| Literature DB >> 34248242 |
Abdul Qayyum1, Imran Razzak2, M Tanveer3, Ajay Kumar4.
Abstract
Coronavirus (COVID-19) and its new strain resulted in massive damage to society and brought panic worldwide. Automated medical image analysis such as X-rays, CT, and MRI offers excellent early diagnosis potential to augment the traditional healthcare strategy to fight against COVID-19. However, the identification of COVID infected lungs X-rays is challenging due to the high variation in infection characteristics and low-intensity contrast between normal tissues and infections. To identify the infected area, in this work, we present a novel depth-wise dense network that uniformly scales all dimensions and performs multilevel feature embedding, resulting in increased feature representations. The inclusion of depth wise component and squeeze-and-excitation results in better performance by capturing a more receptive field than the traditional convolutional layer; however, the parameters are almost the same. To improve the performance and training set, we have combined three large scale datasets. The extensive experiments on the benchmark X-rays datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework by achieving 96.17% in comparison to cutting-edge methods primarily based on transfer learning.Entities:
Keywords: COVID19; Deep learning; Diagnosis; Management
Year: 2021 PMID: 34248242 PMCID: PMC8254442 DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04154-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oper Res ISSN: 0254-5330 Impact factor: 4.820
Cumulative known cases per million since 100th case and deaths per million since 1st death recorded. (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-13/coronavirus-numbers-worldwide-data-tracking-charts/12107500?nw=0)
Fig. 1COVID-19 Death rate and recovery rate in different countries. (www.worldometers.info)
Fig. 3Proposed depth wise multilevel deep network
Fig. 4Proposed depth wise multilevel deep network as feature extractor
Fig. 5Sample dataset images a COVID, b normal, c phenomena, d phenomena viral, e tuberculosis
Fig. 6The visualization of some predicted samples based on our proposed model using RISE library
Fig. 7Confusion metrics of proposed framework
Fig. 8ROC curves for proposed and fine-tuned deep learning models
Fig. 9Precision recall curves for proposed and fine-tuned deep learning models
Details of the COVID-19 5-classes dataset
| Class | Number of X-ray images |
|---|---|
| COVID-19 | 435 |
| Normal | 439 |
| Pneumonia-bacterial | 439 |
| Pneumonia-viral | 439 |
| Tuberculosis | 434 (394 + 40 augmented) |
| Total | 2186 |
Fig. 10Precision recall curves plots based on proposed model with RF, LR, GB, and BT algorithms
Fig. 11ROC plots based on proposed model with RF, LR, GB, and BT algorithms
Fig. 12COVID-19 diagnosis using proposed approach on five classes
Comparison of proposed model with fine-tuned deep learning models
| Algorithms | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finetune + ResNet | 0.8579 | 0.8598 | 0.8530 | 0.8512 |
| Finetune + MobileNet | 0.8934 | 0.8828 | 0.8802 | 0.8795 |
| Finetune + InceptionV3 | 0.9053 | 0.9094 | 0.9123 | 0.9072 |
| Finetune + DesneNet | 0.8735 | 0.8654 | 0.8602 | 0.8596 |
| Proposed model | 0.9328 | 0.9371 | 0.9090 | 0.9169 |
Feature extraction using proposed model with traditional machine learning classifiers
| Proposed + classifier | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random forest | 0.9617 | 0.9581 | 0.9556 | 0.9567 |
| Logistic regression | 0.9498 | 0.9457 | 0.9408 | 0.94288 |
| Gradient boosting | 0.9366 | 0.9302 | 0.9305 | 0.9304 |
| Bagging trees | 0.9419 | 0.9377 | 0.9347 | 0.9360 |
| Multilayer perceptron | 0.9511 | 0.9450 | 0.9440 | 0.9445 |
Comparison with state of the art methods
| Study | Dataset | Model description | Classification accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Narin et al. ( | 2-class: 50 COVID-19/50 normal | Transfer learning with Resnet50 and InceptionV3 | 91.13 |
| Panwar et al. ( | 2-class 142 COVID-19/142 normal | nCOVnet CNN | 88 |
| Altan et al. (Altan & Karasu, | 3-class: 219 COVID-19 1341 normal, 1345 pneumonia viral | 2D curvelet transform, chaotic salp swarm algorithm (CSSA), EfficientNet-B0 | 91 |
| Chowdhury et al. ( | 3-class, 423 COVID-19, 1579 normal, 1485 pneu monia viral | transfer learning with ChexNet | 92.70 |
| Wang and Wong (Wang et al., | 3-class, 358 COVID-19/5538 normal/8066 pneumonia | COVID-Net | 93.30 |
| Das et al. ( | 3-class: 62 COVID-19/1341 normal/1345 pneumonia | ResNet features and XGBoost classifier | 90 |
| Sethy and Behera ( | 3-class: 127 COVID-19/127 normal/127 pneumonia | Resnet50 features and SVM | 92.33 |
| Ozturk et al. ( | 3-class: 125 COVID-19/500 normal 500 pneumonia | DarkCovidNet CNN | 87.20 |
| Khan et al. ( | 4-class: 284 COVID-19/310 normal/330 pneumonia bacterial/327 pneumonia viral | CoroNet CNN | 89.60 |
| Mahmud et al. ( | 4-class: 305 COVID-19 + 305 normal + 305 viral, pneumonia + 305 bacterial pneumonia | Stacked multi-resolution CovXNet | 90.30 |
| Al-Timemy et al. ( | 5-class, 435 COVID-19/439 normal/439 pneumonia bacterial/439 pneumonia viral/434 tuberculosis | Resnet50 features and ensemble of subspace discriminant classifier | 91.6 |
| Proposed framework | 5-class, 435 COVID-19/439 normal/439 pneumonia bacterial/439 pneumonia viral/434 tuberculosis | Multi-scale features CoVIRNet | 93.28 |
| Proposed frame- work + random forest | 5-class, 435 COVID-19/439 normal/439 pneumonia bacterial/439 pneumonia viral/434 tuberculosis | Multi-scale features CoVIRNet | 96.17 |
Fig. 13Confusion metrics for proposed COVID-19 identification framework