OBJECTIVE: Impairment in consciousness is a debilitating symptom during and after seizures; however, its mechanism remains unclear. Limbic seizures have been shown to spread to arousal circuitry to result in a "network inhibition" phenomenon. However, prior animal model studies did not relate physiological network changes to behavioral responses during or following seizures. METHODS: Focal onset limbic seizures were induced while rats were performing an operant conditioned behavioral task requiring response to an auditory stimulus to quantify how and when impairment of behavioral response occurs. Correct responses were rewarded with sucrose. Cortical and hippocampal electrophysiology measured by local field potential recordings was analyzed for changes in low- and high-frequency power in relation to behavioral responsiveness during seizures. RESULTS: As seen in patients with seizures, ictal (p < .0001) and postictal (p = .0015) responsiveness was variably impaired. Analysis of cortical and hippocampal electrophysiology revealed that ictal (p = .002) and postictal (p = .009) frontal cortical low-frequency 3-6-Hz power was associated with poor behavioral performance. In contrast, the hippocampus showed increased power over a wide frequency range during seizures, and suppression postictally, neither of which were related to behavioral impairment. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support prior human studies of temporal lobe epilepsy as well as anesthetized animal models suggesting that focal limbic seizures depress consciousness through remote network effects on the cortex, rather than through local hippocampal involvement. By identifying the cortical physiological changes associated with impaired arousal and responsiveness in focal seizures, these results may help guide future therapies to restore ictal and postictal consciousness, improving quality of life for people with epilepsy.
OBJECTIVE: Impairment in consciousness is a debilitating symptom during and after seizures; however, its mechanism remains unclear. Limbic seizures have been shown to spread to arousal circuitry to result in a "network inhibition" phenomenon. However, prior animal model studies did not relate physiological network changes to behavioral responses during or following seizures. METHODS: Focal onset limbic seizures were induced while rats were performing an operant conditioned behavioral task requiring response to an auditory stimulus to quantify how and when impairment of behavioral response occurs. Correct responses were rewarded with sucrose. Cortical and hippocampal electrophysiology measured by local field potential recordings was analyzed for changes in low- and high-frequency power in relation to behavioral responsiveness during seizures. RESULTS: As seen in patients with seizures, ictal (p < .0001) and postictal (p = .0015) responsiveness was variably impaired. Analysis of cortical and hippocampal electrophysiology revealed that ictal (p = .002) and postictal (p = .009) frontal cortical low-frequency 3-6-Hz power was associated with poor behavioral performance. In contrast, the hippocampus showed increased power over a wide frequency range during seizures, and suppression postictally, neither of which were related to behavioral impairment. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support prior human studies of temporal lobe epilepsy as well as anesthetized animal models suggesting that focal limbic seizures depress consciousness through remote network effects on the cortex, rather than through local hippocampal involvement. By identifying the cortical physiological changes associated with impaired arousal and responsiveness in focal seizures, these results may help guide future therapies to restore ictal and postictal consciousness, improving quality of life for people with epilepsy.
Authors: N D Schiff; J T Giacino; K Kalmar; J D Victor; K Baker; M Gerber; B Fritz; B Eisenberg; T Biondi; J O'Connor; E J Kobylarz; S Farris; A Machado; C McCagg; F Plum; J J Fins; A R Rezai Journal: Nature Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bornali Kundu; Andrea A Brock; Dario J Englot; Christopher R Butson; John D Rolston Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Abhijeet Gummadavelli; Joshua E Motelow; Nicholas Smith; Qiong Zhan; Nicholas D Schiff; Hal Blumenfeld Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Francisco J Flores; Katharine E Hartnack; Amanda B Fath; Seong-Eun Kim; Matthew A Wilson; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Courtney Cunningham; William C Chen; Andrew Shorten; Michael McClurkin; Tenzin Choezom; Christian P Schmidt; Victoria Chu; Anne Bozik; Cameron Best; Melissa Chapman; Moran Furman; Kamil Detyniecki; Joseph T Giacino; Hal Blumenfeld Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jingwen Xu; Maria Milagros Galardi; Brian Pok; Kishan K Patel; Charlie W Zhao; John P Andrews; Shobhit Singla; Cian P McCafferty; Li Feng; Eric T Musonza; Adam J Kundishora; Abhijeet Gummadavelli; Jason L Gerrard; Mark Laubach; Nicholas D Schiff; Hal Blumenfeld Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 6.709