Amit C Achhra1, Asya Lyass2, Leila Borowsky3, Milana Bogorodskaya4, Jorge Plutzky5, Joseph M Massaro2, Ralph B D'Agostino2, Virginia A Triant6,7. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, MetroHealth, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. vtriant@mgh.harvard.edu. 7. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. vtriant@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide the current state of the development and application of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction tools in people living with HIV (PLWH). RECENT FINDINGS: Several risk prediction models developed on the general population are available to predict CVD risk, the most notable being the US-based pooled cohort equations (PCE), the Framingham risk functions, and the Europe-based SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation). In validation studies in cohorts of PLWH, these models generally underestimate CVD risk, especially in individuals who are younger, women, Black race, or predicted to be at low/intermediate risk. An HIV-specific CVD prediction model, the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) model, is available, but its performance is modest, especially in US-based cohorts. Enhancing CVD prediction with novel biomarkers of inflammation or coronary artery calcification is of interest but has not yet been evaluated in PLWH. Finally, studies on CVD risk prediction are lacking in diverse PLWH globally. While available risk models for CVD prediction in PLWH remain suboptimal, clinicians should remain vigilant of higher CVD risk in this population and should use any of these risk scores for risk stratification to guide preventive interventions. Focus on established traditional risk factors such as smoking remains critical in PLWH. Risk prediction functions tailored to PLWH in diverse settings will enhance clinicians' ability to deliver optimal preventive care.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide the current state of the development and application of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction tools in people living with HIV (PLWH). RECENT FINDINGS: Several risk prediction models developed on the general population are available to predict CVD risk, the most notable being the US-based pooled cohort equations (PCE), the Framingham risk functions, and the Europe-based SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation). In validation studies in cohorts of PLWH, these models generally underestimate CVD risk, especially in individuals who are younger, women, Black race, or predicted to be at low/intermediate risk. An HIV-specific CVD prediction model, the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) model, is available, but its performance is modest, especially in US-based cohorts. Enhancing CVD prediction with novel biomarkers of inflammation or coronary artery calcification is of interest but has not yet been evaluated in PLWH. Finally, studies on CVD risk prediction are lacking in diverse PLWH globally. While available risk models for CVD prediction in PLWH remain suboptimal, clinicians should remain vigilant of higher CVD risk in this population and should use any of these risk scores for risk stratification to guide preventive interventions. Focus on established traditional risk factors such as smoking remains critical in PLWH. Risk prediction functions tailored to PLWH in diverse settings will enhance clinicians' ability to deliver optimal preventive care.
Authors: A C Achhra; A Mocroft; P Reiss; C Sabin; L Ryom; S de Wit; C J Smith; A d'Arminio Monforte; A Phillips; R Weber; J Lundgren; M G Law Journal: HIV Med Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew J Feinstein; Robin M Nance; Daniel R Drozd; Hongyan Ning; Joseph A Delaney; Susan R Heckbert; Matthew J Budoff; William C Mathews; Mari M Kitahata; Michael S Saag; Joseph J Eron; Richard D Moore; Chad J Achenbach; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Heidi M Crane Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Rosan A van Zoest; Matthew Law; Caroline A Sabin; Ilonca Vaartjes; Marc van der Valk; Joop E Arends; Peter Reiss; Ferdinand W Wit Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Renslow Sherer; Suniti Solomon; Mauro Schechter; Jean B Nachega; Jurgen Rockstroh; José M Zuniga Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2014 Jul-Aug
Authors: Virginia A Triant; Jeremiah Perez; Susan Regan; Joseph M Massaro; James B Meigs; Steven K Grinspoon; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Angela M Thompson-Paul; Kenneth A Lichtenstein; Carl Armon; Frank J Palella; Jacek Skarbinski; Joan S Chmiel; Rachel Hart; Stanley C Wei; Fleetwood Loustalot; John T Brooks; Kate Buchacz Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anoop S V Shah; Dominik Stelzle; Kuan Ken Lee; Eduard J Beck; Shirjel Alam; Sarah Clifford; Chris T Longenecker; Fiona Strachan; Shashwatee Bagchi; William Whiteley; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Shyamasundaran Kottilil; Harish Nair; David E Newby; David A McAllister; Nicholas L Mills Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Laurence Brunet; Patrick Mallon; Jennifer S Fusco; Michael B Wohlfeiler; Girish Prajapati; Andrew Beyer; Gregory P Fusco Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 2.859