| Literature DB >> 34248398 |
Wu Xuelian1, Jiang Jiang1, Yang Jian1, Feng Qin2, Wang Zhifeng3.
Abstract
A flexible polyaniline/polyvinyl chloride (PVC) polymer conductive wire was prepared using flexible PVC polymer as the substrate by the swelling - in-situ polymerization method, the line-shaped dents were pressed on the substrate by the thermodynamic pre-deformation treatment technology. Based on the orthogonal test method, the effects of five main influencing factors - swelling time (A), swelling temperature (B), oxidation temperature (C), oxidation time (D), and oxidant concentration (E) - on the conductivity of the prepared polyaniline/PVC conductive wire was investigated. The results of the orthogonal array testing were subjected to range analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the influencing factors, in terms of significance, follow the order of swelling temperature, oxidation time, swelling time, oxidation temperature, and oxidant concentration, with the optimal factor-level combination being A2B2C2D2E2, which led to a desirable conductivity up to 1.19 × 10-1 S/cm. In addition, the influence of different conductive line size characteristics on the molecular structure, microstructure, and conductivity of polyaniline/PVC flexible conductive wire was further studied. On the microstructure, as the line width increases, the infrared absorption intensity ratio of the quinone ring and the benzene ring in the polyaniline/PVC conductive wires gradually approaches 1. The microstructure, as the line width of the polyaniline/PVC conductive wire increases, the formed polyaniline gradually changes from flakes and granules to fibrous strips and entangles with each other to form a spatial network structure. The conductivity of the wire increases with the increase of its width up to 1.48 × 10-1 S/cm.Entities:
Keywords: Polymer; flexible conductive wire; orthogonal test; polyaniline
Year: 2021 PMID: 34248398 PMCID: PMC8245068 DOI: 10.1080/15685551.2021.1936373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Des Monomers Polym ISSN: 1385-772X Impact factor: 2.650
5-factor-5-level parameters
| Level | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 1 |
| 3 | 6 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 12 | 30 | 30 | 120 | 2 |
| 5 | 15 | 40 | 40 | 180 | 2.5 |
A: swelling time (h), B: swelling temperature (°C), C: oxidation temperature (°C), D: oxidation time (min), E: oxidant concentration (mol/L).
5-factor-5-level orthogonal arrays and target results
| Number | A | B | C | D | E | Conductivity S/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.39 × 10−2 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6.93 × 10−2 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 7.61 × 10−2 |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1.25 × 10−2 |
| 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3.15 × 10−3 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4.64 × 10−2 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.19 × 10−1 |
| 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4.28 × 10−2 |
| 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3.80 × 10−4 |
| 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1.85 × 10−3 |
| 11 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5.30 × 10−2 |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 7.99 × 10−2 |
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2.28 × 10−2 |
| 14 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3.50 × 10−2 |
| 15 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9.21 × 10−4 |
| 16 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6.85 × 10−3 |
| 17 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2.33 × 10−2 |
| 18 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.65 × 10−2 |
| 19 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1.19 × 10−2 |
| 20 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3.17 × 10−3 |
| 21 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2.83 × 10−2 |
| 22 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4.56 × 10−3 |
| 23 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2.33 × 10−2 |
| 24 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4.02 × 10−3 |
| 25 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3.78 × 10−3 |
Range analysis
| Evaluation | A | B | C | D | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 1.95 × 10−1 | 1.69 × 10−1 | 4.06 × 10−2 | 9.19 × 10−2 | 1.05 × 10−1 |
| k2 | 2.10 × 10−1 | 2.17 × 10−1 | 1.77 × 10−1 | 2.55 × 10−1 | 1.68 × 10−1 |
| k3 | 1.13 × 10−1 | 1.60 × 10−1 | 1.05 × 10−1 | 7.79 × 10−2 | 8.95 × 10−2 |
| k4 | 6.17 × 10−2 | 6.22 × 10−2 | 1.16 × 10−1 | 1.31 × 10−1 | 1.19 × 10−1 |
| k5 | 4.30 × 10−2 | 1.29 × 10−2 | 1.85 × 10−1 | 6.68 × 10−2 | 1.43 × 10−1 |
| 3.90 × 10−2 | 3.37 × 10−2 | 8.12 × 10−3 | 1.84 × 10−2 | 2.10 × 10−2 | |
| 4.21 × 10−2 | 4.33 × 10−2 | 3.54 × 10−2 | 5.10 × 10−2 | 3.36 × 10−2 | |
| 2.25 × 10−2 | 3.21 × 10−2 | 2.10 × 10−2 | 1.56 × 10−2 | 1.79 × 10−2 | |
| 1.23 × 10−2 | 1.24 × 10−2 | 2.31 × 10−2 | 2.62 × 10−2 | 2.38 × 10−2 | |
| 8.60 × 10−3 | 2.57 × 10−3 | 3.69 × 10−2 | 1.34 × 10−2 | 2.86 × 10−2 | |
| Range R | 3.35 × 10−2 | 4.08 × 10−2 | 2.88 × 10−2 | 3.77 × 10−2 | 1.57 × 10−2 |
| Order of importance | B > D > A > C > E | ||||
Figure 1.Trend of conductivity for different factor-level combinations
Analysis of variance table
| Dependent variable: conductivity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Type III sum of squares | df | mean square | F | Sig. |
| Calibration model | . 018a | 20 | .001 | 1.472 | .386 |
| Intercept | .016 | 1 | .016 | 24.745 | .008 |
| Swelling time | .005 | 4 | .001 | 1.840 | .285 |
| Swelling temperature | .006 | 4 | .001 | 2.225 | .229 |
| Oxidation temperature | .003 | 4 | .001 | 1.107 | .462 |
| Oxidation time | .005 | 4 | .001 | 1.889 | .276 |
| Oxidant concentration | .001 | 4 | .000 | .297 | .867 |
| Error | .003 | 4 | .001 | ||
| Aggregate | .036 | 25 | |||
| Total aggregate of calibration | .021 | 24 | |||
aR-squared = .880 (adjusted R-squared = .282)
Figure 2.Infrared spectra of PVC and PANI/PVC conductive wire
Intensity ratios of the quinone and benzene rings with different line-width
| Line-width | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 3353.6 | 2718.4 | 1.23 |
| 1 | 3288.5 | 2751.8 | 1.19 |
| 1.5 | 2914.9 | 2855.9 | 1.02 |
| 2 | 3071.6 | 3298.9 | 0.93 |
| 2.5 | 3192.8 | 3070.3 | 1.04 |
Figure 3.SEM morphology of polyaniline conductive wires with different linewidths (a: 0.5 mm, b: 1 mm, c: 1.5 mm, d: 2 mm, e: 2.5 mm)
Figure 4.Diagram of different line-width and electrical conductivity