Literature DB >> 34242230

Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis is connected with lower mortality. A single institution experience.

Pol Maria Rommens1, Mehdi Boudissa1, Sven Krämer1, Miha Kisilak1, Alexander Hofmann2, Daniel Wagner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) represent an increasing clinical entity. Until today, there are no guidelines for treatment of FFP. In our center, recommendation for operative treatment was given to all patients, who suffered an FFP type III and IV and to patients with an FFP type IIwith unsuccessful non-operative treatment. We performed a retrospective observational study and investigated differences between fracture classes and management alternatives. We hypothetized that operative treatment may reduce mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical charts and radiographs of 362 patients were analysed. Patient demographics, FFP-classification, length of hospital stay (LoS), type of treatment, general and surgery-related complications, mortality, Short Form-8 physical component score (SF-8 PCS) and mental component score (SF-8 MCS), Parker Mobility Score (PMS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were documented.
RESULTS: 238 patients had FFP type II and 124 FFP type III and IV. 52 patients with FFP type II (21.8%) and 86 patients with FFP type III and IV (69.4%) were treated operatively (p<0.001). Overall mortality did not differ between the fracture classes (p = 0.127) but was significantly lower in the operative group (p<0.001). Median LoS was significantly higher in FFP type III and IV (p<0.001) and in operated patients (p<0.001). There were more in-hospital complications in patients with FFP type III and IV (p = 0.001) and in the operative group (p = 0.006). More patients of the non-operative group were mobile (p<0.001) and independent (p<0.001) at discharge. Half of the patients could not return in their living environment.203 of the 235 surviving patients (86%) answered the questionnaires after a mean follow-up time of 38 months. SF-8 PCS, SF-8 MCS and PMS did not differ between the fracture classes and treatment groups. Pain perception was higher in the operated group (p = 0.013).
CONCLUSION: In our study, we observed that operative treatment of FFP provides low mortality rates, although LoS and in-hospital complications were higher in the operative group. At discharge, the non-operative group was more mobile and independent. At follow up, quality of life and mobility were comparable between the groups. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the impact of operative treatment of FFP on mortality and functional outcome.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34242230     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis with transsacral bar and retrograde transpubic screw].

Authors:  Pol M Rommens; Daniel Wagner; Charlotte Arand; Mehdi Boudissa; Johannes Hopf; Alexander Hofmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation.

Authors:  Thomas Mendel; Bernhard W Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Felix Goehre; Stefan Schwan; Florian Brakopp; Friederike Klauke
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Pain Intensity and Degree of Disability after Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.

Authors:  Alexandru Filip; Bogdan Veliceasa; Bogdan Puha; Nina Filip; Elena Cojocaru; Mihaela Pertea; Claudiu Adrian Carp; Bogdan Huzum; Ovidiu Alexa; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  A computed tomography based survey study investigating the agreement of the therapeutic strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Daniel Wagner; Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Tim Hohmann; Florian Gras; Sven Märdian; Alexander Pflug; Silvan Wittenberg; Christoph Ihle; Notker Blankenburg; Kevin Dallacker-Losensky; Tanja Schröder; Steven C Herath; Hans-Georg Palm; Christoph Josten; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).

Authors:  Pol Maria Rommens; Johannes Christoph Hopf; Charlotte Arand; Kristin Handrich; Mehdi Boudissa; Daniel Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis and Sacrum: Current Trends in Literature.

Authors:  Erick Heiman; Pasquale Gencarelli; Alex Tang; John M Yingling; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2022-06-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.