Literature DB >> 34245730

Coupling analysis on ecological environment fragility and poverty in South China Karst.

Qiwei Chen1, Shaoxiang Lu2, Kangning Xiong3, Rong Zhao4.   

Abstract

Ecological environment and poverty have a strong spatial coupling. It is of great significance to study the interaction mechanism between them for ecological restoration and targeted poverty alleviation in ecologically fragile areas. Taking Guizhou Plateau, the center of South China Karst, as a research object, this study constructs a multi-dimensional poverty and ecological vulnerability coupling index system and analyses the coupling relationship between ecological environment and poverty from a village scale, using the comprehensive coupling coordination degree model and hot spot analysis method, followed by classifying the types of poverty villages. Our results suggest that in space, the multi-dimensional poverty index is high in the south, north, and northwest of Guizhou, while, the overall ecological environment quality is high in the west and low in the east. Obvious differences are identified in the spatial distribution pattern between the multi-dimensional poverty index and ecological environment quality, with only point overlap. The multi-dimensional poverty index and ecological environmental vulnerability index of most poor villages have little difference, and the coupling degree is high, extreme coupling accounting for 89.60%. The coupling coordination degree is mainly moderate coordination and basic coordination, poverty and ecological environment are not in high harmony. 69.3% of the poverty villages in the Guizhou Province belong to the type of good ecology-general poverty. Therefore, in the process of development-oriented poverty reduction, according to the coupling relationship between ecology and poverty of the poverty villages. more attention is required for economic development in the east of Guizhou and the ecological restoration in the west.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Coupling relationship; Ecological environment fragility; Multidimensional poverty; South China Karst

Year:  2021        PMID: 34245730     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  3 in total

1.  Measurement and identification of relative poverty level of pastoral areas: an analysis based on spatial layout.

Authors:  Haiying Lin; Youhan Gao; Tianqi Zhu; Huayuan Wu; Pengshen Hou; Wenlong Li; Shuxia Hou; Muhammad Umer Arshad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  The Spatiotemporal Evolutionary Trend and Driving Factors of the Coupling Coordinated Development between Regional Green Finance and Ecological Environment.

Authors:  Tao Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Does Eco-Compensation Alleviate Rural Poverty? New Evidence from National Key Ecological Function Areas in China.

Authors:  Bingtao Qin; Yongwei Yu; Liming Ge; Le Yang; Yuanguo Guo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.