BACKGROUND: Built environment approaches to promoting physical activity can provide economic value to communities. How best to assess this value is uncertain. This study engaged experts to identify a set of key economic indicators useful for evaluation, research, and public health practice. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary group of experts participated in (1) one of 5 discussion groups (n = 21 experts), (2) a 2-day facilitated workshop (n = 19 experts), and/or (3) online surveys (n = 16 experts). RESULTS: Experts identified 73 economic indicators, then used a 5-point scale to rate them on 3 properties: measurement quality, feasibility of use by a community, and influence on community decision making. Twenty-four indicators were highly rated (≥3.9 on all properties). The 10 highest-rated "key" indicators were walkability score, residential vacancy rate, housing affordability, property tax revenue, retail sales per square foot, number of small businesses, vehicle miles traveled per capita, employment, air quality, and life expectancy. CONCLUSION: This study identified key economic indicators that could characterize the economic value of built environment approaches to promoting physical activity. Additional work could demonstrate the validity, feasibility, and usefulness of these key indicators, in particular to inform decisions about community design.
BACKGROUND: Built environment approaches to promoting physical activity can provide economic value to communities. How best to assess this value is uncertain. This study engaged experts to identify a set of key economic indicators useful for evaluation, research, and public health practice. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary group of experts participated in (1) one of 5 discussion groups (n = 21 experts), (2) a 2-day facilitated workshop (n = 19 experts), and/or (3) online surveys (n = 16 experts). RESULTS: Experts identified 73 economic indicators, then used a 5-point scale to rate them on 3 properties: measurement quality, feasibility of use by a community, and influence on community decision making. Twenty-four indicators were highly rated (≥3.9 on all properties). The 10 highest-rated "key" indicators were walkability score, residential vacancy rate, housing affordability, property tax revenue, retail sales per square foot, number of small businesses, vehicle miles traveled per capita, employment, air quality, and life expectancy. CONCLUSION: This study identified key economic indicators that could characterize the economic value of built environment approaches to promoting physical activity. Additional work could demonstrate the validity, feasibility, and usefulness of these key indicators, in particular to inform decisions about community design.
Entities:
Keywords:
city planning; exercise; policy; transportation
Authors: Ivan R Diamond; Robert C Grant; Brian M Feldman; Paul B Pencharz; Simon C Ling; Aideen M Moore; Paul W Wales Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Monica L Wang; Karin Valentine Goins; Milena Anatchkova; Ross C Brownson; Kelly Evenson; Jay Maddock; Kristian E Clausen; Stephenie C Lemon Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2016 May-Jun
Authors: Susan A Carlson; Janet E Fulton; Michael Pratt; Zhou Yang; E Kathleen Adams Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2014-08-09 Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: Gillian D Sanders; Peter J Neumann; Anirban Basu; Dan W Brock; David Feeny; Murray Krahn; Karen M Kuntz; David O Meltzer; Douglas K Owens; Lisa A Prosser; Joshua A Salomon; Mark J Sculpher; Thomas A Trikalinos; Louise B Russell; Joanna E Siegel; Theodore G Ganiats Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Jeffrey A Reynolds; David P Hopkins; Jennifer A Morgan; David R Brown; Christopher S Kochtitzky; Alison E Cuellar; Shiriki K Kumanyika Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ghazal S Fazli; Maria I Creatore; Flora I Matheson; Sara Guilcher; Vered Kaufman-Shriqui; Heather Manson; Ashley Johns; Gillian L Booth Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kelly R Evenson; Anna K Porter; Kristine L Day; Carol McPhillips-Tangum; Karma E Harris; Chris S Kochtitzky; Philip Bors Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 2.830