Literature DB >> 34244282

Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study.

Tom Roberts1,2, Jo Daniels3, William Hulme4, Robert Hirst5, Daniel Horner6, Mark David Lyttle2,7, Katie Samuel5, Blair Graham8,9, Charles Reynard10, Michael Barrett11,12, James Foley13, John Cronin14, Etimbuk Umana15, Joao Vinagre16, Edward Carlton17.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma in frontline doctors during the acceleration, peak and deceleration of the COVID-19 first wave. Personal and professional factors associated with psychological distress are also reported.
DESIGN: A prospective online three-part longitudinal survey.
SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Frontline doctors working in emergency medicine, anaesthetics and intensive care medicine during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress and trauma measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12 and the Impact of Events-Revised.
RESULTS: The initial acceleration survey distributed across networks generated a sample of 5440 doctors. Peak and deceleration response rates from the original sample were 71.6% (n=3896) and 56.6% (n=3079), respectively. Prevalence of psychological distress was 44.7% (n=1334) during the acceleration, 36.9% (n=1098) at peak and 31.5% (n=918) at the deceleration phase. The prevalence of trauma was 23.7% (n=647) at peak and 17.7% (n=484) at deceleration. The prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder was 12.6% (n=343) at peak and 10.1% (n=276) at deceleration. Worry of family infection due to clinical work was the factor most strongly associated with both distress (R2=0.06) and trauma (R2=0.10).
CONCLUSION: Findings reflect a pattern of elevated distress at acceleration and peak, with some natural recovery. It is essential that policymakers seek to prevent future adverse effects through (a) provision of vital equipment to mitigate physical and psychological harm, (b) increased awareness and recognition of signs of psychological distress and (c) the development of clear pathways to effective psychological care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accident & emergency medicine; COVID-19; adult anaesthesia; adult intensive & critical care; mental health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34244282     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  12 in total

1.  Health-Promoting Quality of Life at Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study on the Work-Related Sense of Coherence in Acute Care Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Joana Berger-Estilita; Sandra Abegglen; Nadja Hornburg; Robert Greif; Alexander Fuchs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  COVID-19 related psychological burden and potential benefits of vaccination - Data from a repeated cross-sectional survey in healthcare workers.

Authors:  P Reicherts; G Zerbini; T Halms; M Strasser; I Papazova; A Hasan; M Kunz
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Commun       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Factors associated with peritraumatic stress symptoms among the frontline healthcare workers during the outbreak of COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Xinye Qi; Jiahui Wang; Jingjing Liu; Daniel Adjei Amporfro; Kexin Wang; Huan Liu; Saleh Shah; Qunhong Wu; Yanhua Hao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The impact of COVID-19 on the wellbeing of the UK nursing and midwifery workforce during the first pandemic wave: A longitudinal survey study.

Authors:  Keith Couper; Trevor Murrells; Julie Sanders; Janet E Anderson; Holly Blake; Daniel Kelly; Bridie Kent; Jill Maben; Anne Marie Rafferty; Rachel M Taylor; Ruth Harris
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia: A Year Later Into the Pandemic.

Authors:  Atiah H Almalki; Mohammad S Alzahrani; Fahad S Alshehri; Adnan Alharbi; Samirah F Alkhudaydi; Rawan S Alshahrani; Aseel H Alzaidi; Majed A Algarni; Hashem O Alsaab; Yasser Alatawi; Yusuf S Althobaiti; Ahmed K Bamaga; Abdullah A Alhifany
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Experiences of renal healthcare practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-methods approach.

Authors:  Clare Mc Keaveney; Joanne Reid; Claire Carswell; Ann Bonner; Ilaria de Barbieri; William Johnston; Alexander P Maxwell; Julien O'Riordan; Veronica Strini; Ian Walsh; Helen Noble
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Mental impact of Covid-19 among Spanish healthcare workers. A large longitudinal survey.

Authors:  J Alonso; G Vilagut; I Alayo; M Ferrer; F Amigo; A Aragón-Peña; E Aragonès; M Campos; I Del Cura-González; I Urreta; M Espuga; A González Pinto; J M Haro; N López Fresneña; A Martínez de Salázar; J D Molina; R M Ortí Lucas; M Parellada; J M Pelayo-Terán; A Pérez Zapata; J I Pijoan; N Plana; M T Puig; C Rius; C Rodriguez-Blazquez; F Sanz; C Serra; R C Kessler; R Bruffaerts; E Vieta; V Pérez-Solá; P Mortier
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.818

8.  The impact of COVID-19 on relative health outcomes among healthcare workers in Canada.

Authors:  Raaj Tiagi
Journal:  Healthc Manage Forum       Date:  2022-07-13

9.  COVID-19-Related Trajectories of Psychological Health of Acute Care Healthcare Professionals: A 12-Month Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Sandra Abegglen; Robert Greif; Alexander Fuchs; Joana Berger-Estilita
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-30

10.  "It's Been Ugly": A Large-Scale Qualitative Study into the Difficulties Frontline Doctors Faced across Two Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sophie Harris; Elizabeth Jenkinson; Edward Carlton; Tom Roberts; Jo Daniels
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.