| Literature DB >> 34240668 |
Sahar Hakamy1,2, Mourad Assidi1,2, Mohammad A Jafri1,2, Taoufik Nedjadi3, Heba Alkhatabi1,2, Abrar Al-Qahtani1, Jaudah Al-Maghrabi4, Khalid Sait5, Mohammed Al-Qahtani1, Abdelbaset Buhmeida1, Adeel Chaudhary2,6.
Abstract
Background: TIMP3 is a multifunctional proteolytic enzyme belonging to TIMPs family and acts as a potent inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). TIMP3 possesses a tumor suppresive function by directly promoting tumor cell apoptosis, preventing angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodelling. The lower expression of TIMP3 was associated with poor prognosis and overall survival in various cancer types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of TIMP3 protein expression with ovarian cancer (OC) clinicopathological features and survival outcomes.Patients andEntities:
Keywords: IHC; Ovarian cancer; TIMP3 expression; TMA; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34240668 PMCID: PMC8274532 DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2021.1937866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Libyan J Med ISSN: 1819-6357 Impact factor: 1.657
Correlation between cytoplasmic TIMP3 protein expression patterns and clinico-pathological features of OC
| Feature | Number of cases (%) | IHC cytoplasmic TIMP3 protein expression pattern | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (%) | 1 (%) | |||
| Age | ||||
| <50 | 65 (45%) | 1 (2%) | 64 (98%) | 0.88 |
| 50 | 53 (37%) | 1 (2%) | 52 (98%) | |
| Missing | 26 (18%) | |||
| Serous | 56 (39%) | 1 (2%) | 55 (98%) | 0.63 |
| Mucinous | 28 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 28 (100%) | |
| Other types | 31 (2%) | 1 (3%) | 30 (97%) | |
| Missing | 29 (20%) | |||
| Low grade (WD) | 15 (10%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (100%) | 0.11 |
| Intermediate | 19 (13%) | 1 (5%) | 18 (95%) | |
| High grade (PD) | 65 (46%) | 0 (0%) | 65 (100%) | |
| Missing | 45 (31%) | |||
| Negative | 43 (30%) | 1 (2%) | 42 (98%) | 0.51 |
| Positive | 18 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 18 (100%) | |
| Missing | 83 (58%) | |||
| <23 | 7 (5%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (100%) | 0.80 |
| 23–26 | 28 (19%) | 1 (4%) | 27 (96%) | |
| >26 | 54 (38%) | 1 (2%) | 53 (98%) | |
| Missing | 55 (38%) | |||
| Pre-menopausal | 65 (45%) | 1 (2%) | 64 (98%) | 0.87 |
| Post-menopausal | 52 (36%) | 1 (2%) | 51 (98%) | |
| Missing | 27 (19%) | |||
| Low stage (I, II) | 38 (26%) | 2 (5%) | 36 (95%) | |
| High stage (III, IV) | 69 (48%) | 0 (0%) | 69 (100%) | |
| Missing | 37 (26%) | |||
| Deceased | 39 (27%) | 2 (5%) | 37 (95%) | |
| Living | 62 (43%) | 0 (0%) | 62 (100%) | |
| Missing | 43 (30%) | |||
| None | 54 (38%) | 1 (2%) | 53 (98%) | 0.80 |
| Yes | 38 (26%) | 1 (3%) | 37 (97%) | |
| Missing | 36%) | |||
Figure 1.Immunohistochemical staining of cytoplasmic TIMP3 at 40X magnification: (A) Negative cytoplasmic expression, (B) Weak expression, (C) Moderate cytoplasmic expression, (D) Strong cytoplasmic expression
Figure 2.Cytoplasmic TIMP3 expression (0,1 vs 2,3) as determinant of disease specific survival (DSS) in univariate (Kaplan–Meier) analysis (p = 0.02, log rank)
Figure 3.Cytoplasmic TIMP3 expression (0,1 vs 2,3) as determinant of disease-free survival (DFS) in univariate (Kaplan–Meier) analysis. (p = 0.42, log rank)
Cox’s regression analysis of the prognostic values of TIMP3 protein expression pattern, age at diagnosis, histological subtypes, lymph node status, tumor stage and grade
| SE value | Relative risk | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMP3 protein expression | 0.025 | 1.304 | 20 | 0.004–0.0688 |
| Age at diagnosis | 0.656 | 0.846 | 0.686 | 0.277–7.656 |
| Histological subtypes | 0.926 | 104.183 | 0 | 0.00–2.938 |
| Lymph node status | 0.936 | 0.710 | 0.944 | 0.263–4.261 |
| Tumor state | 0.906 | 196.809 | 0.805 | 0.00–4.150 |
| Tumor grade | 0.978 | 143.602 | 0.018 | 0.00–9.144 |