| Literature DB >> 34245691 |
Mattia Arrigo1, Susanna Price2, David A Baran3, Janine Pöss4, Nadia Aissaoui5, Antoni Bayes-Genis6, Laurent Bonello7, Bruno François8, Etienne Gayat9, Martine Gilard10, Navin K Kapur11, Mahir Karakas12, Maciej Kostrubiec13, Pascal Leprince14, Bruno Levy15, Yves Rosenberg16, Holger Thiele4, Uwe Zeymer17, Michael O Harhay18, Alexandre Mebazaa19.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is a critical syndrome with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Current management consists of coronary revascularisation, vasoactive drugs, and circulatory and ventilatory support, which are tailored to patients mainly on the basis of clinicians' experience rather than evidence-based recommendations. For many therapeutic interventions in AMICS, randomised clinical trials have not shown a meaningful survival benefit, and a disproportionately high rate of neutral and negative results has been reported. In this context, an accurate definition of the AMICS syndrome for appropriate patient selection and optimisation of study design are warranted to achieve meaningful results and pave the way for new, evidence-based therapeutic options. In this Position Paper, we provide a statement of priorities and recommendations agreed by a multidisciplinary group of experts at the Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop in February, 2020, for the optimisation and harmonisation of clinical trials in AMICS. Implementation of proposed criteria to define the AMICS population-moving beyond a cardio-centric definition to that of a systemic disease-and steps to improve the design of clinical trials could lead to improved outcomes for patients with this life-threatening syndrome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34245691 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00172-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Respir Med ISSN: 2213-2600 Impact factor: 30.700