| Literature DB >> 34244570 |
Xin Li1,2, Jin Zhu3,4, Jun An5, Yuqing Wang3,4, Yili Wu6,7,8,9, Xuezhi Li10,11.
Abstract
Congenital Heart Defects (CHDs) are associated with different patterns of malnutrition and growth retardation, which may vary worldwide and need to be evaluated according to local conditions. Although tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is one of the first described CHDs, the etiology outcomes in growth and development of TOF in early age child is still unclear in most cases. This study was designed to investigate the growth retardation status of Chinese pediatric TOF patients under 5 years old. The body height, body weight and body mass index (BMI) of 262 pediatric patients (138 boys and 124 girls) who underwent corrective surgery for TOF between 2014 and 2018 were measured using conventional methods. The average body height, body weight and BMI of the patients were significantly lower than WHO Child Growth Standards, while the most affected was body height. Meanwhile, higher stunting frequency and greater deterioration of both the body height and weight happened in elder age (aged 13-60 months) rather than in infant stage (aged 0-12 months) among these patients. Our results confirmed that intervention should be given at early age to prevent the growth retardation of TOF patients getting severer.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34244570 PMCID: PMC8271005 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93726-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The height, weight and BMI Z-scores of patients with TOF.
| Retardation pattern | Girls | Boys | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 124) | Infant (n = 49) | Child (n = 75) | Total (n = 138) | Infant (n = 65) | Child (n = 73) | |||
| HAZ | − 0.44 ± 2.40 | 0.22 ± 3.14 | − 0.87 ± 1.67 | 0.176 | − 0.34 ± 2.07 | 0.25 ± 2.20 | − 0.88 ± 1.80 | 0.551 |
| WAZ | − 0.52 ± 1.73 | 0.03 ± 2.25 | − 0.88 ± 1.16 | 0.22 | − 0.44 ± 1.52 | − 0.04 ± 1.62 | − 0.80 ± 1.33 | 0.612 |
| BMIZ | − 0.37 ± 1.32 | − 0.31 ± 1.60 | − 0.41 ± 1.11 | 0.379 | − 0.31 ± 1.88 | − 0.33 ± 1.53 | − 0.29 ± 2.16 | 0.04* |
z scores are shown as mean ± SD. Z scores of individuals from infant group and child group were compared using paired samples t test. *P < 0.05 was considered as significant difference.
Figure 1Growth charts for boys with TOF (total number = 138). (A) Height for age in TOF patient boys compared with normal chart. (B) Weight for age in TOF patient boys compared with normal chart. (C) BMI for age in TOF patient boys compared with normal chart. The dotted line represents the world standard value for the height, the green dotted line represents + 2SD, the blue dotted line represents Median, and the red represents -2SD. The data are calculated based on gender and age and calculated in the R Programming Language.
Figure 2Growth charts for girls with TOF (total number = 124). (A) Height for age in TOF patient girls compared with normal chart. (B) Weight for age in TOF patient girls compared with normal chart. (C) BMI for age in TOF patient girls compared with normal chart. The dotted line represents the world standard value for the height, the green dotted line represents + 2SD, the blue dotted line represents Median, and the red represents -2SD. The data are calculated based on gender and age and calculated in the R Programming Language.
The growth retardation frequencies of patients with TOF.
| Retardation pattern | Girls | Boys | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 124) | Infant (n = 49) | Child (n = 75) | Total (n = 138) | Infant (n = 65) | Child (n = 73) | Total (n = 262) | Infant (n = 114) | Child (n = 148) | ||||
| Stunting (HAZ ≤ − 2) | 29 (23.4%) | 9 (18.4%) | 20 (26.7%) | 0.286 | 27 (19.6%) | 8 (12.3%) | 19 (26.0%) | 0.011* | 56 (21.4%) | 17 (14.9%) | 39 (26.4%) | 0.025* |
| Severe stunting (HAZ ≤ − 3) | 6 (4.8%) | 2 (4.1%) | 4 (5.3%) | 1.000 | 13 (9.4%) | 4 (6.2%) | 6 (8.2%) | 0.749 | 16 (6.1%) | 6 (5.3%) | 10 (6.8%) | 0.617 |
| Underweight (WAZ ≤ − 2) | 18 (14.5%) | 7 (14.3%) | 11 (14.7%) | 0.953 | 20 (14.5%) | 5 (7.7%) | 15 (20.5%) | 0.032* | 38 (14.5%) | 12 (10.5%) | 26 (17.6%) | 0.109 |
| Severe underweight (WAZ ≤ − 3) | 7 (5.6%) | 5 (10.2%) | 2 (2.7%) | 0.112 | 6 (4.3%) | 3 (4.6%) | 3 (4.1%) | 0.666 | 13 (5.0%) | 8 (7.0%) | 5 (3.4%) | 0.098 |
| Wasting (BMIZ ≤ − 2) | 8 (6.5%) | 5 (10.2%) | 3 (4.0%) | 0.262 | 18 (13.0%) | 9 (13.8%) | 9 (12.3%) | 0.792 | 26 (9.9%) | 14 (12.3%) | 12 (8.1%) | 0.263 |
| Severe wasting (BMIZ ≤ − 3) | 5 (4.0%) | 4 (8.2%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0.079 | 6 (4.3%) | 2 (3.1%) | 4 (5.5%) | 0.684 | 11 (4.2%) | 6 (5.3%) | 5 (3.4%) | 0.540 |
Wasting frequency of infant group and child group were compared using chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant difference.
Figure 3Schematic summary of growth retardation pattern distribution in TOF patients. The number of each growth retardation pattern in the 124 girls and 138 boys with TOF were calculated based on the original data and summarized.