BACKGROUND: This is the first study to compare the long-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed patients with clinical stage IB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (UICC 7th edition) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (2009-2017). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence or regrowth rates were compared between the two treatment groups. Subgroup analyses of overall survival according to baseline characteristics were also performed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery (median follow-up 47.4 months) and 60 received definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (median follow-up 51.5 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for sex, tumor location, and cT classification. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy groups had similar 3-year overall survival rates (73.1% and 61.7%, respectively, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.58, p = 0.66), 3-year progression-free survival rates (46.5% and 45%, respectively, hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.70, p = 0.92), and recurrence or regrowth rates (53.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.84). In the subgroup analysis, favorable survival was observed after definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for cT1-2 disease (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.84-7.99) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery for cT3 or higher disease (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.67, p-for-interaction = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes were comparable between the treatments. The choice of the treatment according to cT classification might affect survival.
BACKGROUND: This is the first study to compare the long-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed patients with clinical stage IB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (UICC 7th edition) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (2009-2017). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence or regrowth rates were compared between the two treatment groups. Subgroup analyses of overall survival according to baseline characteristics were also performed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery (median follow-up 47.4 months) and 60 received definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (median follow-up 51.5 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for sex, tumor location, and cT classification. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy groups had similar 3-year overall survival rates (73.1% and 61.7%, respectively, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.58, p = 0.66), 3-year progression-free survival rates (46.5% and 45%, respectively, hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.70, p = 0.92), and recurrence or regrowth rates (53.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.84). In the subgroup analysis, favorable survival was observed after definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for cT1-2 disease (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.84-7.99) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery for cT3 or higher disease (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.67, p-for-interaction = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes were comparable between the treatments. The choice of the treatment according to cT classification might affect survival.