Jianzhang Li1, Sven Nebelung2, Justus Schock2, Björn Rath3, Markus Tingart4, Yu Liu4, Nad Siroros4, Jörg Eschweiler4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: jli@ukaachen.de. 2. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Segmentation on carpus provides essential information for clinical applications including pathological evaluations, therapy planning, wrist biomechanical analysis, etc. Along with the acquisition procedure of magnetic resonance (MR) technique, poor quality of wrist images (e.g., occlusion, low signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast) often causes segmentation failure. METHODS: In this work, to address such problems, a shape prior enhanced level set model was proposed. By transferring a shape contour in Cartesian Coordinate System (COS) into a curve in Polar Coordinate System (POS), parameters describing conventional shape invariance, i.e., translations, rotation, and scale were simplified into a single parameter for phase shift, which strongly improved algorithm efficiency. Given a training set in COS, a confidence interval representing the corresponding curves in POS was utilized as the shape prior set term in the model. Integrated with an edge detector, a local intensity descriptor, and a regularization term, the proposed method further possessed abilities against noise, intensity inhomogeneity as well as re-initialization problem. Images from 15 in-vivo acquired MR-datasets of the human wrist were used for validation. The performance of the proposed method has been compared with three state-of-the-art methods. RESULTS: We reported a Dice Similarity Coefficient of 96.88±1.20%, a Relative Volume Difference of -1.53±3.01%, a Volume Overlap Error of 6.03±2.23%, a 95% Hausdorff Distance of 1.43±0.66 mm, an Average Symmetric Surface Distance of 0.50±0.17 mm, and a Root Mean Square Distance of 0.71±0.25 mm for the proposed method. The time consumption was 36.03±19.98 s. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental results indicated that, compared with three other methods, the proposed method achieved significant improvement in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Segmentation on carpus provides essential information for clinical applications including pathological evaluations, therapy planning, wrist biomechanical analysis, etc. Along with the acquisition procedure of magnetic resonance (MR) technique, poor quality of wrist images (e.g., occlusion, low signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast) often causes segmentation failure. METHODS: In this work, to address such problems, a shape prior enhanced level set model was proposed. By transferring a shape contour in Cartesian Coordinate System (COS) into a curve in Polar Coordinate System (POS), parameters describing conventional shape invariance, i.e., translations, rotation, and scale were simplified into a single parameter for phase shift, which strongly improved algorithm efficiency. Given a training set in COS, a confidence interval representing the corresponding curves in POS was utilized as the shape prior set term in the model. Integrated with an edge detector, a local intensity descriptor, and a regularization term, the proposed method further possessed abilities against noise, intensity inhomogeneity as well as re-initialization problem. Images from 15 in-vivo acquired MR-datasets of the human wrist were used for validation. The performance of the proposed method has been compared with three state-of-the-art methods. RESULTS: We reported a Dice Similarity Coefficient of 96.88±1.20%, a Relative Volume Difference of -1.53±3.01%, a Volume Overlap Error of 6.03±2.23%, a 95% Hausdorff Distance of 1.43±0.66 mm, an Average Symmetric Surface Distance of 0.50±0.17 mm, and a Root Mean Square Distance of 0.71±0.25 mm for the proposed method. The time consumption was 36.03±19.98 s. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental results indicated that, compared with three other methods, the proposed method achieved significant improvement in terms of accuracy and efficiency.