Literature DB >> 34248371

Climatic variables and ecological modelling data for birds, amphibians and reptiles in the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (Portugal-Spain).

João C Campos1, Sara Rodrigues1, Teresa Freitas2, João A Santos2, João P Honrado1, Adrián Regos3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Climate change has been widely accepted as one of the major threats for global biodiversity and understanding its potential effects on species distribution is crucial to optimise conservation planning in future scenarios under global change. Integrating detailed climatic data across spatial and temporal scales into species distribution modelling can help to predict potential changes in biodiversity. Consequently, this type of data can be useful for developing efficient biodiversity management and conservation planning. The provision of such data becomes even more important in highly biodiverse regions, currently suffering from climatic and landscape changes. The Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (BRMI; Portugal-Spain) is one of the most relevant reserves for wildlife in Europe. This highly diverse region is of great ecological and socio-economical interest, suffering from synergistic processes of rural land abandonment and climatic instabilities that currently threaten local biodiversity.Aiming to optimise conservation planning in the Reserve, we provide a complete dataset of historical and future climate models (1 x 1 km) for the BRMI, used to build a series of distribution models for 207 vertebrate species. These models are projected for 2050 under two climate change scenarios. The climatic suitability of 52% and 57% of the species are predicted to decrease under the intermediate and extreme climatic scenarios, respectively. These models constitute framework data for improving local conservation planning in the Reserve, which should be further supported by implementing climate and land-use change factors to increase the accuracy of future predictions of species distributions in the study area. NEW INFORMATION: Herein, we provide a complete dataset of state-of-the-art historical and future climate model simulations, generated by global-regional climate model chains, with climatic variables resolved at a high spatial resolution (1 × 1 km) over the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica. Additionally, a complete series of distribution models for 207 species (168 birds, 24 reptiles and 15 amphibians) under future (2050) climate change scenarios is delivered, which constitute framework data for improving local conservation planning in the reserve. João C. Campos, Sara Rodrigues, Teresa Freitas, João A. Santos, João P. Honrado, Adrián Regos.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iberian Peninsula; biodiversity; climate change; climate models; conservation; species distribution models.

Year:  2021        PMID: 34248371      PMCID: PMC8249360          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e66509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Understanding how species are globally distributed and identifying the key factors that influence their spatial and temporal distribution patterns are essential first steps for solid biodiversity conservation planning (Whittaker et al. 2005). Species distributions are primarily shaped by historical and contemporary events, in which environmental and landscape factors play a decisive role in determining spatial and temporal distribution status and trends (Nogués-Bravo et al. 2018). In this regard, climate change has been widely acknowledged as one of the major current and future threats for global biodiversity (Sippel et al. 2020, Raven and Wagner 2021), causing geographical distribution shifts of a large number of species and, consequently, leading to species extinction events, the disruption of entire ecosystems and also deprivation of human well-being (Pecl et al. 2017, Turner et al. 2020). As such, providing detailed and informative climatic data at both spatial and temporal scales is paramount for better predicting potential environmental impacts on biodiversity and associated ecosystems, which ultimately support optimised conservation planning under global change (Newbold 2018). One of the most important tools for assisting efficient management and biodiversity conservation planning is species distribution modelling (SDMs; Araújo et al. 2019). These methods derive statistical relationships between geographical species occurrences and environmental predictors (such as climatic factors), which can be consequently used to spatially and temporally predict species distributions under different environmental scenarios (Guisan et al. 2017). In order to efficiently support biodiversity conservation under future environmental conditions, the combined effect of landscape, concrete land cover information and climate factors must be taken into account to improve the model predictive accuracy of potential future changes of species distributions (Triviño et al. 2018, Pausas and Millán 2019). Improving the predictive power of SDMs becomes paramount in highly biodiverse regions currently under severe climatic and landscape changes. In Europe, Mediterranean rural areas are perfect examples of highly diverse regions from an ecological and socio-economical point of view, suffering from increased effects of landscape and climatic changes (Navarro and Pereira 2012). For instance, the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (BRMI), one of the largest reserves and important areas for wildlife in Europe, with around 1,132,000 hectares (www.unesco.org), is currently subjected to processes of rural land abandonment and climatic instabilities that have contributed to the disruption of ecosystem processes (e.g. escalation of extreme wildfires; Sil et al. 2019). The Reserve encompasses five natural parks and several Natura 2000 sites, comprising high landscape heterogeneity and biodiversity. As an example, the Reserve supports a large number of vertebrate species (around 250 species; www.unesco.org), including several emblematic taxa of conservation concern, such as the black stork [ (Linnaeus, 1758)], the Egyptian vulture [ (Linnaeus, 1766)], the Iberian frog [ (Boulenger, 1879)] and the Seoane’s viper [ (Lataste, 1879)]. However, the current climatic and landscapes changes constitute major threats for the local biodiversity and compiling framework data about how these impacts might influence species distribution patterns in the future could contribute to regional and local conservation efforts. Here, we present a complete dataset of historical (serving as temporal baseline data) and future climate models with a high spatial resolution (1 × 1 km) for the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (Portugal-Spain), as well as a complete series of distribution models for 207 vertebrate species (168 birds, 24 reptiles and 15 amphibians), projected for a historical period (1989-2005) and for future climate change scenarios (2021-2050) in the Reserve.

General description

Purpose

These datasets were developed to provide framework data for biodiversity conservation in one of the most diverse Biosphere Reserves in Europe.

Additional information

The climate model datasets (comprising three main variables – daily total precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures) are provided for two main areas: the Iberian Peninsula and the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (Fig. 1). The climate model simulations are provided for one historical period (daily data from 1989 to 2005) in the Iberian Peninsula (at 9 × 9 km) and two periods (daily data from 1989 to 2005 and from 2021 to 2050) in the Meseta Ibérica (at 1 × 1 km). Future climate data are available from four Global-Regional Climate Model chains and two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). The SDMs are provided for both areas (10 × 10 km in the Iberian Peninsula and 1 × 1 km in the Meseta Ibérica) and for one historical period in the Iberian Peninsula (mean between 1989-2005) and two periods in the Meseta Ibérica (mean between 1989-2005 and mean between 2021 and 2050).
Figure 1.

Geographic location of the study areas: the Iberian Peninsula (climate variables and biodiversity data provided at 10 × 10 km resolution) and the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (data provided at 1 × 1 km resolution).

The data are provided in compressed folders, containing the following information: Climate model files encompassing three climatic variables in netCDF format (files organised according to each area and temporal period) and the corresponding bioclimatic variables available in .tiff format; Species models for 207 vertebrate species, including the corresponding spatial projections for the historic and future scenarios (files organised according to each species, area and temporal period).

Sampling methods

Step description

Presence/absence data for bird species present in the Iberian Peninsula were obtained from the Spanish and Portuguese Atlas of Breeding Birds, at 10 km resolution (Martí and Del Moral 2003, Equipa Atlas 2008). Presence/absence data for reptile and amphibian species were extracted from the Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles of Portugal and Spain, at 10 km resolution (Pleguezuelos et al. 2002, Loureiro et al. 2008). Only native species with at least one presence in the BRMI were selected. In addition, species with less than 30 presences in the Iberian Peninsula were excluded to avoid model overfitting (see Araújo et al. 2019). In the end, data were obtained for 207 species: 168 birds, 24 reptiles and 15 amphibians (see Table 1). Taking into account the taxonomic uncertainties of some species (see Table 1), the species list was determined according to the most recently updated versions of the Altases to avoid any taxonomic conflicts (Sillero et al. 2014).
Table 1.

Species information: taxonomic group, scientific name, species code and number of presences used for modelling (N). The quality threshold (area under the curve - AUC) used for model selection (to be included on ensemble modelling) are indicated. The accuracy metrics of ensemble species distribution models (SDMs), measured by the AUC and True Skill Statistics (TSS), are also mentioned. Ten model replicates were conducted for each species.

Group Scientific name Code N AUC threshold Climate models
AUC TSS
Amphibia Alytes cisternasii ACI12530.80.960.795
Amphibia Alytes obstetricans AOB23360.80.9270.681
Amphibia Bufo spinosus BSP44710.70.9150.654
Amphibia Discoglossus galganoi DGA19300.70.9930.924
Amphibia Epidalea calamita ECA39730.70.9490.757
Amphibia Hyla molleri HMO15020.80.9570.759
Amphibia Lissotriton boscai LBO16950.80.9480.76
Amphibia Lissotriton helveticus LHE7010.80.9710.833
Amphibia Pelobates cultripes PCU22210.80.9680.786
Amphibia Pelophylax perezi PPE55870.80.9890.932
Amphibia Pelodytes punctatus PPU17650.70.950.776
Amphibia Pleurodeles waltl PWA18970.80.9180.659
Amphibia Rana iberica RIB9530.80.9840.871
Amphibia Salamandra salamandra spp.SSA24220.80.9280.706
Amphibia Triturus marmoratus spp.TMA24850.70.9240.673
Birds Accipiter gentilis ACCGENT22660.70.9910.895
Birds Accipiter nisus ACCNISU25650.70.9840.88
Birds Acrocephalus arundinaceus ACRARUN13480.80.990.908
Birds Acrocephalus scirpaceus ACRSCIR15810.70.9910.912
Birds Aegithalos caudatus AEGCAUD41570.70.8880.599
Birds Alauda arvensis ALAARVE29990.80.8960.62
Birds Alcedo atthis ALCATTH22850.70.8610.542
Birds Alectoris rufa ALERUFA50500.70.9460.803
Birds Anas clypeata ANACLYP1410.80.9870.945
Birds Anas platyrhynchos ANAPLAT33540.70.8710.56
Birds Anas strepera ANASTRE3050.80.9810.913
Birds Anthus campestris ANTCAMP22480.80.8960.614
Birds Anthus spinoletta ANTSPIN4390.80.9870.908
Birds Anthus trivialis ANTTRIV11630.80.970.846
Birds Apus melba APUMELB10470.70.9750.849
Birds Apus pallidus APUPALL8470.80.9450.75
Birds Aquila chrysaetos AQUCHRY7000.70.9680.835
Birds Ardea cinerea ARDCINE5430.70.9940.944
Birds Ardea purpurea ARDPURP2590.80.9770.872
Birds Asio flammeus ASIFLAM770.80.9910.973
Birds Asio otus ASIOTUS13620.70.8930.597
Birds Athene noctua ATHNOCT44240.70.9620.793
Birds Aythya ferina AYTFERI1950.80.9870.94
Birds Bubo bubo BUBBUBO21410.70.880.601
Birds Bubulcus ibis BUBIBIS2870.80.9640.827
Birds Burhinus oedicnemus BUROEDI22640.80.9750.836
Birds Buteo buteo BUTBUTE45040.70.8670.546
Birds Calandrella brachydactyla CALBRAC22450.80.9920.909
Birds Alauda rufescens CALRUFE2460.80.9850.903
Birds Caprimulgus europaeus CAPEURO19790.80.8990.618
Birds Caprimulgus ruficollis CAPRUFI17810.80.9160.656
Birds Carduelis spinus CARSPIN840.80.990.963
Birds Hirundo daurica CECDAUR12530.80.9920.952
Birds Certhia brachydactyla CERBRAC23360.70.8680.56
Birds Cettia cetti CETCETT44710.70.9270.674
Birds Charadrius dubius CHADUBI19300.70.9890.896
Birds Chersophilus duponti CHEDUPO39730.80.980.907
Birds Chlidonias hybrida CHLHYBR15020.80.9910.959
Birds Ciconia ciconia CICCICO16950.80.9270.705
Birds Ciconia nigra CICNIGR7010.80.9640.838
Birds Cinclus cinclus CINCINC22210.80.9370.728
Birds Circus aeruginosus CIRAERU55870.80.9790.891
Birds Circus cyaneus CIRCYAN17650.80.9630.832
Birds Circaetus gallicus CIRGALL18970.70.9440.728
Birds Circus pygargus CIRPYGA9530.70.9920.913
Birds Cisticola juncidis CISJUNC24220.80.970.814
Birds Clamator glandarius CLAGLAN24850.70.9940.925
Birds Coccothraustes coccothraustes COCCOCC22660.80.9650.818
Birds Columba livia COLLIVI25650.70.9450.787
Birds Columba oenas COLOENA13480.80.9170.68
Birds Columba palumbus COLPALU15810.70.9470.793
Birds Corvus corone CORCORO41570.80.9360.701
Birds Coracias garrulus CORGARR29990.80.9270.705
Birds Corvus monedula CORMONE22850.70.9920.902
Birds Coturnix coturnix COTCOTU50500.70.9340.717
Birds Cuculus canorus CUCCANO1410.70.980.856
Birds Cyanopica cyana CYACYAN33540.80.9540.765
Birds Dendrocopos major DENMAJO3050.80.9740.814
Birds Dendrocopos minor DENMINO22480.80.950.751
Birds Egretta garzetta EGRGARZ4390.80.9760.878
Birds Elanus caeruleus ELACAER11630.80.9430.734
Birds Emberiza calandra EMBCALA10470.70.9080.695
Birds Emberiza cia EMBCIA8470.80.940.681
Birds Emberiza cirlus EMBCIRL7000.70.9910.901
Birds Emberiza citrinella EMBCITR5430.80.9830.898
Birds Emberiza hortulana EMBHORT2590.80.9470.755
Birds Erithacus rubecula ERIRUBE770.80.9050.619
Birds Falco naumanni FALNAUM13620.80.930.723
Birds Falco peregrinus FALPERE44240.80.990.892
Birds Falco subbuteo FALSUBB1950.70.9750.819
Birds Ficedula hypoleuca FICHYPO21410.80.9750.899
Birds Fringilla coelebs FRICOEL2870.70.9010.644
Birds Fulica atra FULATRA22640.80.9270.688
Birds Gallinula chloropus GALCHLO45040.70.8740.593
Birds Galerida cristata GALCRIS22450.80.9340.701
Birds Galerida theklae GALTHEK2460.80.9430.710
Birds Garrulus glandarius GARGLAN19790.80.9450.717
Birds Gyps fulvus GYPFULV17810.70.9990.98
Birds Hieraaetus fasciatus HIEFASC840.80.9970.956
Birds Hieraaetus pennatus HIEPENN12530.70.990.889
Birds Himantopus himantopus HIMHIMA23360.80.9210.668
Birds Ixobrychus minutus IXOMINU44710.80.9910.944
Birds Jynx torquilla JYNTORQ19300.70.9890.891
Birds Lanius collurio LANCOLL39730.80.9710.855
Birds Lanius excubitor LANEXCU15020.70.8850.611
Birds Lanius senator LANSENA16950.80.9470.761
Birds Larus ridibundus LARRIDI7010.80.9940.968
Birds Loxia curvirostra LOXCURV22210.80.9310.733
Birds Lullula arborea LULARBO55870.70.990.897
Birds Luscinia megarhynchos LUSMEGA17650.70.9920.923
Birds Cyanecula svecica LUSSVEC18970.80.9950.969
Birds Melanocorypha calandra MELCALA9530.80.9180.681
Birds Merops apiaster MERAPIA24220.80.9380.717
Birds Milvus migrans MILMIGR24850.70.9760.835
Birds Milvus milvus MILMILV22660.80.9380.727
Birds Monticola saxatilis MONSAXA25650.80.9410.751
Birds Monticola solitarius MONSOLI13480.80.9920.908
Birds Motacilla alba MOTALBA15810.70.9710.864
Birds Motacilla cinerea MOTCINE41570.80.940.7
Birds Motacilla flava MOTFLAV29990.80.970.836
Birds Muscicapa striata MUSSTRI22850.70.9770.835
Birds Neophron percnopterus NEOPERC50500.70.970.876
Birds Nycticorax nycticorax NYCNYCT1410.80.9950.974
Birds Oenanthe hispanica OENHISP33540.80.9090.686
Birds Oenanthe leucura OENLEUC3050.80.9450.754
Birds Oenanthe oenanthe OENOENA22480.80.9230.674
Birds Oriolus oriolus ORIORIO4390.70.910.666
Birds Otis tarda OTITARD11630.80.9610.797
Birds Otus scops OTUSCOP10470.70.9250.695
Birds Periparus ater PARATER8470.80.920.669
Birds Parus caeruleus PARCAER7000.70.8840.599
Birds Parus cristatus PARCRIS5430.80.9850.863
Birds Parus major PARMAJO2590.70.9350.745
Birds Passer hispaniolensis PASHISP770.80.9420.736
Birds Passer montanus PASMONT13620.70.8690.541
Birds Pernis apivorus PERAPIV44240.80.9370.736
Birds Perdix perdix PERPERD1950.80.9930.954
Birds Petronia petronia PETPETR21410.80.9050.63
Birds Phasianus colchicus PHACOLC2870.80.9970.985
Birds Phoenicurus ochruros PHOOCHR22640.80.910.632
Birds Phoenicurus phoenicurus PHOPHOE45040.80.9490.77
Birds Phylloscopus bonelli PHYBONE22450.80.9060.626
Birds Phylloscopus collybita PHYCOLL2460.80.9220.678
Birds Phylloscopus ibericus PHYIBER19790.80.9350.729
Birds Pica pica PICPICA17810.70.860.536
Birds Picus viridis PICVIRI840.70.8680.551
Birds Podiceps cristatus PODCRIS12530.80.9780.889
Birds Podiceps nigricollis PODNIGR23360.80.9930.962
Birds Prunella collaris PRUCOLL44710.80.9940.957
Birds Prunella modularis PRUMODU19300.80.9760.844
Birds Pterocles alchata PTEALCH39730.80.9740.877
Birds Pterocles orientalis PTEORIE15020.80.9680.84
Birds Ptyonoprogne rupestris PTYRUPE16950.80.9920.902
Birds Pyrrhocorax graculus PYRGRAC7010.80.9920.947
Birds Pyrrhula pyrrhula PYRPYRR22210.80.9170.681
Birds Rallus aquaticus RALAQUA55870.70.9950.948
Birds Recurvirostra avosetta RECAVOS17650.80.990.945
Birds Regulus ignicapillus REGIGNI18970.80.9280.693
Birds Regulus regulus REGREGU9530.80.9280.899
Birds Remiz pendulinus REMPEND24220.80.9660.824
Birds Riparia riparia RIPRIPA24850.70.9930.932
Birds Saxicola rubetra SAXRUBE22660.80.9780.888
Birds Saxicola torquatus SAXTORQ25650.70.8980.622
Birds Serinus citrinella SERCITR13480.80.9840.904
Birds Sitta europaea SITEURO15810.80.9490.736
Birds Sterna nilotica STENILO41570.80.9960.981
Birds Strix aluco STRALUC29990.70.9910.896
Birds Streptopelia decaocto STRDECA22850.70.8980.651
Birds Streptopelia turtur STRTURT50500.70.9270.697
Birds Sturnus unicolor STUUNIC1410.70.9230.71
Birds Sylvia atricapilla SYLATRI33540.70.9910.902
Birds Sylvia borin SYLBORI3050.80.9310.712
Birds Sylvia cantillans SYLCANT22480.80.8960.602
Birds Sylvia communis SYLCOMM4390.70.8990.606
Birds Sylvia conspicillata SYLCONS11630.80.9470.747
Birds Sylvia hortensis SYLHORT10470.70.9830.881
Birds Sylvia melanocephala SYLMELA8470.80.9260.663
Birds Sylvia undata SYLUNDA7000.70.9060.643
Birds Tachybaptus ruficollis TACRUFI5430.70.9670.817
Birds Tetrax tetrax TETTETR2590.80.9880.913
Birds Tichodroma muraria TICMURA770.80.9970.975
Birds Tringa totanus TRITOTA13620.80.9940.98
Birds Troglodytes troglodytes TROTROG44240.80.9310.667
Birds Turdus philomelos TURPHIL1950.80.9360.704
Birds Turdus viscivorus TURVISC21410.70.8960.637
Birds Tyto alba TYTALBA2870.70.9470.749
Birds Upupa epops UPUEPOP22640.70.9040.66
Birds Vanellus vanellus VANVANE45040.80.9790.927
Reptilia Acanthodactylus erythrurus AER22450.70.9320.73
Reptilia Anguis fragilis AFR2460.80.9570.781
Reptilia Blanus cinereus BCI19790.80.9140.655
Reptilia Coronella austriaca CAU17810.80.9540.787
Reptilia Chalcides bedriagai CBE840.70.9930.943
Reptilia Coronella girondica CGI12530.70.9320.715
Reptilia Chalcides striatus CST23360.70.9930.924
Reptilia Emys orbicularis spp.EOR44710.80.9960.954
Reptilia Hemorrhois hippocrepis HHI19300.80.9180.692
Reptilia Iberolacerta monticola spp.IMO39730.80.9950.965
Reptilia Lacerta schreiberi LSC15020.80.9710.831
Reptilia Macroprotodon brevis spp.MBR16950.80.9430.732
Reptilia Mauremys leprosa MLE7010.80.9180.661
Reptilia Malpolon monspessulanus MMO22210.70.9730.868
Reptilia Natrix astreptophora NAS55870.70.8660.543
Reptilia Natrix maura NMA17650.70.9660.809
Reptilia Psammodromus algirus PAL18970.80.9160.677
Reptilia Podarcis bocagei PBO9530.80.9940.95
Reptilia Podarcis guadarramae PGU24220.70.9840.885
Reptilia Timon lepidus spp.TLE24850.70.9440.746
Reptilia Tarentola mauritanica TMR22660.80.9140.674
Reptilia Vipera latastei VLA25650.70.9940.931
Reptilia Vipera seoanei VSE13480.80.9860.93
Reptilia Zamenis scalaris ZSC15810.70.8660.574
The daily climatic data of temperature and precipitation were retrieved from the E-OBS database v.20.0e (Cornes et al. 2018), from 1989 to 2005. Future climatic data were developed from the following model chains in order to account for potential stochasticity of climate model projections: CNRM-CERFACS-CNRM-CM5 (CNRM), ICHEC-EC-EARTH (ICHEC), IPSL-IPSL-CM5A-MR (IPSL) and MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR (MPI) models, generated within the EURO-CORDEX project (Jacob et al. 2020) and is available for two Representative Concentration Pathways, one intermediate scenario where emissions start to decline after 2040 (RCP 4.5) and one extreme scenario where emissions experience a continuous increase (RCP 8.5). Climate model data were bias-corrected using quantile mapping and E-OBS as a baseline for the overlapping period between EURO-CORDEX and E-OBS (1989-2005). Both historical and future climate datasets contain three variables: daily total precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures. For the data collected, temporal and spatial (Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica and the Iberian Peninsula) domains were extracted and data were bilinearly interpolated to common 9 km grids. Subsequently, a spatial downscaling of temperatures was performed, using the digital elevation model from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) databases, at 1 km grid resolution and the vertical temperature gradient (altitudinal correction). Precipitation totals were bilinearly interpolated to the same 1 km grid. The main climate variables (i.e. daily precipitation, maximum temperature and minimum temperature) were used to calculate 19 bioclimatic variables through the “dismo” package from the R software v.4.0.5 (https://www.r-project.org). A Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) analysis between the bioclimatic variables and Spearman correlation tests were conducted using the “usdm” package of R software v.4.0.5 (Suppl. material 1). Highly correlated variables (VIF > 3 and Spearman correlation > 0.7 or < -0.7) were excluded to avoid multicollinearity issues (Guisan et al. 2017). Eight bioclimatic predictors were ultimately selected and implemented in the species distribution models (SDMs; Table 2).
Table 2.

Description of the bioclimatic variables used in species distribution models. The code, name, units and the regional (Iberian Peninsula) and local (Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica) ranges are indicated for each variable.

Code Variable name Units Iberian Peninsula Meseta Ibérica
BIO3IsothermalityCoefficient25 – 4333 - 40
BIO4Temperature SeasonalityCoefficient387 - 870666 - 813
BIO10Mean Temperature of Warmest QuarterºC11.2 – 28.415.2 – 26.8
BIO11Mean Temperature of Coldest QuarterºC-7.8 – 12.9-3.1 – 6.7
BIO15Precipitation SeasonalityCoefficient23 – 9447 - 76
BIO16Precipitation of Wettest Quartermm200 - 2200510 - 1110
BIO17Precipitation of Driest Quartermm0 - 4700 - 130
BIO19Precipitation of Coldest Quartermm30 - 1130120 - 470
Single-species ensemble models were built for each species at the Iberian Peninsula scale using the “biomod2” R package (Thuiller et al. 2009; http://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=302) at 10 km resolution. Although the original climate data were obtained at 9 x 9 km, the SDMs were performed at 10 x 10 km to match the spatial resolution of the Atlases' data. Then, the modelling of the climate suitability (hereafter “climate species models”) for each species using the aforementioned bioclimatic variables for 2005 (derived from the mean between 1989 and 2005) was conducted. The ensemble models were built using six modelling techniques (specifically, Generalised Linear Models, Generalised Addictive Models, Random Forests, Artificial Neural Networks, Gradient Boosting Models and Multiple Adaptive Regression Splines), in order to deal with inter-model variabilities (Thuiller et al. 2009). A repeated (10 times) split-sample approach was used to allow independency between model calibration and model evaluation. Each model was trained using 80% of the data, while the remaining 20% were used for model validation using the area under the curve (AUC) of a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the True Skill Statistics (TSS). An ensemble-forecasting framework was then applied by stacking the single-species models using a weighted average approach available in “biomod2”, using AUC values as model weights. The ensemble models were then projected to the Meseta Ibérica at 1 km resolution for the historical (1989-2005; Fig. 2) and future (2021-2050) periods for the four climate models and two RCP scenarios (Fig. 3). Finally, ensemble model predictions were reclassified into binary presence/absence maps through ROC optimised thresholds available in the “biomod2” package (see Thuiller et al. 2009).
Figure 2.

Example of the historical climate (1989-2005) model projections obtained for the Iberian Peninsula (I.P.; 10 × 10 km) and the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (M.I.; 1 × 1 km). The models present the ensemble suitability values for the Tree pipit (; code: ANTRRIV).

Figure 3.

Example of future climate model projections for 2050 obtained for the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (M.I.; 1 × 1 km). The models present the ensemble suitability values for the Tree pipit (; code: ANTRRIV), according to each climate model (CNRM, IPSL, ICHEC and MPI; Jacob et al. 2020) and each Representative Concentration Pathways scenarios (RCP 4.5; RCP 8.5).

This dataset contributes towards updating the current knowledge on the potential effects of climate change on the distribution of three main taxonomic groups in one of the largest Biosphere Reserves in Europe. In general, a wide range of species responses to climate change were observed, which might be explained by species-specific ecological preferences. The extent of species responses varied according to the four climate models due to the potential stochasticity of climate projections, but the predicted positive or negative climatic effects were congruent amongst all models for each species (see Fig. 3). According to the SDMs, the majority of species are expected to be negatively affected by climate change scenarios (see Fig. 3). In fact, climatic suitable areas for 52% and 57% of the species are predicted to decrease under the intermediate (RCP 4.5) and extreme (RCP 8.5) climate change scenarios, respectively (see example in Fig. 3). Future climatic instabilities might contribute to distribution contractions and shifts, which might increase species vulnerability to extinction due to stochastic effects. Nonetheless, future studies should focus on combining the effects of land-use change and climate factors, in order to improve model predictive accuracy of future impacts on species distributions and, thus, to better support conservation planning and actions in the study area.

Geographic coverage

Description

The geographic range of the data covers the entire continental area of the Iberian Peninsula at 10 km of spatial resolution (45.158ºN and 35.347ºN Latitude; 9.560ºW and 3.889ºE Longitude) and the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica at 1 km of spatial resolution (42.384ºN and 40.588ºN Latitude; 7.692ºW and 5.613ºW Longitude).

Coordinates

40.588 and 42.384 Latitude; -7.692 and -5.613 Longitude.

Temporal coverage

Notes

Climate data cover the historical period between 1989 and 2005 (daily data) and a future period between 2020 and 2050 (daily data of four climate models under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios). Species distribution models (climate species models) for the 207 vertebrate species cover the historical period of 2005 (average of the bioclimatic variables between 1989 and 2005) and a future period of 2050 (average between 2020 and 2050, for each of the four climate models and RCP scenarios).

Usage licence

Usage licence

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

Data resources

Data package title

Climate models and species distribution models of amphibians, birds and reptiles of the Iberian peninsula and the Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica)

Number of data sets

2

Data set 1.

Data set name

Climate models

Data format

netCDF (.nc)

Number of columns

2

Download URL

Part1: https://zenodo.org/record/4589376#.YFTl3dxUnIU Part 2: https://zenodo.org/record/4590027#.YFTmBdxUnIU

Description

Daily climate variables (daily precipitation, maximum temperature and minimum temperature) for a historical (1989-2005) and future period (2021-2050), for four climate models (CNRM, ICHEC, IPSL and MPI) and two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). Climatic variables are provided at 9 × 9 km resolution for the Iberian Peninsula (only for the historical period) and at 1 × 1 km and for the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica (both periods). Data divided into two parts.

Data set 2.

Species distribution models 1 Part 1: https://zenodo.org/record/4598254#.YFTkjdxUnIU Part 2: https://zenodo.org/record/4599822#.YFTlv9xUnIU Species distribution models of 207 vertebrates distributed in the Iberian Peninsula and the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Ibérica. The models are available at 10 × 10 km resolution for the Iberian Peninsula (climate models for 2005). Model projections are available for 2005 and 2050 (for the CNRM, ICHEC, IPSL and MPI climate models and the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios) for the Biosphere Reserve at 1 × 1 km resolution. Data divided into two parts. Pearson correlation analysis between bioclimatic variables Statistical analyses File: oo_524471.pdf
Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
Files of the historic period - AREA_EOBS_H_ALT_VAR_1Code description - AREA refers to the Iberian Peninsula (PI) or Meseta Ibérica (MI), EOBS to the historic climatic dataset of reference (E-OBS), H to the historical period (H), ALT to the altitudinal-based correction of climate variables, VAR to the three provided variables (RR - daily preciptation; TMAX - Maximum temperature; TMIN - Minimum temperature) and 1 to the spatial resolution (1 km).
Files of the future period - MI_MODEL_RCP_MR_ALT_VAR_1Code description - MI refers to the Meseta Ibérica, MODEL to the climate model used (CNRM-CERFACS-CNRM-CM5 - CNRM; ICHEC-EC-EARTH - ICHEC; IPSL-IPSL-CM5A-MR - IPSL; MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR - MPI), RCP to the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP 4.5 - 45; RCP 8.5 - 85), MR to the future period, ALT to the altitudinal-based correction of climate variables, VAR to the three provided variables (RR - daily preciptation; TMAX - Maximum temperature; TMIN - Minimum temperature) and 1 to the spatial resolution (1 km).
Data set 2.
Column labelColumn description
Climate modelsSpecies distribution models of 207 vertebrates for 2005 and 2050
  6 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being.

Authors:  Gretta T Pecl; Miguel B Araújo; Johann D Bell; Julia Blanchard; Timothy C Bonebrake; I-Ching Chen; Timothy D Clark; Robert K Colwell; Finn Danielsen; Birgitta Evengård; Lorena Falconi; Simon Ferrier; Stewart Frusher; Raquel A Garcia; Roger B Griffis; Alistair J Hobday; Charlene Janion-Scheepers; Marta A Jarzyna; Sarah Jennings; Jonathan Lenoir; Hlif I Linnetved; Victoria Y Martin; Phillipa C McCormack; Jan McDonald; Nicola J Mitchell; Tero Mustonen; John M Pandolfi; Nathalie Pettorelli; Ekaterina Popova; Sharon A Robinson; Brett R Scheffers; Justine D Shaw; Cascade J B Sorte; Jan M Strugnell; Jennifer M Sunday; Mao-Ning Tuanmu; Adriana Vergés; Cecilia Villanueva; Thomas Wernberg; Erik Wapstra; Stephen E Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Cracking the Code of Biodiversity Responses to Past Climate Change.

Authors:  David Nogués-Bravo; Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez; Luisa Orsini; Erik de Boer; Roland Jansson; Helene Morlon; Damien A Fordham; Stephen T Jackson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Climate change, ecosystems and abrupt change: science priorities.

Authors:  Monica G Turner; W John Calder; Graeme S Cumming; Terry P Hughes; Anke Jentsch; Shannon L LaDeau; Timothy M Lenton; Bryan N Shuman; Merritt R Turetsky; Zak Ratajczak; John W Williams; A Park Williams; Stephen R Carpenter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity.

Authors:  Peter H Raven; David L Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Future effects of climate and land-use change on terrestrial vertebrate community diversity under different scenarios.

Authors:  Tim Newbold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments.

Authors:  Miguel B Araújo; Robert P Anderson; A Márcia Barbosa; Colin M Beale; Carsten F Dormann; Regan Early; Raquel A Garcia; Antoine Guisan; Luigi Maiorano; Babak Naimi; Robert B O'Hara; Niklaus E Zimmermann; Carsten Rahbek
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.