of cholesterol from the plasma membrane [25,26]. In contrast, we observed that the toxic effects of β-CDs can be masked by their incorporation into PRXs [16]. Additionally, for the treatment of NPC disease, we designed β-CD-threaded acid-degradable PRXs (β-CDPRXs) that can release threaded β-CDs in lysosomes through the acid-induced degradation of PRXs (Figure 1). Acid-degradable β-CDPRXs have been demonstrated to inhibit cholesterol accumulation and prolong survival at a lower dose than HP-β-CD in a mouse model of NPC disease [17]. Therefore, the acid-degradable β-CDPRXs are promising candidates for both attenuating toxicity and potentiating the therapeutic efficacy of β-CD in NPC disease.
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration for the cellular internalization and intracellular degradation of carboxylated β-cyclodextrin (β-CD)-threaded acid-degradable polyrotaxanes (PRXs) with different alkyl spacer lengths
Schematic illustration for the cellular internalization and intracellular degradation of carboxylated β-cyclodextrin (β-CD)-threaded acid-degradable polyrotaxanes (PRXs) with different alkyl spacer lengthsIn our previous studies, acid-degradable β-CDPRXs were chemically modified with hydrophilic oligo(ethylene glycol) chains (e.g. 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl carbamate; HEE) for increasing the solubility in aqueous media [7,17]. Although the chemical modifications of PRXs are essential for improving their solubility in aqueous media, the highly hydrophilic functional groups generally disturb cellular internalization and tissue accumulation. To further improve the therapeutic efficacy of β-CDPRXs, the molecular design of PRXs should be optimized. One potential method for improving the cellular internalization efficiency of PRXs is modification with targeting biomolecules, such as peptides, saccharides, antibodies, and aptamers [27-31]. These targeting molecules interact with specific receptors, enabling selective and highly efficient targeting to specific cells. However, chemical modification of these targeting biomolecules generally requires delicate reaction conditions, and it is difficult to achieve scalable synthesis. Another potential approach for improving the cellular internalization efficiency of PRXs is optimization of the physicochemical characters of PRXs, such as hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity, charge, molecular weight, and threading ratio of CDs. Among these, the chemical modification of charged functional groups potentially improves cellular internalization efficiency [32,33], because both cationic and anionic functional groups facilitate the interaction of PRXs with proteins through electrostatic interactions. We previously reported that weakly acidic carboxymethyl ether-modified α-CDPRX showed selective and high intracellular uptake in a macrophage-like cell line (RAW 264.7 cells), whereas it exhibited negligible uptake in fibroblasts (NIH/3T3 cells) [34]. We considered that the carboxy groups increased the interaction with macrophage scavenger receptor A (MSR-A), which recognizes anionic macromolecules [35], resulting in selective and high intracellular uptake in macrophage-like cell lines. Because macrophages plays a central role in the progression of atherosclerosis and inflammatory diseases [36,37], carboxylation of acid-degradable β-CDPRXs is promising for therapeutic applications in cholesterol-related metabolic diseases such as atherosclerosis.However, previous methods to modify weakly acidic carboxy groups cannot be applied to acid-degradable β-CDPRXs, because acidic carboxy groups lead to the degradation during the reaction and purification processes. In this study, we developed a new synthetic method for the carboxylation of acid-degradable PRX using protected carboxy ester derivatives. This method allows us to modify various carboxy groups without degrading the acid-degradable β-CDPRXs. We synthesized three series of carboxylated β-CDPRXs with different alkyl spacer lengths between the carboxy group and threaded β-CD and investigated their cellular internalization efficiency (Figure 1). A unique observation from our study is that the carboxylated β-CDPRXs showed high cellular internalization efficiency, regardless of the expression of MSR-A. We expected that carboxylation of acid-degradable β-CDPRXs would be a promising design for improving the therapeutic efficacy of PRXs.
Materials and methods
Materials
As described in Supplementary text, we synthesized acid-degradable PRX, composed of β-CD as a cyclic molecule, PEG-b-PPG-b-PEG (Pluronic P123) as an axial polymer, and N-triphenylmethyl groups as acid-labile stopper molecule. In this study, acid-degradable β-CDPRX with 12.5 threaded β-CDs and a number-average molecular weight of 20,500 was utilized for the synthesis of carboxylatedPRXs. HEE-PRX was synthesized as described in our previous study [7]. 1,1ʹ-Carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Glycine ethyl ester hydrochloride, methyl 3-aminopropionate hydrochloride, and methyl 4-aminobutyrate hydrochloride were obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). Dehydrated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and triethylamine (TEA) were obtained from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical (Osaka, Japan). Other reagents and solvents were obtained from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical and Kanto Chemical (Tokyo, Japan)
Instrumentation
1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded using a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) in DMSO-d6 and D2O at 25°C. Chemical shifts in 1H NMR spectra were referenced using DMSO (2.5 ppm in DMSO-d6) and HDO (4.65 ppm in D2O). Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed using a Prominence-i LC-2030 Plus system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an RID-20A refractive index detector and a combination of TSKgel α-4000 and α-2500 columns (300 mm length, 7.8 mm internal diameter; Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan). Sample solutions were injected into the system and eluted with DMSO containing 10 mM LiBr at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min at 60°C. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded using a Spectrum 100 FTIR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA) equipped with an HgCdTe (MCT) detector. The sample powders were ground with KBr for preparing pellets for the analysis.
Carboxylation of acid-degradable PRXs
Three series of carboxylated acid-degradable PRXs were synthesized, as shown in Figure 2(a). The synthesis of carboxymethyl carbamate-modified PRX (CMC-PRX) was as follows: Briefly, PRX (200 mg, 9.76 μmol PRX, and 122 μmol threaded β-CD) and CDI (140 mg, 863 μmol) were dissolved in dehydrated DMSO (10 mL), and the solution was stirred for 24 h at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere. Glycine ethyl ester hydrochloride (1.2 g, 8.6 mmol) and TEA (1.2 mL, 8.59 mmol) dissolved in dehydrated DMSO (5 mL) were then added into the mixed solution, and the solution was stirred for additional 24 h at the room temperature. After the reaction, the solution was purified by dialysis against deionized water using a Spectra/Por 1 dialysis membrane (molecular weight cut-off of 6000–8000; Spectrum Laboratories, CA, USA) for 3 days at 4°C. Subsequently, the solution was freeze-dried to yield carboxymethyl carbamate ethyl ester-modified PRX (CMCE-PRX; 240 mg, 98.1% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 1.03 (m, – C of Pluronic P123), 1.18 (m, – O-CH2-C), 3.0–4.0 (m, – NH-C-C(=O) – of CPC group, – CCO – and – C-C – of PEG and PPG segments in Pluronic P123, respectively, and H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 protons of β-CD), 4.10 (m, – O-C-CH3), 4.35–4.65 ppm (m, O6H proton of β-CD), 4.7–5.2 (m, H1 proton of β-CD), 5.4–6.0 ppm (m, O2H and O3H protons of β-CD), 7.1–7.7 (m, – N-CH2-C(=O) – of CMCE group and Trt group).
Figure 2.
Scheme for the synthesis of carboxymethyl carbamate (CMC)-modified β-CD PRX, and the chemical structures of CMC-PRX, 2-carboxyethyl carbamate-modified β-CD PRX (CEC-PRX), 3-carboxypropyl carbamate-modified β-CD PRX (CPC-PRX), and 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl carbamate-modified β-CD PRX (HEE-PRX)
Scheme for the synthesis of carboxymethyl carbamate (CMC)-modified β-CDPRX, and the chemical structures of CMC-PRX, 2-carboxyethyl carbamate-modified β-CDPRX (CEC-PRX), 3-carboxypropyl carbamate-modified β-CDPRX (CPC-PRX), and 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl carbamate-modified β-CDPRX (HEE-PRX)For the deprotection of carboxy ethyl esters, CMCE-PRX (240 mg) was dissolved in 0.5 M NaOH (10 mL) and allowed to react for 6 h at room temperature. After neutralization with HCl, the solution was dialyzed against 0.1% ammonia solution for 2 days at 4°C and deionized water for 1 day at 4°C using Spectra/Por 1. Subsequently, the solution was freeze-dried to yield CMC-PRX as an ammonium salt (150 mg, 63.4% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ (ppm) = 1.12 (m, – C of Pluronic P123), 3.2–4.5 (m, – NH-C-C(=O) – of CMC group, – CCO – and – C-C – of PEG and PPG segments in Pluronic P123, respectively, and H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 protons of β-CD), 4.9–5.3 (m, H1 proton of β-CD), 7.1–7.5 (Trt group).Carboxylethyl carbamate methyl ester-modified PRX (CECM-PRX) was synthesized using methyl 3-aminopropionate hydrochloride in the same manner as CMCE-PRX (224 mg, 95.5% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 1.03 (m, – C of Pluronic P123), 2.45 (m, – NH-CH2-C-C(=O) – of CECM group), 3.19 (m, – NH-C-CH2-C(=O) – of CECM group), 3.25–4.27 (m, – CCO – and – C-C – of PEG and PPG segments in Pluronic P123, respectively, and H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 protons of β-CD, and – C(=O)-O-C of CECM group), 4.27–4.7 ppm (m, O6H proton of β-CD), 4.7–5.2 (m, H1 proton of β-CD), 5.4–6.1 ppm (m, O2H and O3H protons of β-CD), 6.7–7.45 (m, – N-CH2-C(=O) – of CECM group and Trt group).The deprotection of methyl ester was performed in 0.5 M NaOH for 6 h, which yielded carboxylethyl carbamate-modified PRX as an ammonium salt (CEC-PRX; 146 mg, 65.0% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ (ppm) = 1.15 (m, – C of Pluronic P123), 2.32 (m, – NH-CH2-C-C(=O) – of CEC group), 3.25 ‘(m, – NH-C-CH2-C(=O) – of CEC group), 3.25–4.55 (m, – CCO – and – C-C – of PEG and PPG segments in Pluronic P123, respectively, and H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 protons of β-CD), 4.85–5.2 (m, H1 proton of β-CD), 7.15–7.45 (Trt group).Carboxylpropyl carbamate methyl ester-modified PRX (CPCM-PRX) was synthesized using methyl 4-aminobutyrate hydrochloride in the same manner as CMCE-PRX (218 mg, 94.2% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 1.03 (m, – C of Pluronic P123), 1.64 (m, – NH-CH2-C-CH2-C(=O) – of CPCM group), 2.45 (m, – NH-CH2-CH2-C-C(=O) – of CPCM group), 2.94 (m, – NH-C-CH2-CH2-C(=O) – of CPCM group), 3.1–4.27 (m, – CCO – and – C-C – of PEG and PPG segments in Pluronic P123, respectively, and H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 protons of β-CD, and – C(=O)-O-C of CPCM group), 4.25–4.7 ppm (m, O6H proton of β-CD), 4.7–5.2 (m, H1 proton of β-CD), 5.4–6.1 ppm (m, O2H and O3H protons of β-CD), 6.7–7.45 (m, – N-CH2-C(=O) – of CPCM group and Trt group).The deprotection of methyl ester was performed in 0.5 M NaOH for 6 h to yield carboxylpropyl carbamate-modified PRX as an ammonium salt (CPC-PRX; 163 mg, 74.6% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ (ppm) = 1.13 (m, – C of Pluronic P123), 1.66 (-NH-CH2-C-CH2-C(=O) – of CPC group), 2.12 (-NH-CH2-CH2-C-C(=O) – of CPC group), 3.04 (-NH-C-CH2-CH2-C(=O) – of CPC group), 3.1–4.55 (m, – NH-C-C(=O) – of CPC group, – CCO – and – C-C – of PEG and PPG segments in Pluronic P123, respectively, and H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 protons of β-CD), 4.85–5.3 (m, H1 proton of β-CD), 7.15–7.45 (Trt group).
Potentiometric titration
CarboxylatedPRXs and NaCl (11.7 mg) were dissolved in 10 mM NaOH (20 mL; NaCl concentration: 10 mM, carboxy group concentration: 5 mM). The solution was titrated with 10 mM HCl containing 10 mM NaCl at 25°C using an AUT-701 automatic titrator (DKK-TOA, Tokyo, Japan). The titrant was added in quantities of 40 μL at intervals of 10 s. The pKa value and degree of ionization were calculated from the pH–α curves.
Transmittance measurement
The carboxylatedPRXs were dissolved in phosphate buffer (NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, pH 6–8), acetate buffer (CH3COOH/CH3COONa, pH 4–6), or glycine buffer (glycine/HCl, pH 2–4) at a concentration of 5 mg/mL. The optical transmittance of the solutions at 600 nm was recorded using a V-550 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan).
Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D)
Lipid bilayer-coated sensor chips were prepared as previously described [38,39]. Briefly, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC; Avanti Polar Lipid, Alabaster, AL, USA) was dissolved in chloroform at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. Subsequently, lipid solution was completely dried with nitrogen gas to form a lipid film. To the lipid film, 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4; 5 mL) was added to the lipid film and sonicated to disperse the lipids. The solution was then extruded 21 times through 100-nm membranes using a mini extruder (Avanti Polar Lipid) for obtaining a lipid vesicle solution. QCM-D monitoring was performed using a QSence E1 (Biolin Scientific AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). The QSX 303 SiO2 sensor (Biolin Scientific AB) was mounted on the QCM-D flow modules. A peristaltic pump (Reglo Digital M2-2/12, Ismatec, Wertheim, Germany) was used for injecting degassed HEPES buffer at a flow rate of 100 μL/min until the signal drift was less than 1 Hz for the frequency shift and 0.2 × 10−6 for the dissipation shift in 10 min. Next, the vesicle solution was injected into the chamber at a flow rate of 100 μL/min for 15 min for constructing a lipid layer on the SiO2 sensor chip surfaces. The sensor chip surfaces were then rinsed with degassed HEPES buffer for 10 min to remove excess vesicles. For the lipid-coated sensor ships, the carboxylatedPRX solutions (1 mM threaded β-CD in HEPES buffer) were injected for 5 min at a flow rate of 100 μL/min, followed by stopping of the flow and incubation for 10 min to the allow carboxylatedPRXs to be adsorbed onto the lipid surfaces. Finally, the sensor chip surfaces were rinsed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4) for 10 min at a flow rate of 100 μL/min for removing free carboxylatedPRXs, and the shifts in frequency (ΔF) and dissipation (ΔD) were determined.Protein-immobilized sensor chips were prepared as described previously [40]. Briefly, QSX 301 gold sensor chips (Biolin Scientific AB) were immersed in a cysteamine (Merck) solution (10 mM in ethanol) overnight at room temperature. The sensor chips were subsequently rinsed with distilled water, dried with nitrogen gas, and mounted on the QCM-D flow modules. A peristaltic pump was used for injecting PBS at a flow rate of 50 μL/min until the signal drift was stable. Next, 2% glutaraldehyde solution in PBS (Merck) was injected into the flow modules at a flow rate of 50 μL/min for 30 min, followed by a rinse with PBS for 20 min for removing unreacted glutaraldehyde. Bovine serum albumin (BSA; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical) dissolved in PBS (10 mg/mL) was passed into the chamber for 30 min at a flow rate of 50 μL/min, followed by stopping of the flow and incubation for 60 min to allow immobilization of the BSA onto the sensor chip surfaces. After rinsing of the surfaces with PBS for 20 min, the carboxylatedPRX solutions (1 mM threaded β-CD in HEPES buffer) were injected for 20 min at a flow rate of 50 μL/min, followed by stopping of the flow and incubation for 70 min to allow adsorption of the carboxylatedPRXs onto the BSA-immobilized surfaces. Finally, the sensor chip surfaces were rinsed with PBS for 30 min at a flow rate of 50 μL/min to remove free carboxylatedPRXs, and the ΔF and ΔD were determined.
Cell culture
RAW 264.7 cells, a mouse macrophage-like cell line, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). NIH/3T3 cells, a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line, was obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB, Osaka, Japan). RAW264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 100 units/mL penicillin (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical), and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical) in 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Expression level of macrophage scavenger receptor
Cells were stained with allophycocyanin (APC)-labeled rat anti-mouseMSR-A (CD204) antibody (APC-anti-MSR-A; clone: M204PA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or APC-labeled rat IgG2a,κ isotype control antibody (clone: eBR2a; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min on ice. The Fc receptors in RAW 264.7 cells were blocked with TruStain FcX (anti-mouseCD16/32; clone:93; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min on ice before the cells were labeled with antibodies. The stained cells were subsequently collected through centrifugation at 200 × g at 4°C for 3 min, washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% BSA, and passed through a 35-μm cell strainer (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). The fluorescence intensity of the cells was measured using a NovoCyte 2000 flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The stained cells were excited using a 640-nm laser and detected using a 675 ± 30-nm bandpass filter. A total of 10,000 cells were counted for each sample, and the fluorescence intensity of the cell population was determined using the Novo Express software (version 1.2.5, ACEA Biosciences).
Immunoblotting
Cells were lysed with radioimmune precipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Fujifilm Wako pure Chemical) containing Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The lysates were clarified through centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected. SDS-PAGE was performed on a 10% polyacrylamide gel for 50 min at 150 V. The samples were subsequently transferred to a poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a Trans-Blot Turbo transfer system (Bio-Rad). The membrane was blocked with TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.5) containing 5% BSA for 60 min at room temperature. The membrane was subsequently incubated overnight at 4°C with rat monoclonal MSR-A (clone: 7G5C33; BioLegend; 1:200 dilution) and rabbit polyclonal anti-β-actin (A2066; Merck; 1:1,000 dilution). The membrane was treated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (catalog number: 7077; Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA; 1:1000 dilution) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (catalog number: 7074; Cell Signaling Technologies; 1:1000 dilution) for 60 min at room temperature. The membrane was treated using ImmunoStar Zeta (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical). Chemiluminescence images were acquired using an ImageQuantLAS500 imager (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA).
Cellular uptake analysis by flow cytometry
For the analysis of cellular internalization of carboxylatedPRXs, BODIPY-modified carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX were synthesized as described in the Supplementary text. RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells were plated in a 24-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 and 5 × 104 cells/well, respectively, and incubated overnight. BODIPY-labeled carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX solutions (200 μM threaded β-CD) were applied to the cells and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The cells were harvested, collected by centrifugation at 200 × g at 4°C for 3 min, washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% BSA, and passed through a 35-μm cell strainer. The fluorescence intensity of the treated cells was measured using a NovoCyte 2000 flow cytometer. The FITC-labeled PRX-treated cells were excited using a 488-nm laser and detected using a 530 ± 30-nm bandpass filter. The fluorescence intensity of the treated cells was analyzed as described above.To investigate the involvement of MSR-A in the cellular uptake of BODIPY-labeled carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX, the cells were pre-treated with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS; molecular weight = 5,000; 0.1–10 mM sulfate group; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical) for 3 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were treated with BODIPY-labeled carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX for 24 h at 37°C in the presence of DSS. The fluorescence intensity of the treated cells was analyzed by flow cytometry as described above.
Intracellular distribution analysis
The cells were plated in a 35-mm glass bottom dish (diameter of glass area: 12 mm; Iwaki, Tokyo, Japan) at a density of 1 × 104 cells/dish and incubated overnight. Next, they were cultured in a treatment medium containing BODIPY-labeled carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX for 24 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were stained with 100 nM LysoTracker Red DND-99 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C for 15 min, followed by staining with 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33,342 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) at 37°C for 10 min. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed using a FluoView FV10i (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 60× water-immersion objective lens (numerical aperture: 1.2). The excitation and emission wavelengths for Hoechst 33,342, BODIPY-labeled PRXs, and LysoTracker Red were 405 nm and 455 nm, 473 nm and 520 nm, and 559 nm and 598 nm, respectively. The co-localization of BODIPY-labeled PRXs with LysoTracker-stained puncta was quantified using Fiji’s Coloc 2 plugin for calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient [41].
Cell viability
The cells were plated on a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and incubated overnight. Subsequently, the carboxylatedPRXs (1–1,000 μM threaded β-CD) were added to each well. After incubation for 24 h, Cell Counting Kit-8 reagent (Dojindo Laboratories) was added to each well according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After incubation for 1.5 h at 37°C, the absorbance was measured on a Varioskan LUX multimode microplate reader (Thermo Scientific) at 450 nm. Cellular viability was calculated by comparing the absorbance of the treated cells to that of the untreated cells.
Live/dead staining
RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells were plated in a 24-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 and 5 × 104 cells/well, respectively, and incubated overnight. Subsequently, the cells were cultured in a treatment medium containing carboxylatedPRXs (10 mM threaded β-CD) for 24 h at 37°C. Next, they were stained using a Live/Dead Cell Staining Kit II (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C; in this procedure, calcein-AM (2 μM) and ethidium homodimer III (EthD III; 4 μM) stained live and dead cells, respectively. The phase contrast and fluorescent images of the stained cells were acquired using an IX-71 (Olympus) equipped with a DP-80 dual CCD microscope camera.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using OriginPro 2021 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). The statistical differences between the means of individual groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
Synthesis and characterization of carboxylated PRXs
Previously reported methods for the carboxylation of non-degradable α-CDPRXs are reactions with succinic anhydrides [42-44], glycine [45], and bromoacetic acid [46,47]. However, these methods cannot avoid acidification of the solutions, and they are difficult to be applied for the carboxylation of acid-degradable β-CDPRXs. We reported the synthesis of carboxyethyl ether-modified non-degradable α-CDPRXs using methyl 3-bromopropionate under strongly alkaline conditions [34]. Because this reaction proceeds under alkaline conditions, we first tried to synthesize acid-degradable carboxylated β-CDPRXs using methyl 3-bromopropionate. However, we failed to modify the carboxyethyl ether on acid-degradable β-CDPRXs. It is likely that the methyl ester in methyl 3-bromopropionate is hydrolyzed in alkaline conditions and the resulting 3-bromopropionic acid may cause the degradation of the β-CDPRXs. Therefore, we attempted to modify carboxy groups onto acid-degradable β-CDPRXs through two-step reactions, as shown in Figure 2. The first step is the modification of glycine ethyl ester using CDI, which is generally utilized for the chemical modification of PRXs [7,13,16,17,45]. The second step is the deprotection of the esters under mildly alkaline conditions. This two-step method avoids the acidification of the solutions and the decomposition of acid-degradable PRXs. Additionally, this method allows the preparation of various carboxylated β-CDPRXs with different alkyl spacer lengths between carboxy groups and threaded β-CDs (Figures 1 and 2). Note that the carbamate linkages between β-CD and carboxyalkyl groups do not interfere with the inclusion ability of cholesterol and other compounds [7,48], and carboxylated β-CDs are utilized for cholesterol binding [49,50]. Therefore, we considered that the carboxyalkyl carbamates-modified β-CDPRXs are applicable to the treatment of cholesterol-related metabolic diseases via the inclusion of intracellular cholesterol. In this study, three series of carboxylated β-CDPRXs with different alkyl spacer lengths were synthesized for verifying the effects of the alkyl spacer length adjacent to the carboxy groups on the cellular internalization efficiency of the carboxylated β-CDPRXs.The modification of CMCE on the PRXs was characterized through 1H NMR and FT-IR measurements. For quantifying the number of modified CMCEs on PRXs by 1H NMR, CMCE-PRX was synthesized using glycine ethyl ester (in the case of glycine methyl ester, the peak of methyl ester overlapped with the peaks of β-CD). In the 1H NMR spectrum of CMCE-PRX (Figure 3(a)), new peaks assignable to ethyl ester moieties appeared at 1.18 ppm (-O-CH2-C) and 4.08 ppm (-O-C-CH3). Additionally, in the FT-IR spectrum of CMCE-PRX (Figure 3(b)), new peaks assignable to carbamate moieties appeared at 1208 cm−1 (C–O–C stretching vibration), 1536 cm−1 (N-H bending vibration), and 1724 cm−1 (C = O stretching vibration). These results confirm that the CMCE groups were successfully modified onto PRXs. Similarly, in the 1H NMR spectra of carboxyethyl carbamate methyl ester-modified PRX (CECM-PRX) and carboxypropyl carbamate methyl ester-modified PRX (CPCM-PRX), new peaks assignable to alkyl spacers were observed at 2.45 ppm for CECM-PRX and at 1.64 and 2.45 ppm for CPCM-PRX (Supplementary Figure S2). The FT-IR spectra of CECM-PRX and CPCM-PRX showed new peaks assignable to carbamate moieties (Supplementary Figure S3). Therefore, modification of the carboxy esters was not affected by the alkyl spacer length. Additionally, after modification with carboxy esters, no peaks corresponding to free β-CD and axle polymer were observed in the SEC charts of CMCE-PRX, CECM-PRX, and CPCM-PRX (Supplementary Figure S4), indicating that carboxy esters were successfully modified in the PRXs without degradation.
Figure 3.
(a) 1H NMR spectra of CMCE-PRX in DMSO-d6 and CMC-PRX in D2O (400 MHz, 25°C). (b) FT-IR spectra of unmodified PRX, CMCE-PRX, and CMC-PRX. (c) 1H NMR spectra of CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX in D2O (400 MHz, 25°C). (d) FT-IR spectra of CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX
(a) 1H NMR spectra of CMCE-PRX in DMSO-d6 and CMC-PRX in D2O (400 MHz, 25°C). (b) FT-IR spectra of unmodified PRX, CMCE-PRX, and CMC-PRX. (c) 1H NMR spectra of CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX in D2O (400 MHz, 25°C). (d) FT-IR spectra of CEC-PRX and CPC-PRXThe deprotection of ester moieties was completed within 6 h in 0.5 M NaOH solutions. The 1H NMR spectrum of the deprotected product (CMC-PRX) confirmed that the peaks assignable to ethyl ester were completely disappeared (Figure 3(a)). The same results were confirmed for CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX (Figure 3(c)). In the FT-IR spectrum of CMC-PRX, new peaks were observed at 1604 and 1402 cm−1, which correspond to the carboxylate anion [47]. The same tend was observed in the FT-IR spectra of CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX (Figure 3(d)). We considered that the carboxylatedPRXs were obtained as an ammonium salt, because these PRXs were purified by dialysis in ammonium solution for maintaining the pH at weakly alkaline conditions. The number of modified carboxy groups on the PRXs and number-average molecular weights are summarized in Table 1. The number of modified carboxy groups in CMC-PRX, CEC-PRX, and CPC-PRX were roughly identical (approximately 2 carboxy groups were modified per threaded β-CD). In addition to carboxylatedPRXs, we synthesized HEE-PRX as a control for the cell experiments (Table 1). The number of modified HEE groups was 4.0 per threaded β-CD, because at least 4 HEE groups are required for dissolution in aqueous solutions [7].
Table 1.
Characterization of carboxylated PRXs used in the present study
Code
Number of threaded β-CDs
Number of functional groups on PRX (per β-CD) a
Mnb
Carboxy
HEE
CMC-PRX
12.5
31.3 (2.5)
-
24,200
CEC-PRX
12.5
27.5 (2.2)
-
24,100
CPC-PRX
12.5
22.5 (1.8)
-
23,800
HEE-PRX
12.5
-
50.0 (4.0)
27,100
aDetermined using 1H NMR in DMSO-d6 or D2O at 25°C. The values in parentheses denote the average number of modified functional groups per β-CD threaded on PRXs. bCalculated on the basis of the chemical composition of the modified PRXs, as determined using 1H NMR. The Mn of the modified PRXs was calculated as an ammonium salt.
Characterization of carboxylatedPRXs used in the present studyaDetermined using 1H NMR in DMSO-d6 or D2O at 25°C. The values in parentheses denote the average number of modified functional groups per β-CD threaded on PRXs. bCalculated on the basis of the chemical composition of the modified PRXs, as determined using 1H NMR. The Mn of the modified PRXs was calculated as an ammonium salt.
pKa
and pH-responsivity of carboxylated β-CD PRXs
The ionization degree of each carboxylated β-CDPRX was evaluated by potentiometric titration. The acid dissociation constant (pKa) of the carboxy groups in each carboxylated β-CDPRXs were determined at an ionization degree of 50% on the basis of the pH–ionization degree curves, as shown in Figure 4(a), and Table 2. Upon increasing alkyl spacer length, the pKa values of the carboxy groups increased slightly. Because electron-donating alkyl substituents decrease the acidity of carboxylic acids, the trend of the pKa values for the carboxylated β-CDPRXs is reasonable. From the pH–ionization degree curves, the ionization degree of the carboxy groups at pH 7.4 was also determined (Table 2). Under physiological pH conditions, approximately 90% of the carboxylic acids were ionized for all the carboxylated β-CDPRXs.
Figure 4.
(a) Relationship between the pH and degree of ionization of carboxy groups in CMC-PRX (squares), CEC-PRX (circles), and CPC-PRX (triangles), as determined using potentiometric titration in 10 mM NaCl at 25°C. (b) Relationship between the pH and transmittance of CMC-PRX (squares), CEC-PRX (circles), and CPC-PRX (triangles) solutions (5 mg/mL) at 25°C
Table 2.
pKa of carboxylated PRXs
Code
pKaa
Degree of ionization at pH 7.4 (%)
CMC-PRX
4.87
90.0
CEC-PRX
5.21
90.4
CPC-PRX
5.27
90.9
aDetermined using potentiometric titration in 10 mM NaCl at 25°C.
(a) Relationship between the pH and degree of ionization of carboxy groups in CMC-PRX (squares), CEC-PRX (circles), and CPC-PRX (triangles), as determined using potentiometric titration in 10 mM NaCl at 25°C. (b) Relationship between the pH and transmittance of CMC-PRX (squares), CEC-PRX (circles), and CPC-PRX (triangles) solutions (5 mg/mL) at 25°CpKa of carboxylatedPRXsaDetermined using potentiometric titration in 10 mM NaCl at 25°C.Next, the solubility of carboxylated β-CDPRXs at various pH conditions was tested by dissolving each carboxylated β-CDPRX in a buffer solution. Each carboxylated β-CDPRX solution was transparent at a pH range of 7.4 to 4, whereas precipitation of the carboxylated β-CDPRXs was observed below pH 4 (Supplementary Figure S5), which was most likely due to the protonation of carboxy groups under acidic pH conditions. Subsequently, the optical transmittance of each carboxylated β-CDPRX solution was recorded (Figure 4(b)). Although the transmittance of the solutions decreased under acidic pH conditions, upon increasing the alkyl spacer length in carboxylated β-CDPRXs, the threshold pH values at which the transmittance decreased were shifted to higher pH values. These threshold pH values were not consistent with the pKa values of each carboxylated β-CDPRX. Because the hydrophobicity of the modified carboxy groups increases with the alkyl spacer length, CPC-PRX precipitated at a high pH. Accordingly, these results indicate that the carboxylated β-CDPRXs do not precipitate even in the lysosomes, because the pH value in the lysosomes is approximately 4.5 to 5.0 [51].
Interaction of carboxylated β-CD PRX with lipid and protein
To assess the interaction of carboxylatedPRXs with lipid and proteins, QCM-D measurements were performed using lipid-coated and protein-immobilized sensor chips. The DOPClipid layer was constructed on the sensor chip surfaces (Figure 5(a)) [38,39]. The frequency shifts on DOPClipid layers flowed with carboxylatedPRX and HEE-PRX solutions were almost comparable (Figure 5(b)); however, CPC-PRX showed fewer frequency shifts. The dissipation shifts of CMC-PRX and CEC-PRX were slightly larger than those of HEE-PRX (Figure 5(c)). Accordingly, the interaction of carboxylatedPRXs with the lipid layer was slightly lower than that of HEE-PRX. Because the zeta potential of the DOPClipid layer is slightly negative (−10 to 0 mV) [52], it is considered that the carboxylatedPRXs showed relatively weak interactions with the DOPClipid layer owing to electrostatic repulsion. When ΔF and ΔD were plotted (Figure 5(d)), ΔD/ΔF of carboxylatedPRXs was larger than that of HEE-PRX, suggesting that the carboxylatedPRXs were loosely adsorbed onto the lipid layer.
Figure 5.
(a) Schematic illustration for the construction of DOPC lipid layer on SiO2 sensor chip surfaces. (b-d) QCM-D monitoring of the interaction of carboxylated PRXs and HEE-PRX with DOPC lipid layer: frequency shift (b), dissipation shift (c), and ΔF vs ΔD plot (d). (e) Schematic illustration for the immobilization of BSA on gold sensor chip surfaces. (F-H) QCM-D monitoring of the interaction of carboxylated PRXs and HEE-PRX with BSA-immobilized surfaces: frequency shift (f), dissipation shift (g), and ΔF vs ΔD plot (H)
(a) Schematic illustration for the construction of DOPClipid layer on SiO2 sensor chip surfaces. (b-d) QCM-D monitoring of the interaction of carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX with DOPClipid layer: frequency shift (b), dissipation shift (c), and ΔF vs ΔD plot (d). (e) Schematic illustration for the immobilization of BSA on gold sensor chip surfaces. (F-H) QCM-D monitoring of the interaction of carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX with BSA-immobilized surfaces: frequency shift (f), dissipation shift (g), and ΔF vs ΔD plot (H)The interaction of carboxylatedPRXs with protein was assessed using BSA as a protein model, and BSA was immobilized on the sensor chip surfaces (Figure 5(e)). The frequency shifts on BSA-immobilized surfaces flowing with carboxylatedPRX solutions were obviously greater than those of HEE-PRX (Figure 5(f)), and the dissipation shifts of carboxylatedPRXs were large compared with that of HEE-PRX (Figure 5(g)). Although BSA is a negatively charged protein (pI = 4.9) [15], all the carboxylatedPRXs showed significantly high ΔF with BSA, probably due to the electrostatic interactions with cationic amino acid moieties in BSA. However, when ΔF and ΔD were plotted, CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX showed high values of ΔD/ΔF compared with CMC-PRX and HEE-PRX (Figure 5(h)), suggesting that CEC-PRX and CPC-PRX loosely interact with BSA. Consequently, it is plausible that the carboxylation of β-CDPRXs increases their interaction with proteins, whereas it slightly decreases their interaction with lipids.
Intracellular uptake of carboxylated β-CD PRX
We have previously reported that carboxylated non-degradable α-CDPRXs showed higher intracellular uptake into RAW 264.7 cells compared with HEE-modified α-CDPRX through molecular recognition by MSR-A [34], because the cysteine-rich domain at the extracellular C-terminus of MSR-A recognizes anionic macromolecules [35]. To investigate the cellular uptake level of each carboxylated β-CDPRX and the involvement of MSR-A in their cellular uptake, RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells were used as MSR-A-positive and MSR-A-negative cells, respectively. Flow cytometry and immunoblot analysis confirmed the expression of MSR-A in RAW 264.7 cells, whereas MSR-A expression was negligible in NIH/3T3 cells (Figure 6(a,b)).
Figure 6.
(a) Fluorescence intensity histograms of RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells treated with APC-anti-MSR-A antibody or isotype control. (b) Immunoblot analysis for MSR-A and β-actin in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells. (c, d) Fluorescence intensity of RAW 264.7 (c) and NIH/3T3 cells (d) treated with BODIPY-labeled carboxylated PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD; CMC-PRX = 387 μg/mL, CEC-PRX = 386 μg/mL, CPC-PRX = 381 μg/mL) and HEE-PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD; 432 μg/mL) for 24 h. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001)
(a) Fluorescence intensity histograms of RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells treated with APC-anti-MSR-A antibody or isotype control. (b) Immunoblot analysis for MSR-A and β-actin in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells. (c, d) Fluorescence intensity of RAW 264.7 (c) and NIH/3T3 cells (d) treated with BODIPY-labeled carboxylatedPRX (200 μM threaded β-CD; CMC-PRX = 387 μg/mL, CEC-PRX = 386 μg/mL, CPC-PRX = 381 μg/mL) and HEE-PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD; 432 μg/mL) for 24 h. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001)The intracellular uptake levels of carboxylated β-CDPRXs in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells were evaluated using flow cytometry and BODIPY-labeled carboxylated β-CDPRXs (Supplementary Table S1). BODIPY-labeled HEE-PRX was utilized as a control. Note that the modification of BODIPY to PRXs may alter the physicochemical properties and intracellular uptake, the number of modified BODIPY on PRXs was minimized to avoid the effect of BODIPY (0.1 to 0.2 BODIPY molecules per PRX). In RAW 264.7 cells, the intracellular uptake of all carboxylated β-CDPRXs were significantly higher than that of HEE-PRX (Figure 6(c), Supplementary Figure S6), which is consistent with the previous result on carboxylated α-CDPRX [34]. Additionally, the intracellular uptake of the carboxylated β-CDPRXs was ranked in the following order: CPC-PRX > CEC-PRX > CMC-PRX. The intracellular uptake level of carboxylated α-CDPRX in RAW 264.7 cells was changed by structural parameters such as the number of modified carboxy groups and the molecular weight of the axle polymer, most likely due to the difference in recognition by MSR-A [34]. Therefore, the results suggest that the length of alkyl spacers adjacent to carboxy groups affects the intracellular uptake efficiency and that CPC groups are suitable for the uptake of acid-degradable β-CDPRXs into RAW 264.7 cells.In NIH/3T3 cells, the cellular internalization levels of carboxylated β-CDPRXs were expected to be comparable to that of HEE-PRX because NIH/3T3 cells do not express MSR-A. In fact, the carboxylated α-CDPRXs showed comparable intracellular uptake to HEE-modified α-CDPRX in NIH/3T3 cells [34]. However, the intracellular uptake of all the carboxylated β-CDPRXs in NIH/3T3 cells was significantly higher than that of HEE-PRX (Figure 6(d), Supplementary Figure S6). The intracellular uptake levels of carboxylated β-CDPRXs are ranked in the following order: CMC-PRX > CEC-PRX > CPC-PRX, which was opposite to the results for RAW 264.7 cells. Additionally, the fluorescence intensities of NIH/3T3 cells treated with carboxylated β-CDPRXs were greater than those of RAW 264.7 cells. This is most likely due to the difference in the size and the extent of endocytosis between RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells.We additionally evaluated the intracellular uptake of carboxylated β-CDPRXs in DC2.4 cells, a mouse dendritic cell line, which also did not express MSR-A (Supplementary Figure S7). The intracellular uptake of all the carboxylated β-CDPRXs were significantly higher than that of HEE-PRX in the DC2.4 cells; however, the order of intracellular uptake was different from that in NIH/3T3 cells (Supplementary Figure S7). These results indicate that the modification of carboxyalkyl carbamates in acid-degradable β-CDPRXs facilitates intracellular uptake, even in MSR-A-negative cells.Next, to verify the intracellular uptake pathway of carboxylated β-CDPRXs, we analyzed the intracellular uptake after incubation at 4°C or in the presence of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), a competitive inhibitor of MSR-A [35]. These experiments were performed for CPC-PRX, because CPC-PRX showed significantly higher uptake in the evaluated cells compared with HEE-PRX. CLSM observation confirmed that the intracellular uptake of BODIPY-CPC-PRX and BODIPY-HEE-PRX was suppressed in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells when treated at 4°C for 1 h (Figure 7(a)), suggesting that the intracellular uptake of CPC-PRX follows an energy-dependent endocytosis pathway.
Figure 7.
(a) CLSM images of RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells treated with BODIPY-labeled CPC-PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) and HEE-PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) for 1 h at 37°C (Scale bars: 20 μm). The cell nuclei (blue) were stained with Hoechst 33,342. (b, c) Fluorescence intensity of RAW 264.7 (b) and NIH/3T3 cells (c) treated with DSS (0.1 to 10 mM with respect to the sulfate group in DSS) for 3 h at 37°C, followed by treatment with BODIPY-labeled CPC-PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD) and HEE-PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD) for 3 h. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3; ****P < 0.0001)
(a) CLSM images of RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells treated with BODIPY-labeled CPC-PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) and HEE-PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) for 1 h at 37°C (Scale bars: 20 μm). The cell nuclei (blue) were stained with Hoechst 33,342. (b, c) Fluorescence intensity of RAW 264.7 (b) and NIH/3T3 cells (c) treated with DSS (0.1 to 10 mM with respect to the sulfate group in DSS) for 3 h at 37°C, followed by treatment with BODIPY-labeled CPC-PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD) and HEE-PRX (200 μM threaded β-CD) for 3 h. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3; ****P < 0.0001)When the cells were pre-treated with DSS for 3 h, the intracellular uptake of BODIPY-CPC-PRX in RAW 264.7 cells was significantly decreased with increasing DSS concentration (Figure 7(b)). This result confirmed that MSR-A was involved in the intracellular uptake of CPC-PRX in RAW 264.7 cells. In contrast, the intracellular uptake of CPC-PRX in MSR-A-negative NIH/3T3 cells was not suppressed by DSS treatment (Figure 7(c)). Because the interaction of carboxylated β-CDPRXs with BSA was stronger than that of HEE-PRX (Figure 5(d)), carboxylated β-CDPRXs might strongly interact with membrane proteins, leading to high intracellular uptake. Although we could not identify the membrane proteins involved in the cellular internalization of carboxylated β-CDPRXs in MSR-A-negative cells, we considered that the carboxyalkyl carbamate moieties in carboxylated β-CDPRXs are recognized by membrane-bound proteins. The carboxyalkyl groups modified on β-CDPRXs are naturally occurring amino acids (CMC = glycine, CEC = β-alanine, CPC = γ-aminobutyric acid: GABA). Because these amino acids and their carbamate derivatives are the substrate of amino acid transporters or membrane-bound acylases [53-55], the interaction of the carboxyalkyl carbamates modified on PRXs to these membrane proteins might contribute to the intracellular uptake in MSR-A-negative cell lines. Consequently, the modification of carboxyalkyl carbamates on β-CDPRXs is effective for promoting not only MSR-A-dependent uptake, but also MSR-A-independent uptake in NIH/3T3 cells and other MSR-A-negative cells. Although it is difficult for carboxylated β-CDPRXs to selectively target macrophages through MSR-A recognition, the high intracellular uptake capability of carboxyalkyl carbamate-modified β-CDPRXs in MSR-A-negative cells is beneficial for their therapeutic applications.
Intracellular distribution of carboxylated β-CD PRX
In addition to intracellular uptake, the intracellular distribution of carboxylated β-CDPRXs is an important characteristic, because β-CDPRXs are designed to release threaded β-CDs in lysosomes, especially in the treatment of NPC disease [7,17]. Thus, the intracellular distribution of BODIPY-labeled carboxylated β-CDPRXs was investigated using CLSM in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells after 24 h of treatment. To visualize the localization of BODIPY-labeled carboxylated β-CDPRXs, acidic endosomes and lysosomes were stained with LysoTracker Red. The green fluorescence signals derived from BODIPY-labeled PRXs appeared to co-localize with the acidic endosomes and lysosomes stained as red in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells (Figure 8(a,b)). For quantitative analysis, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined from the CLSM images (Figure 8(c,d)). There was no significant difference among the different types of BODIPY-labeled PRXs in RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells. Additionally, Pearson’s correlation coefficient values were relatively high, suggesting that all types of BODIPY-labeled PRXs that were internalized into RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells were primarily localized in the endosomes/lysosomes. The carboxylation of the β-CDPRXs did not affect the intracellular localization in comparison to HEE-PRX. These results suggest that carboxylated β-CDPRXs are capable of releasing threaded β-CDs in the endosomes/lysosomes, which is important in the treatment of NPC diseases [7,17].
Figure 8.
(a, b) CLSM images of RAW 264.7 (a) and NIH/3T3 cells (b) treated with BODIPY-labeled carboxylated PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) and HEE-PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) for 24 h at 37°C (Scale bars: 20 μm). The cell nuclei (blue) and endosomes/lysosomes (red) were stained with Hoechst 33,342 and LysoTracker Red, respectively. (c, d) Pearson’s correlation coefficient between BODIPY-labeled PRXs and LysoTracker Red in treated RAW 264.7 (c) and NIH/3T3 cells (d). The data are expressed as a box plot, wherein the upper and lower boundaries of the box indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; the black and red lines within the box indicate the median and the mean, respectively, while the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum (n = 20 cells)
(a, b) CLSM images of RAW 264.7 (a) and NIH/3T3 cells (b) treated with BODIPY-labeled carboxylatedPRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) and HEE-PRX (green; 200 μM threaded β-CD) for 24 h at 37°C (Scale bars: 20 μm). The cell nuclei (blue) and endosomes/lysosomes (red) were stained with Hoechst 33,342 and LysoTracker Red, respectively. (c, d) Pearson’s correlation coefficient between BODIPY-labeled PRXs and LysoTracker Red in treated RAW 264.7 (c) and NIH/3T3 cells (d). The data are expressed as a box plot, wherein the upper and lower boundaries of the box indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; the black and red lines within the box indicate the median and the mean, respectively, while the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum (n = 20 cells)
Toxicity of carboxylated β-CD PRX
The cytotoxicity of a material is an important consideration when designing biomedical materials. In our previous study, HEE-PRX was confirmed to exhibit no cytotoxicity in human fibroblasts [7], because the hydrophobic cavity of β-CDs contains a polymer chain that suppresses the extraction of cholesterol from the plasma membrane [16]. However, the chemical modification of acid-degradable β-CDPRXs with cationic amino groups and methyl groups causes cytotoxicity due to the destabilization of the plasma membrane or the induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [16,18]. To confirm whether the carboxylation of β-CDPRXs causes cytotoxicity, we compared the effects of carboxylated β-CDPRX and HEE-PRX on the cell viability of RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells after 24 h of treatment (Figure 9(a)). When the concentration of threaded β-CDs in carboxylated β-CDPRXs was up to 1 mM, the PRXs did not exhibit cytotoxicity in either the RAW 264.7 or NIH/3T3 cells. These results suggest that the carboxylation of β-CDPRXs does not cause cytotoxicity, regardless of the alkyl spacer length.
Figure 9.
(a, b) Viability of RAW 264.7 (a) and NIH/3T3 cells (b) treated with carboxylated PRXs and HEE-PRX for 24 h. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). (c, d) Phase contrast and fluorescence microscopic images of Live/Dead-stained RAW 264.7 (c) and NIH/3T3 cells (d) treated with carboxylated PRXs (10 mM threaded β-CD; CMC-PRX = 19.4 mg/mL, CEC-PRX = 19.3 mg/mL, CPC-PRX = 19.0 mg/mL) and HEE-PRX (10 mM threaded β-CD; 21.6 mg/mL) for 24 h (scale bars = 100 μm). The live (green) and dead cells (red) were stained with calcein-AM and EthD-III, respectively
(a, b) Viability of RAW 264.7 (a) and NIH/3T3 cells (b) treated with carboxylatedPRXs and HEE-PRX for 24 h. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). (c, d) Phase contrast and fluorescence microscopic images of Live/Dead-stained RAW 264.7 (c) and NIH/3T3 cells (d) treated with carboxylatedPRXs (10 mM threaded β-CD; CMC-PRX = 19.4 mg/mL, CEC-PRX = 19.3 mg/mL, CPC-PRX = 19.0 mg/mL) and HEE-PRX (10 mM threaded β-CD; 21.6 mg/mL) for 24 h (scale bars = 100 μm). The live (green) and dead cells (red) were stained with calcein-AM and EthD-III, respectivelyTo further confirm these results, we tested the cytotoxicity of the carboxylated β-CDPRXs through Live/Dead staining (Figure 9(b)). Most RAW 264.7 and NIH/3T3 cells treated with carboxylated β-CDPRXs (24 h, 10 mM threaded β-CDs) were stained green (live cells); the proportion of dead cells, which were stained red, were comparable to that in the control cells (PBS groups). Consequently, we concluded that the carboxylated β-CDPRXs showed negligible toxicity and that they were suitable candidates for biomedical applications.
Conclusions
In this study, we developed three series of carboxyalkyl carbamate group-modified β-CD-threaded acid-degradable PRXs with different alkyl spacer lengths to modulate the intracellular uptake efficiency of β-CDPRXs. The carboxylation of β-CDPRXs enabled strong interaction with the protein model, whereas the interactions of these PRXs with the lipid layer model were slightly lower compared with that of HEE-PRX. The carboxylated β-CDPRXs showed significantly high intracellular uptake in MSR-A-positive RAW 264.7 cells compared with HEE-PRX, because the interaction with MSR-A promoted endocytosis of the carboxylated β-CDPRXs. Interestingly, the carboxylated β-CDPRXs showed significantly higher intracellular uptake in the MSR-A-negative NIH/3T3 cells and other cells compared with HEE-PRX. It is plausible that the caboxylated β-CDPRXs strongly interact with membrane proteins, leading to high intracellular uptake regardless of MSR-A expression. Therefore, the carboxylation of β-CDPRXs is an effective chemical modification for promoting both MSR-A-dependent uptake and MSR-A-independent uptake in MSR-A-negative cells. Although it is difficult for carboxylated β-CDPRXs to achieve selective targeting in macrophages, the high intracellular uptake of carboxylated β-CDPRXs in MSR-A-negative cells is beneficial for their therapeutic application. The basic knowledge obtained in this study is expected to serve as an important guide for considering the molecular design of not only PRX, but also CD-based polymers in therapeutic applications [56].Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Blaise L Tardy; Henk H Dam; Marloes M J Kamphuis; Joseph J Richardson; Frank Caruso Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Daniel S Ory; Elizabeth A Ottinger; Nicole Yanjanin Farhat; Kelly A King; Xuntian Jiang; Lisa Weissfeld; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Cristin D Davidson; Simona Bianconi; Lee Ann Keener; Ravichandran Rao; Ariane Soldatos; Rohini Sidhu; Kimberly A Walters; Xin Xu; Audrey Thurm; Beth Solomon; William J Pavan; Bernardus N Machielse; Mark Kao; Steven A Silber; John C McKew; Carmen C Brewer; Charles H Vite; Steven U Walkley; Christopher P Austin; Forbes D Porter Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Sandra Merscher-Gomez; Johanna Guzman; Christopher E Pedigo; Markku Lehto; Robier Aguillon-Prada; Armando Mendez; Mariann I Lassenius; Carol Forsblom; Taehyun Yoo; Rodrigo Villarreal; Dony Maiguel; Kevin Johnson; Ronald Goldberg; Viji Nair; Ann Randolph; Matthias Kretzler; Robert G Nelson; George W Burke; Per-Henrik Groop; Alessia Fornoni Journal: Diabetes Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 9.461