| Literature DB >> 34248289 |
Sheng Ren1,2, Kehua Guo1, Jianguang Ma3, Feihong Zhu1, Bin Hu1, Haoming Zhou4.
Abstract
There are two key requirements for medical lesion image super-resolution reconstruction in intelligent healthcare systems: clarity and reality. Because only clear and real super-resolution medical images can effectively help doctors observe the lesions of the disease. The existing super-resolution methods based on pixel space optimization often lack high-frequency details which result in blurred detail features and unclear visual perception. Also, the super-resolution methods based on feature space optimization usually have artifacts or structural deformation in the generated image. This paper proposes a novel pyramidal feature multi-distillation network for super-resolution reconstruction of medical images in intelligent healthcare systems. Firstly, we design a multi-distillation block that combines pyramidal convolution and shallow residual block. Secondly, we construct a two-branch super-resolution network to optimize the visual perception quality of the super-resolution branch by fusing the information of the gradient map branch. Finally, we combine contextual loss and L1 loss in the gradient map branch to optimize the quality of visual perception and design the information entropy contrast-aware channel attention to give different weights to the feature map. Besides, we use an arbitrary scale upsampler to achieve super-resolution reconstruction at any scale factor. The experimental results show that the proposed super-resolution reconstruction method achieves superior performance compared to other methods in this work.Entities:
Keywords: Medical image; Multi-distillation; Pyramidal feature; Super-resolution
Year: 2021 PMID: 34248289 PMCID: PMC8255340 DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06287-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Comput Appl ISSN: 0941-0643 Impact factor: 5.606
Fig. 1RMISR baseline model network structure
Fig. 2RMISR visual perception model network structure
Fig. 3The architecture of IMDB, PFMDB, SRB, and PYB: a information multi-distillation block. b Pyramidal feature distillation block, c shallow residual block and d pyramidal block
Fig. 4Information entropy contrast-aware channel attention
Fig. 5The architecture of sub-pixel and meta upsampler
Performance comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms for × 4 image super-resolution
| SR algorithms | Params (M) | Scale | Set5 | Set14 | BSDS100 | Urban100 | Manga109 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | |||
| Bicubic | – | 4 | 28.42 | 0.810 | 26.10 | 0.702 | 25.96 | 0.667 | 23.15 | 0.657 | 24.92 | 0.789 |
| SRCNN [ | 0.057 | 4 | 30.48 | 0.863 | 27.49 | 0.750 | 26.90 | 0.710 | 24.52 | 0.722 | 27.66 | 0.851 |
| FSRCNN [ | 0.012 | 4 | 30.71 | 0.866 | 27.59 | 0.754 | 26.98 | 0.715 | 24.62 | 0.728 | 27.90 | 0.852 |
| VDSR [ | 0.665 | 4 | 31.35 | 0.884 | 28.01 | 0.767 | 27.29 | 0.725 | 25.18 | 0.752 | 28.83 | 0.881 |
| DRCN [ | 1.774 | 4 | 31.53 | 0.885 | 28.02 | 0.767 | 27.23 | 0.723 | 25.14 | 0.751 | 28.98 | 0.882 |
| LapSRN [ | 0.502 | 4 | 31.54 | 0.885 | 28.09 | 0.770 | 27.32 | 0.726 | 25.21 | 0.756 | 29.09 | 0.890 |
| CNF [ | 0.337 | 4 | 31.55 | 0.8856 | 28.15 | 0.768 | 27.32 | 0.7253 | – | – | – | – |
| DRRN [ | 0.297 | 4 | 31.68 | 0.889 | 28.21 | 0.772 | 27.38 | 0.728 | 25.44 | 0.764 | 29.46 | 0.896 |
| BTSRN [ | 0.410 | 4 | 31.85 | – | 28.20 | – | 27.47 | – | 25.74 | – | – | – |
| MemNet [ | 0.667 | 4 | 31.74 | 0.889 | 28.26 | 0.772 | 27.40 | 0.728 | 25.50 | 0.763 | – | – |
| ESPCN [ | – | 4 | 29.21 | 0.851 | 26.40 | 0.744 | 25.50 | 0.696 | 24.02 | 0.726 | 23.55 | 0.795 |
| SRGAN [ | 1.6 | 4 | 29.46 | 0.838 | 26.60 | 0.718 | 25.74 | 0.666 | 24.50 | 0.736 | 27.79 | 0.856 |
| SRMDNF [ | 1.555 | 4 | 31.96 | 0.893 | 28.35 | 0.777 | ||||||
| SelNet [ | 1.417 | 4 | 27.44 | 0.733 | – | – | – | – | ||||
| CARN-M [ | 0.412 | 4 | 31.92 | 0.890 | 28.42 | 0.776 | 27.44 | 0.730 | 25.62 | 0.769 | – | – |
| RMISR-BL | 0.848 | 4 | ||||||||||
The italic number indicates the best result and the bold number indicates the second best result. “–” denotes the results that are not reported
Fig. 6Convergence and PSNR comparison of different SR methods during training
Fig. 7Comparison of Laplacian gradient maps reconstructed by different SR methods
Fig. 8Comparison of lung CT images reconstructed by different SR methods
Fig. 9SR reconstruction of retinopathy images at any scale