Literature DB >> 34245691

Optimising clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a statement from the 2020 Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop.

Mattia Arrigo1, Susanna Price2, David A Baran3, Janine Pöss4, Nadia Aissaoui5, Antoni Bayes-Genis6, Laurent Bonello7, Bruno François8, Etienne Gayat9, Martine Gilard10, Navin K Kapur11, Mahir Karakas12, Maciej Kostrubiec13, Pascal Leprince14, Bruno Levy15, Yves Rosenberg16, Holger Thiele4, Uwe Zeymer17, Michael O Harhay18, Alexandre Mebazaa19.   

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is a critical syndrome with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Current management consists of coronary revascularisation, vasoactive drugs, and circulatory and ventilatory support, which are tailored to patients mainly on the basis of clinicians' experience rather than evidence-based recommendations. For many therapeutic interventions in AMICS, randomised clinical trials have not shown a meaningful survival benefit, and a disproportionately high rate of neutral and negative results has been reported. In this context, an accurate definition of the AMICS syndrome for appropriate patient selection and optimisation of study design are warranted to achieve meaningful results and pave the way for new, evidence-based therapeutic options. In this Position Paper, we provide a statement of priorities and recommendations agreed by a multidisciplinary group of experts at the Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop in February, 2020, for the optimisation and harmonisation of clinical trials in AMICS. Implementation of proposed criteria to define the AMICS population-moving beyond a cardio-centric definition to that of a systemic disease-and steps to improve the design of clinical trials could lead to improved outcomes for patients with this life-threatening syndrome.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34245691     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00172-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  5 in total

1.  Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A RAND Appropriateness Panel Approach.

Authors:  Alastair G Proudfoot; Antonis Kalakoutas; Susanna Meade; Mark J D Griffiths; Mir Basir; Francesco Burzotta; Sharon Chih; Eddy Fan; Jonathan Haft; Nasrien Ibrahim; Natalie Kruit; Hoong Sern Lim; David A Morrow; Jun Nakata; Susanna Price; Carolyn Rosner; Robert Roswell; Mark A Samaan; Marc D Samsky; Holger Thiele; Alexander G Truesdell; Sean van Diepen; Michelle Doughty Voeltz; Peter M Irving
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  The year in cardiovascular medicine 2021: heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Johann Bauersachs; Rudolf A de Boer; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Biykem Bozkurt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 35.855

3.  Acute Heart Failure in the 2021 ESC Heart Failure Guidelines: a scientific statement from the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Josep Masip; W Frank Peacok; Mattia Arrigo; Xavier Rossello; Elke Platz; Louise Cullen; Alexandre Mebazaa; Susanna Price; Héctor Bueno; Salvatore Di Somma; Mucio Tavares; Martin R Cowie; Alan Maisel; Christian Mueller; Òsar Miró
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  The year in cardiovascular medicine 2021: acute cardiovascular care and ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Susanna Price; Jason Katz; Christoph C Kaufmann; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 35.855

5.  Application Value of Emergency Bedside Echocardiography in Early Warning of Acute and Severe Shock and Clinical Classification.

Authors:  Juan Ye; Yan Lin; Shaolin Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.