| Literature DB >> 34247609 |
Xuchun Wang1, Jinhua Pan2, Zeping Ren3, Mengmeng Zhai1, Zhuang Zhang1, Hao Ren1, Weimei Song1, Yuling He3, Chenglian Li3, Xiaojuan Yang3, Meichen Li1, Dichen Quan1, Limin Chen4, Lixia Qiu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article aims to understand the prevalence of hyperlipidemia and its related factors in Shanxi Province. On the basis of multivariate Logistic regression analysis to find out the influencing factors closely related to hyperlipidemia, the complex network connection between various variables was presented through Bayesian networks(BNs).Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian network; Hybrid algorithm; Hyperlipidemia; Inter. Iamb-Tabu
Year: 2021 PMID: 34247609 PMCID: PMC8273956 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11412-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Car Diagnosis network structure
Hybrid algorithm construction of different sample sizes Car diagnosis Bayesian network modeling effect comparison
| Sample size | algorithm | R(E) | M(E) | A(E) | S(E) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | MMHC | 3.2 | 14.2 | 0.2 | 16.0 |
| MMPC-Tabu | 3.2 | 14.2 | 0.2 | 16.0 | |
| Fast.iamb-tabu | 2.6 | 16.4 | 0.2 | 17.9 | |
| Inter.iamb-tabu | 3.2 | 14.2 | 0.2 | 16.0 | |
| 500 | MMHC | 4.2 | 11.7 | 0 | 13.8 |
| MMPC-Tabu | 4.2 | 11.7 | 0 | 13.8 | |
| Fast.iamb-tabu | 3.3 | 12.5 | 0 | 14.15 | |
| Inter.iamb-tabu | 4.6 | 11.3 | 0 | 13.6 | |
| 1000 | MMHC | 4.6 | 10.5 | 0 | 12.8 |
| MMPC-Tabu | 4.6 | 10.5 | 0 | 12.8 | |
| Fast.iamb-tabu | 3.6 | 11.5 | 0 | 13.3 | |
| Inter.iamb-tabu | 5.1 | 10.0 | 0 | 12.55 | |
| 5000 | MMHC | 5.2 | 9.8 | 0 | 12.2 |
| MMPC-Tabu | 4.7 | 9.6 | 0.1 | 12.05 | |
| Fast.iamb-tabu | 5.2 | 8.8 | 0.1 | 11.5 | |
| Inter.iamb-tabu | 6.1 | 7.4 | 0 | 10.45 | |
| 10,000 | MMHC | 7 | 8.2 | 0 | 11.7 |
| MMPC-Tabu | 5.7 | 8.1 | 0 | 10.95 | |
| Fast.iamb-tabu | 5.3 | 6.9 | 0 | 9.55 | |
| Inter.iamb-tabu | 5.4 | 5.4 | 0 | 8.1 | |
| 20,000 | MMHC | 7.9 | 7.4 | 0 | 11.35 |
| MMPC-Tabu | 6.7 | 7.1 | 0 | 10.45 | |
| Fast.iamb-tabu | 5.5 | 7.5 | 0 | 10.25 | |
| Inter.iamb-tabu | 5.0 | 4.4 | 0 | 6.9 |
Fig. 2Age distribution of 4567 subjects
Fig. 3Concentration levels and distribution of four blood lipids
Logistic regression analysis results
| Factors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender(x1) | −0.346 | 0.077 | 20.251 | <0.001 | 0.707 | 0.608 | 0.822 |
| Smoking(x3) | 0.177 | 0.084 | 4.429 | 0.035 | 1.193 | 1.012 | 1.407 |
| physical activity(x5) | −0.090 | 0.045 | 4.008 | 0.045 | 0.914 | 0.837 | 0.998 |
| daily average salt intake(x6) | 0.318 | 0.145 | 4.810 | 0.028 | 1.375 | 1.034 | 1.827 |
| daily average oil intake(x7) | −0.357 | 0.088 | 16.524 | <0.001 | 0.700 | 0.589 | 0.831 |
| BMI(x8) | 0.417 | 0.048 | 75.617 | <0.001 | 1.517 | 1.381 | 1.666 |
| Central obesity(x9) | 0.501 | 0.075 | 44.009 | <0.001 | 1.650 | 1.423 | 1.913 |
| Hypertension(x10) | 0.173 | 0.064 | 7.390 | 0.007 | 1.189 | 1.050 | 1.347 |
| Diabetes mellitus(x11) | 0.442 | 0.107 | 17.078 | <0.001 | 1.556 | 1.262 | 1.920 |
| Constant | −0.999 | 0.347 | 8.266 | 0.004 | 0.368 | ||
Fig. 4Hyperlipidemia Bayesian network model
Hyperlipidemia Reasoning Condition Probability Table
| activity | gender | BMI | Hyperlipdemia(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO | YES | |||
| Insufficient | male | <18.5 | 64.581 | 35.149 |
| Insufficient | male | 18.5~ | 57.515 | 42.485 |
| Insufficient | male | 24.0~ | 37.926 | 62.074 |
| Insufficient | male | 28.0~ | 24.727 | 75.273 |
| Insufficient | female | <18.5 | 69.397 | 30.603 |
| Insufficient | female | 18.5~ | 57.664 | 42.336 |
| Insufficient | female | 24.0~ | 52.28 | 41.72 |
| Insufficient | female | 28.0~ | 37.888 | 62.112 |
| Normal | male | <18.5 | 94.811 | 5.189 |
| Normal | male | 18.5~ | 61.095 | 38.905 |
| Normal | male | 24.0~ | 43.688 | 56.312 |
| Normal | male | 28.0~ | 29.294 | 70.706 |
| Normal | female | <18.5 | 82.164 | 17.836 |
| Normal | female | 18.5~ | 70.408 | 29.592 |
| Normal | female | 24.0~ | 52.875 | 47.125 |
| Normal | female | 28.0~ | 43.453 | 56.547 |
| Sufficient | male | <18.5 | 52.358 | 47.642 |
| Sufficient | male | 18.5~ | 66.463 | 33.537 |
| Sufficient | male | 24.0~ | 43.642 | 56.358 |
| Sufficient | male | 28.0~ | 25.059 | 74.941 |
| Sufficient | female | <18.5 | 62.195 | 37.805 |
| Sufficient | female | 18.5~ | 64.173 | 35.827 |
| Sufficient | female | 24.0~ | 55.612 | 44.388 |
| Sufficient | female | 28.0~ | 48.239 | 51.761 |
Fig. 5Risk reasoning for hyperlipidemia during obesity
Fig. 6Risk reasoning for hyperlipidemia in obesity and diabetes mellitus
Fig. 7Risk reasoning for hyperlipidemia in obesity, diabetes mellitus, and central obesity
Fig. 8Risk reasoning for hyperlipidemia in obesity, diabetes mellitus, central obesity and lack of exercise